logo

HRMT20029 : International Employment Relation

   

Added on  2021-01-13

13 Pages2838 Words49 Views
Languages and CultureEconomics
 | 
 | 
 | 
ROLE OF STATE INEMPLOYMENT RELATIONSAssessment 2Khushi Vasireddy12106615HRMT20029
HRMT20029 : International Employment Relation_1

12106615CQUniversityHRMT20029TABLE OF CONTENT Executive summary............................................................2Introduction.................................................................................3Historical Context..........................................................................3Role of State................................................................................4IR Legislation......................................................................5Employment relations in Germany......................................................5Collective bargaining..............................................................5Workcouncilandunions..........................................................6 Employment Relations in Japan.........................................................6Tradeunionsinjapan..............................................................6JointLabour-ManagementConsultation........................................71
HRMT20029 : International Employment Relation_2

12106615CQUniversityHRMT20029Atypical employment in Germany and Japan..........................................7Conclusion.................................................................................9Reference.................................................................................10Executive summary For this assessment I have compared the role of state for Germany and Japan. Althoughbeing on different continents they have developed into coordinated market economies.Typically, Asian countries like China, South Korea or India have liberal market economieswhere the Labour laws are left for the market to be regulated. Japan is an exception to that.Similarly, countries like US, UK or France in the western developer are also liberal marketeconomies, whereas Germany is not. I have done showed the impact of trade unions andwork councils for Germany followed by the unions and Labour management consultation forJapan which are the basic ways the state plays a role in these countries. As the rise ofatypical employment has impacted both these traditionally coordinated countries, these havebeen shown using graphs. Finally, the similarities and dissimilarities are explored followedby the conclusion. 2
HRMT20029 : International Employment Relation_3

12106615CQUniversityHRMT20029IntroductionAll industrialised countries are generally either Coordinated Market Economies (CMEs) orLiberal Market Economies (LMEs). The political preferences of large businesses andstrategic options that generate domestic produce are driven by the different types ofworkforce skills. CME's generally have workforce which has specific skills. The employerstend to give training in intensive programmes. The workforce and employers have extensivenegotiations regarding the issues relating to employee development. They usually produceblue collar work skills sets (Wilkinson, Wood and Deeg, 2018). In countries that have theliberal market economies the issue of coordination between the firm and its employees andalso its other stakeholders are resolved through market mechanisms. In essence these are freemarket economies (liberal market economy, 2020).Germany is a coordinated market economy, which has companies that are focused on a fixedset of high-quality products, adequate and sufficient skilled workforce pool. They have verystrong and developed long term relationship between company and employees, with greatopportunity for debate and negotiations to achieve greater benefit to the economy (Germany:rebalancing the coordinated market economy in times of disruptive technologies — PolicyNetwork, 2020). Japan, similarly, is also a Coordinated Market Economy, whereby most of the workforce isgetting trained at the beginning of their work life or career. The state plays a role in ensuringthe workforce is coordinated with the employers by setting principles that are beneficial toencourage collective bargaining. 3
HRMT20029 : International Employment Relation_4

End of preview

Want to access all the pages? Upload your documents or become a member.

Related Documents
HRMT20029 International Employment Relations : Assignment
|10
|2879
|123

Comparative Employment Relations in Europe
|10
|3524
|61

Labour Relations Management in Singapore
|11
|2355
|315

Alberta Union Labour Relations
|5
|1165
|416

HUMAN RESOURCE Human Resource and Industrial Relation Strategy Name of the Student Name of the University Author Name
|8
|1765
|388

Challenges Faced by Service Workers in the Fast Food Industry
|7
|1594
|378