logo

A Comparison of Rural Development Research Paper 2022

Allen, T. & Thomas, A. 2000. Poverty and Development into the 21st Century. Oxford University Press, South Africa. Atkinson, D. 2003. Post-apartheid local government reforms: a small-town perspective, CDE, Johannesburg. Atkinson, D. and Zingle, J. 2004. Towards a small-town network: concept feasibility and process papers, Bloemfontein. Atkinson, D. Human Resources Research Council; Rhodes University and University of the Free State. 2003. Evaluation of Local Economic Development (LED) in the Free State Province. Study undertaken for the Premier’s Economic Advisory Council of the Free State. Atkinson, D. McIntosh, A.; Smith, K. & De Visser, J. 2002. A passion to govern: Thirdgeneration issues facing local government in South Africa. Report for the Centre for Development and Enterprise. Behrens, Kristian and Thisse, Jacques-Francois. 2007. Regional economics: A new economic geography perspective. Regional Science and Urban Economics Vol. 37; pp. 457–465. Binns, T. & Nel, E. 2002.Tourism as a development strategy in South Africa. Geographical Journal 168, pp.235-247. Binns, T. and E. Nel. 2002. Supporting local economic Development in post-Apartheid South Africa. Local Economy17, pp.8-24. Centre for Development and Enterprise (CDE), 1996: South

14 Pages3465 Words19 Views
   

Added on  2022-10-15

A Comparison of Rural Development Research Paper 2022

Allen, T. & Thomas, A. 2000. Poverty and Development into the 21st Century. Oxford University Press, South Africa. Atkinson, D. 2003. Post-apartheid local government reforms: a small-town perspective, CDE, Johannesburg. Atkinson, D. and Zingle, J. 2004. Towards a small-town network: concept feasibility and process papers, Bloemfontein. Atkinson, D. Human Resources Research Council; Rhodes University and University of the Free State. 2003. Evaluation of Local Economic Development (LED) in the Free State Province. Study undertaken for the Premier’s Economic Advisory Council of the Free State. Atkinson, D. McIntosh, A.; Smith, K. & De Visser, J. 2002. A passion to govern: Thirdgeneration issues facing local government in South Africa. Report for the Centre for Development and Enterprise. Behrens, Kristian and Thisse, Jacques-Francois. 2007. Regional economics: A new economic geography perspective. Regional Science and Urban Economics Vol. 37; pp. 457–465. Binns, T. & Nel, E. 2002.Tourism as a development strategy in South Africa. Geographical Journal 168, pp.235-247. Binns, T. and E. Nel. 2002. Supporting local economic Development in post-Apartheid South Africa. Local Economy17, pp.8-24. Centre for Development and Enterprise (CDE), 1996: South

   Added on 2022-10-15

ShareRelated Documents
Running head: A COMPARISON OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT
A Comparison of Rural Development
Name of Student:
Name of University:
Author Note:
A Comparison of Rural Development Research Paper 2022_1
A COMPARISON OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT1
Executive Summary
This paper looks at the rural development plans, policies, strategies and frameworks of four
countries: France, Spain, Ireland and Kenya. It compares these rural development initiatives
with those experienced and implemented in South Africa from a historical perspective, with
the aim to analyse and take lessons from this act of comparison from which future policy
makers can rely upon and develop a comprehensive, holistic and inclusive rural development
strategy and practice.
A Comparison of Rural Development Research Paper 2022_2
A COMPARISON OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT2
A Comparison of Rural Development Research Paper 2022_3
A COMPARISON OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT3
Introduction
The dichotomy between town and country has existed from the moment civilizations
have come into being (Rousseau 1995). As human society and technology progressed, the
divide existing between urban and rural living widened until the process of industrialization
in the nineteenth century completely destroyed any link between the cities and villages. It
was only after the end of the Second World War that many countries took up the concern of
developing rural areas to give its citizens residing in the countryside equal political, social
and economic opportunities. Different countries have responded differently to the rural
question, implementing a plethora of policy decisions that succeeded or failed, depending on
a number factors and circumstances. It is therefore interesting to note how varied can rural
development policies be and how essential they are for the overall development of the
country. In order to chalk out the best path for rural development, it is imperative that a
comparison is carried out between the various policies that have been implemented over the
years so that policy framers are in a better position to construct the optimal development
strategy for rural areas. This paper seeks to compare the rural development policies as have
been adopted and implemented by the nations of France, Spain, Ireland and Kenya since
1950. By listing out the various strategies and comparing them with the policies used by other
countries, this paper strives to analyse the implications drawn from this comparative
examination and provide a foundation upon which policy makers in the future could rely
upon.
Discussion
Rural Development in France
France was ravaged first by war and then by the brutal occupation of the Nazi regime
during the Second World War (Landes 1950). As a result, France’s rural landscape was
A Comparison of Rural Development Research Paper 2022_4

End of preview

Want to access all the pages? Upload your documents or become a member.

Related Documents
Structure of Travel and Tourism Industry
|12
|3380
|45

Market Analysis and Marketing Strategy of L’Oreal Paris
|8
|1662
|269