An Analysis of Systems Thinking in Modern Project Management

This essay explores the application of systems thinking in project management, highlighting its benefits in enhancing project success through improved communication, risk management, and organizational alignment. It discusses various systems thinking tools and techniques, such as effective communication strategies, organizational structures, and risk analysis, drawing examples from past project failures like the Deepwater Horizon incident. The essay emphasizes the importance of integrating systems thinking into project management processes to foster collaboration, mitigate risks, and ensure projects align with overall business strategies, ultimately contributing to the delivery of business value and successful project outcomes. The document is available on Desklib, a platform providing study tools and resources for students.

Running head: SYSTEMS THINKING IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT 1
Systems Thinking in Project Management
Student’s name
Institutional Affiliation
Course name
Date

SYSTEMS THINKING IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT 2
Introduction
Project management can be defined as the use of knowledge, skills, together with the relevant
tools and techniques in the activities of projects in order to fulfil project objectives. All business
activities that involve provision of goods and services are typically projects, and therefore tight
management practices are necessary from their initiation to their closure stage. Effective project
management should be professionally conducted in accordance to the project management best practices
so that projects attain their original objective (Harrison & Lock, 2017). The concept of systems thinking
in a very important technic in project management that makes complex projects easier by viewing large
projects in terms of their component parts (Sebok, 2016). System thinking tools are beneficial in project
management because they provide a simple way of framing and solving problems especially those that
are caused by multiple relationships and perspectives.
Recognizing the need to apply system thinking techniques in project management, this essay
discusses their importance in project management and the entire organization. It goes ahead to identify
and discuss the tools and techniques that are analogous to systems thinking. It is worth noting that there
exists an overlap between project management activities and systems thinking (Heagney, 2016). It beats
logic to understand that most project managers even though they understand the important contribution
that systems thinking can bring to project management, still do not apply. The essay also takes a
practical approach by studying project problems that have happened in the past such as the Deep water
Horizon project error and identifies tools that project managers should embrace in order to successfully
manage projects and prevent the occurrence of similar problems.

SYSTEMS THINKING IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT 3
Benefits of system thinking in project management
The project management processes is wide an involve project initiation, planning, execution,
monitoring, control, and closure. A system approach enables the project managers to see the constituent
parts of the project as processes that work together to build a complex whole. System engineering offers
a practical approach to project management in different disciplines. It proposes processes and methods
that are specific to particular domains by identifying risks, opportunities, and problems relevant to that
particular area (Kerzner & Kerzner, 2017) .The system approach to project management can be applied
in many fields of practice such as technology, construction, and enterprise development among other
projects. System procedures might vary depending on specific projects however, some basic principles
are known to enhance effectiveness of systems irrespective of domain. The application of integrated
systems in project management provides a framework for different domains of practice to efficiently
work together towards a common goals.
Systems praxis are the whole intellectual and actual processes that enable creation of efficient
solutions to present complex system problems. It proposes problem solving approaches that integrate the
necessary theory and practice arising from various sources. Systems thinking is the main binding
element of the Praxis framework (Sebok, 2017). It unites the foundations and theories of systems
science with the practical hardware and software components that make up the system. Systems thinking
is recognized as a continuous process that involves assessing and taking in to consideration the context
of the system, and thereafter initiating appropriate procedures on all the sections of the praxis cycle
(Kerzner, 2013). The application of integrative systems in project management allows managers and
other stakeholders to identify, explore, and effectively understand project patterns and address problems
through appropriate methods and frameworks.

SYSTEMS THINKING IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT 4
Systems Thinking Tools and Techniques
Effective communication is a necessity in project management so that all stakeholders work for a
common goal. Communication as part of the system of ensuring that project management processes are
done effectively ensure successful project implementation. The whole project management process from
initiation to closure might involve many stakeholders working under one project or functional manager.
The movement of information from one person to another should therefore be efficient so that
appropriate actions are undertaken at each stage of the system. The best practice is to engage project
stakeholders early and continuously throughout the lifecycle of the project (Standards Association of
Australia, 2003 ). The use of technology in communication becomes essential where stakeholders are
operating across the globes. It is important especially for project managers to take note of the cultures
of different project stakeholders in order build rapport with them. The objective of communication in
project management is achieve effective and efficient communication and not constant communication
that compromises on the project activities.
Communication breakdown between stakeholders might be so much detrimental to the whole
project management system. Poor communications causes misunderstanding within and between project
teams and at the end causes a system breakdown. Common areas of misunderstanding in project
management include project goals, project schedule, and procedures that resultantly lead to decline in
productivity, missing of deadlines, and generation of a substandard product (Binder, 2016). Meetings are
the main channel of communication in project management. Project meetings are basically events that
involve various participants in the project management process where they come together to discuss
issues with an aim of generating group decisions that result to quicker and successful project delivery.
The major types of meetings are the project kick-off meeting, status meeting, stakeholder meetings, and
the project review meeting. The project managers should therefore learn meeting processes so as to

SYSTEMS THINKING IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT 5
ensure that they conduct meetings that are productive. According to the National Commission report on
the BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and Offshore Drilling, inadequate communication together with too
much compartmentalization of information contributed to the blowout. Onshore engineers for instance
did not inform other stakeholders such as site leaders on some material aspects that could have informed
their decisions.
Organizational structures of companies determine how they conduct their project management
functions. There are different project management organizational structures namely; functional,
autonomous, and matrix with each having their own advantages and disadvantages. The matrix structure
occur in three forms as weak, balanced, and strong organizational structures depending on the relative
power between functional managers, and project managers (Lock, 2017).The functional organizational
structure benefits from the use of personnel with higher flexibility. There structure divides the company
in to several specialized departments that contain employees who are trained along the same line to be
able to provide necessary technical support to the project manager (Phillips, 2018). The disadvantage
with this kind of structure is that the project might lack focus.
The matric organizational structure is characterized by the presence of more than one manager
controlling the chain of command. The roles of the project manager relative to that of functional
managers vary leading to the different types of matric structures. The powers of the project managers are
less than, equal to, and greater than those of the functional manager in weak, balanced, and strong
organizational structures respectively. There is no specific structure that is appropriate for all kind of
projects but a structure such as the matrix has a higher chance of working effectively compared to the
rest provided it is designed to conform to the needs of the specific project ( Mills & Koliba, 2015). The
appropriate structure should be set up while implementing a systems that would ensure that the project is
done effective.

SYSTEMS THINKING IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT 6
Organizational culture in a very important aspect that influences the success of projects by
affecting the decision patterns, actions, and influencing individual member behavior. Culture of an
organization defines believes, norms, values and attitudes that are common in all parts of the
organization. A company that has a well-defined culture assures customers and other stakeholders that
do business with the company with stability and equal treatment (Harrison Lock, 2017). A strong culture
can also create barriers that limit the competitiveness of the company by blocking its projects success.
Project managers who do not possess cultural awareness can be restricted by the companies they are
transacting business with. They might possess problems adapting to various norms and cultures across
different sections of the company. On the other hand, leaders who are knowledgeable concerning
organization cultures easily interact and adapt to different cultures.
Risk is the deviation from the expected outcome. There are many possible risks that can occur in
the project management processes. These risks include financial risks, physical risks, operational risks,
environmental risks, and schedule risks. The practice of carrying out proper risk analysis and
management in carrying out the systems approach to project management ensures that little or no losses
are incurred until the project is finished (Weick, 2017). Although the future might not be predicted
certainly, risk management enables the project managers to predict possible risks and minimize their
frequency and severity. The analysis of risks arising from the main decisions made in project
management and development of strategies that would minimize chances of losses are essential in
ensuring the success of projects using a systems approach (Walden, Roedler, Forsberg, Hamelin, &
Shortell, 2015 ).The potential risks that might arise in the execution of the project plan should be listed
based on brainstorming and experience and necessary management put in place to reduce risk. Risk
management can be executed through risk avoidance, risk acceptance, and risk transfer through
insurance.

SYSTEMS THINKING IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT 7
The risk management process consists of risk identification, risk evaluation, risk handling, and
risk controlling. When the project is initiated, the risk management plan that contains a list of possible
sources of risk, their impact mitigation plan, and their metrics. The identification of possible risks is
conducted throughout the life cycle of the project at hand especially during the most important
milestones (Nejib Beyer & Yakabovicz, 2017). During project meetings, stakeholders make discussions
aimed at identifying risks. Risk analysis is aimed at determining the possible impacts of risk on project
plans. During handling, the managers make decisions on how to deal with the risk using the
management techniques. Risk control occurs as the last process and involves comparing expectations
and actual performance to determine deviations and then launching processes aimed at limiting their
severity
The determination of which project to undertake in essential in basically based on the business
value of the project. Business value is the benefits that can be accrued from undertaking the project, a
construction company for instance while bidding for a tender to carry out construction of an advertised
project tender shall quote a price that is above the cost of construction in order to secure a profit. In the
investor’s point of view, business value is the possibility of the project to break even. Project managers
work to deliver an already identified business value to client through execution ( Fleming & Koppelman,
2016). The determination of the project value is beneficial since it prevents the execution of projects that
do not possess an economic value. The project manager should always ensure that he carries out his part
of implementing the project efficiently according to the needs of the initiators so as not to contribute to
reducing business value.
Portfolio alignment is the act of undertaking projects that promote the overall business strategy
of the organization. The alignment promotes project portfolio management by ensuring that projects are
managed effectively because they generate business value to the company. The portfolio management

SYSTEMS THINKING IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT 8
process cycle provides stages that are necessary in successfully carrying out project management
processes (Tabibzadeh & Meshkati, 2014). The process consist of four stages namely inventory,
analyzing, alignment, and management. During inventory stage, the strategic objectives of the project
are identified and mapped to the company strategy. The metrics such as schedule, cost, and resources are
determined at analysis stage. The mitigation of risks, prioritization activities, and balancing of economic
resources is conducted at the alignment stage in order to facilitate rescheduling, redeployment, and
project launch to be conducted at portfolio management level.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the need to employ system thinking techniques in project management is essential
since it ensures that projects are managed successfully. Proper project management promoted by
systems management procedures also ensure that project problems arising due to poor project
management are minimized. Systems management enable the recognition of every process as part of a
whole complex project and therefore, every stage should be completed with recognition of its
contribution to the success of the whole project. This essay emphasized on the benefits of efficient
communication, portfolio alignment, proper risk management, good organizational structure and culture,
among others as tools that promote systems thinking as a solution to proper project management. It is
worth noting that proper achievement of these minor parts of the system would minimize the occurrence
of project management problems such as those that happened at Deep water horizon.

SYSTEMS THINKING IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT 9
References
Binder, J. (2016). Global project management: communication, collaboration and management across
borders. Routledge
Fleming, Q. W., & Koppelman, J. M. (2016, December). Earned value project management. Project
Management Institute.
Harrison, F., & Lock, D. (2017). Advanced project management: a structured approach. Routledge.
Heagney, J. (2016). Fundamentals of project management. AMACOM Div American Mgmt Assn.
Harrison, F., & Lock, D. (2017). Advanced project management: a structured approach. Routledge.
Joseph. Phillips, P. M. P., Cbap, I., & Pmp, C. (2018). Pmp Project Management Professional Study
Guide. Mcgraw-Hill Education.
Kerzner, H., & Kerzner, H. R. (2017). Project management: a systems approach to planning,
scheduling, and controlling. John Wiley & Sons.
Kerzner, H. (2013). Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling and
Controlling. 2006. Editorial John Wiley, Hoboken, New Jersey, ISBN, 471225770.
Lock, D. (2017). The essentials of project management. Routledge.
Mills, R. W., & Koliba, C. J. (2015). The challenge of accountability in complex regulatory networks:
The case of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. Regulation & Governance, 9(1), 77-91.
Nejib, P., Beyer, D., & Yakabovicz, E. (2017, July). Systems Security Engineering: What Every System
Engineer Needs to Know. In INCOSE International Symposium (Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 434-445).

SYSTEMS THINKING IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT 10
Standards Association of Australia 2003, Systems engineering - System life cycle processes, (AS NZS
15288-2003), Standards Australia, North Sydney.
BIBLIOGRAPHY Sebok. (2017, June 2). Guide to system engineeringbody of knowledge. Retrieved from
sebokwiki: http://www.sebokwiki.org/wiki/Foundations_of_Systems_Engineering
Tabibzadeh, M., & Meshkati, N. (2014, March). A risk analysis study to systematically address the
critical role of human and organizational factors in negative pressure test for the offshore drilling
industry: policy recommendations for HSE specialists. In SPE International Conference on Health,
Safety, and Environment. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
Walden, D. D., Roedler, G. J., Forsberg, K., Hamelin, R. D., & Shortell, T. M. (2015). Systems
engineering handbook: A guide for system life cycle processes and activities. John Wiley & Sons.
Weick, K. E. (2017). Earl Boebert and James M. Blossom: Deepwater Horizon: A Systems Analysis of
the Macondo Disaster.