The Response of the Trump Administration to the Covid-19 Crisis

Case Study Report – Donald Trump
The response of the republican government to the Covid-19 pandemic has been nothing short
of disastrous for America. There have been more than 8 million cases and the death toll has
surpassed 200,000, which is quite devastating (Gutiérrez & Clarke, 2020). The death toll in the
US from Coronavirus is nearly 300,000 more than in the average year (Farzan et al., 2020).
President Donald Trump’s attitude towards this disase has been rather casual and careless,
initially calling it a hoax perpetrated by Democrats (Egan, 2020). He even stated that one day
the virus will “magically disappear” (Vazquez & Kelly, 2020). After downplaying the importance
and refusing to impose any form of public health recommendations, Trump was confronted with
ever-increasing case numbers and deaths, and started to blame China for the pandemic, and
then decided to leave the WHO, accusing them of helping China to “cover up their crime”
(McNeil Jr. & Jacobs, 2020). Although the first community case of coronavirus in the US was
announced on February 26, Donald Trump did not take any concrete action to combat the
pandemic till April, by which time the situation had snowballed out of control. In fact, he
compared Covid-19 to the common flu during March (Peters, 2020). It is fair to say that if he had
prepared for the first outbreak by accepting recommendations of the health authorities, such a
large number of citizens would not have been affected by it. By constantly sending out
conflicting messages to the people about how seriously this virus should be taken, he has put
the health of millions at risk, and has not been able to keep the economy going either.
Trump’s approach to deal with this health crisis in such a cavalier fashion has exposed the
structural inequalities in American society. Even as fatalities have exceeded the number of
Americans who died in the Vietnam war, the statistics also show that African Americans as well
as Latinos have suffered grossly disproportionately due to this virus in comparison with white
Americans. The poor living conditions these demographics are exposed to, their reliance on
public transport because of lower car ownership rates, etc, have made them much more
exposed to the risk of infection. They also constitute a majority of the 22 million unemployed
(Ladkin, 2020). Apart from the obvious imbalance in health impact, some deeper cracks have
also been exposed in the fabric of American society. Research has shown, for example, that
Republicans are far less likely to listen to expert scientific advice compared to Democrats (van
Holm et al., 2020). This has resulted in the blue states adopting measures far more stringent
than the red states in terms of lockdowns and physical distancing. The divide between the rural
and urban parts of America has also been exposed, with most urban communities able to work

remotely due to jobs which allow remote working, while rural communities depend on primary
industries like meat packing which don’t allow physical distancing. As a result, health impact on
rural communities have been greater (Digital Planet, 2020).
As mentioned previously, due to the contradictory messages being issued by Trump, Americans
have adopted two equally prevalent attitudes about his statements – either they know he is
spouting falsehoods and have stopped caring, or they have decided to blindly believe what he
says as that gives them a feeling of security. Due to poverty and unemployment brought on by
the recession, many communities are struggling to find ways to make ends meet, and therefore
have little time or inclination to examine the accuracy of the President’s statements. The
consequences of this can be damaging, as many people in India started taking HCQ tablets to
mitigate the effects of Covid-19 after Trump came out singing praises of this medicine (Ladkin,
2020). This is explained by the willingness of people to rally around leaders at times of crisis,
because it is seen as the right and patriotic thing to do (Erlanger, 2020). Even if, as in the case
of Trump, following the leader can lead to death from being infected with Covid 19.
The response of the Trump administration to the Covid-19 crisis has pushed America deep into
financial and economic decline, causing the biggest blow to the US economy since the Great
Depression. The country’s GDP has dropped by 32.9% on an annualized basis, the sharpest
decline since back in 1947. It is estimated that almost 5 years of growth has been wiped out by
this downsizing of the economy (Mutikani, 2020). Unemployment rate among teenagers was as
high as 30% in mid-May. Jobless citizens are provided an additional unemployment benefit of
$600 per week, which is higher than what many would normally earn in employment. Two
weeks paid sick leave, and up to 10 weeks of paid family and medical leave for people who
miss work due to coronavirus have been legislated (Houseman, 2020). While oil prices have
tumbled due to drop in industrial and transport consumption, this is hardly due to any action
taken by the government, rather a byproduct of the recession. Overall, Trump’s attitude has
been to try to solve the health crisis though only fiscally stimulative measures, without much
regard for public health.
Trump’s leadership style can be hard to classify, as he has been unlike any other American
president before him. It comes closest to the Messiah leadership style (Western, 2010), but not
in a positive way either. It has been argued that Trump has not shown any real leadership, but
has tapped into the hidden dynamics which has existed in American society, and has intensified
these dynamics by engaging in divisive rhetoric. For example, the changing demographics in

the US which has led to anxiety among White Americans about their perceived loss of power,
advanced technology replacing jobs, and unquestioned acceptance of neoliberalism (Ladkin,
2020). However, Trump seems to be able to generate unquestioned, cult-like, loyalty from his
followers, by presenting the vision “Make America Great Again”. People close to Trump who
have been critical of his approach have been ruthlessly ridiculed by his followers as well as
Trump himself, and been removed from their position of power subsequently – for example John
Bolton, John Kelly, and many other senior figures (BBC, 2020). This shows peer and self-
surveillance works better than hierarchical control in Messiah leadership style (Western, 2010).
Although Trump speaks directly to the hidden needs of his followers, which are related to racial
superiority of whites, withdrawing from all global co-operation organisations like UN, WHO, etc,
he cannot be called a transformational leader. Transformational leaders must have a degree of
authenticity, be rooted in ideology, and have strong moral character and intellectual bent (Melé,
2009). Trump has been found lacking in all these traits.
The leadership provided by Donald Trump has been based on a cult of narcissistic personality.
As Ladkin (2020) says, his lack of understanding about almost everything that is relevant to
increasing the welfare of people, including medical knowledge, logistical complexities, combined
with a complete lack of compassion, has now led to people questioning the very concept of
effective leadership. The “great man” theory of leadership, which is based on the premise that
leaders create change, has fostered blind followership of Trump among his supporters, and the
results are there for all to see. If USA keeps going down the path espoused by Trump,
mainstream White American society would push for more homogeneity, and an overarching
monoculture that discourages diversity and creativity. This is dangerous and can cause
fundementalism (Western, 2010).
Modernism has taught us that form follows function, but in USA we see exactly the opposite
happening. The structure of governance which ensures opposition between federal and state
levels of authority, the second amendment which ensures citizen’s right to bear arms, a health
system based on neoliberalist principles (Ladkin, 2020), all ensures that what is happening in
America is a direct consequence of the external form. Taking a spiritual leadership approach
may lead to a more motivated and inspired population (Fry & Slocum Jr, 2008), but it may also
deepen divisions because there is a strong section of the white evangelical community that has
aggressively helped Trump (Long, 2020). There is a risk that they could sow the seeds of
division again. Virtuous leadership, which emphasises ethics, servant mentality, integrity, and