Workflow Management in Universal Healthcare and Oncology Report

This report provides an in-depth analysis of universal healthcare, specifically focusing on the adoption of oncology and the implementation of workflow management. It explores the integration of oncology north (academic hospitals) and oncology south, highlighting the importance of informatics in healthcare. The report examines the unique needs of oncology patients and healthcare needs of oncology navigators. It details the process of creating effective workflows, including analyzing the current state, designing a future state, and rationalization. The study emphasizes the role of electronic health records in optimizing healthcare management, discusses the importance of oncology navigators, and explores the potential of workflow mapping to improve efficiency and patient outcomes. It also addresses the challenges of workflow, such as the impact of innovation on patient care and the potential for workaround processes.

Running Head: UNIVERSAL HEALTHCARE 1
Universal healthcare
Name
Students
Institution

Running Head: UNIVERSAL HEALTHCARE 2
Introduction
The adoption of oncology characterizes by education and universal healthcare system in the
United States. The program universal healthcare was initiated as non- profit asset with the aim of
providing support to the people. In other words, the universe healthcare was introduced to offer
healthcare and academic purposes to people in general. The oncology has been differentiated in
such a way that there exist oncology north and the south, respectively.
In contrast, the oncology north deals with matters related to academic hospitals. Both the
oncology join together to form part of helping the people as a whole. In other words, this present
work experience with the adoption of a workflow management formula in the large financial
institution help different oncology to work together effectively jointly.
More importantly, this concept of discussion will be based on various discussing components of
the course topic. One of the primary subjects of the discussion will, therefore, be identifying
unique needs of oncology patients, healthcare needs of oncology navigators and the initial
authorization of financial connections. The analysis part of this project will describe the gradual
evolution of oncology in terms of healthcare management and the optimization in the educational
process. To effectively achieve this research, different concept such as literature and supportive
extensive study will be included within discourse analysis. Most scholars indicates that
computational workflow significantly improved labor productivity and economic increase in
different sectors. Importantly, in creating workflow, there three different distinct steps that are
followed, such as analyzing current state, creating future state workflow, and rationalization.
Part 1: analysis of the current state
This step primarily rested on the evaluation of the oncology north, oncology south in identifying
the opportunities for improvement process concerning the informatics. In simple terms, the term

Running Head: UNIVERSAL HEALTHCARE 3
informatics here basically shows all the scientific criteria integration of the data and human
interaction concerning ecology. However, based on the above argument, different oncology
represents two various distinct aspects such that oncology north deals with healthcare
management. In contrast, the oncology south, deals with academic healthcare issues. Therefore,
to compound this operational problem, oncology north has been involved in the operation of the
healthcare issue for more than eight consecutive years. Due to long involvement, its electronic
health record is very crystal. The crystallite of the oncology north has, therefore, offered
platforms for universal healthcare management and has become a model in the form of
conversion of oncology south. Moreover, both oncology has been both extensively been involved
independently when using IT in the creation of customs solutions. In the future, one of the
realizations which should be given consideration is identifying how this oncology can
unanimously be involved to use IT dependably.
Oncology navigators are also known as a nurse. They are specialized in helping the patient in the
journey of their recovery with cancer. Oncology navigators are perceived to be important people
in terms of improving patient to recover fully. Based on the findings, which was done recently
about healthcare, show that oncology navigator is underdeveloped within the universal
healthcare HER due to the crystal gap. This aspect alerts organization’s attention to be more
serious with oncology navigators for their negligence toward healthcare.
Part: Future workflow within the universal healthcare.
Create select plan manage
Propose
Review of
the idea
Request
Selection
Full
business
case
Review and
approval
Partnership
Project
suspended
Post project

Running Head: UNIVERSAL HEALTHCARE 4
Part 3: Rationale
Sparkes, and Kutzin, 2020 cited that workflow is a series of steps that are performed by different
staff members. Just as indicated above, they are always dependent on the related work or the
particular task assigned. Therefore, the workflow ultimately determines the outcome of the work
which is being done in most of the times. In oncology in general, clinical, and the staff members
indicates that one of the helpful things, which the facilitators can do in most of the problematic
concept is showing the map key in the workflow. Therefore, for one to be a facilitator, they must
pose some of the magical ideas whereby they can lead the rest of the groups in identifying their
hidden skills in dealing with matters of the health as well as the academic. In other words, in
oncology healthcare management, the main work of the assessor is typically leading groups in
making a decision as well as making critical rules to be followed by other groups within the
healthcare.
More importantly, most of the practices which are done within the workflow mapping are mainly
implementing electronic health records, which the majority of the people might not have realized
when improving the quality of the healthcare within the universal. On the hand, the term
workflow mapping mainly means the process of documenting the specific steps as well as the
actions, which originates in completing a given task. According to Sanders, Nandi, Labonté,
Vance, & Van Damme (2019) stated that developing a workflow map typically helps
parishioners such as oncology navigators to see and perform some of the primary roles within the
healthcare without any problems. Therefore, the creation of the workflow help in understanding
what is happening, identify opportunities for boosting new design, and more effective progress
within the oncology. The primary importance of the workflow within the universal healthcare

Running Head: UNIVERSAL HEALTHCARE 5
constitutes Answering phones, making appointments, Scheduling procedures, Making referrals,
Dispensing phone advice, Assigning patients to panels, completing new patient workups,
educating patients, and managing patient role within universal healthcare, entering lab results
into the information systems.
Importantly, the future workflow electronic documentation can sometimes be used to reduce the
number of steps in many ways. One of how electronic documentation reduces the workflow is by
limiting the ambiguity in the data element. Sometimes automated future workflow can reduce the
number of steps through redesigning the work process through mapping out current workflow as
well as analyzing how the organization gets the work done i0n the future. Consequently, the
workflow can have a consequence on the patient, such that it mainly centered on the principle of
improving efficiency, which may result in un-expectant results from oncology navigators. Most
of the time used by the surgeon reduced without significant effects on patient satisfaction or
outcomes. At the point when innovation doesn't satisfactorily bolster the objectives of the
consideration group, it regularly causes workaround work processes. These substitute work
processes are a reason for concern because these casual, transformative frameworks depend on
the clinicians' recollections, and sidestep choice help shields that the structure may give. Studies
have reported other adverse effects, for example, debased coordination among medical
attendants and doctors, medical caretakers dropping exercises during occupied periods, and
diminished capacity to go astray from routine arrangements.

Running Head: UNIVERSAL HEALTHCARE 6
References
Sanders, D., Nandi, S., Labonté, R., Vance, C., & Van Damme, W. (2019). From primary health
care to universal health coverage—one step forward and two steps back. The
Lancet, 394(10199), 619-621.
Sparkes, S. P., & Kutzin, J. (2020). HIV prevention and care as part of universal health
coverage. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 98(2), 80.