Analyzing Strategic Tools for Competitive Strategy
Verified
Added on 2023/02/01
|11
|1819
|93
AI Summary
The essay throws light on analyzing the importance of the different strategic tools which plays an essential role in providing sense of direction and outlines the different measurable goals as well.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running head: COMPETITIVE STRATEGY Competitive Strategy Name of the Student Name of the University Author note
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
1COMPETITIVE STRATEGY Introduction The essay throws light on analysing the importance of the different strategic tools which plays an essential role in providing sense of direction and outlines the different measurable goals as well. The different kinds of tools which will be analyzed in the essay includes SWOT, PESTEL, Ansoff Matrix and Porter’s Five Forces Model which will be beneficial in identifying the different opportunities and threats that can be faced by the organizations. SWOT Analysis SWOTAnalysisisdefinedastheframeworkwhichisusedbythedifferent organizations in evaluating the competitive position of the company along with developing strategic planning accurately (Noe et al. 2017). Moreover, the analysis is designed in order to facilitate the fact-based look at the different strengths and weaknesses of the companies or the industry. Strengths-It helps in describing the aspects in which the organizations excel and separates them from other competitors present in the market. It is inclusive of strong brand image, unique kind of technology which will be beneficial for the company to gain competitive advantage (Kerzner 2019). Weaknesses-It is the second aspect wherein it stops the companies from performing at an optimum level and these are considered to be the areas wherein organizations need growth as to remain competitive. Opportunities-It refers to the different external factors which are favourable and provides the organizations with competitive advantage such as increase in sales and market share of the organization (Jessop, Nielsen and Pedersen 2016).
2COMPETITIVE STRATEGY Threats-It refers to the different factors which have the potential to harm the organization such as increase in competition in the market or tight labour supply which can affect the growth of the company (Hanson et al. 2016). For instance- SWOT Analysis of Apple Strengths Innovative type of products Leadership Position Weaknesses Difficulty in matching expectations of customers Incompatibility Opportunities Technological Advancements (Apple.com.au 2019) Growing Market Threats Huge competition in the market Market Penetration by other brands PESTEL Analysis It is defined as the framework which is used in order to analyse along with monitor the macro-environmental factors which can create profound impact on the performance of the organizations both in positive or negative manner. It is the tool which is useful while starting
3COMPETITIVE STRATEGY a new business in a specific country as it will provide the details of the external environment (Gupta et al. 2016). Political Aspects-It includes the different factors related to degree of intervention of government which can affect the entire industry. It is inclusive of policies related to government, political instability or stability that can create huge impact on the industry or the country (Farinha, Ferreira and Gouveia 2016). Economic Aspects-It is considered as the different determinants of the performance of the economy and the different factors include the economic growth, rate of inflation along with rate of unemployment in the economy as it affects the way the companies try to price their products as well as services (Dombrowski et al. 2016). Social Factors-It is defined as the dimension of the general environment such as demographic factors and customs as well as values in which companies operates. Moreover, the different factors include emphasis on safety, consciousness among individuals for health. TechnologicalFactors-Itincludesthedifferentfactorswhicharerelatedto innovation which may affect the operations of the entire industry and it can be favourable or unfavourable for the market. The technological awareness plays a major role in managing the different aspects in an appropriate manner (Díaz-Chao, Sainz-González and Torrent-Sellens, 2016). Legal Factors-It is inclusive of the different kinds of laws along with regulations that can affect the growth of the companies or the industry in which the companies operates. The different laws include discrimination laws, patent laws along with health and safety laws which can be required to trade ethically (Bharati and Chaudhury 2015).
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
4COMPETITIVE STRATEGY Environmental Factors-The different factors include the different scarcity of the raw materials along with reduction in carbon footprints that can improve the overall scenario for the company to operate in the market (Ansoff et al. 2018). For instance- PESTEL Analysis of Apple Political Stability in the politics in developed countries Improvement in different free trade policies Economic Rapid growth in the developing countries is opportunity Stable economies of developed countries appropriately Social The rising usage of the mobile access is opportunity Rising usage of social media channels Technological Technological Integration Trend of cloud computing Growing application market (Apple.com.au 2019) Legal Increase in the different privacy rules and regulations
5COMPETITIVE STRATEGY Increase in threat in telecom industry due to regulations Environmental Trend of sustainability in business Trends of labour trend Ansoff Matrix It is defined as the tool and model which is essential for the strategic market planning which can be applied to identify the different kinds of opportunities which will be acting as the revenue for the business through proper development of new products along with services or tapping into the different new markets (Ansoff et al. 2018). Market Penetration-It is inclusive wherein the main focus is on increasing the sales of the existing products to the existing market Market Development-It mainly focuses on entering in the new market through proper utilization of the existing products Product Development-It is inclusive of the different aspects wherein the main focus on introducing the different new products to the existing markets (Ansoff et al. 2018) Diversification-It is mainly focusing on entering a new market with the proper introduction of the new products For instance- Ansoff Matrix of Apple Market Development-It is adopted by Apple Company as the major growth strategy and the main aspect is the long-term growth perspective of the company.
6COMPETITIVE STRATEGY Market Penetration-In case of Apple, they engage in the strategy of market penetration through efficient application of marketing strategy along with high level of efficiency (Apple.com.au 2019). Diversification-It is the other aspect wherein Apple is mainly focusing on the diversification strategy to become up to date with the different kinds of products and services and gain competitive advantage. Product Development-It is the aspect wherein the main focus is on the development of new products and Apple has been taking it seriously as they have been introducing the different kinds of products and it equalled to USD14,24 billion in 2016-2017. Porter’s Five Forces Model It is the last aspect wherein it utilizes the five forces in the industry to determine he intensity of the competition in the entire industry and improve the level of profitability in the market as well (Bharati and Chaudhury 2015). Threat of New Entrants-It helps in determining how easy it is for the different companies to enter in the competitive market and the barriers they can face. Bargaining Power of Suppliers-It helps in analysing the number of suppliers present in the market and whether they can threaten the company. Bargaining Power of Buyers- It showcases whether the buyers have power to demand lower price or high product quality to customers. Threat of Substitutes-It showcases whether the buyer can find different substitutes easily in the market.
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
7COMPETITIVE STRATEGY Competitive Rivalry-It analyses the nature of industry whether it is competitive or not in nature. For instance- Five Forces Analysis of Apple Bargaining Power of Suppliers High number of suppliers is weak High supply chain network is weak Bargaining Power of Customers Low switching cost is strong High information of buyers is strong Competitive Rivalry High aggressiveness of firms is strong Low Switching Costs is strong (Apple.com.au 2019) Threat of Substitutes Availability of substitutes is moderate Low performance of different substitutes is weak Threat of New Entrants High requirements of capital are weak High cost of development of brand is weak Conclusion
8COMPETITIVE STRATEGY Therefore, it can be concluded that strategic development tool plays a beneficial role in improving the business operations and operate successfully in the competitive business environment.
9COMPETITIVE STRATEGY References Ansoff, H.I., Kipley, D., Lewis, A.O., Helm-Stevens, R. and Ansoff, R., 2018.Implanting strategic management. Springer. Apple.com.au 2019 Apple (online) Retrieved fromhttps://www.apple.com/au/[Accessed on 25thApril 2019] Bharati, P. and Chaudhury, A., 2015. SMEs and competitiveness: The role of information systems.Bharati, P. and Chaudhury, A.(2009),“SMEs and Competitiveness: The Role of Information Systems”, International Journal of E-Business Research,5(1). Díaz-Chao, Á., Sainz-González, J. and Torrent-Sellens, J., 2016. The competitiveness of small network-firm: A practical tool.Journal of Business Research,69(5), pp.1769-1774. Dombrowski, U., Intra, C., Zahn, T. and Krenkel, P., 2016. Manufacturing strategy–a neglected success factor for improving competitiveness.Procedia CIRP,41, pp.9-14. Farinha, L., Ferreira, J. and Gouveia, B., 2016. Networks of innovation and competitiveness: a triple helix case study.Journal of the Knowledge Economy,7(1), pp.259-275. Gupta, S., Malhotra, N.K., Czinkota, M. and Foroudi, P., 2016. Marketing innovation: A consequence of competitiveness.Journal of Business Research,69(12), pp.5671-5681. Hanson, D., Hitt, M.A., Ireland, R.D. and Hoskisson, R.E., 2016.Strategic management: Competitiveness and globalisation. Cengage AU. Jessop, B., Nielsen, K. and Pedersen, O.K., 2016. Structural competitiveness and strategic capacities: rethinking the state and international capital.Institutional Change: Theory and Empirical Findings: Theory and Empirical Findings, p.227.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser