Challenges Ahead for Sustainable Funding of Healthcare: An Opinion Editorial

Running head: OPINION EDITORIAL
Opinion Editorial
Name of the Student
Name of the University
Author Note

1
OPINION EDITORIAL
According to the reports published by the Parliament of Australia (2017), in spite of
having some failings, Australia has a good health care system. Life-expectancy of Australian
population is highest among the world, ranging up to 81.5 years (approximately) and the
overall cost to the healthcare service is much below the average healthcare cost of many
countries.
Figure: Comparative Analysis of the Health Expenditure
(Source: Parliament of Australia 2017)
Thus Australian, health care system is attributed to wealthy healthcare system. But the
total number of people who are over 85 years are expected to increase from 0.4 million to 1.8
million by the end of 2050. This increase in the number of the aged population is expected to
increase the rate of occurrence of the diseases which are common among the older adults.
However, the government of Australia lacks significant funding for the healthcare services
which are specifically directed towards the older adults (Parliament of Australia, 2017).

2
OPINION EDITORIAL
Treasury’s Intergenerational Report as published on 2010 by common Wealth of
Australia estimated that expenditure on healthcare by government of Australia as a
percentage of GDP must be doubled by 2050. But the Committee for Economic Development
of Australia (CEDA) highlighted that the present health care funding in Australia is not
sustainable. Though the concept of proposed by CEDA covers one aspect of common good
but fails to cover other aspects of common good.
The catholic social thought of common good is of the opinion that life is cannot be
lived in isolation but via the formation of healthy communities (Australian Catholic Social
Justice Council, 2017). Under this formation of healthy community, every person is required
to contribute while sharing mutual benefits. But in order to generate equitable funding only
the governmental bodies are pressurised. This is hampering the understanding of the common
good. The approach must be undertaken in such a way that every individual must come
forward in order to take a significant step towards fund raising towards equitable access to
the health care (Massaro, 2015).
Common good also promotes the establishment of set of right and duties so that the
minimum standards in quality of life can be achieved (Novak, 2017). But under the
perspective of the Australian healthcare system, it is reviewed that, there is growing burden
for chronic illness and there is a significant gap in the health care funding for the indigenous
group of population residing in Australia. This is generating health inequalities (Donato&
Segal, 2013). According to Uphoff et al. (2013), in spite of the active approach undertaken by
the government of Australia, there is prominent health inequality among the indigenous
population residing in Australia like Torres Strait Islander. This main reason behind this is
lack of equilibrium in the social determinants of health. This disequilibrium in the social
determinants of health among the indigenous population is hampering the principle of the
common good. Here though the fund is being raised to address the health care needs of the