Case Discussion: Fraud Theory Analysis and Rational Choice Theory

Running Head: CASE DISCUSSION
Case discussion
Nam of the Student:
Name of the University:
Author Note

1CASE DISCUSSION
Table of Contents
Facts of the Case-.............................................................................................................................2
Fraud Theory Analysis....................................................................................................................2
The Fraud Triangle theory-..........................................................................................................2
The Fraud Scale...........................................................................................................................4
Rational Choice Theory...............................................................................................................4
Conclusion.......................................................................................................................................5
Reference List:.................................................................................................................................6

2CASE DISCUSSION
Facts of the Case-
It is to be stated that Ms. Inshanalli had plead guilty to a charge of fraud amounting to
more than $5000. She was charged for breach of the provision stated in section 380(1) and 733.
(1)(a) of the Criminal Code. Ms Inshanalli had defrauded the victim WSC Corporation
Coppinwood Golf Club. Ms. Inshanalli had been employed as a book keeper to the victim for a
time period starting from April 2014 to January 2016. During her employment period she had
written 134 cheques fraudulently to herself. All the cheques were made to Zamroon Nisha
Inshanalli and were deposited into three bank accounts all in the name of Zamroon Nisha
Inshanalli. Further it is to be stated that out of the 134 cheques she had forged the signature of
Gerard Waslens on 125 cheques.
Zamroon Nisha Inshanalli is of 62 years of age and is married to RaffiqInshanalli with one son
who is 34 years old and resides with them. Apparently her husband and son had been aware of
her convictions for fraudulent activities of the past.
The defendant in this case, Ms. Inshanalli had committed a total fraud of $463,824.42. However,
the defendant has made a restitution of $54,000 dollars leaving $409,824.42 outstanding.
Fraud Theory Analysis
It is to be stated that there are a number of theories that can be applied to analyze the conduct of
fraudsters and gain insight about the reason for commitment of the fraud. Some of the theories
that can be applied to the case include: