Psychotherapy for Obsessive Compulsive Disorder

This case study discusses the application of Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (CBT) and Meta-Cognitive Therapy (MCT) in the treatment of Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD). It includes the client's history, assessment, formulation, and the treatment chosen for the patient. The study aims to critically analyze the use of MCT and CBT in OCD treatment and recommend further development of the study.

PSYCHOTHERAPY FOR OBSESSIVE COMPULSIVE DISORDER

1
Table of Contents
Introduction......................................................................................................................................2
Client’s history.................................................................................................................................3
Assessment......................................................................................................................................3
Formulation......................................................................................................................................4
Treatment and rational Chosen........................................................................................................6
Criticism........................................................................................................................................16
Conclusion.....................................................................................................................................17
References......................................................................................................................................19
Appendix........................................................................................................................................24

2
Introduction
Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (CBT) is identified as the tried and tested treatment for
almost any mental ailment (Newman et al. 2015). The Third Wave Therapy which is a new CBT
based intervention therapy including Meta-Cognitive Therapy (MCT) (Wells, 1995),
Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (Segal, Williams and Teasadale 2002), Compassion
Focused Therapy (Gilbert 2005) amongst others. While the third wave intervention methods
have a diversified approach, strengths and weaknesses, they still merge in their distinct
philosophical approaches of CBT as they are collaborative and therapeutic in nature using a
rational approach (Beck 2012).
In this case study, the application of CBT in the treatment of Obsessive Compulsive
Disorder (OCD) patient will be critically discussed. In addition, the application of MCT is
discussed as a third wave approach to the treatment of OCD will be fully examined and
rationalised.
The Case Study will aim to analyse the important information related to the client, which
includes the background history of the client in which the predicament of the client is discussed
along with its maintaining factors and the assessment tools to be used for the mitigation
intervention of the presenting problem while formulating of the underlying philosophy in context
to a chosen model. The different assessment tools deployed will help in the overall improvement
of the condition of the patients with the support of the different CBT tools. It will further
evaluate and rationalise the use of MCT base, CBT according to the requirements of the client.
Finally, the study will do a critical analysis of MCT based on literature and evidence to
recommend the development of the study regarding the present research.
The author currently works as a trainee CBT therapist in Central North West London
Trust (CNWL) supporting individuals with various mental health disorders such as anxiety,
depression, PSTD and OCD. It is important for the practitioner to maintain the confidentiality in
such treatments, so the patient will be referred as Mr Robert. Mr Robert was referred to me from
his GP, for the treatment of severe OCD using the Alternative CBT interventions. His disease
affects him, mentally, emotionally and physically causing issues in his daily social cycle. The

3
different habits he has acquired due to his anxiety and the panic in various situations causes him
to lose focus on his daily tasks, thereby affecting his life.
Client’s history
Mr Robert is now a 38 year old bachelor living with his 72-year-old mother. After being
diagnosed with OCD officially, he requested to be treated for it via through psychotherapy, as it
will eliminate any other mental disorders documented by the psychiatrist. He has been suffering
from OCD for a while and was taking medicines for it but asked for help as the medicines were
affecting his health.
The severity of the OCD of the client escalated after his mother was hospitalised and was
on life support due to an illness. In due time she recovered, but since the incident, he has
continuous intrusive, and aberrant thoughts fearing his mother would die, believing her sickness
resulted from contamination in his house, however his mother refused to accept the statement.
Mr Robert washes his hands as many as six times hourly to atone for his complex thoughts and
has spurts of severe anxiety if he does not do so. Even though, the number of times he washes his
hands has increased recently, the extreme handwashing resulted to breaking down of his skin,
leading to open wounds. He has also developed a habit of constant praying thinking this would
help the condition of the mother.
The constant visits to the washroom to wash his hands has also affected his job as a
computer engineer putting his relationship in significantly bad terms with the line manager, and
currently, he took sick leave for his treatment. The general physician is looking after his
reference for CBT considering the chronic nature of his affliction which was further worsened by
his mother’s illness.
Assessment
The rationale for the study assessment includes gaining the important information related
to Mr Robert for a better evaluation of his case, to ascertain the suitability of the CBT and form a
therapeutic relationship in collaboration with him. The important rationales of the CBT include:
inspecting suitability, collecting an authentic case history, evaluation of the extent or the
advancement of the disorder, establishment of a case conception for the overall treatment of the

4
individual (Westbrook 2014). According to Abramowitz (2013), assessment focusses on the
understanding of the strengths and weakness of the individuals along with an in-depth analysis of
the problems faced by the person, triggered by the environment, behaviour, physical sensation
and thoughts. In addition, Will and Sanders (2013), postulate that having a complete idea of the
presenting factors in the analysis, improves the remedial relationship and mutual interaction with
the clients, which is extremely necessary for the treatment through CBT. Likewise, Leahy,
Holland and McGinn (2012) recognised that the evaluation improves the expression of empathy,
knowledge and acumen which are important elements in framing a therapeutic relationship.
The condition suitability of Robert was ascertained through several of questioning
sessions including the ability to rationalise that Robert could agree to therapy, to make sure if his
condition was perceptible, predictable, and he was able to agree with the therapists (Dryden and
Branch 2012). Robert is also informed of the whole components of CBT including setting
agendas, working in collaboration to develop a therapeutic relationship, assessment, formulation,
intervention, goal setting homework and prevention from relapse. Therefore, to work
collaboratively, the client will have a better understanding of the CBT model and the
intervention to be used for the treatment (Grant, 2010).
OCD is one of the most unnerving of the members of the anxiety family of disorders,
which is categorised can be understood by deep-seated and unwanted thoughts which are
unnecessary for the individuals and to compensate for these thoughts they have obsessional
habits. The in-depth evaluation in the case of Mr Robert was to make sure about the symptoms of
OCD along with its triggers and implications. In the UK almost one in every fifty individuals
suffers from OCD and the related issues in the society (Ocduk.org, 2018).
Formulation
Conceptualisation or Formulation in this type of psychotherapy process is the
comprehension of the situation according to Kuyken, Padesky and Dudley (2008). Similarly,
Steffen (2013) defines views formulation as a psychological map defining the patient’s current
problem, although the concept framing is disparate from the normally known problems of the
psychological analysis (Beck 2012). Salkovskis 1985 model of OCD was used to have a better
understanding of the type of issues faced by Robert in his OCD. Rees and Anderson (2013),

5
further emphasise on the fact that Cognitive behaviour models see clients with OCD having
different notions exaggerating the sense of anxiety. The Salkovsis 1985 model is one which has
been tried and tested in conceptualisation and intervention processes by many researchers as it
gives a more detailed scenario in the condition of OCD (Westbrook 2014; Berman et al. 2015).
Mr Robert was diagnosed with OCD at a young age which helped in managing it with the
help of the medicine prescribed by his GP. Mooney (2014) informs that OCD treatment with
medicine has been effective over the years. In the current scenario, although, Robert’s situation
deteriorated because his mother’s illness which triggers his anxiety. Since he blames himself for
the illness, it led to extreme anxiety, and therefore the constant handwashing ritual and praying
that he practised was a way to neutralise the anxiety. The formulation is represented in the form
of a diagram to show the causes and the course of his actions. Salkovski’s (1985) model alludes
that the situation of the OCD is in the understanding of perception by the patient and not the
thought itself, but its interpretation is the major reason of the anxiety in the patients. On the
contrary, McGinn and Sanderson (1999) suggest that the intrusive thoughts do not naturally
result to greater anxietycause anility. An in-depth study of OCD by Ladouceur, Gosselin and
Dugas (2000) proved that the increased sense of self-responsibility and blame increases the level
of anxiety in a person. Leahy et al. (2012), argued that the neutralino behaviour is no explanation
of the abnormally of the obsessions.

6
OCD Formulation of Robert based on OCD Model (Salkovskis 1985)
Short circuit
habit
Appraisal/ meaning
Responsibility for outcomes (harm, contamination, died)
Situation
Trigger
Intrusion (the mother’s illness)
I
n
t
r
u
s
i
o
n
(
t
h
e
s
o
n
’
s
i
l
l
n
e
s
s
)
I
n
t
r
u
s
i
o
n
(
t
h
e
Response
Behavioural
Frequent hand washing, praying
Emotional
Severe Anxiety/ Distress/ Guilt

7
Treatment and rational Chosen
The functional analysis in the case of the psychotherapy assessment makes sure of the
individual’s perspective relating to the different aspects of the OCD. The questions in the
functional analysis of Robert focus on understanding the different trigger mechanism of the
OCD. In this case, the illness of his mother acted as the trigger of his OCD causing the patient to
have the constant habit of washing his hands and constant praying. The patient needs to be made
sure of the wellness of his mother so that it does not trigger his OCD. This can be an explanation,
given that there are numerous researches linking Emotional trauma to OCD development
(Williams, 2018).
Goal setting was contemplated toward the start of the mediation for an arranged remedial
cooperative relationship in fulfilling the specific needs of Robert. Simmons and Griffiths (2014),
examined the significance of objective setting and its impact on CBT which ought to be specific,
measurable, achievable, realistic and timely (SMART) as created by Drucker (1954). In any
case, (Whittington and Grey 2014) proposed that there ought to be space for adaptability and
change anytime in SMART with the full help of the client. Robert's long-term objectives were to
be better through having sensible contemplation, an impulse that is not influencing his day to day
life and recapturing his life back socially, physically and economically. In an exchange with
Robert, it concurred that transient objectives were to provoke his negative considerations and
practices, along these lines lessening nervousness by his manifestations of OCD. It was closed
together with Robert that 12 sessions of CBT approach would be used, and there will be a survey
at the sixth session.
National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE 2014), suggested that CBT is the best
treatment of OCD, as apparent by Dèttore et al. (2015); Kapoor, Mehta and Sagar (2015), where
they built up the viability of CBT on OCD through research papers. In treating OCD indications,
the most fitting mediations are Exposure and Responses Prevention (ERP), Cognitive rebuilding
among arranged others (Leahy et al. 2012). Lottie Morris and Jim Nightingale, (2014), advanced
ERP as the mental treatment of decision for OCD. Likewise, Amir et al. (2015); Sassano-
Higgins, Sapp and Van Noppen, (2015) showed ERP's viability in late research examines. In
spite of the fact that it is a very much grounded treatment, there is a low number of individuals
s
o
n
’
s
i
l
l
n
e
s
s
)

8
getting access to it (Goetter et al. 2014). Likewise, Schirmbeck and Tundo (2015) showed that
patient with OCD could resist the interventions. In handling the behavioural viewpoint, ERP was
acquainted with Robert to deal with his obsessive and compulsive conduct.
In order to tend to Robert's physical indications, there was psycho-instruction on how the
body responds to anxiety and its symptoms; as per Seif and Winston (2014), psycho-training is a
basic part of CBT. Robert was shown unwinding procedures (Westbrook 2014); these unwinding
strategies will aid in unwinding his body when he is in a tensed mode. In addition, Socratic
Questioning (SQ) was used as a method for testing the obsessional contemplation in accordance
with Padesky (1993). SQ is a cornerstone component for CBT (Wills and Sanders 2013) and
(Padesky 1993) affirmed that SQ is completely for guided revelation not for modifying a
person's sentiment on their concern.
ERP comprises of constantly uncovering customer's contemplations while keeping them
from playing out their habits with the basis for disintegrating the maintaining factor (Amir et al.
2015). The impact of the intercession lies in rehashing the introduction to lessen the tension and
forestalling customs, so they can understand that the contemplation is innocuous (Seif and
Winston 2014). Notwithstanding, there is an underlying serious tension toward the start of
overseeing ERP (Sassano-Higgins et al. 2015). ERP was used for Robert as expressed above; he
was presented to his obsessional thought process yet also kept from washing his hands, as he
regularly did if under extreme tension. He occupied with the conduct of deferring his habit
ceaselessly as the impulse comes in the avoidance of customs (Seif and Winston 2014). A minor
decrease was seen in Robert both from praying, hand washing and score of the evaluation
apparatuses.
Tragically, in the following session as arranged in the motivation setting, Robert declined
to take an interest in ERP, vocalising his feelings of fear. This issue brought about backpedalling
to his standard habits, which were incited by extreme tension and other related obsessional
musings. Strangely, Monaghan et al. (2015) foreordained that occasionally on account of OCD,
the possibility of presentation can be so terrifying for customers that they may decline to
endeavour it or cling to the escalated regimen. Leahy et al. (2012), investigated that the most
issue looked in OCD was untimely dropouts and customers confronting their fixations
(Schirmbeck and Tundo, 2015). Mentally, ERP can treat OCD. However, Torp (2015) contended

9
that there are some featured impediments, for example, delayed holding up records and a
deficient number of therapists.
There were questions asked on the effectiveness of ERP to treat Robert's concern, in spite
of the fact that Fisher (2009) expressed that it was clear that a few customers with OCD won't
show signs of improvement with just a standard CBT approach, which can once in a while rely
upon an individual as well as the seriousness of the case. As indicated by Morris and Nightingale
(2014), 25% of the customer with OCD reject ERP, and numerous analysts suggest formulation-
driven cognitive therapy in the mix with ERP, instead of exclusively ERP. Through more SQ, the
present issue supposedly related to his comprehension, which implies ERP was insufficient as a
behavioural intercession for treating Robert's case.
The case was under observation to know the following stage and ways to manage
Robert's problems. Clinical Supervision (CS) in CBT is an imperative segment used by all CB
advisors for extra information, quality, seeing issues from different points of view and putting a
check in CBT rehearse (Reiser, 2014). Also, CS is required by the British Association for
Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies (BABCP) (2015) for constant practice as a CB
specialist (Babcp.com, 2015).
In supervision, different intercessions were taken into consideration at given Robert's
showing issues incomprehension. Due to the current introducing factor, a descriptive
clarification of MCT was given. We commonly concurred on experimenting with MCT as a
mediation. Also, new SMART objectives were set, in light of intellectually diminishing his
obsessional habits, and the length of treatment will be expanded relying upon the result of MCT.
The model and treatment of MCT have exhibited to be a skilled hypothesis and the
remedy of psychological issue in grown-ups and kids (Esbjørn, Normann, and Reinholdt-Dunne
2015). Metacognition is characterised by the control, screen and evaluation of considerations by
the interior intellectual components (Wells 2011); these are comprehensive of reasoning,
memory and portion of consideration (Flavell 1979). Thus, MCT discusses the part of
metacognition and metacognition convictions, and its effect on mental issues. As it were, MCT
manages the style of reasoning, which remains a steady factor, not the substance of thought, not
at all like CBT, which can be variable (Fisher 2009). The MCT focusses on building a

10
communication channel between the different individuals helping in the overall understanding of
the different aspects of the anxiety disorder helping the individual mitigate their issues. Fisher
and Wells (2008) proceeded to guarantee that the particular component of MCT from different
methodologies focuses exclusively on the metacognition forms while others harp on the different
insight spaces like overstated peril, conviction affirmation, and swelled duty. In this way, Fisher
(2012) confirms, an all the more metacognitively predominant treatment is required for different
types of OCD, is MCT.
The MCT includes the Self-Regulatory Executive Function (S-REF) built up in 1996 by
Wells and Matthews, which is the supporting guideline of MCT. Moreover, Wells, (2011)
recommended that the S-ref depends on three levels of cognisance: the level of intelligent and
programmed forms, the online sort of procedures that is aware of constrained limit responsible
for evaluation and activity execution, at last, the long haul put away memory.
Inside this status, there are two areas recognised as the metacognition and comprehension
spaces (Fisher, 2012). On the other hand, in CBT there are no levels of insight rather there are
segments of refinement illustration (e.g.) Negative Autonomic Thoughts (NATs) and pattern that
produces negative considerations adding to the mental misery (Wells 2011). Then again, MCT
convictions are related to the style of reasoning and metacognition, which reliably produces the
ideas as showed by Wells (2011).
Using the observations by Fisher and Wells (2009), the model comprises of a discrete
style of reasoning and managing pressure, which bounce back and prompts amplification and
upkeep of passionate enduring, connected to a style of reasoning called Cognitive Attentional
Syndrome (CAS). CAS was seen to cause broad negative reasoning with mental issues (Wells,
2011) and Fisher (2012), expounded on how CAS assumes a basic part in keeping up the
consistent rumination and stress related with OCD.
According to Wells and Mattews (1996), metacognition information is characterised as
the acknowledgement people have about their cognisance and is partitioned into constructive and
contrary convictions. The positive perspectives see the advantage in connecting with on each
piece of CAS, on account of Robert concentrating on over the top considerations that prompted
his customs, supposing it is sure because it expels his obsessional contemplations. While the

11
negative learning focuses on the direness of the discernment, which is understood in OCD as
metacognition combination convictions about interruptions, displayed in type of thought
occasion combination, thought activity combination and thought question combination (Fisher
2012). The understanding of the different of aspects of the Behavioural disorder by the patient
and understanding of the root cause will help in the mitigation of the problem.
Thus, in utilising MCT on account of Robert, the style of reasoning was basic which
comprises of consistent stressing and his preparing mode. In this way, CBT was insufficient for
his since he harped on the substance of his NATs and convictions. Fisher and Wells (2008) states
that a mix of CBT and MCT has turned out to be viable through research did with four members.
They discovered that the blend of presentation with MCT decreased the OCD manifestations. In
any case, there were confinements in the investigation, for example, the quantity of the members,
self-report measures, single case research and association of just a single advisor. Moreover,
Fisher and Wells (2009) determined that paying little mind to the mental issue, a specific request
must be followed in MCT. In MCT the treatment begins with an evaluation, case-detailing that
the CAS and Metacognitive convictions are inserted in, and after that customers are acquainted
with the model to have a superior knowledge called socialisation (Fisher 2012). This is likewise
a comparable procedure in CBT the points of interest of MCT had just been talked about with
Robert beforehand (Westbrook, Kennerley and Kirk 2016).
The Wells and Cartwright (2004) Metacognition Questionnaire - 30 (MCQ-30) helped in
the evaluation. MCQ-30 was used in surveying the positive convictions about stress, negative
convictions about wildness and risks related to musings for Robert's situation. Robert scored 108
which was named extreme. Moreover, CAS-1 was used to quantify the metacognitive
convictions of Robert, with high scores of 19 on 3 inquiries and on the fourth inquiry “can’t
control my thought”: 97%, “worrying helps me cope”: 96% and “focusing on threat keeps me
safe”:100% (Wells, 2011). In the assessment, an engaged survey in evaluation assembles a
strong establishment for case plan in MCT (Fisher and Wells 2008).
In participation, another detailing was framed in light of MCT for OCD by Wells and
Papageorgiou (2000). Fundamentally, the different parts of MCT case detailing incorporate; the
triggers, the mulling nature, positive convictions that find out if the reaction is because of the
trigger and the negative convictions. Fisher (2012) states that the best routine with regards to

12
CBT/MCT needs a formulation of the customer's concern by the specific model of that
confusion, which is the core of CBT/MCT in emotional well-being clutters.

13
Metacognitive Model of OCD/Formulation of Robert
Figure 2: Derived from Wells Model
Viewing figure 2, which speaks of the MCT detailing of Robert, the trigger was from the
child's sickness which brought about extreme nervousness, pain and blame. His examination of
4. Activates meta- belief: Thinking he
contaminated his mother
3. Appraisal of intrusion: I could
have spread germ to my mother
Belief of ritual: if I wash hands
germs will not spread. If I pray
mother will not get sick/die.
6. Beliefs about rituals: If
decontaminate my hands I will be
safe and my son will not die or be
sick.
5. Behavioral Response:
Frequent hand washing/
Praying
P
2. Emotions
Severe anxiety/Guilt
1.Trigger: Mother got
ill

14
contemplations influenced his to trust he spread the germs to his child. This prompted the
metacognition conviction: supposing he sullied his child, accordingly shaping CAS. In
connection to the S-ref demonstrate, OCD is supported by the activating of CAS, which is
controlled by metacognition conviction (Wells 2011). Decidedly, Robert drew in on the
obsessional idea, by endeavouring to supplant it with a positive picture as counteractive action
through his behavioural reactions. Adversely, he wants to stop the idea through engagement of
hand-washing keeping in mind the end goal to control his contemplations. These prompted wild
habits and making his vibe he is responsible for his stresses. Fisher (2012) recognised that OCD
customers frequently show wild convictions including ceremonies. In this way, his negative
metacognition conviction of wildness to hand washing manages his feeling and cognisance,
which kept him from seeing the negative elements related with steady hand washing and its
impact on his prosperity, which continues forever in an endless loop. The constant praying is
also the result of the belief that his mother will stay healthy if he prays. The essential rationality
supporting MCT is the maladaptive metacognitive handling that is responsible for the event and
maintaining of different scopes of enthusiastic issue (Matthews 2015).
As indicated by Wells (2011), the incorrect adapting procedures keep up the issue by
hindering the client from picking up the correct metacognition understanding thus irritating the
self-administrative procedures. So, the wrong metacognition grows and picks the adapting
methodologies. The risk observing is a piece of the adapting conduct in OCD, which is shown in
different ways (Fisher 2009). In Robert's circumstance, his habits were utilised to expel the
meddling considerations by consistent hand washing, keeping in mind the end goal to make
peace inside and stop his stressing.
In the preparing method of an individual, the two methods for encountering mental
situations are alluded to as question and metacognitive mode as per Wells (2011). Hence, in
MCT the underlying treatment objective is to encourage the customers to transform from the
Object Model (OM) with the Metacognition Mode of Processing (MMP) for knowledge into
triggers, which in turns decreases CAS. He additionally clarified that in the OM, the
accomplished musings are identical to the outside occasions, not at all like the MMP by which
occasions can be disconnected from oneself. Obviously, the essential point of MCT for Robert is
the capacity to encounter his fanatical musings in MMP for the consciousness of his uncertainty,

15
and the capacity to see occasion in his brain not connected to reality and without investigation.
Fisher (2012) recommended that people concerning occasions in the metacognition model of
handling, adjust the interruptions and how it is seen, in this way diminishing the signature
appended to the occasion. Notwithstanding, some customers may never need to move from an
OM to the MMP accordingly making MCT difficult to decrease their metacognitive convictions
(Rees and Anderson 2013). What's more, the negative outcome at times brings about an
expansion of individual risk and impression of peril as Wells (2011) proposed.
Grøtte et al. (2014) did quantitative research with an example size of 108 customers with
OCD in an inpatient ward. The culmination of 3 weeks serious program of which metacognition
was comprehensive, the outcome demonstrated a diminishment of OCD side effects and their
metacognition convictions, better recuperation was watched using metacognition conviction that
changes in subjective convictions. These outcomes lifted MCT in connection to its centrality to
metacognition in OCD, in spite of the fact that it is without restriction in the estimate and among
others. The following stage after concept formation in MCT is socialisation, where it is gone for
client's understanding that the issue isn't in the event of the obsessional contemplations yet the
importance and reactions that are joined to them (Wells 2011). Also, SQ and different activities
helped in testing the thoughts, convictions and danger checking in Robert. In any case, in CBT
the SQ is utilised for investigating the substance of the musings while SQ in MCT is for
recognising and capturing CAS as Fisher (2012) expressed.
In addition, particular medications are utilised as a part of MCT in making a move from
OM to MMP this incorporates Detached Mindfulness (DM), Attention Training Technique
(ATT), stress and so forth (Wells, 2011). Commonly with Robert, we focused on DM and ATT
as an intercession in making a move. Wells and Matthews produced DM and ATT in 1994.
DM in MCT is viewed as two words "isolates" which means detachment from any
adapting practices related to obsessional considerations/emotions and the division of the
cognizant experience of contemplations from self. While "mindfulness", portrays attention to a
conviction or thought (Wells 2011). Robert was acquainted with DM to be mindful, isolating
himself and diminishing further examination of his obsessional desires. It is critical to take note
of that; DM is unique about the ordinary Mindfulness in territories of not including

16
contemplation, profound, concentrated body practice or broad practice and can be apportioned
quicker (Ludvik and Boschen, 2015).
There are ten distinct systems utilised as a part of DM Fisher (2012), however, on
account of Robert, the tiger assignment procedure was utilised, by conveying the picture of the
tiger to the psyche and making an effort to avoid changing the appearance or development but
rather simply seeing the tiger. The method of reasoning is simply to do nothing when he sees the
meddling idea, which inevitably decreases CAS with training. Ludvik and Boschen (2015)
completed research to decide the adequacy of DM in connection with rehashed checking in
OCD.
Moreover, ATT is used to effect on CAS and the metacognition, by moving of
consideration in interfering with the CAS and raising the adaptability of metacognition (Wells,
2012). The strategy includes an auditory assignment that incorporates particular consideration for
5 minutes, quick consideration exchanging for 6 minutes and partitioned consideration for 3
minutes. ATT was polished on Robert amid the sessions for 11 minutes and given to him as
homework. The survey of ATT was dissected in the following session, and Robert verbalised a
decent impact of the preparation in moving his consideration and consciousness of his
metacognition adaptability. Even though, Robert said he thought that it was troublesome at first
yet with training and adherence to guidelines he turned out to be better. Forests et al. (2015)
examined on the upside of MCT in connection to CBT, and they underscored on how ATT was
helpful to mental disarranges anxiety and depression particularly.
However, it was seen that ATT and DM were not for evasion or concealment of
obsessional contemplations and must be rehearsed when not stressing or being on edge (Wells
2011). Robert was thinking that its troublesome at first with understanding the method of
reasoning of MCT; OCD clients at first discover ATT troublesome and need focus. To defeat
that Fisher (2012) proposed that advisor is intended to investigate the cause and potentially apply
more socialisation to be ready to apply MCT, which can be more meddling with contemplations
at to begin with, however with more practice, it winds up less demanding. The MCQ 30
diminished to 49 and CAS-1 to 10 for the three inquiries incorporating question 4 with the level
of 60, 56 and 66 separately. Other evaluation apparatuses like Y-BOCS diminished to 20 and the
GAD - 7 to 10. It was likewise obvious physically, behaviorally and psychologically.

17
Relapse avoidance was likewise talked about with Robert created by Marlatt and
Witkiewitz (2002). Evidently, the counteractive action of backsliding in OCD includes preparing
people to execute better approaches for considering and adapting, in response to adverse
contemplations, feelings and convictions (Westbrook, 2014). Albeit as indicated by
Challacombe, Bream and Salkovskis (2011), OCD is at last resort for clients having the capacity
to work every day with insignificant side effects it is hard to regard as on account of Robert.
Criticism
This contextual analysis has less detail on the adequacy of utilising MCT as an
intercession. Matthews (2015), proposed that more research trials are required in deciding the
adequacy of MCT against other proof-based intercession in OCD. Results demonstrated that the
adequacy of treatment of tension issue with MCT is higher when assessed with shortlisting
control gathering and CBT; however, the outcome ought to be taken with the mind (Normann,
Emmerik and Morina, 2014). Furthermore, future research should comprise of bigger example
size and joint utilisation of MCT evaluation with other down to business upheld treatment.
For clinical application and confirmation-based practice, bigger scale trials of the
productivity of MCT interestingly with other mental treatments are required (Schirmbeck and
Tundo 2015). Progression in addressing these difficulties is normal, as the advantages of MCT
turns out to be all the more generally used. In spite of the unmistakable theoretical defence,
explore considers on DM and ATT have been constrained (Ludvik and Boschen 2015).
Consequently, bigger scale subjective research studies are required in territories of ATT and DM
to demonstrate its adequacy in connection to MCT for OCD (Grøtte et al. 2014).
Twohig and Smith (2015) additionally proposed at the exhibit; scientists should try to
amalgamate behavioural, mental, neurochemical, and neuroanatomical results in a far-reaching,
very much organised psychobiological model of OCD. These discoveries will add to the creating
assemblage of exact help for the hugeness of metacognition in OCD and different issue.
Correspondingly, as far as the restorative relationship that is obvious in CBT is by one
means or another ailing in MCT because of less holding yet more elaborate inquiries (Amir et al.
2015). Likewise, the viability of MCT on the relative hugeness of the restorative relationship is
yet to be understood (Fisher and Well 2008). Despite the fact that Wells (2011) underscored that

18
socialisation to case Formulation assumes an indispensable part in building a helpful relationship
in MCT, nonetheless, this is yet to be assessed.
Moreover, MCT is relatively a current way to deal with psychological well-being scatters
(Normann et al. 2014); in this way, one of the difficulties of MCT is the need MCT-prepared
advisor. Like this, more prepared advisors are required for a powerful practice for MCT to
achieve its maximum capacity in intercession. Similarly, Warman, Phalen and Martin (2015)
recommended that consolidated of MCT in future preparing for understudies figuring out how to
end up CB advisor will valuable, as this will go far in managing complex issues of OCD and
other psychological well-being issues.
Conclusion
This contextual investigation has displayed in detail the models, evaluations, plans,
intercessions of both ERP and MCT utilised with an extreme OCD customer (Robert). The
viability and adequacy of CBT and MCT were analysed and its difficulties from different
psychotherapies.
The contextual analysis found that in connection to Robert, an intergraded approach of
behavioural intercession (EPR) and a third wave way to deal with insight (MCT) were powerful
in handling his exhibiting issues. The unmistakable parts of CBT intercession used: assembling a
synergistic and helpful relationship, setting motivation, objective setting, SQ, backslide
counteractive action and others. Moreover, as far as MCT, the basic parts were MCT evaluation
devices, ATT, and DM. More or less, the particular components of MCT planned to change: the
style of reasoning, metacognition substance, modes and bits of knowledge related to perception
and official quality control.
The confirmation demonstrates that metacognition has an essential part in the aetiology of OCD.
Treatment-centred looks into have indicated promising results, with various trials demonstrating
clinically, measurably and noteworthy advancement utilising metacognitive-based strategy.
Despite that, there is a requirement for bigger, controlled trials with broad follow-up periods to
create upon the methodological confinements of research ponders directed to date.

19
Finally, the present contextual analysis is to demonstrate that the best possible reaction to
introduction and reaction anticipation treatment is related to a decrease in metacognition.
Altogether, there are assorted systems to treat OCD yet one of the difficulties in starting a
powerful, quick and accessible treatment for people, completely thinking about their
appropriateness and singularity.

20
References
Abramowitz, J.S., 2013. The practice of exposure therapy: relevance of cognitive-behavioural
theory and extinction theory. Behaviour therapy, 44(4), pp.548-558.
Amir, N., Kuckertz, J.M., Najmi, S. and Conley, S.L., 2015. Preliminary evidence for the
enhancement of self-conducted exposures for OCD using cognitive bias modification. Cognitive
therapy and research, 39(4), pp.424-440.
Babcp.com. (2015). British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies. [online]
Available at: http://www.babcp.com/files/Accreditation/Course/BABCP-Course-Accreditation-
Process-V3-1015.pdf [Accessed 4 Mar. 2018].
Beck, A.T., 2008. The evolution of the cognitive model of depression and its neurobiological
correlates. American Journal of Psychiatry, 165(8), pp.969-977.
Berman, N.C., Fang, A., Hansen, N. and Wilhelm, S., 2015. Cognitive-based therapy for OCD:
Role of behavioural experiments and exposure processes. Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and
Related Disorders, 6, pp.158-166.
Challacombe, F., Oldfield, V.B. and Salkovskis, P.M., 2011. Break Free From OCD:
overcoming obsessive-compulsive disorder with CBT. Random House.
Dèttore, D., Pozza, A. and Andersson, G., 2015. Efficacy of technology-delivered cognitive
behavioural therapy for OCD versus control conditions, and in comparison, with therapist-
administered CBT: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Cognitive behaviour
therapy, 44(3), pp.190-211.
Drucker, P.F., 1954. Management by objectives and self-control. The practice of Management.
Dryden, W. and Branch, R. eds., 2011. The CBT handbook. Sage.
Esbjørn, B.H., Normann, N. and Reinholdt-Dunne, M.L., 2015. Adapting metacognitive therapy
to children with generalised anxiety disorder: Suggestions for a manual. Journal of
contemporary psychotherapy, 45(3), pp.159-166.

21
Fisher, P.L. and Wells, A., 2008. Metacognitive therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder: A
case series. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 39(2), pp.117-132.
Fisher, P.L., 2009. Obsessive-compulsive disorder: a comparison of CBT and the metacognitive
approach. International Journal of Cognitive Therapy, 2(2), pp.107-122.
Flavell, J.H., 1979. Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–
developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), p.906.
Gilbert, P. ed., 2005. Compassion: Conceptualisations, research and use in psychotherapy.
Routledge.
Goetter, E.M., Herbert, J.D., Forman, E.M., Yuen, E.K. and Thomas, J.G., 2014. An open trial of
videoconference-mediated exposure and ritual prevention for obsessive-compulsive
disorder. Journal of anxiety disorders, 28(5), pp.460-462.
Grant, A., Townend, M., Mills, J. and Cockx, A., 2008. Assessment and case formulation in
cognitive behavioural therapy. Sage.
Grant, J.E., Mancebo, M.C., Mooney, M.E., Eisen, J.L. and Rasmussen, S.A., 2015. Longitudinal
course of body-focused repetitive behaviours in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Annals of
Clinical Psychiatry, 27(3), pp.185-191.
Grøtte, T., Solem, S., Vogel, P.A., Güzey, I.C., Hansen, B. and Myers, S.G., 2015.
Metacognition, responsibility, and perfectionism in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Cognitive
Therapy and Research, 39(1), pp.41-50.
Kapoor, S., Mehta, M. and Sagar, R., 2015. Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder. In A Practical
Approach to Cognitive Behaviour Therapy for Adolescents (pp. 245-262). Springer, New Delhi.
Kennerley, H., Kirk, J. and Westbrook, D., 2016. An introduction to cognitive behaviour
therapy: Skills and applications. Sage.
Kuyken, W., Padesky, C.A. and Dudley, R., 2008. Collaborative case conceptualisation:
Working effectively with clients in cognitive-behavioural therapy. Guilford Press.

22
Ladouceur, R., Gosselin, P. and Dugas, M.J., 2000. Experimental manipulation of intolerance of
uncertainty: A study of a theoretical model of worry. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 38(9),
pp.933-941.
Leahey, T.M., Crowther, J.H. and Irwin, S.R., 2008. A cognitive-behavioural mindfulness group
therapy intervention for the treatment of binge eating in bariatric surgery patients. Cognitive and
Behavioral Practice, 15(4), pp.364-375.
Leahy, R.L., Holland, S.J. and McGinn, L.K., 2011. Treatment plans and interventions for
depression and anxiety disorders. Guilford Press.
Ludvik, D. and Boschen, M.J., 2015. Cognitive restructuring and detached mindfulness:
Comparative impact on a compulsive checking task. Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and
Related Disorders, 5, pp.8-15.
McGinn, L.K. and Sanderson, W.C., 1999. Treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder. Jason
Aronson, Incorporated
Monaghan, S.C., Cattie, J.E., Mathes, B.M., Shorter-Gentile, L.I., Crosby, J.M. and Elias, J.A.,
2015. Stages of change and the treatment of OCD. Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related
Disorders, 5, pp.1-7.
Morris, L. and Nightingale, J., 2014. CBT for OCD: habituation or cognitive shift?. The
Cognitive Behaviour Therapist, 7.
Newman, M.G., Castonguay, L.G., Jacobson, N.C. and Moore, G.A., 2015. Adult attachment as
a moderator of treatment outcome for generalized anxiety disorder: Comparison between
cognitive–behavioral therapy (CBT) plus supportive listening and CBT plus interpersonal and
emotional processing therapy. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 83(5), p.915.
Nice.org.uk. (2014). Anxiety disorders | Guidance and guidelines | NICE. [online] Available at:
https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/qs53/chapter/quality-statement-2-psychological-interventions
[Accessed 4 Mar. 2018].
Normann, N., Emmerik, A.A. and Morina, N., 2014. The efficacy of metacognitive therapy for
anxiety and depression: A meta‐analytic review. Depression and Anxiety, 31(5), pp.402-411.

23
Ocduk.org. (2018). Understanding Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD). [online] Available
at: https://www.ocduk.org/ocd [Accessed 26 Mar. 2018].
Padesky, C.A., 1993, September. Socratic questioning: Changing minds or guiding discovery.
In A keynote address delivered at the European Congress of Behavioural and Cognitive
Therapies, London (Vol. 24).
Papageorgiou, C. and Wells, A., 2000. Treatment of recurrent major depression with attention
training. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 7(4), pp.407-413.
Rees, C.S. and Anderson, R.A., 2013. A review of metacognition in psychological models of the
obsessive-compulsive disorder. Clinical Psychologist, 17(1), pp.1-8.
Reiser, R.P. and Milne, D.L., 2016. A survey of CBT supervision in the UK: methods,
satisfaction and training, as viewed by a selected sample of CBT supervision leaders. The
Cognitive Behaviour Therapist, 9.
Salkovskis, P.M., 1985. Obsessional-compulsive problems: A cognitive-behavioural
analysis. Behaviour research and therapy, 23(5), pp.571-583.
Sassano-Higgins, S.A., Sapp, F. and Van Noppen, B., 2015. Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for
Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder. Focus, 13(2), pp.148-161.
Schirmbeck, F. and Tundo, A., 2015. Cognitive behavioural therapy for co-occurring obsessive-
compulsive symptoms. In Obsessive-Compulsive Symptoms in Schizophrenia (pp. 203-217).
Springer, Cham.
Segal, Z.V., Teasdale, J.D., Williams, J.M. and Gemar, M.C., 2002. The mindfulness‐based
cognitive therapy adherence scale: Inter‐rater reliability, adherence to protocol and treatment
distinctiveness. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 9(2), pp.131-138.
Seif, M.N. and Winston, S., 2014. What Every Therapist Needs to Know about Anxiety
Disorders: Key Concepts, Insights, and Interventions. Routledge.
Simmons, J. and Griffiths, R., 2017. CBT for Beginners. Sage.

24
Warman, D.M., Phalen, P.L. and Martin, J.M., 2015. Impact of a brief education about mental
illness on the stigma of OCD and violent thoughts. Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and
Related Disorders, 5, pp.16-23.
Wells, A. and Matthews, G., 1996. Modelling cognition in emotional disorder: The S-REF
model. Behaviour research and therapy, 34(11-12), pp.881-888.
Wells, A., 1995. Meta-cognition and worry: A cognitive model of generalised anxiety
disorder. Behavioural and cognitive psychotherapy, 23(3), pp.301-320.
Westbrook, J.I., 2014. Interruptions and multi-tasking: moving the research agenda in new
directions.
Whittington, A. and Grey, N. eds., 2014. How to become a more effective CBT therapist:
Mastering metacompetence in clinical practice. John Wiley and Sons.
Williams, M. (2018). Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder and the “Root of the
Problem”. Psychology Today. Retrieved 28 March 2018, from
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/culturally-speaking/201112/obsessive-compulsive-
disorder-and-the-root-the-problem
Wills, F. and Sanders, D. (2013). Cognitive behavioural therapy. London: SAGE.
Witkiewitz, K. and Marlatt, G.A., 2007. Modelling the complexity of post-treatment drinking:
It's a rocky road to relapse. Clinical Psychology Review, 27(6), pp.724-738.

25
Appendix
METACOGNITION QUESTIONNAIRE
30 (MCQ-30)
Adrian Wells and Samantha Cartwright-Hatton
This questionnaire deals with the beliefs that people have about their thoughts and, below, some
are listed. Read each statement carefully and express what, in general, agree with it, by looking
for the appropriate number on the side. Please answer all statements; there are no right or wrong
answers.
Sex______ Age________
I do not I agree I agree I completely
agree partially agree
1.
Mulling helps me avoid
Problems in the future. 1 2 3 4
2.
The fact of worrying me often
It's harmful to me. 1 2 3 4
3.
I dwell a lot on me
Thoughts. 1 2 3 4
4.
I have a risk of getting sick because
of my constant concerns. 1 2 3 4
5.
When I reflect on a problem, I am
aware of how my mind works.
1 2 3 4
6.
If I did not check following menacing
thinking and what I fear, if it happens
I will blame myself for it
1 2 3 4
7.
I need to brood for
I can organise myself. 1 2 3 4
8. I have little confidence in my ability
To remember words and names.
1 2 3 4

26
9.
My negative thoughts persist,
regardless of what
I do try to get rid of it.
1 2 3 4
10.
Mulling helps me find
Solutions mentally. 1 2 3 4
11. I cannot ignore my concerns. 1 2 3 4
12. I carefully check my thoughts. 1 2 3 4
13.
I should always have control over my
thoughts. 1 2 3 4
14. Sometimes my memory can trick me. 1 2 3 4
15.
Worrying too much can make me
Crazy. 1 2 3 4
16.
I am constantly aware
Of my thoughts. 1 2 3 4
17. I have a short memory. 1 2 3 4
18.
I dedicate a lot of attention to the
way my mind works. 1 2 3 4
19.
Mulling helps me to deal with the
difficulties. 1 2 3 4
20.
Not being able to control my own
thoughts is a sign of weakness.
1 2 3 4
21.
When I start to worry about
something, I cannot stop
1 2 3 4
22.
I will be punished for failing
To control certain thoughts. 1 2 3 4
23.
Mulling helps me to solve my
problems. 1 2 3 4

27
24.
I do not have much confidence in my
ability to remember places. 1 2 3 4
25. Having certain thoughts is bad. 1 2 3 4
26. I do not trust my memory. 1 2 3 4
27.
If I could not control mine
thoughts, I would not be able to act
in the correct way.
1 2 3 4
28. I need to brood to work better. 1 2 3 4
29.
I have little confidence in my ability
to remember what I did. 1 2 3 4
30. I constantly analyse my thoughts. 1 2 3 4
Please make sure you have answered all the questions.
MCQ-30: SCORING
Insert the answers provided to each item in the diagram below. To get the scores of the
individual subscales, add the scores.
POS NEG CC NC CSC
1 2 8 6 3
7 4 14 13 5
10 9 17 20 12
19 11 24 22 16
23 15 26 25 18
28 21 29 27 30
Total
The subscales are:
POS = positive meta-beliefs about rumination
NEG = negative meta-beliefs about uncontrollability and the danger of worries
CC = confidence in one's own cognitive abilities
NC = need control of thoughts

28
CSC = cognitive self-awareness
The total MCQ score is obtained by adding together the totals of the individual subscales.
Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) scale
Over the last 2 weeks, how often have you been Not at several Over half Nearly
bothered by the following problems? all sure days the days every day
1. Feeling nervous, anxious, or on edge 0 1 2 3
2. Not being able to stop or control worrying 0 1 2 3
3. Worrying too much about different things 0 1 2 3
4. Trouble relaxing 0 1 2 3
5. Being so restless that it's hard to sit still 0 1 2 3
6. Becoming easily annoyed or irritable 0 1 2 3
7. Feeling afraid as if something awful might 0 1 2 3
happen
Add the score for each column + + +
Total Score (add your column scores) =
If you checked off any problems, how difficult have these made it for you to do your work,
take care of things at home, or get along with other people?
Not difficult at all __________
Somewhat difficult _________
Very difficult _____________
Extremely difficult _________

29