Report on the US Healthcare System: Funding, Performance, and Issues

Verified

Added on  2022/09/28

|3
|557
|34
Report
AI Summary
This report provides an analysis of the US healthcare system, highlighting its unique characteristics, funding sources, and performance. The report discusses the hybrid nature of the system, which operates on a mix of single and multi-payer insurance models, and the significant financial contributions from both the private and public sectors. It also examines the system's performance in comparison to other developed nations, focusing on issues such as lack of insurance coverage, high costs, administrative inefficiencies, and the impact on mortality rates. The report references several studies and publications to support its findings, comparing the US healthcare system's spending and outcomes with those of other countries. It concludes by emphasizing the need for improvements in areas like insurance coverage, administrative efficiency, and cost-effectiveness to enhance the overall quality of healthcare in the United States.
Document Page
Student name
Student No
Unit
Title: The Health System in the United States
tabler-icon-diamond-filled.svg

Paraphrase This Document

Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Document Page
According to Papanicolas, Woskie and Jha (2018), the health care system in the US is
unique. The system is not uniform, the health care coverage is not universal and the legislation
mandates health care coverage for everybody. The system could be described as hybrid as it
operates on single or multi-payer insurance system. The funding for the system comes from
different institutions. In 2014, 48 percent of the health care funds came from the private sector,
28 percent from the household and 20 percent from private businesses (Massialos, Wenzl,
Osborn and Sarnak, 2016). Among these, the federal government provided 28 percent and state
and local governments gave 17 percent. Citizen get health insurance from their employers though
privately purchasing them or through government initiatives.
Thought the government spends a lot on the health care system, the system remains a
low performer according to Commonwealth Fund and the US citizens (Osborn, Squires, Doty,
Sarnak and Schneider, 2016). The low performance is due to certain factors such as lack of
insurance coverage, it is expensive, inefficiency administration and underperformance. Having
more people insured will not definitely improve health care outcomes but it would reduce
mortality. A lot of time is wasted in billing and insurance claims while in nations such as
Netherlands and the UK management inefficiencies are minimized through a standardized basic
benefit packages (Boulware, Cooper, Ratner, La Veist and Powe, 2016). Comparing the US
health care system with other developed nations, researchers claim that quality and cost of their
system (US) is the reason for national debts (Wager, Lee and Glaser, 2017). Health care
spending in US was about 16.9 percent in 2018 while in other developed nation ranges around
8.8 percent.
Document Page
References
Boulware, L. E., Cooper, L. A., Ratner, L. E., LaVeist, T. A., & Powe, N. R. (2016). Race and
trust in the health care system. Public health reports.
Mossialos, E., Wenzl, M., Osborn, R., & Sarnak, D. (2016). 2015 international profiles of health
care systems. Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health.
Papanicolas, I., Woskie, L. R., & Jha, A. K. (2018). Health care spending in the United States
and other high-income countries. Jama, 319(10), 1024-1039.
Osborn, R., Squires, D., Doty, M. M., Sarnak, D. O., & Schneider, E. C. (2016). In new survey
of eleven countries, US adults still struggle with access to and affordability of health care.
Health Affairs, 35(12), 2327-2336.
Wager, K. A., Lee, F. W., & Glaser, J. P. (2017). Health care information systems: a practical
approach for health care management. John Wiley & Sons.
chevron_up_icon
1 out of 3
circle_padding
hide_on_mobile
zoom_out_icon
[object Object]