logo

Unconscionable Conduct in Mortgage Contracts

   

Added on  2020-05-16

6 Pages1669 Words118 Views
 | 
 | 
 | 
Running head: BUSINESS LAW ASSIGNMENTBusiness Law AssignmentName of the StudentName of the UniversityAuthor Note
Unconscionable Conduct in Mortgage Contracts_1

1BUSINESS LAW ASSIGNMENTCommercial Bank of Australia Ltd v Amadio [1983] The Commercial Bank of Australia Ltd v Amadio [1983] case has been dealt with thecommon law and statutory developments in the trade practice where a dispute has been foundbetween the trader and consumer. The case has concentrated with the ‘unconscionability’ underthe Trade Practice Act where a substantiative part of the contract has been raised the actualdisputes. It is the first case in Australia, which has introduced the unconscionable conducts in thelaw of Contract. The Old Italian Migrant Couple Mr. and Mrs. Amadio have been sustained as guarantoragainst a loan, which has been taken by their son for his construction business. The loan has beentaken from the Commercial Bank of Australia. However, the bank manager Mr. Virgo has beenfound that their son, Vincenzo Amadio has misrepresented the facts and his parent’s identity asguarantors. Here, when the business failed, the bank has been enforced the guarantor formortgage the building which was owned by Amadios. In this case, the court has been introduced the term unconscionability under theAustralian Contract Law. The court has defined the unconscionability in various ways. TheProcedural unconscionability is the process where the party may suffer damages due to thenegotiations. Here, the stronger party took advantages from the consumers due to their lack ofknowledge of understanding the terms of the contract. In this case, the trader has also takenadvantages of the consumer due to their less knowledge about the contract and the incapable ofunderstanding of facts where the trader has taken benefits from the transaction (Skead, Atkinsand Carruthers 2017).
Unconscionable Conduct in Mortgage Contracts_2

2BUSINESS LAW ASSIGNMENTThe Substantiveunconscionability defines the unfairness of terms or outcomes. It hasmainly caused due to the use of coercion or undue influence. When consumer makes his or herown independent decision due to the excessive pressure of the undue influence, the trader tookthe benefits from them. Most of the situation, court does not concentrate on the facts that whetherthe trade has good or bad bargain powers. The imbalance of bargaining powers is the actualreason of the unconscionability (Skead, Atkins and Carruthers 2017). In this case, the statutory development has been focused on the Corporations Act 2001, TradePractices Act 1974, Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 and variousindustry codes of conduct.Under the Trade Practice Act 1974, section 214A has been expressly discussed the termunconscionable conduct in the contract which caused at the time of transaction between two parties.The section 514B has been defined the facts of prohibition of the unconscionable conduct in theconsumer transaction. In the part IVA of the Trade Practices Act, it also included other relevantsections, which deal with the unconscionable conduct in the trade consumer transaction. The section514A deals with the procedural unconscionability and the sections 51AB and 51AC conduct with thesubstantive unconscionability in the contract (Goldberger 2016). The section 514A under the trade practice, deals with procedural unconscionability under thecommon law of contract. This act protects those people who are disabled by their age, infirmity,medical or mental illness and served with other several disadvantages. When a contract formed underthis duress is known as breach procedural unconscionability. In this case, Justice Mason has focusedon the bargaining powers between two parties where the transaction was not enough qualify for thespecial disability. Therefore, for considering the special disability, the conduct must have enoughability to make the correct judgment in one’s interest is related with the other party. Therefore, the
Unconscionable Conduct in Mortgage Contracts_3

End of preview

Want to access all the pages? Upload your documents or become a member.

Related Documents