Technological Challenges Faced in Nursing Education: A Review

This literature review examines the technological challenges faced in nursing education. The review begins with an introduction that highlights the impact of technological advancements on nursing education, followed by a detailed methodology section outlining eligibility criteria, search strategies (including databases like PubMed Central and Science Direct), and selection/screening processes. A Gantt chart is included to illustrate the timeline of the review. The PRISMA flowchart is presented to summarize the screening process. The evaluation of the search plan assesses the reliability of the data collection process. The review includes references to supporting literature and provides a comprehensive overview of the challenges, barriers, and implications of technology in nursing education, emphasizing the need for practical approaches to address these challenges and support nurses in their training.

Literature review

Table of Contents
TITLE..............................................................................................................................................1
PART A...........................................................................................................................................1
INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................1
METHOD........................................................................................................................................1
Eligibility criteria....................................................................................................................1
Search strategy........................................................................................................................2
Selection and screening..........................................................................................................3
Gantt chart..............................................................................................................................3
PART B............................................................................................................................................5
PRISMA flowchart.................................................................................................................5
PART C............................................................................................................................................6
Evaluation of search plan.......................................................................................................6
REFERENCES................................................................................................................................7

TITLE
To analyse the technological challenges faced for nursing education.
PART A
INTRODUCTION
The background information of the related research question is well associated with the
technical challenge or technological challenges which is faced by nurses during their education
are developed various issues with their education. In addition to this, the advance treatment
pattern and supporting equipment are generally enhance the nurse’s education because the factor
which is mainly influence the condition are will related with the approach which may be taken in
the various factor that enable the nurses to face challenges with the advancement in the
technology that is predominantly arise in the health care settings (Albuquerque and et. al., 2022).
Therefore, the education pattern is generally changed due to the technological aspect which may
influence the education pattern in the nursing. Therefore, the nursing education must consider a
practical rather than the theoretical approach because the disease and the support are not
equivalent to each other there for the support and care are used to provide assistance is to the
patient in the practical way. As per these, the technology could not help the nurses in order to
provide the support on the basis of psychological, emotional, and social approach (Al-Sahouri,
Merrell, and Snelgrove, 2019).
METHOD
Eligibility criteria
The search term is usually focus in order to provide the keywords to make the appropriate factor
which is contributed in order to provide a reliable source to interpret and collect the data which is
related with the research question. The search term such as challenge in nursing education,
technological barrier in nursing education and so on.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria:
Inclusion criteria Exclusion criteria
 English language is required.
 Therefore, the RCT and Cohort study is
used to take for the literature review.
 Rather than the language is excluded
from the study.
 Cross sectional study shows the
1

 Reviewed article and Journals are used
to taken under the analysis which may
show the impact for the review process.
 In addition, the literature shows the
aspect that provide the context for the
appropriate search strategy.
 The nurses and clinical staff are used to
selected as the inclusion of study.
 The education and other factor which is
related with the study of review and
other process.
behaviour and other study which is
comes under the excluded from the
study.
 The search and database approach are
not used within the study.
 The healthcare professional is excluded
from the study.
 The placement and other scenario is
also excluded from the study (Serrano-
Ruiz and et. al., 2020).
Search strategy
The search strategy is usually defined as aspect which is reliable in order to interpret and
collect the data from the various sources which include websites, articles, and many more.
Therefore, the search strategy is usually providing the knowledge and information regards with
the sources which is useful for the data collection within the research process. Search strategy are
used in order to identify relevant data with the evidence-based factor which may show their
reliability and validity for the measurement and accountability of research questions. In this
research process, technological challenges which is faced by nurses during their educations are
usually evaluated with the various approach which help to provide the knowledge regard with the
factor such as physical requirement of nurses in order to provide support and care to the patient.
In addition, so, it is not possible to provide the theoretical knowledge to the nurses in terms of
supporting with the form of education and accessibility to perform the criteria or the scenario to
support the patient for their future placements within the workplace or healthcare setting the
major search is strategies are PubMed central, Springer Link, Science Direct and many more
(Alsayegh, Saker, and Alqattan, 2018).
Selection and screening
The selection of the process is eventually providing the criteria which is based on the
inclusion research which is appropriate and make a proper reliability in the terms of selection and
2

collection of data and information. The inclusion criteria are usually helpful to provide the
selection and screening and such a way which is showing the factor that is reliable and validated
for articles which is appropriate for the proper selection and collection of data. The data and
information are well collected from the various websites and data basis which may helpful to
provide the approach where the nursing education are used to be analyse and their difficulties. It
is evaluated as generally included within the study. Therefore, the exclusion of such articles are
focus in such a way which is reliable and the terms of point which is not undertaking within the
research process (Hill and et. al., 2020).
Gantt chart
3

4

PART B
PRISMA flowchart
The PRISMA flow chart diagram is useful in order to provide the summarisation the screening
process. In addition, they initially provide the context which is well related with the approach
select process and procedure which provide the reporting on decision which is made with the
term of decision made at the various stage systematic review. The number of the article are
usually recorded with the different stage (Jsselstijn and et. al., 2018).
5
Records identified from*:
Databases (n = 220)
Registers (n = 110)
Records detached before
broadcast:
Duplicate records removed
(n = 90)
Records noticeable as
ineligible by mechanisation
tools (n = 45)
Records uninvolved for other
reasons (n = 25)
Records separated
(n = 45)
Registers excluded**
(n = 25)
Reports wanted for recovery
(n = 60) Information not retrieved
(n = 25)
Reports measured for suitability
(n = 90)
Reports excepted:
Cause 1 (n = 70)
Purpose 2 (n = 50)
Object 3 (n = 20)
etc.
Trainings comprised in
examination
(n = 45)
Reports of involved trainings
(n = 30)
Identification of studies via databases and registers
Identification
Screening
Included

PART C
Evaluation of search plan
The evaluation of search plan is usually helpful in order to provide the aspect and
information which is suitable for the research questions which is implemented in order to collect
the reliable data which is useful for the literature review (Qu and et. al., 2018). The literature
review is defined as a process or the research that is will implemented for the analysis of
concept, impact and others prevention factors which may have a capability to resonate the
behaviour of the nursing education that reduce the consequences of technological error and
challenges which is faced by nurses during the future work placements. The technological
barriers are usually arising due to the work portfolio that followed by nurses where they provide
proper support with the physical attention. In addition, the search plan is to evaluate the various
articles and books which is helpful to provide the preventive and intervention approach which is
showing the reliability with the research article or focus on the search plan (Lowery and et. al.,
2020).
6

REFERENCES
Books and Journals
Albuquerque, A.M., Eckert, I., Tramujas, L., McDonald, E.G., Butler-Laporte, G., Brophy, J.M.
and Lee, T.C., 2022. Analysis plan: Version 1.1 Effect of Tocilizumab, Sarilumab, and
Baricitinib on Mortality Among Patients Hospitalized for COVID-19: A Systematic
Review and Meta-Regression.
Al-Sahouri, A., Merrell, J. and Snelgrove, S., 2019. Barriers to good glycemic control levels and
adherence to diabetes management plan in adults with Type-2 diabetes in Jordan: a
literature review. Patient preference and adherence, 13, p.675.
Alsayegh, O., Saker, N. and Alqattan, A., 2018. Integrating sustainable energy strategy with the
second development plan of Kuwait. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 82,
pp.3430-3440. Jafari, M., Ghasemyani, S., Khodayari-Zaranq, R. and Raoofi, S., 2021.
Health Transformation Plan Achievements and Outcomes in Iran (2014-2020): A Scoping
Review. Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran, 35.
Hill, R.E., Wakefield, C.E., Cohn, R.J., Fardell, J.E., Brierley, M.E.E., Kothe, E., Jacobsen, P.B.,
Hetherington, K. and Mercieca‐Bebber, R., 2020. Survivorship care plans in cancer: a
meta‐analysis and systematic review of care plan outcomes. The Oncologist, 25(2),
pp.e351-e372.
IJsselstijn, H., Breatnach, C., Hoskote, A., Greenough, A., Patel, N., Capolupo, I., Morini, F.,
Scharbatke, H., Kipfmueller, F., Ertresvag, K. and Kraemer, U., 2018. Defining outcomes
following congenital diaphragmatic hernia using standardised clinical assessment and
management plan (SCAMP) methodology within the CDH EURO consortium. Pediatric
research, 84(2), pp.181-189.
Lowery, J.T., Weber, T.K., Ahnen, D.J., Schroy III, P.C., Levell, C.L. and Smith, R.A., 2020. An
action plan to address the rising burden of colorectal cancer in younger adults. Colorectal
Cancer, 9(3), p.CRC24.
Qu, G., Shu, L., Zhang, J., Wu, Y., Ma, S., Han, T., Zhang, H., Wang, J. and Sun, Y., 2021.
Suicide ideation, suicide plan, and suicide attempt among left‐behind children and
adolescents: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Suicide and Life‐Threatening
Behavior, 51(3), pp.515-527.
Sauder, R., 2018. The Commonwealth of Learning Six-Year Plan: Mid-Term Strategic Review
of Programmes.
Serrano-Ruiz, M.P., Ramírez-Quintana, A.L. and Ibarra-Mejía, G., 2020. Role of Physical
Environment Factors in Semantic Memory and Cognitive Performance in Open-Plan
Offices Users: A Systematic Literature Review.
7

8