Business Case Analysis Essay 2022

Running Head: BUSINESS CASE ANALYSIS
BUSINESS CASE ANALYSIS
Name of the Student:
Name of University:
Author Note:

1BUSINESS CASE ANALYSIS
Introduction
Business case analysis is related to not only the business structure and the governance of
the selected organisation but also encapsulates the environmental factors, risks and business
practice that the organisation follows. The importance of a business case analysis is to get a brief
information regarding different types of activities that the organisation practices and its impact
on the future business sustainability of the organisation as well. In this context, this essay is also
going to describe different business activities of Adani, Australia and tries to find out the
determinant factors that influence Adani, Australia in course of its business activities.
Case company synopsis
Adani Group is a multinational conglomerate that established its business profoundly in
the Australian market with a multi-dimensional energy and infrastructure service provide
(adanienterprises.com, 2019). Primarily, Adani Group is responsible for providing thermal and
renewable energies in Australia and Asia Pacific region. Based on the official website of Adani
Australia, it can be stated that the organisation owns and operates the Abbot Point Terminal
(Adaniaustralia.com., 2019). Moreover, near Moranbah, Adani Australia established its first
solar farm Rugby Run. This far is responsible to sell 80% of its energy. The core business
orientation of the company is associated with mine development and operation. And integrated
coal management that makes the company highly lucrative and profitable in the Australian
market.

2BUSINESS CASE ANALYSIS
Body of paragraph
Structure and governance
As far as the business structure of Adani, Australia is concerend, it can be stated that the
organisation follows the functional type of business structure where each department has its
autonomy to perform individually. For instance, in Adani, Australia, the organisation has three
different divisions operated by three distinct head of operations. Those three divisions are the
Adani mining, Abbot Point Port Operation and the Adani Abbot Point Terminal
(Adaniaustralia.com., 2019). As a result of that three different CEOs appointed to monitor and
control each of the departments. Lucas Dow is the CEO of Adani Mining, Dwayne Freeman is
associated with the Abbot Point Port Operation whereas Chris Wicks is responsible for the Adani
Abbot Point Terminal respectively. At the same time, the entire organisational activities will be
under the supervision of one regional head. For Adani, Australia the entire operation of the
company in Australia is supervised and controlled by the Country Head Jeyakumar Janakaraj.
As a matter of fact, having a functional type of organisational structure it is also evident
for Adani, Australia to have a decentralised decision making process. According to Thomas et al.
(2016) the decentralised decision making practice makes the decision making process smooth
and effective so that there should be no lag in taking important decisions. Moreover, Olhager, J.,
and Feldmann (2018) opined that in decentralised decision making each department has the
ability to take decisions accordingly. It has core relationship with the organisational governance.
Yuan, Ma and Gao (2015) articulated that the decentralised decision making enabled equal
distribution of power in the hands of different departments. However, the absolute power lies on
the hand of the apex body who makes the final decision. For Adani, Australia also the same

3BUSINESS CASE ANALYSIS
balance of power and decision making abilities can be seen where the Country head takes the last
decision after discussing with different departments.
Environmental factors for performance
Legal and environmental factors are considered to be the most important aspects for
Adani in decision making. Based on the research of Lam et al. (2016) it can be stated that legal
and environmental aspects are part and parcel of an organisation that coincides with the
regulatory frameworks that an organisation should abide. Therefore, measuring the fathom of
strictness of the regulation and impact on the organisation determine the decision making of the
company. For Adani, Australia also the environmental and legal regulation of the Australian
government plays a significant role to influence important decision making and business
orientation of the organisation.
In this regard, the Environmental justice off Australia revealed some of the important
issues that Adani still practice despite of violating the business standard prescribed by the
Australian government. For instance, in 2011 a shipment of Adani Coal was sank in the coast of
Mumbai and it damaged the marine life because Adani did not take any initiative to clean up the
mess event after five years. As a result of that the justice department of Australia raised red flag
against the business operations of Adani in Australia. In this context, the Workplace Health and
Safety measures that the Australian government has mentioned for the business organisation is
also violated by the Adani Group. Based on the research it can be stated that the corporate
culture of Adani, Australia does not fit the government prescribed standard of worker safety.
Henceforth, outbreak of black lung among the coal workers in Queensland provides the proof of
deliberate breach of government standards by Adani, Australia. Those incidents proves that

4BUSINESS CASE ANALYSIS
Adani, Australia has to reconsider its operational activities in Australia and bring more efficacy
into the organisational practices by considering the legal and environmental factors.
Risks for performance
As far as the risks in business operations are concerned, it can be stated that Adani,
Australia is facing a number of risks regarding the corruption and bribery to the higher level of
administration. Henceforth, it becomes a serious threat for the organisation to reconsider its
organisational practices and refurbish its decision making so that it will be effective and
sustainable. In this regard, there are three major risk that Adani, Australia is facing. Such as
Environmental protection
Adani, Australia is facing a great deal of risk in its coal mine practice because it’s
causing marine pollution and environmental pollution. The Green Tribunal Judgment revels that
Adani is planning to ship 60 million tonnes of coal through the fragile Great Barrier Reef. The
location is a world heritage site and the organisation should have adequate risk management
strategies to skip out any kind of environmental degradation. The Environment Protection and
Biodiversity Conservation (EPBC) Act articulates that it is important for the business
organisations to ensure the safety and security of the ecology to its great extent
(Legislation.gov.au, 2019). However, for Adani, Australia, no such measure has been taken.
Bribery and fraudulency
Apart from alleging with huge bribery and fraudulency in India and Indonesia, the
investigators also found out a connection between the Australian branch of Adani and its
subsidiaries. The Mauritius Holding Company which is owned by the Adani family has a number
of subsidiaries registered in the Caymen Islands which is also owned by the Adani Group

5BUSINESS CASE ANALYSIS
Australia. As a result of that the investigators found out inconsistency into the net worth of the
company which is against the regulation of the Australian government (Business.gov.au, 2019).
Tax doges
A serious allegation is imposed on Adani, Australia that confirmed that in the year 2014-
15 the company paid a tax worth on $350 million revenue in Australia (Adanifiles.com.au,
2019). However, the investigation reports stated that there are plenty of shell companies that
Adani operates in the Cayman Islands and deliberately skips the tax burdens.
Business practice of the organisation
The Open innovation model has been followed by Adani, Australia in order to continue
innovation and creativity insider the business practices. Henceforth, implementing advanced
technologies and cutting edge systems are considered to be the most important part for the
organisation to focus on. According to Saebi and Foss (2015) the open innovation models
symbolises a core understanding of the need for innovation in organisational structure and linked
it with the organisational performances. As a result of that it is also essential for Adani, Australia
to implement advanced technologies as a part of its innovative practices and bolsters the market
capitalisation with the help of innovation and creativity.
Functional departments
The functional type of Adani, Australia leads to create a number of functional
departments based on different types of business activities such as Adani Mining, Abbot Point
Port and Adani Abbot Point Terminal. Apart from those large departments all those departments
are divided into different segments with specific actions. Gray and Jones (2016) argued that there
are the human resource department, operations, financial administration, IT departments which

6BUSINESS CASE ANALYSIS
are considered to be the basic structure of an organisation. Each of these departments has its own
departmental head who is responsible for monitoring and controlling the departmental activities.
Furthermore, due to the decentralised structure of the organisation every department can take an
autonomous decision for development and progress of the departmental interests. Apart from that
the R&D department is also existed into the organisational structure of Adani, Australia that
helps the organisation to continue its organisational success.
Conclusion
The above discussion is trying to create a clear perception regarding the organisational
structure and operational activities that Adani, Australia is practicing in Australia. As a giant
organisational character a decentralised structure helps the company to get success with adequate
decision making. As a result of that it becomes effective for the organisation to survive in the
market. However, there are plenty of issues and risk factors that Adani, Australia is facing
currently. It can be concluded that those risks can be mitigated through utilisation of effective
decision making of Adani, Australia in near future.

7BUSINESS CASE ANALYSIS
Reference
Adaniaustralia.com. (2019). Our Leadership Team. Retrieved 13 August 2019, from
https://www.adaniaustralia.com/about
adanienterprises.com. (2019). About Us. Retrieved 13 August 2019, from
https://www.adanienterprises.com/about-us
Adanifiles.com.au. (2019). The Adani Files. Retrieved 13 August 2019, from
https://adanifiles.com.au/#exploitation
Business.gov.au. (2019). Environmental legislation licences and permits. Retrieved 13 August
2019, from
https://www.business.gov.au/risk-management/environmental-impact/environmental-
management/environmental-legislation-licences-and-permits
Gray, D., & Jones, K. F. (2016). Using organisational development and learning methods to
develop resilience for sustainable futures with SMEs and micro businesses: The case of
the “business alliance”. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 23(2),
474-494.
Lam, H. K., Yeung, A. C., Cheng, T. C. E., & Humphreys, P. K. (2016). Corporate
environmental initiatives in the Chinese context: Performance implications and
contextual factors. International Journal of Production Economics, 180, 48-56.
Legislation.gov.au. (2019). Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999.
Retrieved 13 August 2019, from https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2016C00777

8BUSINESS CASE ANALYSIS
Olhager, J., & Feldmann, A. (2018). Distribution of manufacturing strategy decision-making in
multi-plant networks. International Journal of Production Research, 56(1-2), 692-708.
Saebi, T., & Foss, N. J. (2015). Business models for open innovation: Matching heterogeneous
open innovation strategies with business model dimensions. European Management
Journal, 33(3), 201-213.
Thomas, A., Krishnamoorthy, M., Venkateswaran, J., & Singh, G. (2016). Decentralised
decision-making in a multi-party supply chain. International Journal of Production
Research, 54(2), 405-425.
Yuan, K. F., Ma, S. H., He, B., & Gao, Y. (2015). Inventory decision-making models for a
closed-loop supply chain system with different decision-making structures. International
Journal of Production Research, 53(1), 183-219.