Examining Anti-Competitive Practices & Monopolies under UK Law

This report provides an overview of the monopolies and anti-competitive practices legislations in the UK, focusing on the role of the Competition Act 1998, Enterprise Act 2002, and the Office of Fair Trading. It defines monopolies, examines the role of the Competition Commission, and explains dominant positions within the EU common market. The report also considers the application of EU exemptions to potentially anti-competitive practices, referencing the United Brands case. It highlights key features of competition, such as benefits to competitors and customers, improved product quality, and choice for consumers. The analysis covers the legal framework designed to prevent abuse of dominant positions and promote fair competition within the UK and European markets. Desklib provides access to a wealth of study resources, including past papers and solved assignments, to support students in their academic endeavors.

BUSINESS LAW

Task 3

P 3.1outlines the monopolies and anti-
competitive practices legislations in the UK
Monopoly: the business has regulated over the market place and it goes into the
honest hazard for competing in the place of market in UK. For taking the imposing
business model location it is essential that organization has conducted.
 Change over by the market by 25%.
 Examination has been completed by the imposing business models and union
command and they locate that organization has control over the market by 25%.
The antagonism protest helps the customer by increasing competition in the
marketplace and which consequence the price of the piece is lessened and item
excellence is countless. Thus, the organization which is in the restraining
infrastructure position is the solitary breadwinner in the market and have switch
over the better piece of the marketplace. As it is baptised as a scale imposing
business models and multifaceted restraining infrastructures.

Impressive commercial model is the enormous risk in the marketplace of
UK by the extensive companies. In addition, the organization which was
given by the restraining infrastructure in UK is the imperial mail and mail
administrations. The government of Uk is more galloped about the
restraining infrastructure organization in the market. Examining specialist is
given to the imposing business models and union command. In addition,
they achieve the cases which are referred by the workplace of practical
swapping. Thus, the case is selected by them by handling the antagonism
law and customer law. Including the unlawful demonstration in UK, if any
organization rise the syndication in the market can be obtained by
consumer law.

Features of competition
 The competitor gets benefits when the competition is regulated by the
competition act.
 Customers are also get benefits when monopoly is prohibited.
 The quality of the product is good.
 Ration of choice is availed to the consumers.
 The product price is fewer.[Businesscasestudies.co.uk, 2015]
Competition Act 1998:
There are dissimilar new requirements which are comprised this parade and
it restricted the hostage focused practices and manhandle of irresistible
location. Thus, the article 81 and 82 of cheap of Rome was altered and now
in preparation of Lisbon 2009 they are object 101 and 102.
Enterprise Act 2002 it moreover rolled out developments in the
antagonism demonstration 1998. Thus, there are different enactment has
been included and make more beached rivalry protest of the Uk.
[businesscasestudies.co.uk, (2015)

P 3.2 Explain the Role of competition
commission within the context of
monopolies and anti- competitive
practices and UK office of fair trading.
It is the body which look at the resistance in the market. They have master
to investigate the limitation in the market. They controlled the resistance
show in the market. They examine the merger and differing asks. Dispute
act is supplanted the driving arrangements of activity and mergers
commission. It is known as the limitation and market ace from 2014.
Settlement of Lisbon 2009 changed the limitation commission.
Office of sensible exchanging: It helps in taking the choice what's more
published the data and suggestion. They moreover manages the assessing
break is made by the organization. Moreover, they in like way take the
endorsement. [Businesscasestudies.co.uk, 2015]

The court analyzed the case and imparted that business firms is in the
psyche boggling position and make manhandle of the position in the
market by not giving the things and ventures in the market and also
compels the assorted conditions upon the purchasers. They additionally
charge arranged specific cost from the unmistakable customer. The choice
of the limitation commission is in like way crushed by the court in which it
is held organization is exempted of reason and limit. [Reckon.co.uk, 2015]

P 3.4 Define dominant position with the EU
common market
 Any organization who has the control over market essentially then the organization will overpower position and if any
organization mishandle their position in the market will be unlawful in Uk rivalry law. The organization who abuse their
position are skilled remaining single in the market and wipe out the adversaries in the market. They change into the one
provider in the market. In rivalry act batter of predominant position is conveyed in the article 102 by the arrangement of
Lisbon. The vitality of the exchange is ensured by the European arrangement.
 Organization endeavours the shoppers by
 1. Striking the out of line condition.
 2. Create a limit of supply of the item.
 3. Control distinctive cost
 4. Greedy cost
 5. Unfair performances
 Intrigue is ensured by the EU settlement however it is essential that they are individual from this bargain. This bargain
likewise restricted the undesirable impact on the exchange and furthermore disallowed the manhandle of predominant
situation. [businesscasestudies.co.uk, 2015]
 Concurring the convictions of the case it is assessed by the court that United Brand has the prevalent position, and abusing
their mind-boggling position. They are acquiring American Bananas. They made the bananas and gave the bananas which are
not prepared to the vendor for offering in the market and bananas which are prepared are used by the distributer for the
individual use. In 1975 find by the EC that brought together Brands mistreat their overarching position. Regardless, Company
communicated that the are not mauling their position and not act against any courses of action of the resistance show

P3.4 consider the application of EU
exemptions to potentially anti-
competitive practices
 If any organization mishandle the overwhelming position and against intensive practices then they have
these denials.
 1. Any organization who abusing their predominant position and work on debilitating to c strong
practice then they needs to display that there is no impact upon the resistance in the market and it helps in
the economy progress. This exceptional case is known as individual denial.
 2. Any organization which meet the individual exception then square restriction will be related upon
these assenting is known as the piece uncommon cases.
 3. Parallel exclusion is the dismissal which related on the organization when they meet the individual
and piece uncommon cases.
 4. The preferred standpoint will be passed on in the midst of the clients with no segment.

 5. There is circumstance in which abuse is essential.
 For this condition United Brand connection is not exempted from the above dismissals. Competition
commission pass arrange that they are exempted however court communicated that they mishandle the
position by not giving the bananas in the market. [Reckon.co.uk, 2015]

References
Reckon.co.uk, 2015 United Brands - Reckon Open [Accessed 17 July
2015]<http://www.reckon.co.uk/open/United_Brands>
Businesscasestudies.co.uk, 2015 Anti-competitive practices - The
importance of competition policy - Office of Fair Trading | Office of Fair
Trading case studies and information | Business Case Studies. [Accessed 16
July 2015].