Changing Depreciation Methods and Compliance with IAS 16 or IASB 116
Verified
Added on 2024/04/25
|5
|570
|369
AI Summary
This case study discusses Marion's decision to change the depreciation method of Pringles Ltd without proper disclosure, violating IAS 16 and AASB 116. The importance of disclosing such changes in financial statements is highlighted.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Changing depreciation methods 1
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Contents D. Do Marion’s actions comply with the requirements of IAS 16 or IASB 116?.....................................2 References.............................................................................................................................................4 2
D. Do Marion’s actions comply with the requirements of IAS 16 or IASB 116? IAS 16 and AASB 116 both accounting standards relate to the property, plant and equipment and their accounting treatment and reporting mechanism in the financial statements of a company. In accordance with the provisi0ns of these standards whenever a company changes its method of depreciation, it is mandatory to disclose such change in the notes to financial statements of the company.As per paragraph 73 of IAS 16 for each class of property, plant and equipment a company is required to disclose the depreciation method used useful lives of assets and the rates of depreciation charged and accumulated depreciation in the financial statements of company. As per paragraph 61 of IAS 16, the depreciation method used by the company shall be reviewed annually and the change in method shall be reported as the change in estimate under IAS 8 in the notes to financial statements of company. Also as per paragraph 61 of AASB 116, at each annual reporting period of the company, the depreciation method used for fixed assets shall be reviewed and any change in the method of charging depreciation shall be disclosed in the notes to financial statements of company as a change in accounting estimate in accordance with AASB 108 (Laing & Perrin, 2014). In the case of Pringles Ltd, the company has been charging depreciation on its assets as per straight line method of charging depreciation since the formation of company. The company is likely to earn high profits in the year 2016 and 2017 but the economist predict that the profits of the company are likely to decline in the year 2018 and 2019. Therefore, in order to maintain the uniformity in profits for the coming years, the accountant of company Marion Mason decided to change the depreciation method of company from straight line method to sum of years’ digit method. However Marion did not disclose the change of method in the financial statements of the company as the reason given by the General Manager Peter was not a sound reason for change of method and in the opinion of Maron it will not form any good impression on the stakeholders of company and other users of financial information (Sun & Rath, 2010). The non-disclosure of change in method of depreciation by Marion is an act of violation of provisionsofaccountingstandardsIAS16andAASB116.Theprovisionsofthese accountings standards require disclosure in the notes to financial statements and therefore, the act of Marion does not comply with the requirements of IAS16/AASB116. 3
4
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
References Laing, G.K. and Perrin, R.W., 2014. Deconstructing an accounting paradigm shift: AASB 116non-currentassetmeasurementmodels.InternationalJournalofCritical Accounting,6(5-6), pp.509-519. Sun, L. and Rath, S., 2010. Earnings management research: a review of contemporary research methods.Global Review of accounting and Finance,1(1), pp.121-135. 5