Taxation Report: Analyzing Mr. Desai's Trading and VAT Obligations

Verified

Added on  2023/06/03

|12
|2453
|233
Report
AI Summary
This report addresses the taxation issues of Mr. Desai, a client of a Chartered Accountant firm, analyzing his antique trading activities and VAT obligations. The report defines 'badges of trade' to determine if Mr. Desai's vocation constitutes trading and discusses the differences between tax avoidance and tax evasion. It details allowable and disallowable business expenses, including loan expenses, capital expenses, fines, and depreciation. The report also covers VAT registration, including when it is required and the deadlines. It further explains the VAT return process, payment schedules, and the ineligibility for the flat-rate scheme, and the possibility of claiming bad debt relief. The report provides a calculation of Mr. Desai's adjusted trading profit for the year ending December 31, 2017.
Document Page
Taxation
tabler-icon-diamond-filled.svg

Paraphrase This Document

Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Document Page
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction......................................................................................................................................3
Question 1........................................................................................................................................3
Question 2........................................................................................................................................4
Question 3........................................................................................................................................5
Part A...........................................................................................................................................5
Part B...........................................................................................................................................6
Part C...........................................................................................................................................7
Question 4........................................................................................................................................8
Part A...........................................................................................................................................8
Part B...........................................................................................................................................8
Part C...........................................................................................................................................9
Part D...........................................................................................................................................9
References......................................................................................................................................11
Document Page
INTRODUCTION
Tax is a levy on the profit derived by the trading and the professional activity (Hoynes, Miller,
and Simon, 2015). The income tax Act describes the activity which is regarded as trading, and it
is known as “Badges of Trade”. The present study is about the evaluation of the badges of trade
along with the taxability of the business profits by considering relevant tax provisions. In this
study description regarding the allowed and disallowed expenses from the profit of the business
is also stated. Further the registration requirement under the vat, return, and payment of vat
liability and the eligibility of the flat rate scheme for the businesses has been discussed.
QUESTION 1
The income tax is a levy on the profit which is earned by the person from a business activity or
by profession or vocation (Saad, 2014). In the income tax of the United Kingdom, for
determining whether the transaction is considered as trading or not, “Badges of Trade” test is
defined which are as follows-
When a person enters into a transaction with the objective to earn the profit from the
transaction, then it is regarded as a trade according to the income tax rules.
If the person regularly deals with the same activity, then the same is regarded as a
trade. In the case of “Pickford v Quirke”, the taxpayer buys the mill for the trading
purpose, but due to the worse condition, the taxpayer sale all the items with the
objective to earn profits. The taxpayer regularly sale the items of the mill (Elsevier
UK Ltd, 2010). Therefore this transaction is considered as profit from trading.
Document Page
If the person, after purchasing any asset, modifies it with the objective for enhancing
the sale. Then it is a trading activity.
Nature of transaction is such that, even the single transaction also be regarded as
trading. In other words, the person is not required to carry out day to day activity of
the sale and purchase, but the single transaction of the sale and purchase also leads to
the trading activity (Elsevier UK Ltd, 2010).
If there is a direct link between the existing business and selling of any item by the
person, then it constitutes the profit from trading activity.
Financing arrangement such as obtains the loan for purchasing the asset and only
when the asset is sold, and then the loan is repaid. It is also regarded as trading
activity. In the case of “Wisdom v Chamberlain” the taxpayer obtained the loan for
buying the mould of silver bullion. Due to the non-repayment of interest from the
money, the taxpayer sold the mould. The profit is regarded as a trading profit.
In the present study, Desai enters into a buying and selling activity of the antiques and restoring
on a regular basis and making the profit (Elsevier UK Ltd, 2010). After considering all the above
aspect, Mr Desai vocation is termed as trading.
QUESTION 2
Part A
Difference between Tax Avoidance and Tax Evasion
Tax Avoidance Tax Evasion
Tax Avoidance refers to Reducing tax Tax Evasion refers to Reducing tax liability
tabler-icon-diamond-filled.svg

Paraphrase This Document

Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Document Page
liability but without breaking the tax rules
(Murray, 2017).
through illegally.
It is normally said to be “hedging of tax”. Tax evasion is “Concealment of tax”.
This generally happens before arises of Tax
liability.
Tax evasion generally happens after arises of
tax liability.
Tax avoidance is a type of Legal method that
is implicated by making use of justified
means (Braithwaite, 2017).
However, Tax evasion is a type of illegal or
criminal method that is implicated by make
use of that means, which is not allowed by
law.
It shows the postponement of tax liability. Tax evasion shows the custody or penalty.
Part B
Both tax evasion, as well as tax avoidance, leads to the reduction of the revenue of the
government. The government should make the penalty provision to the person at the time of non-
compliance of the rules. Along with this government offer a various scheme for the investment
and also the income from that investment exempt so that the tax liability can be minimized.
QUESTION 3
Part A
According to the income tax 2007 of the United States, all the business expenses which are
incurred wholly and exclusively related with the business activity are allowed in the income tax
(Low Incomes tax reform group, 2018). In other words, for the allowable expenses, it is essential
Document Page
that the cost must be incurred for running the business activity (DeBacker, Heim, and Tran,
2015). Further, the capital expenses are not allowed, which is generally incurred for buying the
assets with a significant amount. Moreover, the income tax also disallowed some revenue nature
expenses such as personal expenses, which cannot be claimed by the person from the assessable
income (Cooper, & et al. 2016).
Part B
Expenses of £ 1500 are incurred for acquiring the loan is the allowed expenses. It is
because the loan is acquired for business purpose and amount incurred is the revenue
expense. Since allowed business expenses should be deducted from the profit and in the
income and expenditure account, this expense is already deducted. Therefore no further
treatment is required.
£ 4200, was spent on installing the new window in the factory, this expense is regarded as
the capital expense. Therefore it cannot be deducted from the profit. Since this expense is
already deducted from the profit; therefore it should be added again.
£ 250, related with the fine is not allowed in the income tax.
Depreciation amount £ 3500 is included in the income and expenditure account. Since
depreciation is considered as a capital allowance in the income tax and it can be deducted
from the trading income. Therefore, no more treatment is required.
Legal fees of £ 286, is related to the business activity. Therefore, it is allowed as a
business expense and can be deducted from business profits. Therefore no more treatment
is required.
Document Page
Money received from the insurance company is not regarded as a profit of the business.
Since £ 18000 is already credited in the income statement, therefore, this receipt should
be deducted from the profit.
The interest of £ 1000, received from supplier against the loan. It is not the income from
the business, therefore not included in the profit and loss account.
Part C
Calculation of the adjusting trading profit for Mr Desai for the year ended 31 December 2017
Particulars Amount (in £)
Net Profit for the year ended December
2017
12100
Less- income which is not considered as
business income and already credited in
income and expenditure account
Receipt from the insurance company (18000)
Interest received from the supplier (1000)
Add- expenses which are not allowed and
already debited in income and expenditure
account
Expenses incurred on installation of window 4200
Expenses related to fines 250
Total Profit/(loss) (2450)
tabler-icon-diamond-filled.svg

Paraphrase This Document

Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Document Page
QUESTION 4
Part A
The registration under the VAT is required if the taxable turnover of the business get exceeded
from the prescribed limit under the act. In the United Kingdom, the person must get registered
the business under the VAT if in a twelve month of the period the taxable turnover of the
business gets exceeded from £85000 or if the person expected that the within a period of thirty
days, the taxable turnover will get exceeded from the prescribed limit, then it is compulsory to
take the registration under the VAT (UK VAT returns, 2018).
The time limit to get the registration is within the thirty days from the date when the turnover
crossed the prescribed limit.
In the present study, it is assumed that the turnover of Mr Desai is fully taxable. Since the Desai
on 1st November won the contract, by which the turnover of the business gets exceeded from the
£85000. Therefore it is compulsory for Desai to get the registration under the vat within a period
of thirty days from the date on which turnover crossed the prescribed limit.
Part B
Generally, in the United Kingdom, all the VAT returns filed on a quarterly basis. However, the
quarter does not mean to comply with the calendar quarter. At the time of registration of the
VAT, a business can choose their quarterly period. If the annual VAT liability of the business is
greater than £ 2.3 Million, then it is compulsory to make the payment on the last day of the
second or third month of each quarter. In any other case, the return for the VAT liability is due
on the 7th day of the next month in which the quarter in the end. The person is making the
payment of VAT liability electronically and submits the return through the electronically.
Document Page
In this case, Mr Desai has to submit VAT liability electronically and up to the 7th day of the next
month of the quarter end.
Part C
Under the flat rate scheme, the person can charge the VAT from the customer in a normal
manner but make the payment of the liability on the turnover to the government at the fixed rate.
For obtaining the benefit of the flat rate scheme the turnover the business must be less than or
equal to £150000 (UK VAT returns, 2018).
In the flat rate scheme, the person has to make the payment of the fixed rate of the VAT; there
are different rates is described as per the type of business. Further, the person has to maintain the
different accounts related with what the amount is charged from the customer and what is the
amount payable to the government. Along with this, the person who availss the flat rate scheme
cannot claim the vat paid on the purchase.
In the present study, the turnover of Mr Desai is exceeded from the £150000. Therefore Desai
cannot avail the benefit of the flat rate scheme.
Part D
Generally, VAT liability is paid by the businessman at the time when the transaction incurred not
when the payment is received from the customers. Sometimes, this may lead to the difficulty in
the businessman (UK VAT returns, 2018). Since if the businessman paid the tax to the
government at the time of incurrence of the transaction, however, later customer makes the
default in the payment to the businessman and then they are unable to realize the payment from
the customer in such case businessman can claim the bad debt relief. For claiming the bad debt
Document Page
relief, the overdue should be more than six months from the date of invoice. Along with this, it is
compulsory to write-off in a particular bad debt account.
In the present study, the customer of Mr Desai makes the default in the payment. Therefore if the
overdue amount is more than the six months from the invoice, then Mr Desai can claim the bad
debt relief and must be a write-off in a particular bad debt account.
tabler-icon-diamond-filled.svg

Paraphrase This Document

Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Document Page
REFERENCES
Braithwaite, V., 2017. Taxing democracy: Understanding tax avoidance and evasion. Routledge.
Cooper, M., McClelland, J., Pearce, J., Prisinzano, R., Sullivan, J., Yagan, D., Zidar, O. and
Zwick, E., 2016. Business: Who Owns It, and How Much Tax Do They Pay?. Tax Policy and
the Economy, 30(1), pp.91-128.
DeBacker, J., Heim, B.T. and Tran, A., 2015. Importing corruption culture from overseas:
Evidence from corporate tax evasion in the United States. Journal of Financial
Economics, 117(1), pp.122-138.
Dharmapala, D., 2017. The Economics of Tax Avoidance and Evasion. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Elsevier UK Ltd, 2010. TRADING INCOME AND BADGES OF TRADE. [Pdf]. Available
through < http://www1.lexisnexis.co.uk/taxtutor/public/business/2a_business_tax/2a10-
01(F).pdf>. [Accessed on 6th November 2018].
Hoynes, H., Miller, D. and Simon, D., 2015. Income, the earned income tax credit, and infant
health. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 7(1), pp.172-211.
Low Incomes tax reform group, 2018. What business expenses are allowable?. [Online].
Available through < https://www.litrg.org.uk/tax-guides/self-employment/working-out-profits-
losses-and-capital-allowance/what-business-expenses#diff>. [Accessed on 6th November 2018].
Murray, J., 2017. What Is the Difference Between Tax Avoidance and Tax Evasion?. [Online].
Available through <The Balance, www. the balance. com/tax-avoidance-vs-evasion-397671>.
[Accessed on 6th November 2018].
Saad, N., 2014. Tax knowledge, tax complexity and tax compliance: Taxpayers’ view. Procedia-
Social and Behavioral Sciences, 109, pp.1069-1075.
UK VAT returns, 2018. [Online]. Available through <
https://www.avalara.com/vatlive/en/country-guides/europe/uk/uk-vat-returns.html>. [Accessed
on 6th November 2018].
Document Page
chevron_up_icon
1 out of 12
circle_padding
hide_on_mobile
zoom_out_icon
[object Object]