Comprehensive Report: Sustainable Enterprise Analysis of Urbanise.com

This report provides a detailed analysis of Urbanise.com Limited, a software development company, focusing on its sustainability practices. The report begins with an introduction to the concept of sustainable enterprises and the importance of monitoring systems in modern businesses. It then discusses Urbanise.com's business model, which involves developing software for building operations. The core of the report explores the three dimensions of sustainability: economic, social, and environmental. The economic dimension emphasizes profitability, risk management, and good corporate governance. The social dimension highlights employee treatment and community engagement. The environmental dimension, considered most crucial for Urbanise.com, examines resource and energy efficiency, with a specific focus on the company's role in the software industry. The report identifies relevant sustainability indicators, such as ecological footprint and the Environmental Sustainability Index (ESI). Finally, it concludes with a summary of findings and insights into Urbanise.com's approach to sustainability, emphasizing the importance of environmental considerations in the software development sector.

Running head: SUSTAINABLE ENTERPRISE
SUSTAINABLE ENTERPRISE
Enter name of the Student:
Enter name of the University:
Author note:

Running head: SUSTAINABLE ENTERPRISE
Table of Contents
1. Introduction............................................................................................................................3
2. Discussion..............................................................................................................................4
2.1. The Enterprise.................................................................................................................4
2.2. Sustainability Dimensions...............................................................................................5
2.2.1. Economic Dimension...............................................................................................5
2.2.2. Social Dimensions....................................................................................................6
2.2.3. Environmental Dimensions......................................................................................7
2.3. Specific Sustainability Area............................................................................................8
2.4. List and Assessment of Indicators for Monitoring..........................................................9
3. Conclusion............................................................................................................................11
4. References............................................................................................................................13

Running head: SUSTAINABLE ENTERPRISE
1. Introduction
Now a days, it is common for all the companies for using the technology to lesser
otherwise greater degree. Numerous of cases, good working of any networks, systems also
equipment will be a key for the business to operate continuously. It can also said that the
consumer will offer straight a service of technology. However sometimes the faults which
give rise for the critical solutions can look at any of the period. However, in some company
where the infrastructure of computer is very much important, it will necessary for controlling
correct operation of this so that the possible errors do not finish by affecting total facility
given to the users. For detecting also preventing the failures, it is very much suitable to
having the best tool for monitoring and for this a good monitoring system is needed. This
monitoring systems are responsible to control technology which is used by any company
related to networks and communications, operating systems, hardware also many more in
order to examine the presentation and operation also identify and alert for the probable errors.
Any worthy monitoring system is capable to monitor the infrastructures, facilities,
applications also monitor devices. The monitoring systems have some common features
which are system alerts, analysis in real time, graphic visualization, reports production,
notification, record, installing the plug-ins and difference of the types of user. For detecting
and also preventing the failures, it is so much suitable to having the best tool for monitoring
and for this a good monitoring system is needed. This monitoring systems are responsible to
control technology which is used by any company related to networks and communications,
operating systems, hardware and many more in order to examine the performance and
operation also detect also alert for the possible errors. Indicators can deliver a critical
guidance to create the decision in several ways. This can translate knowledge of social
science and physical science into some elements of information which is manageable also can
enable this process of making decision. This can help for measuring also calibrating the

Running head: SUSTAINABLE ENTERPRISE
development in the direction of the objectives of the sustainable development. By this early
warning, this can prevent social, environmental and also the economic damage. The
sustainability indicators are dissimilar from the traditional indicators like profit of the
stockholders, measure of water quality and many more. The indicators of sustainability
replicate reality that three dissimilar segments are tightly interconnected. There are various
indicators present which are relevant to the enterprise such as economic indicators,
environmental indicators and social sustainability indicators.
2. Discussion
2.1. The Enterprise
The enterprise is another name of the business. Here, the selected enterprise name is
Urbanise.com Limited. It is situated in the Australia and a company of software development.
This company develops software which enables the operators of building to mechanize,
streamline, simplify and improve the operations of the buildings also the performance. This
software complement by the remote sensors which monitor several properties for providing
the response and visibility.
The segments of the company includes the Mystrata and Urbanise. Mystrata segment
includes the platform of the building financial management. Urbanise segment includes the
professional services and platform licensing (Chofreh et al., 2014). This company offers
Urbanise platform that includes several functionalities like management of property and
community, maintenance of the asset, operation centre, mobile workforce, monitoring of the
assets, ecommerce for the services, portal of the customer and utility monitoring. This
company by its subordinate company named Mystrata Holdings Pty Limited that permits the
customers to manage the portfolios of the apartment buildings, co-ops, commercial towers,
condominiums and housing estates.

Running head: SUSTAINABLE ENTERPRISE
This company uses the latest technologies like Internet of Things (IoT) and cloud
technology to totally reimagine the facility delivery to the communities and buildings. This
company offers the customers such an innovative service delivery solutions which make
everyday life easier for all the citizen of urban area (Costamagna, 2013). This company offers
Urbanise platform that includes several functionalities like management of property and
community, maintenance of the asset, operation centre, mobile workforce, monitoring of the
assets, ecommerce for the services, portal of the customer and utility monitoring. This
company by its subordinate company named Mystrata Holdings Pty Limited that permits the
customers to manage the portfolios of the apartment buildings, co-ops, commercial towers,
condominiums and housing estates.
2.2. Sustainability Dimensions
Sustainability is mainly described as achieving needs of existing without negotiating
the capability of the upcoming generations to come across theirs (Dovers & Hussey, 2013).
There are mainly three dimensions present in the sustainable development which are
economic, social and environmental (Edgeman & Eskildsen, 2014). The three dimensions are
indicated to as people, profits and planet.
2.2.1. Economic Dimension
The economic dimensions of the sustainability is in which most of the businesses are
look like a firm. For sustainability, the business should be profitable (Geeraert, 2016). The
activities which fit under this economic dimension that include risk management, proper
governance and compliance. This economic dimension is sometime referred as the pillar of
governance that referred to the good corporate governance (Hák, Janoušková & Moldan,
2016). It means that the management and boards of directors bring into line with the benefits
of the shareholders along with the company’s end-user customers, value chains also
community (Han et al., 2014). The stockholders may wish to distinguish that the company

Running head: SUSTAINABLE ENTERPRISE
practices the transparent also accurate methods of accounting. The stockholders need
guarantees that the companies avoid the clashes of interest to choose the board members by
them rather the influence of any political party or any illegal practices (Hirsh, 2014). The
economic dimension provides the counterweight to the ultimate processes which corporations
are pressed to approve sometimes like chemical fertilizer or cancelling fossil fuels
instantaneously rather than phasing in modifications (Izvercianu & Ivascu, 2013). This
economic dimension is sometime referred as governance’s pillar which referred to the
respectable corporate governance. It means the management and boards of directors bring
into line with the interests of the shareholders as well as company’s end-user customers,
value chains also community (Lago et al., 2015). The stockholders may wish to differentiate
that company performs the crystal clear also perfect approaches of accounting. The
stockholders need assurances that the companies avoid the clashes of interest to choose the
board members by them rather the effect of any political party or any unlawful practices.
2.2.2. Social Dimensions
This social dimension ties back into other concept named as social license. The
sustainable business have provision also authorization of their stakeholders, staffs also
community in which it functions (Marnika, Christodoulou & Xenidis, 2015). There are
various approaches present to secure and maintain this support but it needs to treat fairly both
the locally also globally. On the side of the employee, businesses progress on the preservation
also plans of the engagement which includes much more responsive benefits like better
paternity and maternity profits, opportunities of learning also development and flexible
scheduling (Missimer, 2013). For the engagement of community, companies go through
many ways for giving back containing the sponsorship, investment, fundraising and
scholarships in the local public projects.

Running head: SUSTAINABLE ENTERPRISE
2.2.3. Environmental Dimensions
The environmental dimension gets most attention often. All the companies
concentrate on decreasing the water usage, packaging waste, carbon footprints also the
overall effect on environment (Sánchez, 2015). These companies have set up that they have
the advantageous impression on planet which have the positive impact in financial part. By
reducing the amount of the material which is used in the packaging generally decreases
complete expenses on these ingredients (Schader et al., 2016). Further businesses which have
the undeniable also the obvious impact on environment like food or mining production
approaches environmental dimension via the benchmarking and reducing (Marnika,
Christodoulou & Xenidis, 2015). The leading order effects are instant effects and
opportunities generated by physical presence of any software by way of any creation also the
procedure which is involved in its design and production. The energy efficiency does not
necessarily lead to the resource savings by itself and the reason behind this is the effects of
the potential rebound. The challenges with this environmental dimension is that there are the
externalities which are not captured (Schreurs & Steuwer, 2015). All-in charges of the carbon
dioxide, waste in general, land renovation and waste water are not so informal to compute
since always the companies are not the ones on hook for all the excess they produce
(Schwettmann, 2014). For that reason, the benchmarking arises to attempt and measure these
externalities, so the development to reduce these can track also report in the significant way.
Here this selected company is a software development company. The environmental
sustainability crosses with the software in the two domains. One is the Green in software
which means how developer can make the software more sustainable by environmentally and
how can they make the procedure of developing the software much more environmentally
sustainable (Singh et al., 2014). The other one is Green by software which means how
developer achieve the goals of environmental sustainability via the software. The selected

Running head: SUSTAINABLE ENTERPRISE
companies have initiate that the companies have the valuable impression on this planet that
have the progressive impact in the financial part of the company (Marnika, Christodoulou &
Xenidis, 2015). By dropping the quantity of the material which is used in the packaging
commonly reduces general expenditure on these materials.
2.3. Specific Sustainability Area
The three sustainable dimensions are economic, social and environmental which are
discussed above. From these the environmental dimension is most important for the chosen
enterprise Urbanise.com Limited. Especially, the environmental dimension has a huge
concerns the immediate effect of the resource efficiency and energy efficiency which can
effortlessly estimate for any fresh product by the understanding its functionality (Vetitnev,
Kruglova & Bobina, 2015). There is some argument about the energy efficiency that it
usually conflicts with the goals of quality for example energy performance trade off. There is
a process present where developer analyse the correlation between attributes of
environmental sustainability and attributes of standardized quality for identifying the effects
on the environment sustainability.
There are many indicators present which are definitely attentive on environmental
dimension of the sustainable development also the management of resource. The examples of
this type of indicators including ecological footprint, the ESI which is Environmental
Sustainability Index also the EPI which is Environmental Performance Index (Waas et al.,
2014). Both the EPI and ESI are developed by the CIESIN which is Center of International
Earth Science Information Network.
The energy efficiency of environmental sustainability is the energy level presentation
of any type of software and quantity of the resources of energy used below the stated
situations (Walker et al., 2018). The resource efficiency of environmental sustainability is

Running head: SUSTAINABLE ENTERPRISE
how proficiently the resources are used by any creation whenever creating the tasks and
serving the valuable workload (Zhang et al., 2018). So as to examine the environmental
dimension of the sustainability, cataloguing is significant meanwhile all interdependencies
connected to equally the environment also quality are produced for enquiry (Zollo, Cennamo
& Neumann, 2013). Alike grouping may also use to recognize the other features of the
sustainability dimensions which agree to the necessities of the quality.
The environmental sustainability goals at enlightening the human benefit despite the
fact of guarding the natural properties. If the software manufactured goods is considered, the
measurement goals at addressing the necessities of ecology containing the energy efficiency
(Burford et al., 2013). In the systems of software intensive, it does not think through only the
optimization and energy efficiency. Though, the major inspiration is the energy efficiency is
the significant feature also it has the straight consequence or the first order consequence on
this environmental sustainability (Dias, 2017). The leading order effects are instant effects
and opportunities generated by the physical presence of any software as any product also the
procedure which is involved in its design and production. The energy efficiency does not
necessarily lead to the resource savings by itself and the reason behind this is the effects of
the potential rebound (Marnika, Christodoulou & Xenidis, 2015). The effects in
environmental dimension of the software systems are mainly depended on the domain and
cannot analysed generally.
2.4. List and Assessment of Indicators for Monitoring
There are many dissimilar ways to discuss the sets of indicators. The use of the
indicator assures that the program of monitoring addresses only the key variables associated
with the significant impacts of environmental also improves the communication of
monitoring and reporting processes (Hák, Janoušková & Moldan, 2016). The environmental
indicators are discussed here. The main aims of the environmental indicators is to

Running head: SUSTAINABLE ENTERPRISE
interconnect the information about human activities also environment (Vetitnev, Kruglova &
Bobina, 2015). They can be especially beneficial to highlight the developing important
environmental influences for the period of the monitoring programs.
These indicators execute numerous functions. They can lead for well conclusions and
more operational actions by make simpler, instructive and creating combined information
obtainable to the policy creators (Schreurs & Steuwer, 2015).
The sustainable development indicators (SDI) generally comprise a combination of
the environmental, social and economic measures (Izvercianu & Ivascu, 2013). However,
other categories are sometime included in this such as cultural and institutional indicators.
These indicators have potential to turn the abstract concept of this sustainability into the
action. However this potential is very far from the achievement and it is proved difficult to
agree the standardized set of the indicators (Hák, Janoušková & Moldan, 2016). It is partly
for the reason of the conditions for the sustainability are not easily defined also because it
requires dissimilar actions in every environmental situation and the context of development.
There are many indicators present which are definitely focussed on environmental
dimension of the sustainable development also the resource management. Examples of this
type of indicators including the ecological footprint, the ESI which is Environmental
Sustainability Index and the EPI which is Environmental Performance Index. The ecological
footprint, actually developed by the Wackernagel and Rees. Both the EPI and ESI are
developed by the CIESIN which is Center of International Earth Science Information
Network.
Indicators can deliver a critical guidance to create the decision in several ways. This
can translate knowledge of social science and physical science into some units of information
that is manageable also can enable process of making the choice (Zollo, Cennamo &

Running head: SUSTAINABLE ENTERPRISE
Neumann, 2013). This can help for measuring also calibrating the evolution in the direction
of the aims of sustainable development. By early warning, this can prevent social,
environmental and economic damage (Schreurs & Steuwer, 2015). The sustainability
indicators are dissimilar from the traditional indicators like profit of the stockholders,
measure of water quality and many more. The indicators of sustainability replicate reality that
three dissimilar segments are tightly interconnected (Han et al., 2014). There are various
indicators present which are relevant to the enterprise such as economic indicators,
environmental indicators and social sustainability indicators.
3. Conclusion
From this above project, it can be concluded that the selected enterprise that is
Urbanise.com Limited is the sustainable enterprise. This company develops software which
enables the operators of building to automate, streamline, simplify and optimize the building
operations also the performance. This company offers Urbanise platform that includes several
functionalities like management of property and community, maintenance of the asset,
operation centre, mobile workforce, monitoring of the assets, ecommerce for the services,
portal of the customer and utility monitoring. This company uses the latest technologies such
as Internet of Things (IoT) and cloud technology to totally reimagine the facility delivery to
the communities and buildings. There are mainly three dimensions present in the sustainable
development which are economic, social and environmental. The economic dimensions of the
sustainability is in which most of the businesses are look like the firm. For sustainability, the
business should be gainful. The activities which fit under this economic dimension that
include risk management, proper governance and compliance. The social dimension of
sustainable development is worried mainly with social investment and building of safe and
secure communities. The environmental dimension gets most attention often. All the
companies focus on lessening their water usage, packaging waste, carbon footprints also the

Running head: SUSTAINABLE ENTERPRISE
overall effect on environment. The environmental dimension has a great concerns immediate
effect of the resource efficiency also energy efficiency that can smoothly approximate for any
fresh creation by understanding its functionality. The indicators of sustainability replicate
reality that three dissimilar segments are tightly interconnected. There are various indicators
present which are relevant to the enterprise such as economic indicators, environmental
indicators and social sustainability indicators. These indicators perform many functions. They
can lead for better decisions and more effective actions by simplifying, clarifying and making
aggregated information available to the policy makers. The sustainability enterprise are the
business by which users can gain the profit and all the sustainable dimensions are executed in
this chosen company named Urbanise.com Limited which are economic dimensions, social
dimensions and environmental dimensions.

Running head: SUSTAINABLE ENTERPRISE
4. References
Burford, G., Hoover, E., Velasco, I., Janoušková, S., Jimenez, A., Piggot, G., ... & Harder, M.
(2013). Bringing the “missing pillar” into sustainable development goals: Towards
intersubjective values-based indicators. Sustainability, 5(7), 3035-3059.
Chofreh, A. G., Goni, F. A., Shaharoun, A. M., Ismail, S., & Klemeš, J. J. (2014). Sustainable
enterprise resource planning: imperatives and research directions. Journal of Cleaner
Production, 71, 139-147.
Costamagna, F. (2013). The European Semester in Action: Strengthening Economic Policy
Coordination While Weakening the Social Dimension?. LPF-WEL Working Paper,
(5).
Dias, J. G. (2017). Environmental sustainability measurement in the Travel & Tourism
Competitiveness Index: An empirical analysis of its reliability. Ecological Indicators,
73, 589-596.
Dovers, S., & Hussey, K. (2013). Environment and sustainability: a policy handbook.
Federation Press.
Edgeman, R., & Eskildsen, J. (2014). Modeling and assessing sustainable enterprise
excellence. Business Strategy and the Environment, 23(3), 173-187.
Geeraert, A. (2016). It’s not that easy being green: The environmental dimension of the
European Union’s sports policy. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 40(1), 62-81.
Hák, T., Janoušková, S., & Moldan, B. (2016). Sustainable Development Goals: A need for
relevant indicators. Ecological Indicators, 60, 565-573.

Running head: SUSTAINABLE ENTERPRISE
Han, M. Y., Sui, X., Huang, Z. L., Wu, X. D., Xia, X. H., Hayat, T., & Alsaedi, A. (2014).
Bibliometric indicators for sustainable hydropower development. Ecological
indicators, 47, 231-238.
Hirsh, J. B. (2014). Environmental sustainability and national personality. Journal of
Environmental Psychology, 38, 233-240.
Izvercianu, M., & Ivascu, L. (2013). System Information for Risk Evaluation in the
Sustainable Enterprise. In Advanced Materials Research (Vol. 622, pp. 1633-1637).
Trans Tech Publications.
Lago, P., Koçak, S. A., Crnkovic, I., & Penzenstadler, B. (2015). Framing sustainability as a
property of software quality. Communications of the ACM, 58(10), 70-78.
Marnika, E., Christodoulou, E., & Xenidis, A. (2015). Sustainable development indicators for
mining sites in protected areas: tool development, ranking and scoring of potential
environmental impacts and assessment of management scenarios. Journal of Cleaner
Production, 101, 59-70.
Missimer, M. (2013). The social dimension of strategic sustainable development (Doctoral
dissertation, Blekinge Institute of Technology).
Sánchez, M. A. (2015). Integrating sustainability issues into project management. Journal of
Cleaner Production, 96, 319-330.
Schader, C., Baumgart, L., Landert, J., Muller, A., Ssebunya, B., Blockeel, J., ... & Gerrard,
C. (2016). Using the sustainability monitoring and assessment routine (smart) for the
systematic analysis of trade-offs and synergies between sustainability dimensions and
themes at farm level. Sustainability, 8(3), 274.

Running head: SUSTAINABLE ENTERPRISE
Schreurs, M. A., & Steuwer, S. D. (2015). Autonomous driving-political, legal, social, and
sustainability dimensions. In Autonomes Fahren (pp. 151-173). Springer Vieweg,
Berlin, Heidelberg.
Schwettmann, J. (2014, December). The role of cooperatives in achieving the sustainable
development goals–the economic dimension. In A Contribution to the UN DESA
Expert Group Meeting and Workshop on Cooperatives the Role of Cooperatives in
Sustainable Development for All: Contributions, Challenges and Strategies (pp. 8-
10).
Singh, N. J., Danell, K., Edenius, L., & Ericsson, G. (2014). Tackling the motivation to
monitor: success and sustainability of a participatory monitoring program. Ecology
and Society, 19(4).
Vetitnev, A., Kruglova, M., & Bobina, N. (2015). The economic dimension of volunteerism
as a trend of university research. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 214, 748-
757.
Waas, T., Hugé, J., Block, T., Wright, T., Benitez-Capistros, F., & Verbruggen, A. (2014).
Sustainability assessment and indicators: Tools in a decision-making strategy for
sustainable development. Sustainability, 6(9), 5512-5534.
Walker, S., Coleman, N., Hodgson, P., Collins, N., & Brimacombe, L. (2018). Evaluating the
environmental dimension of material efficiency strategies relating to the circular
economy. Sustainability, 10(3), 666.
Zhang, L., Zhang, B., Bao, H., & Huang, H. (2018). Optimization of cutting parameters for
minimizing environmental impact: considering energy efficiency, noise emission and
economic dimension. International Journal of Precision Engineering and
Manufacturing, 19(4), 613-624.

Running head: SUSTAINABLE ENTERPRISE
Zollo, M., Cennamo, C., & Neumann, K. (2013). Beyond what and why: Understanding
organizational evolution towards sustainable enterprise models. Organization &
Environment, 26(3), 241-259.