Negative Impact of Workplace Violence/Stress on Waitrose Profitability

This research report examines the negative impact of workplace violence and stress on the profitability of Waitrose, a major UK retail company. The study employs a positivism research philosophy and a deductive approach, utilizing a quantitative method with a survey questionnaire administered to 100 Waitrose employees. The report investigates factors contributing to workplace stress, such as long working hours, abrupt organizational changes, routine work, and job insecurity. It aims to determine the extent to which these factors affect profitability, employing central measure of tendency and regression analysis. The literature review explores existing research on workplace stress, violence, and their effects on organizational outcomes. The methodology section details the research philosophy, approach, strategy, sampling methods, data collection, and analysis plans. The report concludes with recommendations for minimizing workplace stress and enhancing profitability, offering valuable insights for retail companies and academic researchers alike. The research also aims to address key research questions and objectives, including identifying the causes of workplace stress, its impact on profitability, and potential strategies for improvement.

“The analysis of the negative
impact of violence or stress in
the working environment on
firm’s profitability: A study
on Waitrose”

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This research study has been undertaken to put emphasis on illustrating the impact of
workplace stress or violence in the overall profitability of the organisation in the light of the
retail giant Waitrose. Because of the nature of the working environment of the Waitrose let alone
the retail companies that delineates extreme workloads, routine work and also constant changes
in the responsibilities because of the extreme competition the possibility of workplace stress and
violence is very high in Waitrose that may lead to the lower productivity of the organisation also
lower profitability as well. The underlying research will be helpful in illustrating to what extent
these factors affect the profitability of the organisation. Positivism research philosophy will be
adopted for this research along with the deductive research approach. The research study will be
quantitative in nature and close-ended survey questionnaire will be designed accordingly. For the
survey, 100 employees from Waitrose will be selected by convenient sampling method and the
response of the survey questionnaire will be collected by the personal visit of the researcher.
Central measure of tendency and regression analysis will be conducted to check to what extent
workplace violence and stress affect the profitability of Waitrose.
1

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title..................................................................................................................................................1
Chapter 01: Introduction..................................................................................................................1
1.1 Background of the Research..................................................................................................1
1.2 Rationale for the proposed research......................................................................................1
1.3 Research questions/aim/objectives........................................................................................2
1.3.1 Aim.................................................................................................................................2
1.3.2 Research Objectives........................................................................................................2
1.3.3 Research Questions.........................................................................................................3
Chapter 02: Literature review..........................................................................................................4
2.1 Workplace stress or violence.................................................................................................4
2.2 Factors contributing employee stress or violence..................................................................5
2.2.1 Long working hours........................................................................................................5
2.2.3 Abrupt and constant changes in the organisation...........................................................5
2.2.4 Boring routine works......................................................................................................6
2.2.5 Changes of responsibilities.............................................................................................6
2.2.6 Job Insecurity..................................................................................................................7
2.2.7 Short and tight deadlines................................................................................................8
2.2.8 Unsupportive work environment....................................................................................8
2.3 Impact of workplace stress or violence on the profitability of the organisation...................9
2.4 Conceptual Framework..........................................................................................................9
Chapter 03: Methodology..............................................................................................................11
3.1 Research philosophy............................................................................................................11
3.2 Research approach...............................................................................................................11
3.3 Research strategy.................................................................................................................12
3.3.1 Research population......................................................................................................12
3.3.2 Sampling frame, size and techniques............................................................................13
3.3.3 Data collection and measurement.................................................................................13
3.4 Pilot Study...........................................................................................................................14
3.5 Data analysis plan................................................................................................................14
3.6 Ethical consideration...........................................................................................................15
3.7 Time plan.............................................................................................................................15
Conclusion.................................................................................................................................16
REFERENCES..............................................................................................................................17
2

TITLE
The title of this research work is “The analysis of the negative impact of violence or
stress in the working environment on firm’s profitability: A study on Waitrose”
CHAPTER 01: INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background of the Research
The work dynamics of the business is constantly changing and is getting complex day by day
because of the ever-changing consumer demand pattern and also the change in the competitive
structure of the business. The organisations need to respond quickly to these changes and
challenges that evolve in the business world and employees stay at the heart of all of these plans
to be implemented successfully (Awara, 2011). These constant change plan and workloads often
give rise to the violence or stress in the working environment of the organisation which
ultimately results in the loss of organisational productivity and goodwill leading adverse impact
on the overall profitability of the organisation (Ambro, and Praprotnik, 2012). Waitrose belongs
to the highly concentrated and competitive retail industry of the UK (Raonek, 2013). The
workloads for the employees in the retail industry are high compared to the other industry
because of the nature of the business which needs constant interactions with the customers and
responding to their calls accordingly (Chen, et al, 2015). With the changing patterns of the
operational activities as well as the demand for increased service excellence and work time the
work stress is eminent among the workers of the Waitrose that may harm the overall profitability
of the company as a whole.
1.2 Rationale for the proposed research
This research has been carried out to illustrate the negative impact that workplace violence has
on the overall profitability of the organisation in the context of the UK’s one of the leading retail
industry in the UK. The underlying research will judge the severity of the different factors that
lead to the workplace stress such as the bad management practices, long hours, heavy workloads,
short deadlines, job insecurity, abrupt changes in the organisational culture, lack of freedom,
boring and routine work and also lack of support from the management on the creation of the
workplace violence and also on the overall profitability of the Waitrose. The underlying research
will fill be significant for all the retail companies to know about the potential causes that lead to
1

workplace stress in retail organisation workplace and how they affect the employee’s
performance and also the profitability of the organisation.
There have been previous researchers on the employee’s stress and workplace violence
and their impact on the organisational profitability and also performances but limited researches
have been done in the context of the retail industry and the underlying research study will fill this
gap by illustrating how workplace stress or violence affect the profitability of retail organisation
in the context of Waitrose along with the key factors that lead to this. The research study will
also be helpful for the enthusiastic academicians who like to determine the causes that lead to the
workplace stress. The research work will also work as a ground for the future researchers who
will opt to conduct similar kind of research study. The research will also be useful to gain
academic knowledge regarding the key aspects of workplace violence and the precise impact
analysis of this on the profitability of the organisation. The underlying research will also be
helpful for the managers of the retail companies as well to effectively maintaining the workplace
stresses as the potential recommendations will be made by the end of this research to cut down
the workplace stress in the context of retail businesses.
1.3 Research questions/aim/objectives
1.3.1 Aim
The aim of this research is to determine the factors that lead to the workplace violence or
stress and the negative impact that these have on the profitability of the organisation in the
context of the Waitrose.
Another significant aim of this research project is to help the manager of the retail
organisation to deal with stress and violence effectively and also to assist them in delineating
proper strategies in handling them. This research study has also been conducted in the aim of
extending academic knowledge and deep ideas regarding the selected workplace violence issues
and its impact on the organisational profitability.
1.3.2 Research Objectives
The objectives that will be met by this research are:
 To ascertain different causes that lead to create stress and violence at the workplace in the
retail industry of UK.
 To determine the way in which stress leads to create violence at the workplace in
Waitrose.
2

 To find out the relationship between stress and violence in Waitrose and the way in
which they create negativity.
 To identify the link between violence and stress with that to the profitability of Waitrose.
 To understand the consequences of workplace violence or stress in Waitrose and the way
in which it impacts upon its overall profitability.
 To recommend ways in which workplace stress can be minimised and organisational
profitability can be enhanced in context to Waitrose.
1.3.3 Research Questions
The questions that are going to be addressed by these research are:
 What are the reasons behind workplace stress or violence in the retail industry of UK?
 How does stress results in causing violence in Waitrose?
 How stress and violence are relatively leads to create negativity at the workplace?
 What is the link between stress or violence and profitability of Waitrose?
 What are the possible consequences of stress and violence on the profitability of
Waitrose?
 What are the ways in which Waitrose can minimise stress and violence at its workplace
to enhance their overall profitability?
3

Chapter 02: Literature review
The literature review section articulates the previous researcher’s opinions, judgements
and findings and also arguments regarding a particular topic. There are different theories that
may be used to develop literature review for research such as it may be developed only by
summarising the key sources, can also be developed by depicting summary and synthesising
discussions along with that and also can also be developed by building own conceptual
framework. It can be augmented, historical, methodological and systematic as well. Literature
review is important because it helps to understand the problem being studied, helps to determine
the areas that the researcher needs to focus on, achieve deeper knowledge regarding the research
topic, identify the gaps of the previous research and form research objectives and questions
according to that. The criticism of literature review is that it may lack relation to current context
and in some cases it may lead to the biasness of conducting a research. The literature review used
in the underlying research will help to understand the key factors associated with the workplace
stress or violence mentioned by the previous researchers and their impact on the wider context of
the organisation related to generating negative profitability.
2.1 Workplace stress or violence
In the view of Alam (2015) workplace stress is the discomfort or the dissatisfaction that
the workers feel because of the uneven treatments and inconsistencies they encounter at the
workplace. Gadomska (2013) added to this discussion by saying that workplace violence is the
result of the workplace stress and both internal and external factors lead to the workplace stress.
Van Den Broeck (2016) depicted that both employees own psychological factors, as well as
intra-organisational factors, contribute to the workplace stress and violence. Alam (2015) listed
that the psychological factors include the individual behavioural factors, background, education,
experience and also the culture of the employees and these shape up the overall workplace
approach and outlook of the employees that lead to the employee stress. Burnes (2015) argued
that individual’s internal psychological factors can be altered and marked the organisational
factors as the key factors that contribute to the employee stress level and also have emphasized
that organisational factors can dominate and alter the psychological factors in the context of the
employee stress level or violence. Williams & Cooper (2012) justified this statement by stating
that workplace culture, nature of the work, freedom, challenges, deadline, expectations and also
4

the performance targets are the key contributing factors that formulate the overall stress level of
the employees and overstress depict high employee dissatisfaction which eventually results into
the higher employee turnover and also the lower performance and productivity from the
employees.
2.2 Factors contributing employee stress or violence
Carriquiry (2017) mentioned that most of the factors that lead to the employee stress and
violence can be controlled by the organisation and their impact can also be minimised to a large
extent if adequate measures are taken. Chen (2013) argued that the factors that lead to employee
stress and violence may vary individual to individual and can also vary according to the context
of the organisations. The key factors that lead to employee stress or violence can be depicted
below:
2.2.1 Long working hours
According to Williams & Cooper (2012) the working hours for the employees in most
countries are fixed by the legislative authorities but in real there less application to that as
organisations are always keen to maximise their benefits by influencing the employees to
perform more in hope of giving extra pay rise and career growth and also by allowing overtime
schedules that eventually result in extra work stress and load. Eriksen (2014) argued that though
the companies hope for extra productivity and performances of the employees by involving them
long period of time in the workplace but eventually it doesn’t pay off as a study conducted by
Hussey (2016) reveals that the average productivity rate for the employees who work for 8 hours
a day are far greater than the employees who work for 10 or more hours. Krøtel And Villadsen
(2015) added that because of the increased cost pressure from the competitor’s organisations are
forced to bring out the maximum benefits from their employees hence their performance
indicating factors and appraisal factors are connected to the average working hours of the
employees that force the employees to be more engaged in the workplace which eventually result
in the workplace stress and dissatisfaction.
2.2.3 Abrupt and constant changes in the organisation
Mohr et al (2011) opined that in the last two decades there have been major changes in
the business world due to the technological evolutions, globalisations and also ever changing
consumers demand pattern and these factors are forcing organisations to bring constant and
frequent changes in the internal processes of the organisations. Choudhury (2014) opined that
5

changes are inevitable for the long-term sustainability of the business but these often lead to
workplace stresses and disagreements. Besides all the changes are not equally good and changes
mean the employees who are the key player connected to it needs to adjust themselves
differently to what they are not used to as added by Healey (2016) argued that the employees
often are unwilling to work under new organisational processes as it brings vagueness and adds
to a greater difficulty level and challenges if not communicated and implemented well and so a
feeling of discomfort works inside the minds of the employees when changes are announced.
Williams & Cooper (2012) commented that some changes may result into employee cut and
some changes may make it difficult for the older employees to cope up with and all these
uncertainties give rise to the protest and inconsistencies among themselves that hurt the company
badly in the long run.
2.2.4 Boring routine works
According to Cartwright & Cooper (2017) dynamic employees love challenges and
variations in the workplace but boring routine works where there is less opportunities for
creativities and differentiated thinking often lead to workplace stress and monotonousness. Raber
et al (2013) opined that workplace boringness depends on the nature of the business
organisations such as the retail industry which doesn’t produce their goods have less chances of
creativity and challenges at the workplace and employees are bound to repeat their daily tasks
over and over again which eventually results into monotonous attitudes and increases the overall
stress level of the employees. Powell & George-Warren (2014) argued that boringness doesn’t
only derive from the nature of the duty that employees perform but also is connected to the
career growth opportunities that the organisation enables to the employees. Loo (2016) marked
the career growth opportunity is one of the key motivational factors that ask for continuous effort
from the employees to perform better and contribute positively towards the growth of the
organisations and also help to keep the employees always motivated. Burnes (2015) opined that
career growth sets new set of targets and challenges for the employees that keep them always
active and committed to the organisation forming less stress and dissatisfaction in the workplace.
2.2.5 Changes of responsibilities
In the view of Carriquiry (2017) because of the changing working pattern and business
environment the organisations are asking for the multiple role-play from their employees because
of the operational cost-cutting pressure and so on and a person can’t be equally good at every
6

role he or she plays hence multiple role-play often leads to the stress and extra workloads of the
employees that ultimately result in inconsistent performances and also extra stress level of the
employees working in the organisation. Junare and Patel (2012) argued that aloof from the
multiple role-play requirement organisations shift and change the role of the employees as a part
of their organisational policy as well which is also a strong contributor to the workplace stress
level as new responsibilities mean new challenges and the employees may not have the same
level of comfort level and competency if they are asked to play new role abruptly. Eriksen
(2014) warned that organisations may face serious resistance from their employees in the event
of role play that may sometimes turn into workplace violence leading towards organisational
efficiencies but most of the organisations in recent times have no alternatives other than asking
their employees to be prepared for new challenges as the business environment is asking for new
capability build-up and changing technological infrastructure often ask for new skills from the
employees eventually leading towards extra stress level of the employees.
2.2.6 Job Insecurity
Hussey (2016) identified job insecurity is the basic and primary factor that contribute
significantly in creating workplace violence or stress as if employees are not sure of their
positions and sustainability in the organisation they will not be able to concentrate on their work
and will be always in agony which will result into the increase of stress level. Krøtel and
Villadsen (2015) argued that job insecurity doesn’t only relate the uncertainty of losing the job
anytime rather it also includes some factors such as the uncertainty associated with the salaries,
incentives, career growth opportunities, unequal treatment and so on and these factors also are
strong forces leading towards the creation of employee stress level at the workplace. Mohr et al
(2011) opined that because of the unreal performance expectations form the organisations the job
securities for the employees have reduced over the years and no matter how much good the
working environment is and how much salary does the organisation pay, the employees stress
won’t reduce if they are not secured their position in the job. Choudhury (2014) added to this by
saying that job insecurity creates fear and increased level of pressure that deters the best
contributions from the employees as employees remain over cautious of committing error in the
fear of losing the job. Healey (2016) marked job security as the fundamental factors for
workplace stress over everything as this plays vital role in delineating the overall contributions
from the employees.
7

2.2.7 Short and tight deadlines
Williams & Cooper (2012) mentioned that because of the restrictions of the total work
hours by law most of the organisations are asking the tasks that are given to the employees in a
relatively short time than the adequate level which brings more psychological pressure and
detreats the performance level of the employees leading towards workplace violence and stress.
Cartwright & Cooper (2017) opined that because of the increased performance pressures and
also the workloads the tight schedules are implemented by the company and also most of the
companies believe in the philosophy that the employees perform best under the pressure which is
eventually not the case as trying to reach the deadline in most cases employees mess up
everything and always suffer from anxiousness as well. Raber et al (2013) argued that short and
tight deadlines are logical if the organisation has the right resources and right persons in place
and organisations shouldn’t always go for short deadlines rather they can ask for short deadline
works at a fixed interval which result into greater acceptance from the employees reducing the
stress level and pressure from the employees.
2.2.8 Unsupportive work environment
Powell & George-Warren (2014) opined that even the challenging tasks get easier if the
workplace is supportive and congenial as the performance standard of the employees depend
much on the support and cooperation that the employees get from the workplace. Loo (2016)
workplace support and friendly attitudes from the co-workers help the employees to understand
the tough tasks and also to adapt with the changing and contradicting circumstances that lead to
the dissatisfactions and also the stress level of the workplace. Gadomska (2013) opined that
unsupportive workplace environment is the result of the bureaucratic organisational structure that
hinders the proper flow of communication and reach of the employees and without adequate
support employees remain unsure regarding their approaches that lead to confusion and rising
stress level in the mind of the employees as well. Alam (2015) argued that unsupportive
workplace environment is the result of some factors such as the absence of the safety equipment,
poor workplace decorations, lack of support from the co-workers, hostile attitudes from the
higher management and also the risks associated regarding the machineries and other stuffs in
the workplace and all these factors contribute equally towards the creation of workplace stress.
8

2.3 Impact of workplace stress or violence on the profitability of the organisation
In the view of Burnes (2015) workplace stress or violence leads towards the downfall in
the overall productivity and performance of the employees that negatively creates impact on the
organisational profitability overall. According to Carriquiry (2017) organisational profitability is
connected with some good indicators that depicts the good state of customer relationship
management, best uses of resources, increased productivity and also the consistencies in the
overall internal and external organisational processes. Junare and Patel (2012) articulated that
organisational profitability is the sound state of the organisation that is the result of the
excellence level of the performances of the functional departments of the organisation and
human resources remain at the heart of depicting the profitability of the organisation. Eriksen
(2014) added to this statement by opening that human resources are the key strategic asset for the
organisation as the competitive advantage and operational efficiencies are directly connected
with the competency and productivity of the human resources.
Hussey (2016) added that as human resources hold this much significance in the
organisation hence their satisfaction and comfort level are connected with the profitability of the
organisation and as the employee extra stress level creates fears, confusions and anxieties among
the employees hence it has an adverse impact on the profitability of the organisation. Krøtel And
Villadsen (2015) mentioned that everything in the organisation is connected to chain which
begins from the employees and if they are stressed out and are not being able to provide their
best performances it is more likely that this will have negative impact on the profitability of the
organisation overall by creating inconsistencies in the strategy implementation. Production target
reaches and also customer relationship management as well. Choudhury (2014) warned that
overstress among the employees may hurt the company badly especially for the companies that
depends much on the personal skill and competencies of the workers as loss of human resources
mean the loss of strategic assets for them which eventually jeopardizes their longtime
sustainability as well. Healey (2016) argued that though some pressure and stress in the
workplace may bring short-term benefits but eventually these are going to hurt the companies
severely in the long run as high employee dissatisfaction will mean higher employee turnover
and lower productivity and the end result is lower profitability of the organisations.
2.4 Conceptual Framework
The conceptual framework for the underlying research is provided below:
9

Figure 1: Conceptual framework
The conceptual factors show that factors like long working hours, abrupt and constant
changes in operations, boring routine works, heavy workloads, job insecurity, short and tight
deadlines lack independence, unsupportive work environment lead to workplace stress and
violence and result into the lower profitability of the organisations.
10

Chapter 03: Methodology
The design and outcome of the entire research study are connected to the methodology
selected by the research. The methodology of the research depicts the data collection strategy,
data analysis tools selection and also determines the way researcher reaches the conclusion. The
methodology selection is related to the flexibility factors and the orientation and background and
also rationale of the research. The details methodology that is going to be applied to this research
are below:
3.1 Research philosophy
The selection of the research philosophy is determined by the nature of the research
context and also the types of the propositions that the research wants to establish. To conduct this
research, the researcher will select positivism research philosophy. The researcher has preferred
positivism research philosophy over interpretivism, epistemology and realism because positivism
research theory is more objective and result oriented research philosophy by which the exact
conclusion can be made. Positivism research philosophy will also allow the researcher to depict
the casual relationship between the workplace stress and negative profitability in the context of
Morrison. Positivism research philosophy will also allow to judge the precise facts at first and
then draw conclusion according to that. For all of these reason the research will choose
positivism research philosophy to conduct this research.
3.2 Research approach
Two research approaches alternatives are available to them and those are the inductive
approach and deductive research approach. The data collection pattern, analysis tools and also
details research strategy are connected to the selection of the research approaches. According to
Goddard & Melville (2015) inductive research strategy depicts the approach which starts with
observations or tests followed by the pattern development and lastly ends with the establishment
of a new proposition. It is more scientific in nature that relates experimental study for a long
period of time through repeated experiment and observations. Gobo (2014) stated that deductive
approach differs significantly from the inductive approach as it is also known as the top-down
approach that is initiated with the explorations of the existing theories at first, followed by the
hypothesis testing and later confirming the hypothesis by data analysis and result generations.
The deductive approach also delineates conducting research on the existing established topic. For
11

this research study deductive approach will be preferred by the researcher over the inductive
research approach mainly because the researcher will choose to explore the already established
topic and also the researcher will opt to implement the hypothesis testing to depict the negative
impact that employee stress level has on the profitability of the company. The inductive
approach has not been considered because of the time involvement as well as the experimental
nature of the approach. The deductive approach has also been preferred as there are ample data
sources and also suits best in terms of the quantitative data that has been preferred by the
researcher in this context.
3.3 Research strategy
There are mainly two kind of alternatives available to the researcher regarding the
selection of the data collection strategy such as the quantitative research strategy and the
qualitative research strategy. Quantitative research focuses on the collection of the numerical and
statistical data and also the application of the mathematical and statistical techniques as
mentioned by Ketchen & Bergh (2014). On the other hand, the qualitative method focuses on the
collection of the descriptive facts and information and infers to the data analysis tools such as
thematic analysis for drawing the conclusion of the research as stated by Keys (2015). Between
qualitative research strategy and quantitative, the researcher will prefer to go for quantitative
research strategy as it best suits the context and also goes best with the close-ended survey
questionnaire method preferred by the researcher. The quantitative research strategy is also
consistent with the deductive research approach. By applying quantitative approach, the
researcher will design survey questionnaire close-ended in nature and will collect responses in
numerical form to apply mathematical and statistical tools. Qualitative methods will be avoided
as it is more suitable for an interview and long-term observations and in most cases it fails to
provide the accurate solutions rather establish a fact that requires deeper further research as
argued by Kothari (2014).
3.3.1 Research population
The survey questionnaire population for this research study are all the employees
working in the Waitrose as the research topic is related to the employee’s workplace stress and
violence. For interview the population are the all the employees working in Waitrose. To identify
the research populations the researcher will use survey monkey calculator. The research
population size result shown below.
12

https://www.surveymonkey.co.uk/mp/sample-size-calculator/(Accessed:).
3.3.2 Sampling frame, size and techniques
The survey will be conducted among the 169 employees which will be selected from 300
employees of Waitrose by using the convenient sampling method. According to Newman &
Benz (2011) convenient sampling technique is a non-probability sampling technique that helps
the researcher to select the participants from a group based on their reach, willingness and
flexibility of the researcher. The survey responses will be collected with the direct presence of
the researcher at 10 outlets of Waitrose situated in the London. Every employee participating in
the survey will be given 30 minutes’ time to fill up the survey form. The secondary data will be
mainly collected from the published journals, newspapers, articles and also the internet published
resources on the relevant topics. For this purpose, the academic articles and journals will be
gathered from some well-known websites called SCOPUS, FRANCES and SCIENCE DIRECT,
etc.
13

3.3.3 Data collection and measurement
The researcher will use both primary and secondary data for this research and for primary
data collection close-ended survey questionnaire comprising of different questions regarding the
workplace stress and also its impact on the organisational performance level has been used. For
close ended survey paper the following Likert Scale will be used:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Strongly
Disagree
Somewhat
Disagree
Disagree Neutral Agree Somewhat
Agree
Strongly
Agree
The survey participants will be asked to choose any of the close-ended options and give
tick marks on that. The survey data will be collected directly with the presence of the surveyor.
A semi-structured interview paper will be designed for the interview of the 10 selected managers
and previous appointment will be taken to interview them to learn about their views regarding
workplace stress and how they attempt to handle that.
3.4 Pilot Study
Han et al (2015) mentioned different types of research designs available to the researcher
such as the descriptive, experimental, semi-experimental and also correlational research design.
Among these research designs, the researcher will apply descriptive research study as it suits the
context of the research. The descriptive research study will help the researcher in conducting the
research by designing a survey questionnaire and develop the causal relationship between the
employee stress level and the profitability of the organisation. Experimental research design has
been avoided as it needs repeated observations and testing for a long time is more applicable
where there are no time and resources constraints as depicted by Pedro (2012). The survey
method will accompany the descriptive research method by complementing the researcher to
collect the real world responses from the respective parties to depict the original context.
3.5 Data analysis plan
For data analysis of this research, the researcher will prefer mathematical and statistical
techniques mainly as the research study is quantitative in nature. For recording and organising
the primary data collected through the close-ended survey, the researcher will opt to apply mean,
median and mode analysis to understand the trend of the data sets. To decide on discrepancies
among the data sets the researcher will apply the measure of the central tendencies such as
14

variance and standard deviation analysis. To mathematically prove the negative impact of the
workplace stress on the profitability of the organisation the researcher will also execute
regression analysis where the organisational profitability will be assumed as the dependent
variable and the various factors leading to organisational stress will be assumed as the
independent variable. The regression analysis will help the researcher to what extent employee
workplace stress or violence affect the profitability of the organisation precisely with
mathematical justifications.
3.6 Ethical consideration
There will be some accessibility issues regarding the data collection of this research.
Firstly, to conduct the survey on the employees of Waitrose the researcher will have to take
permission from the respective authorities of Waitrose at first and for that, a formal application
paper will be issued to the Waitrose authority seeking the permission for the survey. For the
company-specific data use relevant permissions will be taken and appropriate sources will be
mentioned. To maintain the ethics no discriminatory act will be allowed at the time of the survey
process based on the gender, background, religion and position in the company. The personal
contact information and data will be protected with due care and access to private data will be
restrained accordingly. Before mentioning anyone’s contact information relevant permission will
be taken. In terms of secondary information, appropriate sources will be mentioned to avoid the
copyright claim issues. No force, influence or coercion and harm to anybody will be conducted
during the research study.
3.7 Time plan
The timeframe for this research study is depicted below:
Table 1: Gantt chart
Task Start date Expected end date
Supervisor allocation May 2018 June 2018
Outcome and approval
For the proposal
July 2018 August 2018
Meeting with the supervisor
For ideas and structure
July 2018 August 2018
Literature review September 2108 January 2019
Development of methodology February 2019 April 2019
15

Planning for the research May 2019 July 2019
Data collection August 2019 October 2019
Data analysis November 2019 January 2020
Finding analysis February 2020 April 2020
Review and correction May 2020 June 2020
Submission July 2020 July 2020
Awaiting result August 2020 August 2020
Conclusion
The key aim of this research is to determine the potential reasons that lead to the
workplace stress level or violence at Waitrose and also to depict the impact of these factors on
the profitability of the organisation. The impact analysis will be done with the help of close-
ended survey paper and the data will be analysed by apply quantitative data analysis tools. The
conclusion will be drawn accordingly and recommended actions will be preferred to get rid of
the workplace violence or stress at Waitrose at the end of this research study.
16

REFERENCES
Alam, S. (2015). Employee Turnover in MFIs: Reasons & Remedies. SSRN Electronic Journal.
Ambro, M. and Praprotnik, M. (2012). Employee Motivation and Organisational Profitability.
Organizacija, 41(5).
Awara, N. (2011). Strengthening Customer Retention Through the Management of Customer
Relationships in Services Marketing. SSRN Journal.
Burnes, P. (2015). Voluntary employee turnover: why IT professionals leave. IT Professional,
8(3), pp.46-48.
Carriquiry, J. (2017). Impact of M&A on Employee Turnover. SSRN Electronic Journal.
Cartwright, S., & Cooper, C. (2017). Managing workplace stress. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Chen, B. (2013). Subjective Performance Feedback, Employee Turnover and Renegotiation-
Proof Contracts. SSRN Electronic Journal.
Chen, Y., Chen, C. & Hsieh, T. (2015). Correlation of service quality, customer satisfaction
customer loyalty, and lifestyle at hot springs hotels. Journal of International Management
Studies, August, 51-59.
Choudhury, K. (2014). Managing workplace stress. [Place of publication not identified]:
Springer, India.
Chung, Y. (2018). Workplace ostracism And workplace behaviours: A moderated mediation
model of perceived stress and psychological empowerment. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 1-
14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2018.1424835
Eriksen, B. (2014). Growing Pains: How Employee Turnover Affects Firm Performance. SSRN
Electronic Journal.
Gadomska, K. (2013). Significance of organisational alignment to organisational
efficiency. Organization and Management, 2013(3 (156).
17

Gobo, G. (2014). Glocalizing methodology? The encounter between local methodologies.
International Journal Of Social Research Methodology, 14(6), 417-437.
doi:10.1080/13645579.2011.611379
Goddard, W. & Melville, S, (2015), Research Methodology: An Introduction, 2nd edition,
Blackwell Publishing
Han, H., Wang, W. and Mao, B. (2015). Borderline-SMOTE: a new over-sampling method in
imbalanced data sets learning. Springer, pp.878--887.
Healey, J. (2016). Managing stress. Thirroul, N.S.W.: Spinney Press.
Hussey, D. (2016). Editorial. Employee turnover. Strategic Change, 7(6), pp.311-312.
Junare, D. and Patel, D. (2012). Studying Interrelation: Employee Turnover &
Technology. Indian Journal of Applied Research, 3(8), pp.445-446.
Ketchen, D., & Bergh, D. (2014). Research methodology in strategy and management.
Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Keys, P. (2015). A methodology for methodology choice. Syst. Res., 5(1), 65-76.
doi:10.1002/sres.3850050108
Kothari, C. (2014). Research methodology. New Delhi: New Age International (P) Ltd.
Krøtel, S. And Villadsen, A. (2015). Employee turnover in hybrid organizations: the role of
public sector socialization and organizational privateness. Public Administration, 94(1),
pp.167-184.
Loo, R. (2016). Managing workplace stress: A Canadian Delphi study among human resource
managers. Work & Stress, 10(2), 183-189. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02678379608256797
Mohr, D., Young, G. and Burgess Jr, J. (2011). Employee turnover and operational performance:
the moderating effect of group-oriented organisational culture. Human Resource
Management Journal, 22(2), pp.216-233.
18

Newman, I., & Benz, C. (2011). Qualitative-quantitative research methodology. Carbondale, Ill.:
Southern Illinois University Press.
Pedro, L. (2012). International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory & Practice.
(2012). International Journal Of Social Research Methodology, 15(6), ebi-ebi.
doi:10.1080/13645579.2012.735809
Peltokorpi, V., Allen, D. and Froese, F. (2017). Erratum: Organizational embeddedness, turnover
intentions, and voluntary turnover: The moderating effects of employee demographic
characteristics and value orientations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(4), pp.612-
612.
Pereira, V., Malik, A. and Sharma, K. (2015). Colliding Employer-Employee Perspectives of
Employee Turnover: Evidence from a Born-Global Industry. Thunderbird International
Business Review, 58(6), pp.601-615.
Peterson, J. (2015). Employee Bonding and Turnover Efficiency. SSRN Electronic Journal.
Pierce, L. and Snyder, J. (2017). Unethical Demand and Employee Turnover. SSRN Electronic
Journal.
Pohler, D. and Schmidt, J. (2015). Does Pay-for-Performance Strain the Employment
Relationship? The Effect of Manager Bonus Eligibility on Nonmanagement Employee
Turnover. Personnel Psychology, 69(2), pp.395-429.
Powell, R., & George-Warren, H. (2014). The working woman's guide to managing stress.
Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Raber, M., Dyck, G., & Crisp, M. (2013). Managing Stress for Mental Fitness. Menlo Park:
Crisp Publications, Incorporated.
Rajan, D. (2016). Employee Turnover and Employee Performance:A Study among
Nurses. ANVESHAK-International Journal of Management, 5(2).
Raonek, S. (2013). The employee productivity, the contributor to organizational growth.
Organizacija, 11 (2).
19

Sapovadia, V. and Patel, S. (2017). Business Ethics & Employee Turnover: CAFE Matrix. SSRN
Electronic Journal.
Siyanbola, T. and Gilman, M. (2017). The extent of employee-turnover in Nigerian SMEs:
employees’-owner/managers’ standpoint. Employee Relations, pp.00-00.
Sum, V. (2012). Stock Returns and Employee Turnover. SSRN Electronic Journal.
SWARNALATHA, D. and T. S. PRASANNA, T. (2014). Employee Engagement and Employee
Turnover. Indian Journal of Applied Research, 4(5), pp.328-329.
Van Den Broeck, J., Broeckx, F. and Kaufman, L. (2016). Decomposing stochastic frontier
efficiency into secular and organisational efficiency. Journal of Computational and Applied
Mathematics, 37(1-3), pp.251-264.
van Dixhoorn, J. (1997). Stress at the Workplace: Health and Productivity—ISMA-5.
International Journal Of Stress Management, 4(4), 233.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/b:ijsm.0000008684.86816.7b
Williams, S., & Cooper, L. (2012). Managing workplace stress. Chichester: Wiley.
Zhang, L. (2012). Information Specificity, Employee Turnover and Information Loss. SSRN
Electronic Journal.
https://www.surveymonkey.co.uk/mp/sample-size-calculator/(Accessed:).
20