Taxation Law Assignment - Holmes Institute HA3042, T2 2019: Analysis

Verified

Added on  2022/11/09

|15
|3315
|337
Homework Assignment
AI Summary
This assignment delves into the intricacies of Australian taxation law, specifically focusing on capital gains tax (CGT) and capital allowances. The assignment presents a case study involving a 65-year-old Australian resident, Jasmine, who is selling various assets, including her family home, a car, a cleaning business, furniture, and paintings. The solution analyzes the CGT implications of each asset sale, considering pre-CGT rules, personal use assets, small business concessions, and collectables. Additionally, the assignment explores capital allowances, using a scenario involving a manufacturing company that has purchased an industrial CNC machine. The solution examines the relevant legislation and applies it to determine the appropriate tax deductions for the depreciation of the machine and associated costs.
Document Page
Running head: TAXATION LAW
Taxation Law
Name of the Student
Name of the University
Author Note
tabler-icon-diamond-filled.svg

Paraphrase This Document

Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Document Page
1TAXATION LAW
Table of Contents
Answer 1: Capital Gains Tax.........................................................................................2
(A) The Capital gain related to the Family Home..................................................2
(B) Capital gain/loss made from car.......................................................................3
The Capital gain in relation to:...................................................................................4
(C) The Sale of Business........................................................................................4
(D) Selling the Furniture.........................................................................................5
(E) Selling the Paintings.........................................................................................6
Answer 2: Capital Allowance........................................................................................7
Identification of Issues.....................................................................................7
Laws.................................................................................................................7
Application.......................................................................................................8
Conclusion....................................................................................................................10
References....................................................................................................................11
Document Page
2TAXATION LAW
Answer 1: Capital Gains Tax
According to the case, 65-year-old Jasmine is an Australian resident and born in the
UK. As she was looking after her cleaning business there and now she is at her retiring stage.
Therefore, she wants to sell off her assets so that at this stage, she can go back to her born
place. The discussion below is of the list of assets that Jasmine is selling and the related
Capital Gain Taxes:
(A) The Capital gain related to the Family Home
As per the law those assets that have been bought on/after the period of 20 September
1985, the tax related to the capital gain will be liable to be imposed upon those assets. Here,
Jasmine has her own house in which she was residing along with her family for so many
years. In the situation of purchasing before the date of 20 September is referred to as Pre-
CGT (Ato.gov.au 2019). The taxpayer must be aware of the exemption that he/she is liable to
receive on their capital gain/loss occurred with the CGT event (Blissenden 2015). If an
individual has kept the ownership of his/her house throughout their living period, then that
will be treated as the primary residence consider to the CGT asset under “Section 118-110
(1)” of Income Tax Assessment Act, 1997.
Computation of Capital Gain/Loss
Particulars Amount ($)
Selling amount 650,000
Less: Cost Base 40,000
Capital Gain 610,000
As per the stated case, Jasmine’s home was purchased in 1981 for $40,000 that is now
worth $650,000, and it is treated as Jasmine’s main residence. Jasmine has purchased her
Document Page
3TAXATION LAW
house before 20th September 198. It will be considered to be Pre- CGT. As considering her
throughout the period of living in that house from the time she bought the house will be
treated as the main residence within “Section 118-110 (1)”.
Hence, exempted from the Capital gain tax that is occurring from the selling of the
house.
(B) Capital gain/loss made from car
Within “Section 104-10 (1)”, it has been stated if an individual is selling off his/her
CGT asset, then there will be an occurrence of CGT event C1. Along with that it has been
stated under “Section 108-20 (2)”, the asset will be considered as for the personal use of the
individual if he/she is using that asset for the private purpose or used as some mode of
entertainment The personal assets used by a taxpayer includes the items such as Television at
home, Cellphones for private use, bicycle or a car and a ship for private purpose.
There are some special rules and laws made for the assets that are used for personal
purpose (O’Connell 2017). Further, for this case referring the “Section 108-10 (3)” that states
that the acquiring price of an asset is less than $10,000 then it will be omitted from the
Capital Gain Tax. Along with this as per “S 108-20 (1)”, if taxpayer held with any capital
loss then that will be omitted from the CGT.
Computation of Capital gain/loss, made by Jasmine is as shown below.
Computation of Capital Gain/Loss
Particulars Amount ($)
Selling amount 10,000
Less: Cost Base 31,000
Capital Loss 21,000
tabler-icon-diamond-filled.svg

Paraphrase This Document

Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Document Page
4TAXATION LAW
As from the above computation, Jasmine has made a capital loss of $21,000 and under
“Section 108-20 (1)”, it will be disregarded.
The Capital gain related to:
(C) The Sale of Business
As per “Division 152”, small business entities will get help from the reduction (Evans
et al 2014). The small entities have to fulfil such conditions:
o If the turnover of the business in the present as well as in the previous year is below
$2 million,
o Net worth asset below of $ 6 million,
o CGT asset held as an active asset.
Small Business reliefs or concessions for the taxpayers is classified into four types
that have stated below.
i. 15 Year Exemption- if CGT asset holds at least for 15 years.
ii. Retirement Concession- a business that used their sales revenue for personal
retirement association to this can lead disregard for capital gain in the CGT asset’s
disposal.
iii. 50% reduction- Capital gain can get a reduction of up to 50% (Evans, Minas and
Lim 2015).
iv. Rollover relief- if bought replacement asset, then the capital gain will be considered
as a deferred asset.
While going through this case, the certain points mentioned, like Jasmine by herself
commenced her small cleaning business. As she has planned to shift permanently to the UK,
so she has found a buyer that is going to take over her cleaning business for $125,000. In the
selling price, it includes the cost of business equipment worth $75,000 and goodwill
Document Page
5TAXATION LAW
amounted to $60,000 (Hemmings and Tuske 2015). Jasmine’s Net worth of business assets is
above $6 million that is sold by her. Therefore, Jasmine is liable to get concessions under
“Division 152”.
o Jasmine was residing in Australia for more than 15 years and was busy in her
business. Thus, the assets she is having with her there is also more than 15 years old.
Therefore, she is eligible to get 15 Year deduction for the CGT.
o She is going to shut down her business permanently and moving back to her born
country, UK. Hence, the existence of CGT event F1 with respect to her Goodwill
(O’Connell 2017).
o In the situation of closing of a business (planned or unplanned) if goodwill has to
face any loss, then it comes within “Taxation ruling of TR 1999/16”.
o Jasmine is now at her age of retiring as she has decided to move permanently to the
UK after selling off her assets. In this case, she is eligible to come under
“Subdivision 152-C”. Under this division, she will be liable to get a deduction of
50% on closing her business permanently.
(D) Selling the Furniture
Computation of Capital Gain/Loss
Particulars Amount ($)
Selling amount 5,000
Less: Cost Base 2,000
Capital Gain 3,000
Above computation shows the Capital gain that Jasmine has occurred on selling the
furniture. In the given case it has said that Jasmine has sold out her furniture that is for her
private use. Therefore, she has made a Capital gain of $3,000.
Document Page
6TAXATION LAW
As per “Section 118-10 (3)” the asset that is used by the taxpayer for his/her personal
use and bought below $10,000 will be disregarded from Capital gain tax. In this case,
Jasmine has bought the furniture below $10,000 for her private use (O’Connell 2017). Hence,
Capital gain of $3,000 will be disregarded that comes within “section 118-10 (3)”.
(E) Selling the Paintings
According to “Section 108-10” of Income Tax Assessment Act, 1997”, the asset that
is used as private or entertainment purpose comes under Collectables items. Collectable items
include Jewellery, antiques, paintings, art, coins and stamps (Ato.gov.au 2019). As per this
“Section 108-10, ITAA 1997”, the collectable that has purchased below $500 will be
disregarded from Capital gain tax. Further, if there is made any loss on selling those
collectables, then it allowed for an offset with the capital gains.
As the acquisition cost of the paintings that have been bought by Jasmine was less
than $500; therefore, she will be exempted from the capital gain tax within “Section 108-10
(1)”.
However, there is one exceptional case in her selling of paintings as one of the
paintings that she has purchased directly from the artist was amount $1,000. Here she will not
get any exemption for her collectable item and be liable for the Capital gains tax (Clark
2014). The computation of capital gain tax has shown below.
Computation of Capital Gain/Loss
Particulars Amount ($)
Selling amount 5,000
Less: Cost Base 1,000
Capital gain 4,000
tabler-icon-diamond-filled.svg

Paraphrase This Document

Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Document Page
7TAXATION LAW
Less: Reduction of 50% 2,000
Net Taxable Capital Gain 2,000
Answer 2: Capital Allowance
Identification of Issues
As per the case, John owns a motor vehicle parts and accessories manufacturing
company. Further, he has purchased industrial Computer Numerical Control (CNC) machine
that is imported from Germany needs a guiding rod after sometime (Yussof, Isa and Mohdali
2014). The case states trip cost and machine installation charge for the period.
In the Act within “Section 40-25 (1)” it has been stated about the price to be deducted
in the devaluing assets. As per this section if an individual owes a devaluing asset that is part
of the value of the decrease in asset or the owner of that asset has installed it as ready or to
use other than any taxable purpose then the taxpayer will be allowed to claim for a tax
deduction (McGregor-Lowndes and Critall 2017).
Laws
It has been mentioned in the ITAA Act 1997 within “Division 40”, an individual is
liable for the entitlement of deduction for the amount identical to the decreasing rate of a
depreciating asset. The decreasing price of the asset reflects the value decreasing because of
the actual amount, that taxpayer received (Hichliffe 2014).
An individual within the provision of chief operating of “Section 40-25 (1)” is liable
to get the deduction for the whole year for the amount that is equal to:
the value of depreciating asset or use of it leads to earning income and ready for use
installation or,
the use of an asset by the taxpayer is generating any income to him, or
Document Page
8TAXATION LAW
any asset that is installed as all set that is ready for use.
According to “Section 40-60 (1)”, at the starting period, the taxpayer having those
depreciating assets starts decreasing its actual value. The starting period refers to that time on
which the taxpayer starts using the assets that are installed as ready for use. Considering
ITAA Act 1997, it has been mentioned in the “Section 40-25 (2)”, that the taxpayer will not
be liable to get any deduction until the asset is for private purpose (Black 2018). Further,
“Section40-30 (1)” states depreciating assets as the assets having their limited time for use
that is expected to drop down its value until the use.
Referring to the case of the Law Court of the “Broken Hill Pty Ltd v. FCT” (1969-
70), it has stated the purchase price or the cost of acquiring the asset includes some other
prices. These costs include amount such as the incidental cost and installation charge that
linked with the time of conveyance along with its installation period (Wheelahan 2016).
Other costs will also be included for the expenses such as the arrangement cost, and cost
occurred in removing the plant so that can make space to install the new plant these. The
depreciation is approved on the asset’s cost under “Sub-division 40-C”.
“Section 110-25” of Income Tax Assessment Act 1997, states that the acquiring
cost of an asset comprises of the element like the cost or the money incurred for the first time
so that the asset can be purchased along with the \asset’s market value (Augustinos 2014).
Cost Base includes the following five elements:
i. The amount that has incurred on the purchase of an asset,
ii. Any other charges on the purchase and sale of an asset,
iii. The asset consists of Cost of Title that has bought after 20th August 1991,
iv. Capital expenses on assets such as installation charge and the shifting of an asset so
that it increases the value of an asset,
Document Page
9TAXATION LAW
v. Further, capital expenses for protecting the Asset’s Right for the title.
The cost of purchase and sale of an asset relates to the acquisition cost under “section
110-35” expenses like shifting the cost, professional charges like stamp duty and
advertisement cost.
Application
As the case states that, John has traded in the CNC machine from Germany. The
amount of machine costs $300,000. The CNC machine started its work doing after its
installation. Further, John has started using from 15 January, but later on, he discovered that
that machine is needed a guiding rod. It has been mentioned under “Section 40-30 (1)”, the
time period of operating the machine considered as the depreciation of an asset. Hence, it is
expected to decrease its value of cost until the time that is used by John as for the motive of
taxation.
With the reference of “section 110-35”, on the date of 15th January, the CNC machine
starts for its use. It is that time when John has finished his installation for the machine, and he
is going to use the CNC machine for the very first time. Addition to this it also includes the
guiding rod. Referring to “Broken Hill Pty Co Ltd v. FCT” (1969-70), the cost of acquiring
the CNC machine includes the cost related to capital enhancement that is $5000 for the
guiding rod.
As per the Chief Operating Provision under “Section 40-25 (1)”, the income tax
deduction is permissible on the equal of the value to the declining price of CNC machine.
Cost base referring to “Section 110-25, ITAA 1997”, also includes the amount that is paid for
the CNC Machine. John has made expense on the inspection of the machine while going
Germany that relates the acquisition cost to the incidental as well as inspection, but this
tabler-icon-diamond-filled.svg

Paraphrase This Document

Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Document Page
10TAXATION LAW
reflects the cost that incurred at the time of acquiring (Burton 2018). The cost at the time of
acquiring the asset within “Section 110-25”, is computed below.
Computation of Cost Base of Asset
Particulars Amount ($)
Acquisition Cost 300,000
Incidental and Inspection Cost 12,000
Cost to Capital enhancement (guiding rod) 5,000
Installation Cost (Capital expenditure) 25,000
Total Cost Base 342,000
Conclusion
It can be concluded from the above discussion that John has valid and genuine points
to claim for deduction. As per the situation of John, “Section 40 25(1)” of ITAA 1997 will be
applicable to it. John has accessories manufacturing company, and for that, he requires the
needed assets to be imported on time. He has travelled and invested additional for the
necessary assets. From analyzing the case study, it has found that John has the right to claim
for the depreciation on the asset's Total Cost Base under "Subdivision 40 C".
Document Page
11TAXATION LAW
References
Ato.gov.au 2019. online Ato.gov.au. Available at:
https://www.ato.gov.au/misc/downloads/pdf/qc22147.pdf Accessed 17 Sep. 2019.
Ato.gov.au 2019. online Ato.gov.au. Available at:
https://www.ato.gov.au/misc/downloads/pdf/qc22147.pdf Accessed 17 Sep. 2019.
Ato.gov.au 2019. online Ato.gov.au. Available at:
https://www.ato.gov.au/misc/downloads/pdf/qc20300.pdf Accessed 17 Sep. 2019.
Ato.gov.au 2019. Legal Database. online Ato.gov.au. Available at:
https://www.ato.gov.au/law/view/document?docid=TXR/TR199916/NAT/ATO/00001
Accessed 17 Sep. 2019.
Ato.gov.au 2019. Your main residence. online Ato.gov.au. Available at:
https://www.ato.gov.au/General/Capital-gains-tax/Your-home-and-other-real-estate/Your-
main-residence/ Accessed 17 Sep. 2019.
Augustinos, N., 2014. The Meaning of Market Value in Australia's Income Tax Assessment
Act 1997. J. Australasian Tax Tchrs. Ass'n, 9, p.103.
Black, C., 2018. Taxation of Intellectual Property Under Domestic Law and Tax Treaties:
Australia. Taxation of Intellectual Property under Domestic Law, EU Law and Tax Treaties",
IBFD: Amsterdam.
Blissenden, M., 2015. The income tax and CGT consequences of property
disposals. Taxation in Australia, 49(7), p.385.
Burton, M., 2018. Extending the tax expenditure concept in Australia.
chevron_up_icon
1 out of 15
circle_padding
hide_on_mobile
zoom_out_icon
[object Object]