Trusted by 2+ million users, 1000+ happy students everyday
Showing pages 1 to 2 of 5 pages
Assessment item 1Critical evaluation of information sourcesValue: 10%Length: 1000 words +/- 10%Submission method optionsAlternative submission methodTaskThis task must be attempted by all students.In Topic 1, Israel Tobin, CERA’s HR Manager, has been asked to prepare a short, crisp presentation for his executive management team colleagues on how HR benefits organisational performance. This is a ‘moment of truth’ for Israel and for the company. CERA is an SME whose executives have a limited understanding of the strategic role of HRM. So, it is important for Israel to base his presentation on information that is persuasive, evidence-based and can withstand challenge.Your task is to provide a critical comparison of two sources of information that will contribute to explaining the role of HRM in effective organizational performance.Select the academic source by Tung-Chun, above, and locate one non-academic, digital source that you believe is useful in explaining to the CERA executive team how HRM benefits business performance.Your task is to provide a critical comparison of two sources of information that will contribute toexplaining the role of HRM in effective organisational performance.RationaleThis assessment task will enable you to demonstrate your achievement of the following learning outcome in the subject:• be able to critically evaluate the role of human resource management in effective organisationalperformanceMarking criteria201690 HRM 502 Marking guide – Assessment 1Criterion and weighting High distinctionDistinctionCreditPassFailCritical comparison of twosources relating to Critical thought is applied to the comparison of Identifies the implications of the differences Correctly analyses the differences between the two Correctly identifies several differences Poor quality answer that contains little or
the role of HRM in effective org. performance(7 marks)sources, having regard to the purpose to which the information is being put. The paper demonstratesdepth in evaluationof sources.between the two sources, and demonstrates critical thought indoing so. sources and is able to demonstrate how this is relevant to theinformation task. between the two sources, but someinaccuracies or errors in judgment. These are linked to the information task, but there are several gaps.no substantiation of claims. (< 3.5)Referencing (3 marks)(Minimum referencing requirement: threesources, including one academic source.)Correct use of the APA 6 system for in-text citations and references. Minor errors in use of punctuation and italics in applying the APA 6 system for in-text citations and references. Errors in providing correct details of sources in applying the APA 6 system for in-text citations and references.Errors in punctuation and details of sourcesin applying the APA 6 system. Fails to apply the APA6 system in all or most in-textcitations and references. (< 2.5).Presentation• Use sentences and paragraphs, with an introduction and conclusion.• A table may be used.• 12 point font, 1.5 line spacing.• Title page showing the word count (excluding the reference list), name, student number, subjecttitle.• Numbered pages, with a running header showing name and student number.• Provide a reference list of sources used in the paper.RequirementsThis assignment must be submitted through Turnitin.Use only two information sources, as specified in the task.Do not use appendices or footnotes.Use the APA 6 referencing system.Do not number or dot point the reference list.For this asessment APA referencing format is required. For guidance in the use of this referencing please see the CSU Referencing website at http://student.csu.edu.au/study/referencing-at-csuAdditional information to assist you with your assignment can be found here http://student.csu.edu.au/study/skills/guidesandtips/writing-at-uni
Found this document preview useful?
You are reading a preview Upload your documents to download or Become a Desklib member to get accesss