Question 1 PART A The objective is to compute the present value of the annuity payment for which the formula stated below can be used. Present value of annuity = P(1-(1+r)-n)/r The inputs for the above formula are as follows. Hence, present value = (3600*(1-1.01-24)/0.01) Solving the above, we get present value = $ 76,476.19 PART B The bonds issued by the company have the following characteristics. Par value is $ 10,000 with interest rate applicable being 10% p.a. and a maturity period of 12 years. a) The simple interest does not change and is the same for each of the 12 years. Hence, interest paid by the company till maturity = 10000*10%*12 = $ 12,000 b) Now considering the interest being compounded, the total amount paid as interest would be the equivalent of the future value of interest annuity payments at the time of maturity. This can be computed using the following computation based on the given inputs. PART C The weight of the three sources of capital to the firm is computed as shown below in the tabular format.
Weight of a given capital = (Market value of given capital/Total capital)*100 The information regarding the cost of the various capitals is indicated below. Using the information on respective weights of the capital and also their corresponding costs , the WACC can be computed as shown below. Question 2 a) The project feasibility can be determined using the NPV which can be computed in the manner shown below using the given information on cashflows and also the investment requires rate of return. The NPV of the project comes out as positive which signifies project financial feasibility and hence it would be executed (Petty et. al., 2015). b) The project feasibility can be determined using the NPV which can be computed in the manner shown below using the given information on cashflows and also the investment requires rate of return The first step is to compute the project life time value of labour cost related savings which is = (4200*(1-1.25-15)/0.25) = $ 16,208.9
The NPV of the project comes out as positive which signifies project financial feasibility and hence it would be executed (Damodaran, 2015). c) If the two projects highlighted above are mutually exclusive, then the superior project ought to be identified which would be chosen. In order to enable the same, the NPV of project A and project B has been compared which clearly highlights that the former has a higher value of NPV making project A the appropriate choice (Brealey, Myers and Allen, 2014). d) It is not true that same results are obtained from NPV and IRR for every project. In certain cases the results may differ. A noticeable example in this regards would be projects involving net cash inflow in any year after the project starts producing revenue. In such a case, it is likely that IRR would produce multiple values and hence the underlying decision would not match with that indicated by NPV (Parrino and Kidwell, 2014). Question 3 Market participants make attempt to outline if a given stock is undervalued or overvalued. This is achieved only when the fair value or intrinsic value of the stock is computed on the basis of the present information and future estimates. Stock is termed as undervalued if the fair value computed is higher than the prevailing market value of the stock or if the fair value is lower than the prevailing market value of the stock, then the stock is termed as overvalued. Consider for instance the stock of the mining giant Rio Tinto. Assume that the market price is $23 but the fair price through valuation technique comes out as $ 32. In such situation, the Rio Tinto stock would be termed as undervalued and therefore buying can be done (Parrino and Kidwell, 2014). The technical analysis is a process which aims to estimate the future stock movement based on the respective past movements under the assumption that future stock movements tend to be impacted by the past stock movements. Thus, technical analysis aims to facilitate the market participants in taking calls related to trading in stocks by considering the trends, support and resistance (Damodaran, 2015). The fundamental analysis in sharp contrast aims to determine the fair value of the share considering the present performance and estimating
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
the financial performance based on the estimated external and internal factors. The final decision by the market participants to buy the share or not is taken on the basis of comparison between the market price and the fair value which would highlight if at the prevailing price it is undervalued or overvalued (Brealey, Myers and Allen, 2014).
References Brealey, R. A., Myers, S. C. and Allen, F. (2014)Principles of corporate finance, 6thed.New York: McGraw-Hill Publications Damodaran, A. (2015).Applied corporate finance: A user’s manual3rd ed. New York: Wiley, John & Sons. Parrino, R. and Kidwell, D. (2014)Fundamentals of Corporate Finance,3rd ed. London: Wiley Publications Petty, J.W., Titman, S., Keown, A., Martin, J.D., Martin, P., Burrow, M. and Nguyen, H. (2015). Financial Management, Principles and Applications, 6thed.. NSW: Pearson Education, French Forest Australia