Methodological Challenges in Investigating Cognitive Development in Infants
Verified
Added on 2023/06/10
|13
|3786
|85
AI Summary
This essay sheds light on the methodological challenges encountered in the outcome investigation of cognitive development in infants, theoretical aspects of Piaget’s and Erikson’s developmental psychology of infancy and childhood, and the role of genetics, regulatory behaviours and motor development on infant development.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running head: PSYCHOLOGY PSYCHOLOGY Name of the Student: Name of the University: Author note:
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
1PSYCHOLOGY Studies related tocognitive growth and developmentinhuman infantshave largely been reliant on thedescriptive dataat thebehavioural levelwhich is theage whereby a specific ability emerges(Bjorklund & Causey, 2017). Over the past four decades, investigations on human cognitive development have claimedcertain degree of abilities in infancy provided the apparently immature and ineffectual appearance of the newborn(Jones et al., 2014). However, such revelations have developed as a consequence of the elevating subtle and sensitive mechanisms whereby the major proportion has showngreat degree of dependency on the behavioural responses such as visual fixations, eye movements, sucking along with the range of psycho physiological recordings such as heart rate(Estes et al., 2015). As paediatric and clinical child psychologists have been revealing high degree of engagement in evaluation of infancy at biological and environment risk, this has been due in part to the reducing rate of mortality along with the consequentialdeveloping series of surviving infants at the elevated risk for developmental morbidity(Bjorklund, 2013). However, in addition to the awareness on significant factors of disabilities in terms ofserious mental retardation, epilepsy, sensory impairments, a greater degree of inclination has further aimed on assessing the evaluation of more subtle, high rate of prevalence and behavioural issues and complexities. The following essay focuses on the methodological challenges which have been encountered in the outcome investigation of cognitive development in infants by further shedding light on the theoretical aspects of Piaget’s and Erikson’s developmental psychology of infancy and childhood. In addition to this, it will further evaluate the understanding of the role of genetics, regulatory behaviours and motor development on infant development. Though the advanced cognitive neuroscience mechanisms have determined infancy research as anintegrated approach to the domain of neurobiological bases of behavioural
2PSYCHOLOGY growth and development, the evaluative investigations often demonstrate certain methodological challenges and issues which tend to influence the findings in the study of infant development (Jones et al., 2014). It has been noted that in the sphere of developmental evaluative studies, the cause-effect inferencesmust be showirritability by the alternative understandings of observed impactsthat could further be generated by certain factors related toconfounding influences (Walfisch et al., 2013). Though it has been distinguished thatrandom assignments does not demonstrate adequate level of capability in the studies of natural occurrences of conditions related to extreme low birth weight (ELBW), the cohort also regarded as follow up studies claim the majorconceptualization of causal inferences in terms of ELBW, drug exposure which results to certain forms of neurodevelopmental outcomes (Tran et al., 2013). Furthermore, selection of control variablesmust be established both onconceptual foreground and by the means of associations which reveal a weak relationship between the variable and the outcomes measure of interest. However, it has been noted thatmultiple regression mechanismsare often considered to be effective butcreate complexities when multicollinearity has its existence because of elevating degree of concurrent predictor variables. A second essential challenge with determining to develop a mechanism of learning which can sustain large complex problems such asvisual perception or language which is a well-established mechanism for attaining awareness must develop adequate competence to deal with the exponentially significant rate of anticipated relevant correlations that has its availability in the input(Bernard et al., 2013). For instance, in randomly ordered series of various elements, there can be witnessed12 possible unique pairs. However, when these series are increased it necessitates an equally developing rateof sensory examples in order to develop the understanding of the relevant pairs which are considered to be constructive for the organism(Bjorklund & Causey, 2017). At this juncture, it is further to be
3PSYCHOLOGY noted that, in the context of natural situational occurrences, there can be witnessed no practical area of avenue for infants to encounter any such instances. This has been referred to the computational explosion issueand has been specificallysubtle when taken into consideration not only adjacent pairs of entities but further non-adjacent pairs along with higher-order combinations of over two elements in any sensory or domain of cognitive development(Mueller et al., 2015). Furthermore, regardless to the occurrence of the computational explosion challenges, human observers have been identified as responsive to thestatistical probabilities which further define the fundamental structureswhich have beenembedded in both the spheres of sequential strings in regards to visual as well as auditory along with spatial arrangements pertaining to visual entities(Monk, Georgieff & Osterholm, 2013). However, these elements have the propensity toinvoluntarily extort a range of statistics that involves other conditional rate of probabilitieswhich further providean increased rate of metric of certainty in relation to the relative frequency of element co-occurrences. These statistical awareness and understanding is considered to be vigorous and rapid and further executes its operations in an unsubstantiated mode during infant development (Barac et al., 2014). Furthermore, there can be witnessed a significantly accumulating instances which actsdecisive role and enhances the rate of chances that infants’ internal illustrations of visual, auditory along with other sensory inputs emerge based on a fundamental statistical learning mechanism. In recent times, it has been noted that the implementation of habituation and novelty responsiveness have led observers to seek for a range of questions related to infancy. For instance, if aninfant looks longer at the novel facial expression, then researchers can evaluate the difference between the infant’s smiling and frowning expressions(Jones et al., 2014). Furthermore, roper habituation of infants with an images and further testing them at the later
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
4PSYCHOLOGY phase with the same image makes it possible for researchers to assess the memory of an infant. In the opinion of renowned biologist and philosopher,Jean Piaget, each infant demonstrates the ability to construct a comprehensive understanding of the world based on the assumptions and learning of their own reactions in the world.In order to provide explanations regarding the cognitive development of infants, Piaget had comprehended theprocess of adaptation which is refereed as a process whereby knowledge has been shaped through certain events. The process of adaptation tends toincorporate two complementary, intertwined as well as powerful processes such as assimilation and accommodation(Demetriou, Spanoudis & Shayer, 2014). The theoretical aspects of Piaget noted thatknowledge and informationcan be generated in accordance to what the infant has already been aware of, such information are considered to be assimilated (Mueller et al., 2015). However, at certain situational contexts, thechild’s level of understanding and awareness of the world does not allow assimilating new information. Furthermore, new knowledge often fail to assimilate into the current level of awareness of the child,two vital conditions can develop, whereby the child reveals utmost incompetence to assimilate or the child tends to shift its own level of awareness to allow newly developed understanding to be generated.Furthermore, thesensorimotor periodaccording to Piaget’s theoretical aspects has its occurrences during infancy by thepreoperational, concrete operational and formal operational courses of childhood(Demetriou, Spanoudis & Shayer, 2014). It has been noted that during thesensorimotor period, factors related to the ‘thinking’ process constitutes of determining sensory information with increased level of motor activity. Piaget’s theory claims that infants have the propensity to obtain knowledge through actions like looking, listening, touching, sucking and grasping. The sensorimotor period comprises a series of
5PSYCHOLOGY six stages which initiates from the birth and continuestill 2 years of age(Haywood & Getchell, 2014). During these stages infants fail to distinguish thatstimuli belong to the concrete entities with the external world for example the noises and reverberationwhich generate from other things to the way theyattempt to understand the direction of any moving object for instance, a child tend to move around the sofa or table to follow the direction of a moving ball and tends to anticipate the re-emergence of the ball. At this juncture, it is significant to note that though Piaget’s perspective of infant cognition has been recognized as immensely decisive, several claims and propositions have posed challenges related to the theoretical aspects of infant development(Bjorklund, 2013). Furthermore, one of thevital criticisms is that Piaget shed light on the approaches that infants demonstrate the ability to attain knowledge through movements that is “motor’ in the course of sensorimotor period and avoided other methods through which infants can develop knowledge(Spector & Maurer, 2013). Certain observations revealed that limbless children tend to determine a normal cognitive life regardless to the lack of ordinary sensorimotor experience during infant development. Thus it can be claimed thatPiaget had shown immense rate of importance to the factors of mobile and tactile explorationand further avoided other vital sensory as well as organizational abilities which infants possess (Bjorklund, 2013). As Piaget was greatly inclined towards the broader domain concerning the overarching characteristics of cognitive developmentfrom birth through the stage of adolescence, theother researchers showed immense inclination on the areas of specific elements of cognitive development, which focus on types of skills infant acquire and during which stages(Mueller et al., 2015). As researchers of infant cognition have been particularly inclined in the classification, memory and pretend to play. However, certain significant factors have been associated to the representational thinking which is understood as the ability to perceive about the objects and
6PSYCHOLOGY individuals who are not present (Saccani et al., 2013). Piaget further developed this perception that this infiltrate did not have its development until the age of two years. Thus the implementation of various investigative techniques, modern researchers have comprehended the observation of emblematic perceptions at a considerable young age(Bjorklund, 2013). At this juncture, it is vital to identify the theoretical aspects ofPiaget whereby he shifted the attention on play away from the domains of social and emotional progressand towards cognitive development. As Piaget argued that factors related to play had contributed to intellectual growth through processes of ‘accommodation’ and ‘assimilation’(Fairbairn, 2013). However, with the development of symbolic play along with conceptual perceptions, substantiated through the competence level of a child in the process of signifying the world, it can be recognized as the groundwork of the development of later symbolic behavioural patterns (Bjorklund, 2013). Theunderstanding of play stated by Freud allows children to articulate or explicitly convey the negative or unconstructive sense of emotions and further to resolve those inner apprehensions within the core of unconscious sense of feeling. Furthermore, the understanding ofcatharsis is recognized as the reconciliation of intuitive urges with the demands and regulations of society as being internalized by the individuals(Spector & Maurer, 2013). As activities related to play offers certain areas of avenues for infants to accomplish the degree of catharsis and thus emerges factors concerning distressing experiences and situations by providing a secured approach to articulate complex sense of emotions. Furthermore, these vital approaches tend to concentrate onthe internal as well as emotional spheres of childrenand therefore can be perceived as significantly relevant while dealing with children who have been encountered with the disruptive situations and disorders of war and civil conflict(Nyaradi et al., 2013). However, through the theoretical aspects ofFreud, these approaches emphasizes on the
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
7PSYCHOLOGY advantageous factors of a dedicated instance and liberty for infants and children to engage in playful activities within the emotional structure developed by play therapists.Furthermore, another vital significant aspect while considering cross-cultural facets of play in infant and child development.Freud had signified the way families from certain cultural backgroundswhich tend to underline the cognitive significance of playful activities with an individual standpoint on play whereby every component show very object and toy centric. However, families belonging to other cultural backgrounds show greater degree of propensity to focus on the social factors of play. Thus it has been noted that the level of interactions within play and the poignant significance of play are considered to be of immense vitality. Furthermore, it has been identified by Freud that infants demonstrate a certain degree of capability of erotic activity from the time of birth (Klein, 2017). Theinitial phase of manifestations and understanding of childhood or infantile sexuality occurs in the relation to the bodily functions related to feeding and removal of bodily wastes.Moreover, of all the vital conceptualizations of Freud, thenotions and theoretical aspects developed by him with regard to the erotic life of infants emerge serious degree of criticisms from various spheres(Saccani et al., 2013). As in the oral stage developed by Freud, theinfant’s need in attaining pleasurehas been sufficiently accomplished through the process of consuming mother’s milk, the satisfaction of needs vital at this stage is highly dependable on mother, whereby the mother acts as a first love object for the child.As the process of feeding has been recognized as one of the most vital activity for a child, factors associated to both physiological and psychological emotions play influential role in the lives of infants (Freud, 2017). While each child possess distinctive genetic potentials, bothhuman and animal observationsfocus to vital needs that every child has along with the severe long-term impact for
8PSYCHOLOGY brain functions if such desires remain unattained. At this juncture, it becomes persuasive that the consequences of childhood environment with constructive or unconstructive circumstances tend to correlate with therange of neurodevelopment processes which are associated with factors of neurogenesis, migration, synaptic sculpting and myelination(Mueller et al., 2015). Asgenes and events demonstrate high degree of interdependence, the complex process of developing a human mind requires both these vital factors whereby the remarkable malleability and adaptability of humanity is permitted by thegenetically-transmitted aptitudeto effectively perceive and show responsiveness tomyriad environmental cueswhich further involves the intricate social- emotional milieu generated when humans share common habitat and the organs therefore become immenselysensitive and receptive towards certain environmental factors(Conradt et al., 2013). At this juncture, it is highly significant to evaluate the stated framework that engages into factors of awareness, cognition and sense of feelings and emotions in comparison to a more frugal understanding of global or fundamental aspect of ‘self-regulation’. It has often been noted that a major segment of children reveal striking advancements in the process ofcontrol or regulation of attention, awareness, cognition as well as emotion from the phase of infancy through the course of early childhood(Saccani et al., 2013). In addition to this, although individual divergences have been broad, these factors tend to become considerably constant over the period by the later phase of early childhood. Thus, it can be possible to signify infants or children as considerably‘regulated’ or controlled relative to each other and further to pertain this factor across several spheres of their functioning.It is significant to identify that prior to brain imaging and eye tracking came into consideration, factors associated to motor development have been evaluated on the development process of infants’ growth. Motor behaviour has been distinguished as both functionally
9PSYCHOLOGY comprehensive and directlyapparent, factors related to motor development acts as an ideal model system for comprehending transitions emerging in other areas of development. Thus to conclude it can be stated that infants’ motor skills and abilities tend to enhance as their bodies and environments have been undergoing certain phases of transformations. As the body and environment have been persistently in certain degree of fluctuations, affordances for actions also tend to undergo changes. Thus infants develop the knowledge to shown inclination towards appropriate actions by perceiving as well as simplifying affordances for actions.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
10PSYCHOLOGY References Barac, R., Bialystok, E., Castro, D. C., & Sanchez, M. (2014). The cognitive development of young dual language learners: A critical review.Early Childhood Research Quarterly,29(4), 699-714. Bernard, J. Y., De Agostini, M., Forhan, A., Alfaiate, T., Bonet, M., Champion, V., ... & EDEN Mother-Child Cohort Study Group. (2013). Breastfeeding duration and cognitive development at 2 and 3 years of age in the EDEN mother–child Cohort.The Journal of pediatrics,163(1), 36-42. Bjorklund, D. F. (2013).Children's strategies: Contemporary views of cognitive development. Psychology Press. Bjorklund, D. F. (2013).Children's strategies: Contemporary views of cognitive development. Psychology Press. Bjorklund, D. F., & Causey, K. B. (2017).Children's thinking: Cognitive development and individual differences. Sage Publications. Conradt, E., Lester, B. M., Appleton, A. A., Armstrong, D. A., & Marsit, C. J. (2013). The roles of DNA methylation of NR3C1 and 11β-HSD2 and exposure to maternal mood disorder in utero on newborn neurobehavior.Epigenetics,8(12), 1321-1329. Demetriou, A., Spanoudis, G., & Shayer, M. (2014). Inference, reconceptualization, insight, and efficiency along intellectual growth: A general theory.Enfance, (3), 365-396.
11PSYCHOLOGY Demetriou, A., Spanoudis, G., & Shayer, M. (2014). Inference, reconceptualization, insight, and efficiency along intellectual growth: A general theory.Enfance, (3), 365-396. Estes, A., Zwaigenbaum, L., Gu, H., John, T. S., Paterson, S., Elison, J. T., ... & Kostopoulos, P. (2015). Behavioral, cognitive, and adaptive development in infants with autism spectrum disorder in the first 2 years of life.Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders,7(1), 24. Fairbairn, W. R. D. (2013).Psychoanalytic studies of the personality. Routledge. Freud, S. (2017).Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality: The 1905 Edition. Verso Books. Haywood, K., & Getchell, N. (2014).Life Span Motor Development 6th Edition. Human kinetics. Jones, E. J., Gliga, T., Bedford, R., Charman, T., & Johnson, M. H. (2014). Developmental pathways to autism: a review of prospective studies of infants at risk.Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews,39, 1-33. Klein, M. (2017). The origins of transference. InThe Analytic Situation(pp. 13-22). Routledge. Monk, C., Georgieff, M. K., & Osterholm, E. A. (2013). Research review: maternal prenatal distress and poor nutrition–mutually influencing risk factors affecting infant neurocognitive development.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry,54(2), 115- 130. Mueller, N. T., Bakacs, E., Combellick, J., Grigoryan, Z., & Dominguez-Bello, M. G. (2015). The infant microbiome development: mom matters.Trends in molecular medicine,21(2), 109-117.
12PSYCHOLOGY Nyaradi, A., Li, J., Hickling, S., Foster, J., & Oddy, W. H. (2013). The role of nutrition in children's neurocognitive development, from pregnancy through childhood.Frontiers in human neuroscience,7, 97. Saccani, R., Valentini, N. C., Pereira, K. R., Müller, A. B., & Gabbard, C. (2013). Associations of biological factors and affordances in the home with infant motor development.Pediatrics International,55(2), 197-203. Spector, F., & Maurer, D. (2013). Synesthesia: a new approach to understanding the development of perception. Tran, T. D., Biggs, B. A., Tran, T., Simpson, J. A., Hanieh, S., Dwyer, T., & Fisher, J. (2013). Impact on infants’ cognitive development of antenatal exposure to iron deficiency disorder and common mental disorders.Plos one,8(9), e74876. Walfisch, A., Sermer, C., Cressman, A., & Koren, G. (2013). Breast milk and cognitive development—the role of confounders: a systematic review.BMJ open,3(8), e003259.