AMOS Analysis: Model 1 vs Model 2

AMOS analysis

1. Diagrams for Models 1 and 2 with standardized path parameters
Model 1:
Model 2
2. Is the fit for model 1 acceptable
To test whether fit for model 1 acceptable or not; chi-square has been used. Below is the output
of the test:
Severity
GenRisk
EatRisk Behavior
Conscious
-0.087 0.121
0.342
0.048
-.055
0.026
0.328
Severity
EatRisk
Efficacy
Behavior.000
-.228
0.131
0.492
0.158

Severity
Observed N Expected N Residual
0 2 22.7 -20.7
1 23 22.7 .3
2 47 22.7 24.3
3 39 22.7 16.3
4 22 22.7 -.7
5 3 22.7 -19.7
Total 136
EatRisk
Observed N Expected N Residual
0 8 22.7 -14.7
1 16 22.7 -6.7
2 92 22.7 69.3
3 11 22.7 -11.7
4 8 22.7 -14.7
5 1 22.7 -21.7
Total 136
GenRisk
Observed N Expected N Residual
2 36 34.0 2.0
3 76 34.0 42.0
4 20 34.0 -14.0
5 4 34.0 -30.0
Total 136

Conscious
Observed N Expected N Residual
2 2 22.7 -20.7
3 9 22.7 -13.7
4 34 22.7 11.3
5 49 22.7 26.3
6 34 22.7 11.3
7 8 22.7 -14.7
Total 136
Behaviour
Observed N Expected N Residual
1 5 17.0 -12.0
2 7 17.0 -10.0
3 16 17.0 -1.0
4 22 17.0 5.0
5 52 17.0 35.0
6 21 17.0 4.0
7 6 17.0 -11.0
8 7 17.0 -10.0
Total 136
Test Statistics
Severity EatRisk GenRisk Conscious Behaviour
Chi-Square 73.824a 259.735a 84.235b 78.500a 101.882c
df 5 5 3 5 7
Asymp. Sig. .000 .000 .000 .000 .000
a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected frequencies less than 5. The minimum expected
cell frequency is 22.7.
b. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected frequencies less than 5. The minimum expected
cell frequency is 34.0.
c. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected frequencies less than 5. The minimum expected
cell frequency is 17.0.
Critical values:
Degrees of
freedom
0.05