Australian Social Welfare and Human Right Policy

This article discusses the Australian social welfare and human right safety policies, their analysis, and suggestions for strengthening them. It also highlights the impact of these policies on the GDP rate and increased CSR program of the corporates.

RUNNING HEAD: National disability and human right policy 0
AUSTALIAN SOCIAL WELFARE AND HUMAN RIGHT POLICY
HUMAN RIGHT Equal POLICY
SOCIAL WELFARE AND HUMAN RIGHT POLICY
Name of the Student-
University Name

National disability and human right policy 1
Introduction
With the increasing ramified economic changes, Australian Government has issued
various social welfare and human right safety policies. These policies are issued with a view
to strengthen the health care framework and increase the social welfare of the people living
in Australia. It is analyzed that Australian Social policy is introduced with an aim to
mitigate the negative impact of society and strengthen the environmental working
environment. It aims to improve people’s wellbeing and concerned with the welfare of
social work program of the Australia. The Australian council of social services in Australia
is indulged in leading welfare advocacy group which undertake future work output and
human right safety program. This government body have used a number of advocacy
strategies such as policy report, media release, petitions and other supporting program to
strengthen the social welfare and human right safety policies. The introduction of the this
Australian Social policy named social welfare and disable people development policy was
introduced on the basis of idea of a fair go, albeit omitting the original inhabitants. The
main objective of this policy is to strengthen the policy program for the support of the
disable people in their workplace (Harman, Pruetz, & Houston, 2015).

National disability and human right policy 2
Analysis of the Australian social policy program
There are several social policy program have been issued by Australian government
to strengthen the social welfare and disable people development in Australia. It is analyzed
that various bodies and organization for the economic co-operation and development
countries are facing several social policies challenges and issues in growth in the income
support program, slower economic activities and high unemployment functions. It is
analyzed that there are several policies have been introduced to mitigate the social and
health issues programs of the Australia (Cheshire, 2016). The recent issued policy on the
human welfare and social inclusion policy have shown that every disable people should also
participate in the policy domain. This policy was issued with an aim to establish the proper
linkage between the Australia developments and disable people’s growth at large. The state
of Australia and welfare programs have been introducing the proper development program
to mitigate the negative impact of the undertaken social work program and strengthen the
equality among the people including the disable people as well. Australian’s welfare
policies provide many examples of why many of the people are struggling due to the non-
effective policy program. Allowance and disabilities supporting payment program have
recently been introduced to tighten to make sure that disable people who need it could claim
these policy in their betterment program (Duckett, & Willcox, 2015).
The disability and human right policy in Australia is issued to overcome the issues and
challenges faced by the disable people in their working. Australia has several numbers of the
right-based policy and services areas for the people with the disabilities across international
area policy program. These all policies are led by Disability Discrimination Act, 1992
(DDA), which is indulged in protecting the people with the disabilities from the
discrimination. In order to promote the disable people, Australian government has issued
welfare work program which are issued to strengthen the work program of the disable
people in the corporate sector (McDonald, & Marston, 2012).
Australia has specific legal obligation and other international laws which need to be
complied before implementing new policies program and laws. The CRPD department also
needs to be considered by the department of policy before issuing the disability and human
right policy in Australia (Fulcher, 2015). The CRPD department is the imperative chain as it
demands the changes made not only through the through shifts in attitude towards disability

National disability and human right policy 3
but also implementation of comprehensive and effective legislation (Howard, & Williams,
2017).
The main suggestion for strengthen the Australian safety and disable program policy would
be to assist people with disabilities into the employment. Australian government needs to
make mandatory for the people in Australia to hire these disable people in their work
corporate sectors (Cheshire, 2016). These work process they could also undertake in their
corporate social responsibilities activities program. It will not only make the work process
effective but also promote the disable people in their working program. There are several
number of policy makers who spoke about the importance of strengthen the disable living
standard and issuing the disability and human right policy in Australia. They have revealed
that if the condition of these disable people is made better then it will play pivotal role in the
increasing GDP rate of Australia (Meekosha, Wannan, & Shuttleworth, 2016).
The main effect of change in disability and human right policy in Australia would be on the
GDP rate and increased CSR program of the corporates. It will lower down the
unemployment rate and also strengthen the national income of the Australia. Nonetheless, it
will positively impact the society and economic development of the Australia at large. It
also strengthens eh government commitment to its international rights and establishes the
harmonization in its international and domestic human rights for the betterment of country
(Miller, & Hayward, 2017).
Conclusion
It is analyzed that this mandated responsibilities have shown that in order to make
effective participation of the disable people in the labour market, without having any sort of
accommodations problems and inequality requires proper implementation of the reform
policies and program in Australia. Now in the end, it could be inferred that these policies are
issued with a view to strengthen the health care framework and increase the social welfare
of the disable people living in Australia. This above given discussion have shown the
imperativeness of the Australian’s welfare policies and examples of why many of the people
are struggling due to the non-effective policy program.

National disability and human right policy 4
References
Cheshire, L., (2016). Governing rural development: Discourses and practices of self-help in
Australian rural policy. Routledge.
Duckett, S., & Willcox, S. (2015). The Australian health care system (No. Ed. 5). Oxford
University Press.
Fulcher, G., (2015). Disabling policies?: A comparative approach to education policy and
disability. Routledge.
Harman, B. P., Pruetz, R., & Houston, P. (2015). Tradeable development rights to protect
peri-urban areas: lessons from the United States and observations on Australian
practice. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 58(2), 357-381.
Howard, A., & Williams, C. (2017). Succession and success: New generation capacity
building in social work education Australia. Advances in Social Work and Welfare
Education, 19(1), 10.
McDonald, C. & Marston, G., (2012). Patterns of Governance: The Curious Case of Non‐
profit Community Services in Australia. Social Policy & Administration, 36(4),
pp.376-391.
Meekosha, H., Wannan, A., & Shuttleworth, R. (2016). The politics of diversity in
Australia: extending the role of community practice. Politics, Power and Community
Development, 139.
Miller, P., & Hayward, D. (2017). Social policy ‘generosity’at a time of fiscal austerity: The
strange case of Australia’s National Disability Insurance Scheme. Critical Social
Policy, 37(1), 128-147.

National disability and human right policy 5

National disability and human right policy 6