Team Composition & Belbin's Roles: Analyzing a 25-Member Organization

This essay examines the composition of a 25-member team within an organization through the lens of Belbin's Team Roles. It identifies the prevalence and characteristics of various roles within the team, including Implementers, Shapers, Completer/Finishers, Plants, Monitor/Evaluators, Specialists, Coordinators, Team Workers, and Resource/Investigators. The analysis highlights the strengths and weaknesses associated with each role, offering insights into the team's overall dynamics and potential areas for improvement. The essay underscores the importance of understanding team role distribution for effective team management and performance.

I was a part of a team which had 25 members in it in an organization.
Belbin’s roles My team
Implementer Out of the 25 members of team, 3 was
observed to be the implementer.
Three of them were observed to be
disciplined and highly reliable. However,
they were bit inflexible.
Shaper Two of the rest were shaper with
challenging and dynamic personalities.
However, they were see to be highly
influential to provocation.
Completer/ finisher One of the rest was the finisher with the
quality of delivering on time and the
drawback of being reluctant to delegate.
Plant 3 of the rest were observed to be the plant in
the organization with extrovert and
communicative personality and the
detrimental quality of ignoring the
incidentals.
Monitor/ evaluator 2 of the rest were observed to be the
monitors with the quality of accurate
judgement and the effective decision
making and along with that, they were seen
to lack the quality to motivate others.
Specialist 3 of the rest were specialist with the

dedicated mind-set in the supply of the
knowledge and the skills.
Coordinator 4 of the rest were seen to be the coordinator
with the quality of being confident and good
in decision making along with the skill of
manipulation.
Team worker 3 of the rest were team worker with the co-
operative and effective skills of listening
along with the negative quality of being
indecisive at pressure situations.
Resource/ investigator 4 of the rest were the resource with the
enthusiastic, communicative and the skills
of exploring the opportunities along with
the over optimistic mind-set.