Risk Management in Construction: A Workplace Safety Report

This report delves into the critical aspects of safety and risk management within a construction workplace, using a real-world incident involving Canberra Construction Company as a case study. It meticulously examines the company's failure to implement adequate safety measures, leading to a fatal electrocution of a truck driver due to low-hanging power lines. The report details the workplace description, highlighting the absence of safety protocols, lack of hazard warnings, and the company's inadequate response to the incident. It identifies the low-slung power lines as the primary hazard and proposes preventive measures such as engineering controls, administrative controls, and worker training. The incident description outlines the events leading to the driver's death and the company's attempts to conceal evidence. The report analyzes the resolution process undertaken by Safe Work Australia, including investigations, compensation, and the eventual liquidation of the company. Finally, it suggests improvements to the resolution process, emphasizing the need for stricter penalties and enhanced worker training to prevent future incidents, offering a comprehensive overview of workplace safety failures and recommended improvements.

Running Head: SAFETY AND RISK MANAGEMENT 1
Safety and Risk Management
By
Institution

SAFETY AND RISK MANAGEMENT 2
Safety and Risk Management at Workplace
Introduction
Risk management is the process of identifying and prioritizing risks in the workplace
and making changes to reduce or eliminate the risks (Glendon, Clarke & McKenna, 2016). In
every working environment, in hospitals, construction sites, offices and many other
environments, risk management plays a major role. Various effects occur due to overlooking
of risk management. Among these effects includes accidents, injuries, loss of productivity,
damage products and finally causing the liquidation of the company (Glendon, Clarke &
McKenna, 2016). Putting all these effects together, every workplace should implement safety
and risk management practices that help in identifying and eliminating the hazards. Hazards
are very dangerous; they are any source of potential damage, harm, or adverse effects on
someone’s health (Hopkin, 2017). Identification of hazards is possible, and hence preventable
measures should be in place. This paper analyses a workplace identifies the available risks
and gives responses to solving the risk.
In the article, Michael Booth a driver of a truck succumbs to electrocution when his
truck hit low-slung power lines when working for Canberra Companies Kennos contractors.
The workplace was not conducive, making it risky for the driver. The following gives the
workplace description.
Workplace Description
Despite the formation of various acts by the ACT Worksafe to safeguard working
places and ensure workers safety, Canberra Construction Company did not provide the
necessary safety to the workers. The working environment was full of risks and hazards,
which was dangerous to workers. For instance, the electric wires, which were hanging and
finallyelectrocuting the truck driver, were avoidable hazards (Tylor, 2015).Hanging power
lines are dangerous and for the company not to consider themhazardous, was ignorance.
There were no signs on the power lines or a flag indicating danger; this was total ignorance.

SAFETY AND RISK MANAGEMENT 3
The company had no remorse for the losses that most of the employees were having.
After the death of Booth, there was no documentation from the company explaining how the
incident happened and how remorseful they were in losing a worker (Tylor, 2015). This helps
us understand the working place for this construction company. The working environment
was unsafe for the workers. Workers had no protective clothing when at work (Tylor, 2015).
At some point, this company had a case where a painter fell down and died due to injuries to
the head. This is an avoidable instance in that a helmet would be of help. With this condition
of the workplace, it is very unsafe for any worker and any employment happening is against
the set rules and standards (Knaus, 2012).
The conditions, highlighted in the above discussions, show the hazards that were
predisposing factors to harm. The risk factors contributing to the breach were avoidable, but
preventive measures were not in place before the occurrence of the safety breach. The hazard
that we find in the article is the low-slung power line, which was exposed. This hazard is
avoidable when effective preventive measures are in place. There are many preventive
measures which when applied, could lead to the avoidance of safety breach. Some of these
measures are engineering control measures, substitution and isolation control measures
(Gharaie, Lingard & Cooke, 2017).
Power lines are very dangerous on any construction site, and so precautions have to
be in place before the damage occurs. There are several precautions, which when considered
could have saved the life of the driver and the future of the company too. First, before the
establishment of a construction site at that place, safety and risk manager could probably
have pointed out the risk (Hegeman, 2013). This means that no risk manager was involved in
choosing the construction site as the present risk manager within site had no qualifications.
When deciding on a workplace site, companies should involve risk managers to identify any
risk available and analyze the danger of the risk, before establishing a site or abolishing the

SAFETY AND RISK MANAGEMENT 4
site.Electrocution of the driver was an avoidable condition; it is only that the company did not
put in place the preventive measures.
Secondly, the company could install different signs at the power line; this will send a
message to workers of the available danger. Whenever any point in a site is hazardous,
indicating by use of different methods will help prevent any safety breach from occurring. In
this incident, the company could install flagged warning lines to mark both the horizontal and
the vertical power lines and thus helping workers to understand where there is a danger. With
flagged power lines, every worker or a visitor within site will know of the availability of the
hazard at that point. Many companies employ this measure in preventing electrocution or
other minor injuries caused by electricity. It is a preventive measure, which keeps everyone
alert of the danger (Kim, Lewko, and Garritano, 2016).
Training workers is also a method that could prevent the breach from happening.
Training is an important aspect that helps to prevent workers from hazards and risk which
they could easily avoid (Demirkesen& Arditi, 2015). Workers should undergo various
training to understand the different types of hazards; they should be enlightened on hazard
identification and hazard avoidance (Demirkesen& Arditi, 2015). The worker needs to be
enlightened on their rights and in case of any risk they have to report. Training gives
employees authority and voice which is important for every employee.
Apart from preventive measures associated with the hazard, there are administrative
control measures which when put in place will prevent a breach from occurring. The
company should employ a qualified risk manager who would help in identification of the
hazards and risks and work towards eliminating or reducing the effects of the hazards (Zhang
et al., 2013). Training of the employees is also part of administration role to help prevent
them from hazards that can easily be avoided. If the company had all these preventive

SAFETY AND RISK MANAGEMENT 5
measures in place, the safety breach would not occur. The security breach was an avoidable
scenario, and it occurred out of ignorance and negligence.
Incident description
From the article, we get to understand the incident and what happened to the
construction site. A truck driver, working in the site was delivering the materials for
construction. At the point of delivering material, there were power lines which were lying
low. This was a hazard dangerous enough to cause death but wasn't addressed. The truck of
the driver hit the power lines, and finally, the driver succumbed to electrocution. This
incident was one that could be easily avoided by the company, but the company did not put
any measures in place. The company was very irresponsible that they did not remorse the
death of the driver, the company also tried to hinder investigations of the driver’s death. A
security officer at the company tried to alter the attendance records of the driver; this was to
clear evidence (Tylor 2015). All this indicate how irresponsible the company was to his
employees.
The incident occurred due to the state of which the company was regarding risk
management provision. The company did not consider the life of a worker as important. It
valued the services provided by the workers most and not worker’s safety. This describes
why the company was not able to employ the preventive measures to help avoid such an
incidence. This is just one of the many incidences that do occur daily in different construction
sites. The Canberra Company is one among many of the companies in Australia that have
safety cases on the court. Many construction companies have different incidences of
accidents at sites, but they do not address, as they take the incidence to be minor. With the
new safety and risk management rules created in by the government in 2012, companies
should understand the risk they take when they do not ensure safety at the workplace (Takala
et al., 2014).

SAFETY AND RISK MANAGEMENT 6
Resolution by Safe Work
Safe Work a governmental agency, whose main responsibility is to improve work
health, safety and workers compensation, is important when an incident occurs. It fights for
the rights of the workers against their ruthless employers (Takala et al., 2014). Safe work is
responsible for fighting for any employee when there are incidences occurring at the
workplace (Takala et al., 2014). In this construction site, where an employee has died due to
hazards, there are several ways that safe work used to resolve the problem.
In this incidence, Safe Work Australia employed some of their practice codes for
construction sites to help reach resolutions. Among the codesused, we have to monitor,
collecting, analyzing and reporting of the incidence as the first implemented policy (McInnes
et al., 2016). From the article, several investigations were taking place within site, this made
the company to get ways of walloping the required information. An officer in the company
was directed to alter the driver’s duty records in order to cover up the evidence. The incident
was then reported to the necessary authorities. We see the company ending up in court. This
is one of the methods that the safe work used in resolving the incident.
Secondly, the incident was solved with workers compensation code which states that
any work within a construction site or workplace, when encounters accidents while on the
site, receives compensation from the company (Battaglia, Frey & Passetti, 2014). The
incident in the article, led to the death of the driver and so the company was required to
compensate. Although the compensation fee could not exactly replace the driver’s presence
in his family, it helped in making the family understand justice can prevail.The company had
to pay a compensation fee of 1.1 million dollars to the family of the diseased.
Arrangements to abolish the construction site took place after the court trial. After a trial, the
company was ordered to undergo liquidation, meaning there will be no re-establishment of

SAFETY AND RISK MANAGEMENT 7
the company. The company was found with many allegations, which could have been
avoided. Since the company was ignorant and could not give value to their workers, the
company had to undergo liquidation. The compensation fee imposed to this incident was
huge that could lead to the company’s bankruptcy (Battaglia, Frey & Passetti, 2014).
The method used by safe work to handle the problem in the incident was good. There
were investigations that took place, the company ended up in court for trials and finally, a
judgment was out which did not favor the company. The company had to pay a fine of 1.1
million dollars due to negligence. This is great way employed in dealing with the
construction companies, although few aspects have to be emphasized on, for effectiveness in
an incident that could happen in future. First, the compensation fee or the fine given to the
company could be made slightly high, maybe 1.5- 1-8 million dollars, this would be a huge
amount of money that will make other contractors careful with safety measures. Having
proposed thisdoes not mean the fine was little but increasing that punishment would send a
great communication to the rest of the constructors as they will work to ensure workers'
safety and target not to get the penalty.
Workers at the construction site should undergo training to help them understand the
different types of hazards (Sacks, Perlman & Barak, 2013). The Safe Care team should
always enlighten workers on the need to having a voice at a workplace. Whenever an incident
occurs on a construction site, they should give training to the workers who by any chance did
not undergo the safety training. Workers should also undergo training to identify the different
hazards and how this hazards can be avoided and reported. When safe care embarks in doing
this, most of the workers will be enlightened, and the country will have reduced cases of
accidents at the construction site (Sacks, Perlman & Barak, 2013).
Every company, either small or big, should have safety rules that govern it. A
company running without the safety rules, is at risk of causing injuries to workers (Ozmec et

SAFETY AND RISK MANAGEMENT 8
al., 2015). The safety rules will define to workers on the procedure to follow in case they
identify a hazard. Safe Care should employ different mechanisms in which they are able to
identify companies with no safety rules (Ozmec eta l., 2015). Prevention should be Safe
Care’s priority and not handling the matter after the incident. The following are some of my
suggestion on how I would have addressed the problem the in the company if I were among
the workers.
Identifying the hazard and taking the appropriate measures could be my priority.
Workers in any company have other roles to play, they are not limited to performing the
duties allocated to them but should be concerned with their health and safety (Perlman, Sacks
& Barak, 2014). Communicating to the management would have been my first step when no
actions are taken in, would move to the external forces like Safe care. Company’s ignorance
and negligence on the hazard that was visible enough on the site led to the death of the driver.
This is enough to stop the company from proceeding further with their construction.
Conclusion
The Australian Government through Workplace Health and Safety agency has set
rules on how construction companies or any other working place should prioritize safety and
risk management. This will help in minimizing the damages caused by hazards. Many people
get injured, some become disabled, and others die every year due to overlooking risk
management. Putting this important function into place will help reduce the increased cases
of accidents at workplaces.

SAFETY AND RISK MANAGEMENT 9
References
Battaglia, M., Frey, M., & Passetti, E. (2014). Accidents at work and cost analysis: a field
study in a large Italian company. Industrial health, 52(4), 354-366.
Knaus, C. (2012). Canberra painter dies after falling from the roof. Retrieved from
http://www.canberratimes.com.au/act-news/canberra-painter-dies-after-falling-from-
roof-20120424-1xiho.html. Accessed 29/09/2017.
Demirkesen, S., & Arditi, D. (2015). Construction safety personnel's perceptions of safety
training practices. International Journal of Project Management, 33(5), 1160-1169.
Gharaie, E., Lingard, H., & Cooke, T. (2015). Causes of fatal accidents involving cranes in
the Australian construction industry. Construction Economics and Building, 15(2), 1-
12.
Glendon, A. I., Clarke, S., & McKenna, E. (2016). Human safety and risk management. CRC
Press.
Hegeman, K. (2013). Prevent electrical injuries on construction sites. Retrieved from
http://www.forconstructionpros.com/blogs/construction-toolbox/blog/10847488/
prevent-electrical-injuries-on-construction-sites. Accessed 29/ 09/17.
Hopkin, P. (2017). Fundamentals of risk management: understanding, evaluating and
implementing effective risk management. Kogan Page Publishers.
Kim, H., Lewko, J., Garritano, E., Sharma, B., Moody, J., & Colantonio, A. (2016).
Construction fatality due to electrical contact in Ontario, Canada, 1997–2007. Work,
54(3), 639-646.
McInnes, J. A., MacFarlane, E. M., Sim, M. R., & Smith, P. (2016). Working in hot weather:
a review of policies and guidelines to minimise the risk of harm to Australian
workers. Injury prevention, injuryprev-2016.

SAFETY AND RISK MANAGEMENT 10
Ozmec, M. N., Karlsen, I. L., Kines, P., Andersen, L. P. S., & Nielsen, K. J. (2015).
Negotiating safety practice in small construction companies. Safety science, 71, 275-
281.
Perlman, A., Sacks, R., & Barak, R. (2014). Hazard recognition and risk perception in
construction. Safety science, 64, 22-31.
Sacks, R., Perlman, A., & Barak, R. (2013). Construction safety training using immersive
virtual reality. Construction Management and Economics, 31(9), 1005-1017.
Takala, J., Hämäläinen, P., Saarela, K. L., Yun, L. Y., Manickam, K., Jin, T. W., ... & Lin, G.
S. (2014). Global estimates of the burden of injury and illness at work in 2012.
Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene, 11(5), 326-337.
Tylor, G. (2015). Canberra Construction Company fined $ 1.1 million over death of a truck
driver.
Votano, S., & Sunindijo, R. Y. (2014). Client safety roles in small and medium construction
projects in Australia. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 140(9),
04014045.
Zhang, S., Teizer, J., Lee, J. K., Eastman, C. M., & Venugopal, M. (2013). Building
information modeling (BIM) and safety: Automatic safety checking of construction
models and schedules. Automation in Construction, 29, 183-195.