Basic Restaurant Operations in Kuala Lumpur: A Comparative Study of Sushi Zanmai and Hanatama
Verified
Added on 2023/06/12
|6
|1429
|452
AI Summary
This article compares the basic restaurant operations of Sushi Zanmai and Hanatama in Kuala Lumpur. It explores their strategies, target market, and competition in the Japanese cuisine community. The article also discusses which restaurant has the advantage in this tough market competition.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running head: BASIC RESTAURANT OPERATIONS BASIC RESTAURANT OPERATIONS Name of the student: Name of University: Author Note:
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
1BASIC RESTAURANT OPERATIONS The competition in the restaurant market in Malaysia is quite tough for the Japanese restaurants. Various Japanese restaurant chains are entering the market of Malaysia which has increased the competition level among the restaurants serving Japanese cuisine in Kuala Lumpur Despite the fact that the Japanese cuisines are quickly winning the hearts and mouths of Malaysian consumers, the competition level has been creating the situation tough for the restaurants to maintain their uniqueness. Moreover, the restaurant chains have been affecting the business of the individual restaurants of like Ippudo, Santouka and Bankara which shows that the individual restaurants have to compete in various layers to attract their customers. These factors arefast food, fast casual, family dining, casual dining, upscale casual dining, fine dining, institutional and retail foodservice operations.In order to exploit the Japanese cuisine community in Malaysia, these individual restaurants and the Japanese restaurant chains need to differentiate themselves or they will not be able to survive.In Malaysian market, both the selected restaurants provide good value for money which is important for attracting more customers as well as retaining them (Agarwal and Dahm 2015). However, these tworestaurants have different style of operation and ownership. Therefore, their targets are not the same. The only similarity between these restaurants are their offerings. Both of these restaurants are specialised in the Japanese signature food sushi. This is the reason; they are competing with other Japanese restaurant located in the same region. The selected restaurants Sushi zanmai is a Chain restaurant and Hanatama is an Independent restaurant. Both of these restaurants in Kuala lampur, demonstrates their red ocean strategy. In this strategy the restaurants are indulged in head to head conflict with the players of particular segment (Canny 2014). They compete with one another remaining in the same market space within the boundary of same industry on principle of competitive advantage. Sushi Zanmai owns extensive proficiency in the raw material selection and use genuine ingredients in their offerings. This restaurant chain uses their original recipes as these
2BASIC RESTAURANT OPERATIONS cuisines are authentically Japanese. It sources components from the top suppliers round the world as well as maintains the strict food safety as well as hygiene standard for safeguarding the highest standard of quality. It focuses on the serving safe and high quality foods yet affordable Sushi along with the Japanese dishes with a very reasonable price. Moreover, all the strategies that this Japanese restaurant chain applies in gaining competitive advantage in this tough market competition largely depend on their brad image. Hanatama on the other hand does not have any popular brand image like Sushi Zanmai but has built a strong place in the market of Kuala lumpur. Like all other individual restaurants, located in the market of Malaysia, the space in the restaurant is much small but it has a huge popularity among the students as it is located near the university. Beside their affordable price that this restaurant offers, it has succeeded to maintain its consistency of flavour as well as portioning. Hanatama offers a wide range of sushi diversities with a cheap price at RM2.00 nett. Unlike others, this restaurant offers variety of sushi and sweets with variation of price which proves it to be value of money to the students. In fast food and fast casual segment cannot be applicable for these restaurants as they offer full table facilities.In the segment of family dining, both these restaurants are applicable to this category. Sushi Zanmaihas accommodation of more than 100 people in their outlets and Hanatama has 90. The factors are these restaurants do not provide alcohol and food is served in platters. Here the factors aregood choice of food, options for all ages, tasty as well as easy to eat foods, comfortable, clean facilities, faster service and easy ordering facilities. Sushi Zanmaialso perfectly matched the factors of casual dining because the features like moderately priced food in the casual atmosphere is present (Han, Bonn and Cho 2016). It is also a part of wider chain. Hanatama can also be termed as casual dining as it is independentlyownedandprovidesmoderatelypricedfoodwithtableservice.Sushi
3BASIC RESTAURANT OPERATIONS Zanmaiis an example of upscale casual dining.The factors are the presence ofa dining room section separated from a lounge section with multiple screens and a wide range of Manu options. The branches ofSushi Zanmaiare usually found in the shopping districts or busy places. This can attract the young professionals as well as millennials with urban ambiance (Lee, Hallak and Sardeshmukh 2016). Both of these restaurants do not have any particular dress code that the customers will follow nor they have décor featuringhigh quality materials which can be found in the fine dining restaurants (Wolf et al. 2015).Hanatama is a retail restaurant as it operates in the Malaysian market independently.It does not have many branches but has gained popularity among the young Malaysian students. On the either hand, Sushi Zanmaiis also retail foodservice organisation as it is a part of a restaurant chain operating in Malaysia. Both of these restaurants are not institutional as they do not have any particular space or demography to serve. In competition, Sushi Zanmaihas more advantage as it belongs to a restaurant chain but recently it has been losing its popularity. The first and foremost factor is its taste (Läikkö- Roto and Nevas 2014). It is a family dining restaurant where ether is a special important of food serving, cleanliness and entire atmosphere are related. Japanese food items have speciality which differentiates them from other cuisines but in Sushi Zanmaithe quality has become much poor according to the existing loyal customers themselves. It is a casual dining restaurant which offers moderate price for the customers, but the price has been raised recently which has reduced its popularity among the Malaysians. The restaurant uses the leftover foods in their staff meal consumption which can be effective in the minds of the employees as well as customers leading losing popularity. In addition to this, the employees in Hanatama are employed permanently which is not the case in Sushi Zanmai. As retail
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
4BASIC RESTAURANT OPERATIONS foodservice organisation the services of the restaurant should have a consistency but the employees’’ limited training or skills will affect the popularity in near future.
5BASIC RESTAURANT OPERATIONS References: Agarwal,R.andDahm,M.J.,2015.Successfactorsinindependentethnic restaurants.Journal of foodservice business research,18(1), pp.20-33. Canny, I.U., 2014. Measuring the mediating role of dining experience attributes on customer satisfactionanditsimpactonbehavioralintentionsofcasualdiningrestaurantin Jakarta.International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology,5(1), p.25. Han, S.J., Bonn, M.A. and Cho, M., 2016. The relationship between customer incivility, restaurant frontline service employee burnout and turnover intention.International Journal of Hospitality Management,52, pp.97-106. Läikkö-Roto, T. and Nevas, M., 2014. Restaurant business operators' knowledge of food hygieneandtheirattitudestowardofficialfoodcontrolaffectthehygieneintheir restaurants.Food control,43, pp.65-73. Lee,C.,Hallak,R.andSardeshmukh,S.R.,2016.Innovation,entrepreneurship,and restaurant performance: A higher-order structural model.Tourism Management,53, pp.215- 228. Wolf, C., Fishman, E.K., Horton, K.M. and Raman, S.P., 2015. Stories From the Kitchen: Lessons for Radiology From the Restaurant Business.Journal of the American College of Radiology,12(3), pp.307-308.