Aboriginal and Torres Islander community

Running head: NURSING ETHICS
NURSING ETHICS
Name of the Student:
Name of the University:
Author’s Note:

NURSING ETHICS1
Ethics is the study that involves practical reasoning and the nurses on a daily basis
have to face ethical dilemmas. A number of factors determines ethical behaviour; thus, for
one person, it might be ethical but for others, it may vary as per the situation point of view
(Brans, 2019). Nurses are directed to act according to the ethical concepts during the delivery
of care. Nurses form a bridge between the two most important stakeholders in healthcare,
patients and doctor and thus, act a meditator in transferring information to maintain an
adequate flow of communication and thus, ethical dilemmas concerning these two people are
found to occur in most of the times. In this narrative, an ethical dilemma related to informed
consent will be discussed. A woman belonging to the Aboriginal and Torres Islander
community was admitted to a reputed hospital in Australia for the treatment of asthma. After
a thorough examination, it was found that she had anaemia and require a blood transfusion. It
was discussed with her and her family about the procedure of blood transfer that would help
her; however, they decline the procedure because they do not want to transfer blood of
someone else in her body. According to Jie (2015), the nursing principles state that autonomy
to be a nursing principle where the patient has the right to decide about the treatment and the
nurses need to encourage patients to make their own decision without any form of judgment
or coercion and have the right to accept or reject a treatment. However, the doctors thought
that it would be best for her to have a transfusion and thus, without her or family member’s
concern, a blood transfusion was conducted. The registered nurse of the patient was facing an
ethical dilemma of whether to inform the patient and family about the transfusion. The ethical
principles and the Australian nurse’s code of ethics value statements come into play in
shaping the decision of the nurse (Cowin et al., 2019). From the point of view of the doctor,
the patient was in need of transfusion and only to save her life, he had decided upon the
procedure and on the perception of the patient, it is unethical because consent was not taken
and despite the rejection of the option, the healthcare professionals had administered outside

NURSING ETHICS2
blood into her body. According to the Australian nurse’s code of ethics value statement, the
purpose of it is to offer the nursing professional with a reference for reflecting the conduct for
themselves as well as others (Pickles, Lacey & King, 2019). It helps them to guide in ethical
decision-making and maintaining the right standards and ethical values that the nurse must
uphold. In addition to ethics, there are legal implications associated with this case. According
to McSherry and Waddington (2017), common law state that a patient is competent to take
his or her own treatment decision unless provided to be incompetent. On the basis of the
common law approach, four jurisdictions in Australia that are New South Wales, Tasmania,
Queensland, and Victoria have enacted legislation that adopts a functional test of
competence. In Victoria (the location of this case), s 36(2) of the Guardianship and
Administration Act 1986 states the two aspects of being incapable of taking a decision related
to treatment (Chesterman, 2018). In this case, there is a blurred boundary between capacity
and rationality. As per the doctor, it was identified that the patient party that was the reason
for the patient’s incompetence to take a decision demonstrated a lack of rationality. On the
contrary, the legislation defines capacity as the patient’s understanding and does not require
the assessment of rationality. Vuong et al. (2018) opined that rationality is a theory of
decision-making capability that allows the healthcare subjects to make unpopular decisions
that can be considered as high irrational by others. Therefore, it can be stated that the patients
need to be given the right to make an irrational decision; however, it is noted that they
understand and appreciate the outcome of the decision. A similar example can be found in the
case of Jehovah’s Witness that refuses to life-saving blood transfusion due to cultural belief.
It is one of the most irrational values that is being honoured by the doctors. In the healthcare
setting, nurses are regularly observing patients that are refusing recommended treatment and
it is not possible to conduct a neuropsychological assessment on each of them to assess the
incapability in understanding the effect of refusing the treatment or procedure (Haahr et al.,