Leadership as a Process: Transformational Leadership Analysis

This report delves into leadership as a process, exploring the significance of overseeing organizational information and the role of leaders in creating vision, inspiration, and structures. It emphasizes the importance of managing learning through creating, sharing, and exploiting information. The report introduces transformational leadership theories and presents an illustrative incident from the author's experience in an organizational gospel ministry, highlighting the evolution of their leadership perspective. The analysis discusses the impact of leadership factors on outcomes and the significance of process learning for making effective decisions. The conclusion emphasizes the relevance of leadership as a process in navigating complexity and unforeseen circumstances, advocating for flexibility, collaboration, and support for team members. The report includes references to relevant literature on leadership and organizational change.

LEADERSHIP AS A PROCESS
Brief Introduction
The Leadership process can be defined as a focal part of the time spent overseeing
organizational information. Leaders give vision, inspiration, frameworks, and structures at all
levels of the association that encourages the transformation of information into a competitive
edge. Overseeing learning requires a cognizant exertion with respect to leaders at all levels of
the association to oversee three key learning forms: making, sharing and misusing information
(Aula, 2010).
Initiative or leadership as a procedure is staying alert, thankful and service to the assorted
variety of people, their societies and propensities in the group that I impact, for instance, the
program where I am the chairman of the group. This implies adopting a confined strategy to
manage circumstances, decipher data, execute improvement plans and changes, while
remembering the overall view, without needing control and answers constantly. This would
bring about having connected with supporters and confidants to accomplish our shared
objectives and complete things. This would likewise imply that I need to do my part in making
the earth and space for consistent development for everyone in the association.
Transformational Leadership Process
Transformational leadership hypotheses give a helpful focal point to seeing how leaders affect
the administration of organizational learning (Erwin & Garman, 2010). Despite the fact that
there are contrasts between the transformational and alluring/charismatic leadership
hypotheses, researchers are currently seeing them as sharing, much in like manner and alluding
to this assemblage of work as the new leadership hypothesis (Brookes, 2014).
An Illustrative Incident in the Program for Leadership as
Process
Leadership has been a consistently changing idea for me. The general population that I have
experienced while serving in service have significantly impacted my meaning of leadership. I
have seen my worldview on leadership advance because of their impact in my life. Leadership is

L E A D E R S H I P A S A P R O C E S S P a g e | 2
a social and objective arranged impact process, unfurling in a worldly and spatial environment.
In this process, leadership factors, for example, a leader's practices, influence a distal result like
group execution through more proximate interceding builds, for example, adherent inspiration;
the expression "leadership" infers that a leader greatly affects a solitary supporter than the
other way around. Distinguishing such processes is testing in light of the fact that the impacts
on interceding develop or on results don't really happen inside a similar transient and spatial
measurements.
However, such process learning is essential for two reasons. Process models illuminate the
"how" and "why" of impacts and in this way permit surveying generalizability and limit
conditions. Also, such information encourages specialists to settle on the correct decisions:
Whether, for instance, a values-based or motivating forces-based leadership approach is more
compelling in raising execution relies upon the systems behind these methodologies (e.g.,
distinguishing proof versus remunerate possibilities) in the particular setting, and the time it
takes for these impacts to disclose.
In university, I and my associate started an organizational gospel ministry that placed yours
truly in charge of the ministry to the poor people in downtown. I had been responsible for
sorting out and generating sandwich works, and he was in charge of the adolescent gathering
that happened toward the final of the institution time. By that stage of my expertise, I used to
be exceptional at running errands. Therefore, I finished exactly what was assigned to me and
perhaps went past that which was asked of me. Moreover, I formed teams which created the
sandwiches and bought the resources. I made the snacks, organized the programs, and
provided essential guidelines on how to evangelize. Fortunately, the ministry was operative on
numerous points; we'd numerous young folks interested in our monthly programs, and we
provided a huge amount of attention bundles, and therefore we got many opportunities of
dispersing the gospel.
Concluding Remarks
Leadership researchers like Jim & Annelie (2014) have contended that overseeing information
successfully is basic to making a maintainable competitive advantage. Leaders are fundamental

L E A D E R S H I P A S A P R O C E S S P a g e | 3
to the way toward making societies, frameworks, and structures that encourage information
creation, sharing, and development. In my future professional practice, Leadership as Process is
relevant to face the complexity and unforeseen circumstances not just on the job, but also the
external environment and globally.
I can never accurately pinpoint the people, resources, obstacles, and solutions that I will need
or encounter. I feel that the best preparation that I can give myself is to practice being flexible
and collaborative with people whom I might work with. Also, if I am in a position to oversee
working teams, by applying Leadership as the process I aim to let them feel that the
management is constantly supporting them, giving them space to try and that there is meaning
to the work that we were responsible for.

L E A D E R S H I P A S A P R O C E S S P a g e | 4
References
Aula, P. K. (2010). Social media, reputation risk, and ambient publicity management. Strategy &
Leadership, 38(6), 43-49.
Brookes, S. (2014). Is selfless leadership an impossible ideal for public leaders? The International Journal
of Leadership in Public Services, 10(4), 200-216.
Erwin D. G & Garman A. N. (2010). Resistance to organizational change: linking research and practice.
Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 41(5), 39-56.
Jim A. & Annelie A. (2014). Deconstructing resistance to organizational change: a social representation
theory approach. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 342-355.
Ki-Hoon L. & Stefan J. S. (2014). Organizational transformation and higher sustainability management
education: The case of the MBA Sustainability Management. International Journal of
Sustainability in Higher Education, 15(4), 450-472.
Mel, F. (2012). The Impact of Leadership, Management, and HRM on Employee Reactions to
Organizational Change. In A. J. Joseph J. Martocchio (Ed.), Research in Personnel and Human
Resources Management (pp. 177-208). Emerald Publishing Limited.
Nubia, E. (2016). Is the top leadership of the organizations promoting tax avoidance? Journal of
Financial Crime, 23(2), 273-288.
Steven H. A, Medea C. D, Owen M. & Thai-Son N. (2015). Organizational outcomes of leadership style
and resistance to change (Part Two). Industrial and Commercial Training, 12(3), 135-144.