An analysis of a case study organisation and recommendations for a marketing strategy
Verified
Added on  2023/04/23
|15
|4054
|246
AI Summary
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running head:AN ANALYSIS OF A CASE STUDY ORGANISATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR A MARKETING STRATEGY An analysis of a case study organisation and recommendations for a marketing strategy Student’s Name University Name Author’s Note
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
2 ANANALYSISOFACASESTUDYORGANISATIONANDRECOMMENDATIONSFORA MARKETING STRATEGY Table of Contents 1. Introduction.......................................................................................................................................4 2. Discussion.........................................................................................................................................4 2.1 Analysis of the marketing situation of Fitbit................................................................................4 2.1.1 Porters Five forces analysis...................................................................................................5 2.2 Proposed Marketing Strategy.......................................................................................................7 2.2.1 Marketing Objectives............................................................................................................7 2.2.2 Strategic Focus......................................................................................................................8 2.2.3 Competitive Positioning........................................................................................................8 2.2.4 Marketing Mix: 4 P's of marketing.......................................................................................9 3. Evaluation of the marketing strategies.............................................................................................10 4. Conclusion.......................................................................................................................................13 Reference List......................................................................................................................................14
3 ANANALYSISOFACASESTUDYORGANISATIONANDRECOMMENDATIONSFORA MARKETING STRATEGY Executive Summary This report undertakes an analysis of the Fitbit organisation that deals in wearable fitness devices. In the first section, an analysis of the marketing situation of the company have been done. The revenue growth of Fitbit seems more strategically beneficial in comparison to the growth rate of competitive firms like Garmin and Jawbone, both of whom have achieved business growth rate under 100%. The Porters model have been used to understand the market position of the company in detail. There are several similar market competitors that causesfragmentationofthetargetmarket.However,Fitbithasholdofabout80% copyrighted proprietary technology in the domain of fitness band innovation and that is why the company has hold over 25% of the global market. People prefer premium products under the category of wearable fitness trackers. However, Fitbit cannot be expecting a continued sales hike based on a qualified as well as simplified technology of a step tracker that is nowadays available with accessory gadgets also. The marketing objectives of the organisation have also been clearly identified by the researcher in the following report. Research study shows that Fitbit has focused less on the potential of the US market. It is high time that stop considering US as a proxy market. Other models like SWOT analysis and Marketing Mix have also been employed for evaluation of the marketing strategies of the company.
4 ANANALYSISOFACASESTUDYORGANISATIONANDRECOMMENDATIONSFORA MARKETING STRATEGY 1. Introduction A marketing analysis of Fitbit have been accomplished in this report. The strategic growth of the organisation up till 2015 and the reasons for the conclusive business drop down have also been analysed here. With the help of the frameworks like Porter’s five forces model, SWOT analysis and Marketing mix, an evaluation of the current market and business position of the organisation have been done. Based on the outcomes of the evaluation, the project business growth for Fitbit have been traced also. 2. Discussion 2.1 Analysis of the marketing situation of Fitbit The case study shows that Fitbit has grown significantly as an organisation from 2011 to 2015. The raw business data shows that the organisation has 3 digit revenue growth against the previous financial year for each of these 5 years. Especially, asBaalbaki, Hoffman and Gilliard(2017), informs, the business growth of Fitbit, in the year 2015 shows a 149% growth compared to that achieved in the financial year 2014. This revenue growth seems more strategically beneficial in comparison to the growth rate of competitive firms like Garmin and Jawbone, both of whom have achieved business growth rate under 100%. It is evident that the organisations dealing in the similar products would automatically gain the benefits of market demand, as the market saturation of such innovative gadgets is very low and conversely the market demand is equivalently high. The success analysis of Fitbit in the year 2015, conducted bySengupta(2017),reveals that their success have been co-related with the main business decisions incorporating their decision to enter into partnership with brands like Strava as well as Sketchers, decisions of product up-gradation including the likes of assimilating multisport tracking in the device, ability to track the heart rate capabilities and enhancing the features of the Fitbit app.
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
5 ANANALYSISOFACASESTUDYORGANISATIONANDRECOMMENDATIONSFORA MARKETING STRATEGY Figure 1: Strategic Growth of Fitbit (Source:Abrantes et al. 2017) 2.1.1 Porters Five forces analysis 2.1.1.1 Rivalry among current competitors Fitbit was not able to gain their advantage of being the first mover in the industry as the competitors were quick to enter the space. In the market of fitness band, Fitbit promotes them developers of premium products. However,Phillips(2017), analyses that the products of Fitbit are ultimately similar with other major market products. The main difference of Fitbit with the other brands that that the competing market brands manoeuvre with the attributes like fashion, cost and other similar factors that helps them to keep safe from the impacts of the price wars in then developing markets. However, asPinto and Yagnik(2017) analyses, there are several similar market competitors that causes fragmentation of the target market.
6 ANANALYSISOFACASESTUDYORGANISATIONANDRECOMMENDATIONSFORA MARKETING STRATEGY The product with which the company deals, has little scope of innovation and that is why it is slightly difficult for any particular brand to make the industry move in a particular direction. 2.1.1.2 Threats of market entrants Less market saturation in the industry of e-fitness tracking products make the market entry easier for the emerging brands. However, in sharp contrast,Shankar et al. (2016), states that the market presence of Fitbit is strong enough to be impacted by the entry of the new market entrants. The social sharing as well as the external application integrations makes the switching costs higher in favour of Fitbit. Fitbit has hold of about 80% copyrighted proprietary technology in the domain of fitness band innovation and that is why the company has hold over 25% of the global market. However,Fotopoulou and O’Riordan(2017), analyses that the competition in the market of wearable technology industry can be fostered by the entrance of apparel brands like Kate Spade or Michael Kors, whose dedicated target market would bring about further market segmentation. 2.1.1.3 Bargaining power of Buyers The buyers have the opportunity of selecting from a variable range of similar tracker brands and from products pertaining to the same brands ranging from $34 up to $900. The availability of large number of market players allows the buyers to expect more product features from their chosen brand at a considerable price. People prefer premium products under the category of wearable fitness trackers (Hoffmann, Ramirez and Lecamp 2018). However, Fitbit cannot be expecting a continued sales hike based on a qualified as well as simplified technology of a step tracker that is nowadays available with accessory gadgets also. 2.1.1.4 Bargaining power of Suppliers
7 ANANALYSISOFACASESTUDYORGANISATIONANDRECOMMENDATIONSFORA MARKETING STRATEGY MajorshareofmanufacturingofFitbit’sproductsrestsonChinesesuppliers. However, there are several suppliers who have contract with Fitbit and the company can comfortably switch between the suppliers in the country. On the contrary,Tuten and Solomon(2017), should not be having much power to influence the organisation. This is because the products of Fitbit are their intellectual property that cannot be imitated by the supplier manufacturers. The manufacturers do not have the legal authority to forward integrate since the software is embedded in to the devices of the main company. The organisation also have an alternative base of suppliers in other Asian countries like Taiwan and Hungary also. 2.1.1.5 Threats of market substitutes Along with the fitness tracking devices, the people also have the option of using the smart watches or their smart phones for serving the purposes that fitness bands also serve. In this context, it deserves mention that Apple Series Watch 2 has entered in to a partnership with Nike enticing the fitness freaks with a comfortable wearable band, GPS along with enhanced running features (Mahoney,Lovich and Brady 2019). 2.2 Proposed Marketing Strategy 2.2.1 Marketing Objectives It deserves mention that after 2015 the revenue stream of Fitbit started to witness a fall. There have been a drop of 19% in revenue over the year in 2016. This implies that the organisation have to alternate their marketing objectives in order to fit in to the changing market needs and dynamic consumer demands. The organisation needs to restructure their accessories strategy by banking up on the social elements and community regarding an active lifecycle. In order to remain nimble in the market, the company needs to enhance the social experience of their users (Wu et al. 2017).
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
8 ANANALYSISOFACASESTUDYORGANISATIONANDRECOMMENDATIONSFORA MARKETING STRATEGY They can also deliver tailored guidance to the users for driving changes in their behaviour so that they can gain better fitness. The organisation has focused less on the potential of the US market. It is high time that stop considering US as a proxy market. 2.2.2 Strategic Focus The organisation needs to shift their strategic focus towards the market of smart watches and also emphasise on fostering corporate relationships. The projected strategic focus of the company should be on consumer health and fitness as well as enterprise health. In terms of focusing on consumer health, the organisation can emphasise on providing more personalised insights as well as guidance to the customers regarding health improvement. Fitbit can aim at developing corporate relationship with the exponential market players of the health care industry and innovate the enterprise health scheme. 2.2.3 Competitive Positioning Although Xioami MI band is catching up, the market rapidly, they have not been able to record proportionately higher sales figures in their target markets compared to Fit bit. After facing market competition, Fitbit has introduced products with great technology act a highly affordable price. The recent product offerings include feature rich tracker, wireless Bluetooth version 4.0 syncing, high battery life as well as smart calorie tracker also (Jennings et al. 2016). Being a first mover in the fitness band market, the company has been able to maintain its leadership position in the fitness tracker market. However, market Trends show that established organisations like Nike or Apple might easily occupy the best position in the fitness segment in the upcoming 10 years. The revenue level of the company has already been in level with its chief competitors. This is a sure indication that product diversity of Fitbit is not able to grab consumer demands anymore. The athletic design of Fitbit has not been able to attract the customers since it gives a cheap feeling by its looks. ON the contrary, based on
9 ANANALYSISOFACASESTUDYORGANISATIONANDRECOMMENDATIONSFORA MARKETING STRATEGY a fibre model, the Gear Fit of Samsung has been able to attract the attention of the viewers and the introduction of each model of Gear Fit has experienced huge demand among the customers. MI band, Apple Watch as well as Gear Fit of Samsung have been developing new markets in the Asian and the Australian markets. Considering the strategic advantage of huge market demand, as evident in the last flash sale of MI, it is evident that Fitbit should develop a more comprehensive framework for penetrating in these markets. It still exists as a substitute brand only in these markets. 2.2.4 Marketing Mix: 4 P's of marketing Price The website prices of Fitbit ranges from 40 US dollars to 900 US dollars. As compared to the prices of fitness products of parallel market brands, the price of Fitbit is slightly on the higher side. Besides, in order to increase the adaptivity of the product a customer needs to buy accessories ranging from $7 to 300 US dollar (Mahoney,Lovich and Brady 2019). Hence it is needed that in the financial year 2019-20 the company focuses on reducing the prices of all Fitbit Rangers by 20 to 100 US Dollars. They also need to develop new technology where customers will not need to buy accessory products. Product 11 different fitness tracking brands have been introduced in the market in the year 2019.these brands have mobile applications that can perform in the same way as a Fitbit does. Hence, if alternative technology is not advised by Fitbit, the market value of the brand will fall significantly. Place
10 ANANALYSISOFACASESTUDYORGANISATIONANDRECOMMENDATIONSFORA MARKETING STRATEGY Since 2018, the trend of e-commerce has taken over. That is why Fitbit needs to increase sale of their product online to their official website or through E-Commerce websites. In this context they can considered the sales model of Xiomi in Chin (Hoffmann, Ramirez and Lecamp 2018). The sales portal of the company are not equally active in all the countries. This is why people in many countries who are aware of the product cannot purchase it. Hence, it is recommended that the company should make their online commerce stronger in the future in order to increase their customer base. Promotion Fitbitmainlyusesthirdpartyonlineportalandpaidonlineadvertisementfortheir promotions. However, recent market Trends show that all electronic gadgets and gadget brands mainly promote their products through social media advertising or through online guerrilla advertising. The major and popular fitness brands arrange fitness events for public. Such an event was hosted by Sony in the year 2019.the customer scored by their fitness products, participate in free advisory classes that taught them how to keep care of personal health to their fitness devices demonstrating product use and other such activities. It is highly recommended that fitness conducts search products promoting campaign which can directly impact and developed brand loyalty of Fitbit among the customers. 3. Evaluation of the marketing strategies Starting from the adjusted earnings per share of 0.12 US Dollar on a revenue of 570.5 million US dollars in the second quarter of financial year 2017-18 the stock value of Fitbit in NSE increased by 20%. The company is optimistic about the reaffirmed adjustment of EPS value of US dollar 1.12 to US Dollar 1.24 on a profit return of about 2.6 Billion US dollar. The significant development in the research and development of the organisation since 2017 is the main reason behind this extreme revenue growth of the company. Increasing investment in
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
11 ANANALYSISOFACASESTUDYORGANISATIONANDRECOMMENDATIONSFORA MARKETING STRATEGY research and development by almost 20%, Fitbit was able to gain about 140 issued patents by the end of 2017. In factBaalbaki,Hoffman and Gilliard(2017),states that Technologies like Blaze and Alta activations help to decrease the average selling price of Fitbit devices by 28 US dollars. As an impact of these new developments in the company experienced about54% revenue growth in Africa, Middle East as well as European region by the end of the second quarter of 2018-19 financial year. Disruptive technological advancements has placed the company in the position of the biggest gainer in US and EMEA market in 2019 with 76% of the revenue coming from these two regions. The company will be launching its B2RUN series with 180000 product units for increasing its sale in China by 2020.they have also set up Corporation ships with Tmall.com in China for the same. SWOT analysis Strengths The company has 70% share in the device market as well as 68% market share considering the dollar value as in 2017. Secondly, the company enjoys the benefits of speed agility as well as the willingness to take new entrepreneurial business risks. Although the growth rate of the business has reduced after 2015, the Global sales of Fitbit still stands at an aggregate value of 142 percent. These features come in almost all the Fitbit devices starting with its lowest price range of Fitbit flex that comes under 99 US dollars. The concept of direct relationship as well as ongoing communication with the users helps Fitbit to deliver the customers a better understanding of the individual customer goals related to fitness. Weaknesses Lack of credibility in synchronising health and fitness is one of the major weaknesses of Fitbit. The device resembles a Smart watch by its looks, however does not include the most popular features of any apple watch or any such device. This deficiency in styling does not
12 ANANALYSISOFACASESTUDYORGANISATIONANDRECOMMENDATIONSFORA MARKETING STRATEGY make the customer wants to wear the device all day long. As evident in the research survey of Kumar(2018),only 11% of the Global Fitbit users are happy about the look of the fitness device of this premium fitness brand. Opportunities The growing popularity of Fitbit devices in USA gives the company a chance to emphasize theirfocusonmanagingpersonalhealth.VariousLifestylemalfunctionsarecausing commonplace health issues like stress, strain and obesity among the people in US. In case if Fitbit can incorporate technology that can enable Wellness outreach programs the current sales of the device in America is going to be boosted by 150% as per the analysis ofHuang and Hsu(2017).As suggested byGawleyet al. (2016), in order to develop this Wellness mechanism, the device needs to have strong sensors that can analyse as well as demonstrate Anatomical data of the wearer. Threats The wide swath of equivalent competitors of Fitbit along with the new companies emerging into the fitness wearing market like apple, Microsoft, Sony, Samsung and so on are other major threats to the organisation. These companies have huge research and development budget and spends about 30% of their capital revenue on advertising campaigns. In this context, it deserves mention that one major reason behind a drop of Fitbit sales in Europe had been the lack of investment behind promotion and Advertising. Only 10% of the profit revenue had been utilised by the company in promoting the specific unique features of Fitbit (Hoffmann, Ramirez and Lecamp 2018). That is why the TV commercials could not have significant impact on the mind of European customers, especially in a market where there are several parallel competitors.
13 ANANALYSISOFACASESTUDYORGANISATIONANDRECOMMENDATIONSFORA MARKETING STRATEGY 4. Conclusion As analysed in this Research report, the strategy growth of Fitbit has been static up till 2015.howeverseveralfactorslikenewmarketingTrends,bringdemandofsubstitute products as well as emergence of other popular market brands started to diminish the market popularity of the Fitbit products. This prompted Fitbit to change their Market Positioning strategy and they invest to consumer approaches like development of corporate relationships and strategizing customer fitness and wellness. As an impact, since the initial quarter of financial year 2017-18, the product diversity of the company started to increase and new markets began to open up for Fitbit.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
14 ANANALYSISOFACASESTUDYORGANISATIONANDRECOMMENDATIONSFORA MARKETING STRATEGY Reference List Abrantes, A.M., Blevins, C.E., Battle, C.L., Read, J.P., Gordon, A.L. and Stein, M.D., 2017. Developing a Fitbit-supported lifestyle physical activity intervention for depressed alcohol dependent women. Journal of substance abuse treatment, 80, pp.88-97. Baalbaki, S., Hoffman, D.L. and Gilliard, D.J., 2017. The Fitbit Addiction: Will This Disruption Last?. Journal of Marketing Development and Competitiveness, 11(4), pp.86-103. Fotopoulou, A. and O’Riordan, K., 2017. Training to self-care: fitness tracking, biopedagogy and the healthy consumer. Health Sociology Review, 26(1), pp.54-68. Gawley, R., Morrow, C., Chan, H. and Lindsay, R., 2016, October. BitRun: Gamification of Health Data from Fitbit® Activity Trackers. In International Conference on IoT Technologies for HealthCare (pp. 77-82). Springer, Cham. Hoffmann, J., Ramirez, R. and Lecamp, L., 2018. Right on time-Socioecological strategy and implications of turbulence in the Swiss watchmaking field. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 137, pp.101-117. Huang, K.C. and Hsu, J.F., 2017. Balance between Privacy Protecting and Selling User Data of Wearable Devices. Jennings, C.A., Berry, T.R., Carson, V., Culos-Reed, S.N., Duncan, M.J., Loitz, C.C., McCormack, G.R., McHugh, T.L.F., Spence, J.C., Vallance, J.K. and Mummery, W.K., 2016. UWALK: the development of a multi-strategy, community-wide physical activity program. Translational behavioral medicine, 7(1), pp.16-27. Kumar, V., 2018. Transformative marketing: the next 20 years. Mahoney, T.Q., Lovich, J. and Brady, L., 2019. Social Media Strategy in the Sporting Goods Industry: Potential Application for Brooks Sports, Inc.
15 ANANALYSISOFACASESTUDYORGANISATIONANDRECOMMENDATIONSFORA MARKETING STRATEGY Phillips, J., 2017, April. A successful case study with IT marketing. In BSAVA Congress Proceedings 2017 (pp. 365-366). BSAVA Library. Pinto, M.B. and Yagnik, A., 2017. Fit for life: A content analysis of fitness tracker brands use of Facebook in social media marketing. Journal of Brand Management, 24(1), pp.49-67. Sengupta, S., 2017. Wearable Healthcare Technology: Fibit® Inc’sSmartwatch Strategy. Shankar, V., Kleijnen, M., Ramanathan, S., Rizley, R., Holland, S. and Morrissey, S., 2016. Mobile shopper marketing: Key issues, current insights, and future research avenues. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 34, pp.37-48. Tuten, T.L. and Solomon, M.R., 2017. Social media marketing. Sage. Wu, J., Li, H., Lin, Z. and Goh, K.Y., 2017. How big data and analytics reshape the wearable device market–the context of e-health. International Journal of Production Research, 55(17), pp.5168-5182. Wu, J., Li, H., Lin, Z. and Zheng, H., 2017. Competition in wearable device market: the effect of network externality and product compatibility. Electronic Commerce Research, 17(3), pp.335-359.