Strategic Management Project 2022
VerifiedAdded on 2022/10/06
|17
|1484
|25
Presentation
AI Summary
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
STRATEGIC PROJECT
MANAGEMENT
MANAGEMENT
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
INTRODUCTION (PROJECT A)
• Project A refers to the DeGrandis Running Shoes company.
• The company has a wide range of products.
• Manufactures boots with a newer technology of sole
cushioning(Matthews, Rossiter and Smith, 2019).
• The project aims at delivering the product within the time frame for the
project.
• The company has been surpassing the competitors (Di Maria, 2019).
• The revenues have increased by over an amount of $5 million.
• Project A refers to the DeGrandis Running Shoes company.
• The company has a wide range of products.
• Manufactures boots with a newer technology of sole
cushioning(Matthews, Rossiter and Smith, 2019).
• The project aims at delivering the product within the time frame for the
project.
• The company has been surpassing the competitors (Di Maria, 2019).
• The revenues have increased by over an amount of $5 million.
COMMENTARY
• The project by the DeGrandis was related to the incorporation of the soft
cushioning technology within their new shoe.
• The project team successfully completed the project within the time span
that had been provided(Goldman and Rascher, 2017).
• The board of directors are not happy with the fact of utilizing Chinese
suppliers for manufacturing of the shoes.
• Chinese manufacturers make use of child labor for the manufacturing
(Zhang et al., 2018).
• This was considered as an unethical approach by the board of directors
having not abided the company’s code of conduct(Rascher and Goldman,
2017).
• The project by the DeGrandis was related to the incorporation of the soft
cushioning technology within their new shoe.
• The project team successfully completed the project within the time span
that had been provided(Goldman and Rascher, 2017).
• The board of directors are not happy with the fact of utilizing Chinese
suppliers for manufacturing of the shoes.
• Chinese manufacturers make use of child labor for the manufacturing
(Zhang et al., 2018).
• This was considered as an unethical approach by the board of directors
having not abided the company’s code of conduct(Rascher and Goldman,
2017).
PROJECT PERFORMANCE SCORECARD
Dimension Score Explanation
Stakeholders 6/10 • The board of Director did not monitor the project
procedure.
Project process 8/10 • Has been carried out smoothly in an effective
manner.
Innovation and Learning 7/10 • Soft Cushioning technology has been utilized.
Quality 8/10 • The quality of the shoe has been kept
well in mind.
Benefit 5/10 • Considered to be beneficial to all age groups.
Use 6/10 • Can be utilized for walking, as well as
running.
Dimension Score Explanation
Stakeholders 6/10 • The board of Director did not monitor the project
procedure.
Project process 8/10 • Has been carried out smoothly in an effective
manner.
Innovation and Learning 7/10 • Soft Cushioning technology has been utilized.
Quality 8/10 • The quality of the shoe has been kept
well in mind.
Benefit 5/10 • Considered to be beneficial to all age groups.
Use 6/10 • Can be utilized for walking, as well as
running.
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
CONCLUSION
• Details of the DeGrandis has been provided along with the recent project
they had undertaken.
• The recent project includes the shoe manufacturing implementing the
newest technology of soft cushioning.
• The procedure of the project team was efficient enough to complete the
project within the given span of time.
• Board of Directors were not happy since the team took help from a
Chinese manufacturing company which utilizes child labor.
• This was against the Company’s Code of Conduct.
• Details of the DeGrandis has been provided along with the recent project
they had undertaken.
• The recent project includes the shoe manufacturing implementing the
newest technology of soft cushioning.
• The procedure of the project team was efficient enough to complete the
project within the given span of time.
• Board of Directors were not happy since the team took help from a
Chinese manufacturing company which utilizes child labor.
• This was against the Company’s Code of Conduct.
RECOMMENDATIONS
• Stakeholders- The board of directors should have been more concerned
about the ongoing project on their part to avoid the misconduct.
• Project Process- the procedure of the project could have been more
efficient if all the information is conveyed to the stakeholders.
• Innovation and learning- newer innovations would have been used.
• Quality- better quality of products could have been used.
• Stakeholders- The board of directors should have been more concerned
about the ongoing project on their part to avoid the misconduct.
• Project Process- the procedure of the project could have been more
efficient if all the information is conveyed to the stakeholders.
• Innovation and learning- newer innovations would have been used.
• Quality- better quality of products could have been used.
INTRODUCTION (PROJECT B)
• Project B includes the DeGrandis Sporting Goods to be the official sponsor
for the Australian Olympic Team.
• The project was running 6 months over, but all the requirements have
been successfully met (Cho and Kim, 2017).
• The sales had gone up by an estimate of $3 million (Zhao and Liu, 2019).
• However, the project made revelations that the Senior executive had
bribed the association for the sponsorship (Chiu, Kim and Won, 2018).
• Project B includes the DeGrandis Sporting Goods to be the official sponsor
for the Australian Olympic Team.
• The project was running 6 months over, but all the requirements have
been successfully met (Cho and Kim, 2017).
• The sales had gone up by an estimate of $3 million (Zhao and Liu, 2019).
• However, the project made revelations that the Senior executive had
bribed the association for the sponsorship (Chiu, Kim and Won, 2018).
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
COMMENTARY
• The sponsorship was provided to the DeGrandis Sporting Goods, to supply
all of the merchandise to the Australian Olympic Team.
• Senior executive team of the sporting company had provided a revenue
to an AOC official to get hold of the sponsorship (Kulczycki, Mikas and
Koenigstorfer, 2017).
• This was against the code of conduct belonging to the DeGrandis Sporting
Goods company to carry out business activities by paying bribes (Lal,
Alvarez and Preble, 2017).
• The sponsorship was provided to the DeGrandis Sporting Goods, to supply
all of the merchandise to the Australian Olympic Team.
• Senior executive team of the sporting company had provided a revenue
to an AOC official to get hold of the sponsorship (Kulczycki, Mikas and
Koenigstorfer, 2017).
• This was against the code of conduct belonging to the DeGrandis Sporting
Goods company to carry out business activities by paying bribes (Lal,
Alvarez and Preble, 2017).
PROJECT PERFORMANCE SCORECARD
Dimension Score Explanation
Stakeholders 4/10 • The stakeholders had no idea about the
misconduct.
Project process
3/10
• the procedure that was carried out to get
hold of the sponsorship was unethical.
Innovation and Learning
2/10
• The company had the primary aim of
incorporating innovation that was spoiled
by the act of misconduct.
Quality 2/10 • The quality of the products were however
of great quality in regards to the Olympic.
Benefit 4/10 • The company made a profit of $3 million.
Use 4/10 • The merchandise had been used by the
AOC.
Dimension Score Explanation
Stakeholders 4/10 • The stakeholders had no idea about the
misconduct.
Project process
3/10
• the procedure that was carried out to get
hold of the sponsorship was unethical.
Innovation and Learning
2/10
• The company had the primary aim of
incorporating innovation that was spoiled
by the act of misconduct.
Quality 2/10 • The quality of the products were however
of great quality in regards to the Olympic.
Benefit 4/10 • The company made a profit of $3 million.
Use 4/10 • The merchandise had been used by the
AOC.
CONCLUSION
• The DeGrandis Sporting Goods organization had undertaken this project
to sponsor the merchandise to the Australian Olympic Team.
• Partnership programs had been scheduled.
• The media revealed the act of bribery that was undertaken by the senior
executive of the company.
• The advertisements had been stopped.
• This report also includes the performance evaluation scorecard of the
project carried out.
• The DeGrandis Sporting Goods organization had undertaken this project
to sponsor the merchandise to the Australian Olympic Team.
• Partnership programs had been scheduled.
• The media revealed the act of bribery that was undertaken by the senior
executive of the company.
• The advertisements had been stopped.
• This report also includes the performance evaluation scorecard of the
project carried out.
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
RECOMMENDATIONS
• Stakeholders of the DeGrandis Sporting Goods have been not properly
monitoring over the project, hence led to a misconduct.
• Procedure for the project had been carried out in an unethical manner,
which shouldn’t have been effectively undertaken as a reason of success
• The company had been much more beneficial if the revenue had been
generated using ethical procedures.
• Stakeholders of the DeGrandis Sporting Goods have been not properly
monitoring over the project, hence led to a misconduct.
• Procedure for the project had been carried out in an unethical manner,
which shouldn’t have been effectively undertaken as a reason of success
• The company had been much more beneficial if the revenue had been
generated using ethical procedures.
INTRODUCTION (PROJECT C)
• This project specifically consist of the inclusion of Ladybird Brand within
the DeGrandis Sporting.
• The timeframe as well as the budget of the project had been met (Chiu,
Kim and Won, 2018).
• Customers dissatisfied due to the fact of inferior quality of the clothing.
• DeGrandis ceased the ordering of the newer stock from Ladybird (LIN and
ZHENG, 2015).
• This project specifically consist of the inclusion of Ladybird Brand within
the DeGrandis Sporting.
• The timeframe as well as the budget of the project had been met (Chiu,
Kim and Won, 2018).
• Customers dissatisfied due to the fact of inferior quality of the clothing.
• DeGrandis ceased the ordering of the newer stock from Ladybird (LIN and
ZHENG, 2015).
COMMENTARY
• The DeGrandis Sporting Company had introduced the Ladybird brand
without having any reviews with customers.
• The supply of the clothes were of inferior quality (Peng, 2015).
• Customers raised the complaints for the service.
• Reduction of sales (Zhou, 2015).
• Increase within customer dissatisfaction (Nendwich, 2018).
• The DeGrandis Sporting Company had introduced the Ladybird brand
without having any reviews with customers.
• The supply of the clothes were of inferior quality (Peng, 2015).
• Customers raised the complaints for the service.
• Reduction of sales (Zhou, 2015).
• Increase within customer dissatisfaction (Nendwich, 2018).
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
PROJECT PERFORMANCE SCORECARD
Dimension Score Explanation
Stakeholders 8/10 • The Stakeholders had been in proper
knowledge of the happening.
Project process
5/10
• the procedure was carried out effectively.
Innovation and Learning 7/10 • Environment friendly clothing had been
introduced.
Quality 2/10 • Inferior quality of clothing.
Benefit 1/10 • Had no benefits.
Use 3/10 • Used by customers but had given negative
feedbacks.
Dimension Score Explanation
Stakeholders 8/10 • The Stakeholders had been in proper
knowledge of the happening.
Project process
5/10
• the procedure was carried out effectively.
Innovation and Learning 7/10 • Environment friendly clothing had been
introduced.
Quality 2/10 • Inferior quality of clothing.
Benefit 1/10 • Had no benefits.
Use 3/10 • Used by customers but had given negative
feedbacks.
CONCLUSION
• DeGrandis included the Ladybird brand for better quality of products.
• Customers provided with a bad review of the clothes.
• Led to poor sales as well as dissatisfaction of the customers.
• The DeGrandis sporting stopped taking products from the Ladybird.
• DeGrandis included the Ladybird brand for better quality of products.
• Customers provided with a bad review of the clothes.
• Led to poor sales as well as dissatisfaction of the customers.
• The DeGrandis sporting stopped taking products from the Ladybird.
RECOMMENDATIONS
• Stakeholders of the DeGrandis Sporting Goods have been properly
monitoring over the project, hence led to such misconduct.
• Procedure for the project had been carried out in an unethical manner,
which shouldn’t have been effectively undertaken and should have been
done in accordance to the customers as a reason of success.
• The company had been much more beneficial if the revenue had been
generated using their own products.
• Stakeholders of the DeGrandis Sporting Goods have been properly
monitoring over the project, hence led to such misconduct.
• Procedure for the project had been carried out in an unethical manner,
which shouldn’t have been effectively undertaken and should have been
done in accordance to the customers as a reason of success.
• The company had been much more beneficial if the revenue had been
generated using their own products.
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
REFERENCES
• Matthews, R.L., Rossiter, W. and Smith, D.J., 2019. Localisation within the global supply chain: evidence from the sporting goods industry.
• Goldman, M. and Rascher, D.A., 2017. Determining Fair Market Value for Duke’s Sporting Goods Store.
• Rascher, D.A. and Goldman, M.M., 2017. Determining fair market value for duke’s sporting goods store. Case Studies in Sport Management, 6(1),
pp.95-99.
• Di Maria, E., 2019. A short history of the sporting goods industry. The Global Sport Economy: Contemporary Issues, p.13.
• Zhao, J. and Liu, X., 2019, September. Supply Chain Relationship, Technological Innovation and Firm Performance in Sport Goods Industry. In The
4th International Conference on Economy, Judicature, Administration and Humanitarian Projects (JAHP 2019) . Atlantis Press.
• Zhou, C., 2015. Impact of electronic commerce on the sporting goods market. Open Cybernetics & Systemics Journal, 9(1), pp.2135-2140.
• Cho, S. and Kim, K.H., 2017. Free trade agreements, sporting goods and playing talent. Routledge Handbook of International Sport Business.
• Kulczycki, W., Mikas, S. and Koenigstorfer, J., 2017. Where to engage in CSR? The influence of social cause proximity on attitude toward small-
sized (vs large-sized) sporting goods retailers. Sport, Business and Management: An International Journal, 7(5), pp.497-514.
• Zhang, J.J., Kim, E., Mastromartino, B., Qian, T.Y. and Nauright, J., 2018. The sport industry in growing economies: critical issues and
challenges. International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship, 19(2), pp.110-126.\
• Lal, R., Alvarez, J.B. and Preble, M.G., 2017. Dick's Sporting Goods.
• Chiu, W., Kim, T. and Won, D., 2018. Predicting consumers’ intention to purchase sporting goods online. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and
Logistics.
• Chiu, W., Kim, T. and Won, D., 2018. Predicting consumers’ intention to purchase sporting goods online: an application of the model of goal-
directed behavior. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 30(2), pp.333-351.
• Peng, S., 2015, August. Research on the Evolution of Sports Industry Structure in Developed Countries. In 2015-1st International Symposium on
Social Science. Atlantis Press.
• Nendwich, M., 2018. Validation of a new model to explain the impact factors of customers behaviour buying sporting goods. The Business &
Management Review, 9(4), pp.447-453.
• Andreff, W., 2019. 6. The winter sports industry and Winter Olympics in historical perspective: from Grenoble 1968 to Albertville 19921. Historical
Perspectives on Sports Economics: Lessons from the Field, p.67.
• LIN, B. and ZHENG, Y., 2015. On the international competitiveness of China's sporting goods industry and its influencing factors. Shandong Sports
Science & Technology, (2), p.4.
• Matthews, R.L., Rossiter, W. and Smith, D.J., 2019. Localisation within the global supply chain: evidence from the sporting goods industry.
• Goldman, M. and Rascher, D.A., 2017. Determining Fair Market Value for Duke’s Sporting Goods Store.
• Rascher, D.A. and Goldman, M.M., 2017. Determining fair market value for duke’s sporting goods store. Case Studies in Sport Management, 6(1),
pp.95-99.
• Di Maria, E., 2019. A short history of the sporting goods industry. The Global Sport Economy: Contemporary Issues, p.13.
• Zhao, J. and Liu, X., 2019, September. Supply Chain Relationship, Technological Innovation and Firm Performance in Sport Goods Industry. In The
4th International Conference on Economy, Judicature, Administration and Humanitarian Projects (JAHP 2019) . Atlantis Press.
• Zhou, C., 2015. Impact of electronic commerce on the sporting goods market. Open Cybernetics & Systemics Journal, 9(1), pp.2135-2140.
• Cho, S. and Kim, K.H., 2017. Free trade agreements, sporting goods and playing talent. Routledge Handbook of International Sport Business.
• Kulczycki, W., Mikas, S. and Koenigstorfer, J., 2017. Where to engage in CSR? The influence of social cause proximity on attitude toward small-
sized (vs large-sized) sporting goods retailers. Sport, Business and Management: An International Journal, 7(5), pp.497-514.
• Zhang, J.J., Kim, E., Mastromartino, B., Qian, T.Y. and Nauright, J., 2018. The sport industry in growing economies: critical issues and
challenges. International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship, 19(2), pp.110-126.\
• Lal, R., Alvarez, J.B. and Preble, M.G., 2017. Dick's Sporting Goods.
• Chiu, W., Kim, T. and Won, D., 2018. Predicting consumers’ intention to purchase sporting goods online. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and
Logistics.
• Chiu, W., Kim, T. and Won, D., 2018. Predicting consumers’ intention to purchase sporting goods online: an application of the model of goal-
directed behavior. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 30(2), pp.333-351.
• Peng, S., 2015, August. Research on the Evolution of Sports Industry Structure in Developed Countries. In 2015-1st International Symposium on
Social Science. Atlantis Press.
• Nendwich, M., 2018. Validation of a new model to explain the impact factors of customers behaviour buying sporting goods. The Business &
Management Review, 9(4), pp.447-453.
• Andreff, W., 2019. 6. The winter sports industry and Winter Olympics in historical perspective: from Grenoble 1968 to Albertville 19921. Historical
Perspectives on Sports Economics: Lessons from the Field, p.67.
• LIN, B. and ZHENG, Y., 2015. On the international competitiveness of China's sporting goods industry and its influencing factors. Shandong Sports
Science & Technology, (2), p.4.
1 out of 17
Related Documents
Your All-in-One AI-Powered Toolkit for Academic Success.
+13062052269
info@desklib.com
Available 24*7 on WhatsApp / Email
Unlock your academic potential
© 2024 | Zucol Services PVT LTD | All rights reserved.