Contemporary People Management - Assignment
8 Pages2113 Words52 Views
Added on 2021-06-14
Contemporary People Management - Assignment
Added on 2021-06-14
ShareRelated Documents
Student’s Last Name1Contemporary People ManagementBy (Name)CourseProfessorUniversityDate
Student’s Last Name2Contemporary people management (CPM) and human resource management (HRM) have a great impact on the institutions, society, and humanity. CPM and HRM function effectively when combined as they reinforce each other. CPM and HRM generate positive outcomes in an organization. However, effective HRM has barriers as it can be achieved throughhard and soft techniques (Abreu and Badii, 2006 p.102). This paper explores utilitarianism as well as the happiness principle as the theoretical dimensions. As utilitarianism argues, it is evident that human happiness can be viewed as an ethical objective. Significantly, CPM and HRM contribute to the ethical objective through various ways as seen in this essay (Bolton and Houlihan, 2007 p.150). As experts indicate, CPM and HRM face ethical challenges which are connected to remuneration, employees, benefits, recognition, reward, health, and safety measures. This essay outlines the association between utilitarianism, CPM, and HRM.Utilitarianism is referred to as a normative ethical concept which put a locus based on theright as well as wrong on the basis of results connected to the individual selected actions. This theory suggests that best actions increase utility (Wilcox, 2008 p.203. The utility is perceived as the well-being of an individual or all the pleasures generated through actions. Moreover, utilitarianism views the interests of human-beings as equal. The utilitarian theory incorporates both hard and soft ethics in human resource management. The hard HRM uses the staff to satisfythe organizational needs and meet goals. On the other hand, the soft HRM focuses on employees where they are seen as the main subjects. At some point, utilitarianism does not agree with some points. For instance, utilitarianism disagrees that actions should be selected in the context of anticipated outcomes or if participants should obey the rules that maximize utilitarianism. However, the theory is outlined in a different perspective by Epicurus and Aristippus in the
Student’s Last Name3hedonists as they view happiness as the significant good of utilitarianism tradition. In this case, the utility is also viewed as the happiness principle. Assuming the concept of rational egoism, utilitarianism theory maximizes the general happiness of many people. Especially, in the case of decision-making, utilitarianism provides individuals with action evaluations which are acquired considering their consequences (Beardwell and Claydon, 2007 p.35). The theory produces practical results if the consequences are weighed. Utilitarianism can be explained using an example of a doctor and a patient Using utilitarianism, lying may be considered as good as it saves a patient and family from heartbreaking news and great happiness is experienced, However, utilitarianism indicates that lying may cause more harm to the patient (Shields, Brown, Kaine, Dolle-Samuel, North-Samardzic, McLean, Johns, O'Leary, Robinson and Plimmer, 2015 p.100). In decision-making, the anticipated consequences provide individuals with an opportunity to predict the right options.In addition, utilitarianism may be employed in a situation of a dilemma as it views people in an equal perspective. In such a way, utilitarianism contributes to advantages of many people and it correlates to the greatest happiness principle. Therefore, the issue of the Greatest Happiness Principle is the most significant in utilitarianism. For instance, the inability to foresee consequences as well as foresee the future on an action, In addition, the Greatest Happiness Principle is connected to several flaws. For instance, since people fail to predict future in regard to their actions, in case future can be altered by those actions then the individual actions may fail.Moreover, the unforeseen impacts of individual actions fail, in regard to utilitarianism it is considered unethical. The Greatest Happiness Principle gives people the opportunity to hurt others as far as the majority is happy. The principle also ignores the government laws which are created to guide the individual morals.
End of preview
Want to access all the pages? Upload your documents or become a member.
Related Documents
Contemporary Human Resource Management - PDFlg...
|6
|2105
|266
Essay on Utilitarianism and Its Principlelg...
|7
|1940
|572
Human Happiness in HRM and CPM Practiceslg...
|7
|2183
|489
200826 Contemporary People Managementlg...
|9
|2172
|44
Utilitarianism and Deontological Theorylg...
|10
|2416
|487
Utilitarian Approach to Genetic Enhancement.lg...
|9
|3177
|12