This essay recaps the differences and impact of Semler's style of leadership and management in earlier and later stages of his life, and evaluates their applicability for streamlining business operations and increasing productivity in an organization.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
1 Organization Behaviour Identification of the issue The aim of this essay is to recapitulate the differences and the impact of Semler’s style of leadership and management in the earlier and later stages of his life. This will allow one to understand the necessity of leadership within a business environment. The knowledge gained from the Semler’s styles would be evaluated for their ability to be adopted for streamlining business operations and increasing productivity in an organization. For the sake of privacy, the name of the organization will not be mentioned. Early styles criteria selection and analysis Semler’s initial style of management and leadership was synonymous with the rule of an iron fist.Theorganizationoperatedaroundregulationsandfixedprotocolsthatwerestrictly maintained. However, productivity was still at a low even when the employees were working overtime. As a result, the environment of the company became grim as everyone suffered from stress and pressure. Semler received an ultimatum from the doctor regarding his own stress level which caused him to revolutionize working patterns. Late styles criteria selection and analysis The later style of business is identified by a democratic way of management, where the employees are allowed to take major decisions on their own. In return, the employees were dependent on one another, rather than the management or the Semler himself for running the business. This system was first used in the Botanique hotel and was later extended to the Senco company. Another key style was the one where the employees were shifted from one position or department to another. This forced them to learn new things, gain greater first-hand knowledge about the system and work processes (Zak, 2018). This enabled them to guide the employees under them and also increased the overall productivity of the company. Identification of contingencies and analysis The work culture present in my company is closer to Semler early styles. Even though, the styles are not as rigid. However, in the chosen company, employees do not have the freeway to control or fashion their work on their own. They are dependent on their superiors and have to work in a way that is deemed to be fit by them. Applicability to my organization Semco’s working culture can be implemented easily as the chosen organization has a low number of employees and their work also does not vary much from one another. It will be able to
2 Organization Behaviour empower and develop the employees to be able to take their own decisions which will improve the quality of work produced by them and they will take on the role of a self-aware leader who is not only proficient in their respected fields but also has an understanding of other departments (Hunt & Fitzgerald, 2018). Theoretical framework comparison Another theory that can be applied in the organization is Behavioral theory of leadership. Behavioral leadership is more focused on the behavior and actions of the leader rather than their traits. This model would also be able to culture the behavior of a person and make him adapt to the given role of leader. Whereas, Semler’s philosophy underlines the importance of achieving a balance between the employee and the job they perform. It has to be one that is well suited to the capabilities and skills of the employee. Only then will the productivity increase from an internal impetus for growth. Overall Evaluation Semler himself has identified that the developed style of leadership is not fit for all business environments. It is more suitable for organizations where the employees are individualistic and quite adept at their own work. However, this idea of leadership also taps into the basic qualities and capabilities of the employees and pushes them to develop it. As a result, the employee productivity levels are increased. Recommended action Semler’s mode of management also need to be applied in the manner the bosses and the head of an organization operate. In this model, even their contribution to the company is put to a test and evaluated by the employees themselves. As a result, not only the employees but also the managing departments have to better themselves.
3 Organization Behaviour References Hunt, J., & Fitzgerald, M. (2018). STYLES OF LEADERSHIP.Leadership: Regional and Global Perspectives, 62. Zak, P. J. (2018). The neuroscience of high-trust organizations.Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research,70(1), 45.