Fraud Theory Analysis: A Case Study of R v. Inshanalli

Running Head: CASE ANALYSIS
CASE ANALYSIS
Name of the Student:
Name of the University:
Author Note

1CASE ANALYSIS
Table of Contents
Case Facts........................................................................................................................................2
Fraud theory analysis.......................................................................................................................2
Fraud Triangle theory..................................................................................................................3
The Fraud Scale...........................................................................................................................4
Rational Choice Theory...............................................................................................................4
Conclusion.......................................................................................................................................5
Bibliography:...................................................................................................................................6

2CASE ANALYSIS
Case Facts
It can be noted that Ms. Inshanalli was charged of committing fraud under section 380(1)
and 733.(1) of the Criminal code.She had pleaded guilty to the charge of committing fraud which
amounted to more than $5000. It is to be stated that Ms. Inshanalli had been working in WSC
Corporation Coppinwood Golf Club as a book keeper for a period of almost two years from
April 2014 to January 2016. During the course of her employment Ms. Inshanalli had
fraudulently written 134 cheques to herself. It is to be stated that all the cheques had been
deposited into different bank accounts of Zamroon Nisha Inshanalli and were written to her
name. Further 125 of the cheques written by her contained Gerard Waslens’ Signature, which
she had forged.
Zamroon Nisha Inshanalli is the wife of RaffiqInshanalli. They have a son who resides
with them and is 34 years of age. Zamroon Niha Inshanalli is 62 years old. It was apparent that
the son and husband of Ms. Inshanalli were aware of her fraudulent activities and her convictions
in the past for the same reasons.
It can be stated, in this case that the defendant had committed fraud amounting to
$463,824.42. The defendant in this case, Ms Inshanalli however had made a restitution of
$54,000. $409,824.42 were left as outstanding dues.
Fraud theory analysis
Numerous fraud theories can be used and applied in this case for analyzing the
misconduct of the fraudsters and discuss the main reasons for committing fraud by fraudsters