AASB 138 Application: Technology Enterprises Ltd Case Study Report

This case study report examines the application of AASB 138, the Australian Accounting Standards Board standard for intangible assets, within the context of Technology Enterprises Ltd. The company is engaged in a research and development project related to battery recharging technology. The report details the accounting standards relevant to the preparation of financial statements, specifically focusing on the recognition and measurement of internally generated intangible assets like patents. It analyzes the impact of AASB 138's restrictions on the comparability of financial statements and provides recommendations for Technology Enterprises Ltd to improve investor understanding of its financial reporting, including enhanced communication of key information and clear disclosure of accounting policies. The report also discusses the classification of R&D expenditure into research and development phases, and the costs associated with intangible assets. The report concludes by emphasizing the importance of compliance with relevant business laws and regulations to ensure the accuracy and reliability of financial statements.

Case Study Report

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Australian Accounting Standards Board 138 is considered as a Commenwealth Government
Body which is governing all the accounting standards by laying down principles or standards
company, public sector enterprises or not profit business organisation has to comply. This report is
based on Technology Enterprises Ltd which has been engaged in a research and development
project related to modification in process related to the recharging of batteries of its own products.
This report further discuss about the Accounting standard necessary to be followed for preparation
of the financial statement.

Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..................................................................................................................2
INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................................4
MAIN BODY.......................................................................................................................................4
1. Accounting standard AASB 138 & its application for formulation of financial statement.........4
2. AASB 138 restrictions impacting the comparability features of financial statements................6
3. Recommendation related to concern of investor interpretation of financial statements..............7
CONCLUSION....................................................................................................................................8
REFERENCES.....................................................................................................................................9

INTRODUCTION
AASB and IAS are the accounting standard which has to be followed by every business
organisation for preparation of its financial statements. The present report is based on case of
Technology Enterprises Ltd which has initiated a process of Research and Development in context
of bringing modification in the manner of recharging of batteries implanted in its own products and
goods. The report will show application use of AASB 138 in preparation of financial statements of
Technology Enterprises Ltd for the year ended 30 June 2018. Further it will streamline about the
AASB 138 rules and restrictions which results in reducing the comparability features of financial
statements. At last, it will recommend measures to be taken by Technology Enterprise Limited so as
to mitigate the problems related to interpretation of Financial Statements by the investors and other
stakeholders of the company.
MAIN BODY
1. Accounting standard AASB 138 & its application for formulation of financial statement.
The term Australian Accounting Standards Board (AASB) is a Commenwealth Government
Body which helps in regulating accounting standards by defining requirements which has to be
followed by every company, public sector entities as well as not for profit organisation on which it
is applicable. The Australian Accounting Standards Board helps in developments of standards,
procedures and methodology which assist companies in successful preparation of financial
statements for a particular period of time.
These accounting standards also helps in making proper and accurate interpretations which
defines the accounting mechanism to be adopted for completing of a particular transaction, activities
or events of the business that are creating impact on the preparation of the financial statements of
the company (Steenkamp and Steenkamp, 2016). All the information provided with the help of
financial statements as per the requirements of accounting standards provides transparency of
business operations and transaction taken place throughout the accounting year.
AASB 138 – The Australian Accounting Standards Board 138 provides the definition in relation
with Intangible Asset. This accounting standard defines:
1. How to make recognition of an Intangible Asset.
2. The way measurement of an Intangible Asset can be made
3. Provides requirements related to the disclosure of an Intangible Asset.
In case of Technology Enterprises Ltd, company has started in July 2017 a research and
development project with the aim of bringing modification in the process of charging of all the
batteries which are used in by its own company products. After successful completion of research
and development project in June 2018, company has applied for undertaking of Patent right for its
new modified design. Patent is considered as one of the intangible asset which provides a monopoly

right in form of government authority or license of making, selling, utilising or developing the
invention made. Patent is provided by applying to the patent office under the applicable act.
As per AASB 138, Patent is considered as internally generated Intangible asset of which
recognition and measurement has to be done under the rules, regulations and norms as applicable
(Bond, Govendir and Wells, 2016). First intangible asset generated has to be identified that whether
such asset is meeting the criteria for recognition under the research phase and development phase.
1. Research Phase – If intangible asset is developing during research phase, then no
recognition will be provided. Patent is an intangible asset for which Technology Enterprise
Ltd has applied. All the expenditure incurred by Technology on conducting research will be
recognised as expense as and when it will be incurred properly
2. Development Phase - Intangible asset arising during conduct of development process, then
recognition will be provided for technical feasibility of completing intangible asset for
assessing its future use or sale. Also, the intention of completing intangible asset and its
ability to use or sell is meaningful. Recognition is provided when availability of financial,
technical and other resources for completing such development and its use and sell option
has been made. Ability of measuring the amount of expenditure taking place in case of
development of such intangible asset (Bodle and et.al., 2018).
Cost associated with an Intangible asset generated internally - Technology Enterprises Ltd
has incurred cost expenditure in conducting of research and development of project is as follows:
The cost of an Intangible asset which is generated internally during the research and development
process is calculated as taking sum of all the expenditure which are incurred from that date when
intangible asset has first meet the criteria of recognition. The cost calculation for Technology
Enterprises Ltd of its internally generated intangible asset i.e. Patent design includes all the cost
which are directly attributable as well as necessary for creating, producing and preparing the asset
so as to make it capable of operating in manner which is specified and required by the management
of the company.
Particulars Cost (in $)
Cost related to the time spent on searching and
evaluating alternative materials
100 000
Cost incurred in respect of time taken for designing
models, constructing and testing of prototypes
700 000
Cost of time incurred on imparting training and
maintenance of worker for new design
200 000
Estimated present value of design 4000 000
Fair Value of design 3000 000

The following components are not considered as part of the cost of an intangible asset i.e. Patent
which is internally generated:
1. Selling cost, administrative expenses and other general overhead expenditure unless are
directly accountable for preparing of such intangible asset for use
2. Identifies all the inefficiencies as well as operating losses which are to be incurred at the
initial level before achievement of intangible asset to the plan performance
3. Expenditure incurred on giving training to the employees and staff of the company related to
operating function of such asset (Tran and Zhu, 2017).
So the cost of an Intangible asset for Technology Enterprises Ltd will be as follows:
Particulars Cost (in $)
Cost related to the time spent on searching and
evaluating alternative materials
100 000
Cost incurred in respect of time taken for designing
models, constructing and testing of prototypes
700 000
Total Cost 800 000
2. AASB 138 restrictions impacting the comparability features of financial statements.
AASB 138 is related with Internally generated intangible assets which includes identifiable
intangible assets either originated, developed or produced by the company itself and internal
goodwill which is easily not accountable as a source of value. Both the identifiable intangible assets
and internal goodwill are related to factors such as the information system of the firm,
administrative structures, design and processes, knowledge related to market trends and technology,
customer and supplier networks.
Purchase of intangible assets made at cost are recognised only but internally generated
intangible assets are not given any recognition (Adighibe, 2015). The accounting frameworks of the
AASB which is existing states allow only intangible expenditures to be recorded in the accounting
period system as assets on the basis that the items meet both the asset definition and recognition
criteria. The properties of intangibles including variability and uncertainty in production,
heterogeneity and specificity and appropriability may lead to uncertainty on behalf of firm’s ability
in realising expected benefits from their intangibles for the managers.
This uncertainty creates issue related to GAAP as the accounting regulations are concerned
more with reliability as well as relevance of the financial information and are contained in AASB
138 Intangible Assets. It doesn't aim at assessing and evaluating the amount of sexpenditure on the

intangible assets. Instead, objectives of standard is to allow recording of only those intangible assets
which is bearing a price from an exchange business transaction. Also, on the basis of mode of
acquisition accounting standard differentiates accounting methods for expenditure on intangibles
(Hussey and Ong, 2017). Items which has been excluded from recognition as an intangible asset
include brands names, mastheads, publishing titles, customer software etc. But these items can be
recognized as an intangible asset if purchase has been made.
The Intangible Assets consist of the three basic themes as follows:
1. All the expenditure made on purchased of intangibles (either separately acquired or as part
of an acquisition) which has met the definition of an intangible asset are deemed to be
recognisable as intangible assets.
2. All the other expenditure related to intangibles will come under the heading of internally
generated intangible asset provisions which are further classifiable only as either Research
or Development.
3. Out of expenditure incurred on the research and development, only development expenditure
meeting definition of intangible asset, recognition standards or rules plus the six tests in
AASB 138 Intangible Assets are recognisable as an intangible asset.
3. Recommendation related to concern of investor interpretation of financial statements.
Business transaction and activities taking place in an accounting year is recorded and
summarised in an accurate and correctly manner by every company in its financial statements every
year. Technology Enterprise Limited by considering following recommendation can mitigate its
concern related to the interpretation of the financial statements made by investors are as follows:
1. Technology Enterprise Limited should enhance the manner and method of communicating
of all the important and relevant information related to business in its financial statements by
determining the key themes and terminology. It will help the investors and other
stakeholders of the company in making better and clear understanding of financial
statements (Paruchuri and Misangyi, 2015).
2. By using the keywords, themes or terminology it provides an ease to company as well. With
the help of this terminology or themes, Technology Enterprise Limited can reordered its
disclosures and frame grouped related notes under headings such as “Debt and Equity”,
“Working Capital”, “Investments”, “Financial Risk Management ” etc. All these changes can
be made visible in the new structure of notes.
3. Any changes made during the accounting period in conducting of its business operations and
activities by the company, then it is necessary on behalf of Technology Enterprise Limited to

highlight all the relevant matters and information. Also, communicating the same relevant
information to the investors and stakeholders in a clear and concise manner should be done.
4. For better interpretation of financial statement by the investor of Technology Enterprise
Limited, it is good on behalf of company to make description of all the significant and
necessary accounting policies, procedures, estimates and judgements made in a specific
note.
5. It is better recommended to the management of Technology Enterprise Limited to take into
consideration both the quantitative and qualitative factors when determining whether the
nature of information is material or relevant and should become part of financial statement
or not (Brazel and et.al., 2015).
6. Technology Enterprise Limited should covers all the information and matters of relevant and
material importance in its books of accounts and financials, of which the investors and other
stakeholders such as creditors, government, competitors can find important in their decision
making process.
7. The financial statement, books of accounts of the relevant accounting year should be
prepared by complying with all the requisite business laws, rules and provisions as specified
by the Company Act so as to reduce the chance of error which can be occurred while
recording of business transaction.
CONCLUSION
From the above report it has been concluded that, AASB 138 is a term which basically deals with
the Intangible Assets of the company. The AASB 138 is an accounting standard which helps
Technology Enterprises Limited in providing recognition to its intangible asset in form of patent
which has been developed during the research and development process conducted. Also, the report
has made disclosures related to the issues faced by the investors while making interpretation of
financial statements of the company because of unclear concept and non disclosure of material
information about the company. Further, report has defined measures which has help the company
in mitigating all the risk associated with the investor's interpretation and understanding. Technology
Enterprises Limited should focus on preparation of its financial statements in an accurate and
correct manner which contains the every detail of company which is crucial from the investor
points. It is very important from the investor perspective of Technology Enterprise Limited to
consider both the qualitative as well as quantitative factors while preparing the financial statements.

REFERENCES
Books and Journals
Adighibe, C. N., 2015. Public private partnership infrastructure delivery: benefits and costs for
society (Doctoral dissertation, Queensland University of Technology).
Bodle, K. and et.al., 2018. Critical success factors in managing sustainable indigenous businesses in
Australia. Pacific Accounting Review. 30(1). pp.35-51.
Bond, D., Govendir, B. and Wells, P., 2016. An evaluation of asset impairment decisions by
Australian firms and whether this was impacted by AASB 136.
Brazel, J. F. and et.al., 2015. Understanding investor perceptions of financial statement fraud and
their use of red flags: Evidence from the field. Review of Accounting Studies. 20(4). pp.1373-
1406.
Hussey, R. and Ong, A., 2017. Corporate Financial Reporting. Macmillan International Higher
Education.
Paruchuri, S. and Misangyi, V. F., 2015. Investor perceptions of financial misconduct: The
heterogeneous contamination of bystander firms. Academy of Management Journal. 58(1).
pp.169-194.
Steenkamp, N. and Steenkamp, S., 2016. AASB 138: catalyst for managerial decisions reducing
R&D spending?. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting. 14(1). pp.116-130.
Tran, A. and Zhu, Y. H., 2017. The impact of adopting IFRS on corporate ETR and book-tax income
gap. Austl. Tax F. 32. p.757.
Online
AASB 138. 2019. [Online]. Available through: <https://legalvision.com.au/aasb-138-intangible-
assets-summary-for-businesses/>.
Revenue recognition principle. 2018. [Online]. Available through:
<https://www.accountingtools.com/articles/2017/5/15/the-revenue-recognition-principle>.