Critical Evaluation of Failure of Peripheral Intravenous Catheters
Verified
Added on  2023/04/05
|12
|2457
|85
AI Summary
This document provides a critical evaluation of the failure of peripheral intravenous catheters and the effectiveness of using skin glue as an intervention. It includes information on the research design, results, and implications for nursing practice.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
SONM Us e On ly2806 NRSAssessment 3,Trimester1,2019 Assessment 3:Critical Evaluation (2000words) Weighting 50% Due date: 17:00hrs May 13, 2019 Critical Evaluation Template (Do not submit this table template) Introduction PICOComplete this table What is the problem/population? Failure of peripheral intravenous catheters What is the intervention? the addition of skin glue to standard peripheral intravenous catheter What is the Comparator? to use of skin glue or not What is theprimary outcome? peripheral intravenous catheter failure at 48 hours, irrespective of the cause 1
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
SONM Us e On ly2806 NRSAssessment 3,Trimester1,2019 What are the secondary outcome/s? The failure of the individual modes of a peripheral intravenous catheter such as infection, phlebitis, dislodgement, or occlusion Critical Appraisal models Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP). (Critical Appraisal Skills Programme, 2018) JournalThe journal of the Annals of Emergency Medicine is highly regarded because it has monthly ISSN of 0196-0644 and E-ISSN of 1097-6760 (Clarivate Analytics, n.d.). The journal was published in Australia. This implies the findings of the research are credible and can be relied upon for decision making. Authorsthe authors are experts in the field because all of them have attained masters level and above, and have experience because they are attached to reputed hospitals. Title, Abstract and Literature Review A good journal article title should have the problem of investigation, the target population, and the method of study (Orcher, 2016). The title of the research paper is consistent with the text because it is in line with the study objective which is to examine if the failure rate of peripheral intravenous catheters could be minimized by 2
SONM Us e On ly2806 NRSAssessment 3,Trimester1,2019 the addition of skin glue to it. The significant features of an abstract include the study objective, methods, results and conclusion, all of which are reflected in this research study (Dewan & Gupta, 2016). The literature has also been cited in the background and it’s relevant but brief. Research Design The research utilized nonblinded, randomized control trial quantitative type of study design which belongs to the level I evidence (Balshem et al., 2011). Does the addition of skin glue to the insertion site of the peripheral intravenous catheters in the ED minimize the failure of the device at 48 hours?” The research was significant because the most commonly used medical invasive device in hospitals is the peripheral intravenous catheters. Approximately 80% of the all the admitted patients undergo the medical insertion during their stay in the emergency department (Limm, Fang, Dendle, Stuart, & Warburton, 2013; Zingg,& Pittet, 2009). The study has hypothesized that the addition of skin glue to the site of insertion of the peripheral intravenous catheters in the ED will minimize the rate of failure at 48 hours. This is a scientific hypothesis (Javanmard & Montanari, 2014). The participants were divided into two groups: the standard group (with standard peripheral intravenous catheter securement) and skin glue group (with standard peripheral intravenous catheter securement in addition to the skin glue at the insertion site). Cloth-bordered transparent polyurethane dressing and tape was applied to the 3
SONM Us e On ly2806 NRSAssessment 3,Trimester1,2019 patients in the standard group, whereas those in the skin glue group received one drop of cyanoacrylate glue at the insertion site and one additional drop under the peripheral intravenous catheter hub. The sample The population of interest comprised of patients who required hospital admission had to be 18 years and above, had a patent upper limb peripheral intravenous catheter inserted through intact skin by a healthcare provider The research took place at Caboolture Hospital which is a community hospital located in North of Brisbane. The hospital has 52,000 emergency presentations each year. All eligible participants were screened by one of the three trained emergency research nurses. The screening was done after ascertaining that a patient needed hospital admission so as to differentiate from those being discharged from the emergency department. The selected patients had to be aged 18 years and above had to have a peripheral intravenous catheter inserted at a patent upper limb through a healthy skin by an ED nurse or doctor. The researchers obtained ethical approval from the human research ethics committee of the hospital. Data collection The study gathered data on patient and PIVC characteristics using patient questionnaire and through observation. These included the age, mean, PIVC failure, infection, phlebitis, dislodgement and occlusion. The primary outcome was measured by the failure of the peripheral intravenous catheter at 48 hours, defined as a combination of one or more of phlebitis, infection, dislodgement and occlusion. The 4
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
SONM Us e On ly2806 NRSAssessment 3,Trimester1,2019 research nurses individually examined the outcomes (as long as the patient was still admitted) or by telephone once the patient had been discharged, at 48 hours or above after enrolment. Device failure was recorded if the peripheral intravenous catheter was replaced during the initial 48 hours. Secondary outcomes were measured using the failure of each of the modes of the peripheral intravenous catheter. Data was collected using time in which any changes in the peripheral intravenous catheter at 48 hours was a failure. Quality tools such as peripheral intravenous catheter devices were used as the unit of measurement and analysis. The devices are standardised and thus the quality of the tool was guaranteed. Data was collected by research nurses who randomized the patients into two groups namely the standard care group and the skin glue group. Peripheral intravenous catheter securement using cloth-bordered cloth transparent polyurethane dressing plus tape was carried out on the standard care group, whereas the skin glue group was administered with a single drop of cyanoacrylate glue at the insertion site of peripheral intravenous catheter skin. The research nurse used the peripheral intravenous catheter devices as the unit of measurement and then recorded the time difference between the initial peripheral intravenous catheter insertions up to the use of peripheral intravenous catheter dressing. Bias is defined as the tendency of a process of measurement to under or over-estimate the value of a population parameter (Simundic, 2013). The authors used randomization which reduces researcher bias by all means because the participants are allocated to groups by chance rather than by choice (Rosenberger, & Lachin, 2015; Suresh, 2011). 5
SONM Us e On ly2806 NRSAssessment 3,Trimester1,2019 Data Analysis The quantitative results were presented in the form of tables. Table 1 contained the patient and PIVC characteristics in which the demographic data such as age, mean, PIVC readings, insertion site, the time difference in hours between insertion to intervention etc were recorded. Table 2 comprised of the primary and secondary results measures across three parameters and in percentage, namely standard care no, skin glue and the difference at 95% CI. The primary results were reported in the form of PIVC failure, whereas the secondary outcomes in the form of the four models of peripheral intravenous catheter insertions Results The results answer the research question because they determine the device failure at the rate of 48 hours when the skin glue is used and during the normal standard process without the glue. The study doesn’t suggest any further research. Multiple suggestions for the implication of the study in healthcare have also been made. There was a 10% absolute reduction in the failure of the device; an indication that ten are needed to be treated in order to prevent one peripheral intravenous catheter failure. The implication of this finding is that the statistically low rate of dislodgement influenced the reduction even though the research was not designed to ascertain the variations in secondary output 6
SONM Us e On ly2806 NRSAssessment 3,Trimester1,2019 Conclusion The application of skin glue alongside the use of standard care to minimize the rate of failure of the peripheral intravenous catheter for patients aged 18 years and above is successful and effective. The use of skin glue reduced the peripheral intravenous catheter failure by 10%, and there was a reduction in rates of phlebitis and occlusion. Therefore, the use of skin glue to augment the standard peripheral intravenous catheter should be encouraged by all healthcare practitioners in order reduce the prevalence of the failure of peripheral intravenous catheter insertion (Simonova et al., 2012). The patients are expected to benefit from the significant reduction in peripheral intravenous catheter failure in terms of patient comfort and outcomes. However, there is a need for a future cost-benefit analysis to determine the cost-effectiveness of the approach (Bugden et al., 2016). Relevance to nursing practice The research is relevant to the clinical setting in various ways namely to the patients, clinical expertise, and in agreement with available evidence. The patients who received the intervention experienced an absolute reduction of 10% failure in the device. Consequently, there was a lower rate of dislodgement. Moreover, the patients that received the skin glue reported low rates of phlebitis and occlusion. The method of applying skin glue is fast and simple to undertake in a busy emergency department setting. The technique does not have adverse side effects when dislodging the insertion 7
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
SONM Us e On ly2806 NRSAssessment 3,Trimester1,2019 (Rickard et al., 2015). Substantial reduction in the failure rate of the peripheral intravenous catheter will be of value to the patients because they will experience comfort and outcomes. The patients will incur considerably 30% cost of the peripheral intravenous catheter replacement. This implies that healthcare access will increase because such services will be affordable and the extended stay at the hospital will be reduced as well. The research is also relevant to the clinical setting because it informs the clinical expertise in multiple ways. Healthcare providers can now use the findings of this research as a basis for improving the quality of their services when using peripheral intravenous catheter insertions. Furthermore, they will reduce the rates of dislodgements. The findings indicate that there was a high generalization, and thus the research design can be replicated in other studies examining relatively similar subject areas (Polit & Beck, 2010). Healthcare providers can also gain clinical skills such as the side effects of the use of skin glue and thus exercise preventive measures. The use of skin glue takes less time and thus increasing staff time with the patients. Thus nurses can have more time with their patients thus building a strong nurse-patient relationship which is necessary for effective healing. Moreover, quality healthcare service promotes hospital flow because patients are satisfied with the services and thus are willing to follow existing policies and regulations of the hospital. Furthermore, the use of skin glue in addition to peripheral intravenous catheter insertions reduces the costs of operation because the research found out that skin glue costs 30% of the cost of the standard insertion procedure. 8
SONM Us e On ly2806 NRSAssessment 3,Trimester1,2019 The study is relevant to the clinical nursing setting because it is in agreement with the existing evidence. For instance, this is the first randomized controlled trial that uses skin glue in addition to peripheral intravenous catheters in the emergency department. Thus, the findings add more information to the field of research and also provides room for additional research. The outcomes of this study are consistent with those of Marsh et al. (2017) who found out that the rates of failure were approximately 35%, whereas this study had a failure rate of 28% in the control group. Previous literature has indicated that the common factor leading to devise failure was insufficient sticking of the peripheral intravenous catheter to the skin of the patient leading to dislodgement, bacterial infection, and irritation (Marsh et al., 2017). The findings of this study are consistent with those of 3 because this study found out that the addition of skin glue to the insertion significantly reduced the rate of device failure by 10%. 9
SONM Us e On ly2806 NRSAssessment 3,Trimester1,2019 References Balshem, H., Helfand, M., Schünemann, H. J., Oxman, A. D., Kunz, R., Brozek, J., ... & Guyatt, G. H. (2011). GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence.Journal of clinical epidemiology,64(4), 401-406. Bugden, S., Shean, K., Scott, M., Mihala, G., Clark, S., Johnstone, C., ... & Rickard, C. M. (2016). Skin glue reduces the failure rate of emergency department–inserted peripheral intravenous catheters: A randomized controlled trial.Annals of emergency medicine,68(2), 196-201. Clarivate Analytics (n.d.).Master Journal List: Annals of Emergency Medicine. Retrieved fromhttp://mjl.clarivate.com/cgi-bin/jrnlst/jlresults.cgi? PC=MASTER&Word=*Annals%20of%20Emergency%20Medicine Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (2018).CASP (Randomised Controlled Trial) Checklist. Retrieved fromhttps://casp-uk.net/casp-tools-checklists/ Dewan, P., & Gupta, P. (2016). Writing the title, abstract and introduction: Looks matter!.Indian pediatrics,53(3), 235-241. Javanmard, A., & Montanari, A. (2014). Confidence intervals and hypothesis testing for high- dimensional regression.The Journal of Machine Learning Research,15(1), 2869- 2909. Limm, E. I., Fang, X., Dendle, C., Stuart, R. L., & Warburton, D. E. (2013). Half of all 10
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
SONM Us e On ly2806 NRSAssessment 3,Trimester1,2019 peripheral intravenous lines in an Australian tertiary emergency department are unused: pain with no gain?.Annals of emergency medicine,62(5), 521-525. Marsh, N., Webster, J., Mihala, G., & Rickard, C. M. (2017). Devices and dressings to secure peripheral venous catheters: A Cochrane systematic review and meta- analysis.International journal of nursing studies,67, 12-19. Orcher, L. T. (2016).Conducting research: Social and behavioral science methods(2nded.). New York, NY: Routledge. Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2010). Generalization in quantitative and qualitative research: Myths and strategies.International journal of nursing studies,47(11), 1451-1458. Rickard, C. M., Marsh, N., Webster, J., Playford, E. G., McGrail, M. R., Larsen, E., ... & Dunster, K. R. (2015). Securing All intraVenous devices Effectively in hospitalised patients—the SAVE trial: study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial.BMJ open,5(9), 1-7. Rosenberger, W. F., & Lachin, J. M. (2015).Randomization in clinical trials: theory and practice(2nded.).New Jersey, NJ. John Wiley & Sons. Simonova, G., Rickard, C. M., Dunster, K. R., Smyth, D. J., McMillan, D., & Fraser, J. F. (2012). Cyanoacrylate tissue adhesives–effective securement technique for intravascular catheters: in vitro testing of safety and feasibility.Anaesthesia and intensive care,40(3), 460-466. Simundic, A. M. (2013). Bias in research.Biochemia medica: Biochemia medica,23(1), 12- 11
SONM Us e On ly2806 NRSAssessment 3,Trimester1,2019 15. Suresh, K. P. (2011). An overview of randomization techniques: an unbiased assessment of outcome in clinical research.Journal of human reproductive sciences,4(1), 8-18. Zingg, W., & Pittet, D. (2009). Peripheral venous catheters: an under-evaluated problem.International journal of antimicrobial agents,34, S38-S42. 12