logo

Corporate Financial Management: SML, CML, MVP, and CAPM

Explain and graphically depict the differences between Security Market Line (SML) and Capital Market Line (CML). Discuss the importance of minimum variance portfolios and why the CAPM equation is more relevant than other equations when calculating the required rate of return.

11 Pages2494 Words422 Views
   

Added on  2023-06-07

About This Document

This report discusses the significance of SML, CML, MVP, and CAPM in Corporate Financial Management. It explores the difference between SML and CML, the significance of Minimum Variance Portfolio (MVP), and why CAPM calculation is used for identifying the required rate of return by investors. The report also highlights the limitations and significance of CAPM. The subject is Corporate Financial Management, and the course code and college/university are not mentioned.

Corporate Financial Management: SML, CML, MVP, and CAPM

Explain and graphically depict the differences between Security Market Line (SML) and Capital Market Line (CML). Discuss the importance of minimum variance portfolios and why the CAPM equation is more relevant than other equations when calculating the required rate of return.

   Added on 2023-06-07

ShareRelated Documents
Running head: CORPORATE FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
Corporate Financial Management
Name of the Student:
Name of the University:
Authors Note:
Corporate Financial Management: SML, CML, MVP, and CAPM_1
CORPORATE FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
1
Table of Contents
Introduction:...............................................................................................................................2
Indicating the alteration between SML and CML:....................................................................2
Exploring the significance of Minimum Variance Portfolio (MVP):........................................5
Exploring why CAPM calculation is used for identifying the required rate of return by
investors:....................................................................................................................................7
Conclusion:................................................................................................................................9
References:...............................................................................................................................10
Corporate Financial Management: SML, CML, MVP, and CAPM_2
CORPORATE FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
2
Introduction:
The report aims in highlighting the different level of measure, which allows investors
to maximise the level of returns from investment. The difference between the SML and CML
line has mainly allowed the investors to identify the level of investment risk, which needs to
be evaluated before conducing investment decisions. Furthermore, the presence of minimum
variance portfolio has mainly allowed investors for raising the level of income from
investment, which reducing the level of risk hampering the portfolio. The calculations of
CAPM allow the investor for detecting the level of expected returns, which can be generated
from investment. However, there are certain level of methods, which are used by investors
instead of CAPM model for detecting the level of risk and returns.
Indicating the alteration between SML and CML:
Figure 1: Security Market Line (SML) Graph1
1 Hong, Harrison, and David A. Sraer. "Speculative betas." The Journal of Finance 71.5
(2016): 2095-2144.
Corporate Financial Management: SML, CML, MVP, and CAPM_3
CORPORATE FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
3
Figure 2: Capital Market Line (CML) Graph2
The above figures directly help in depicting the level of different characteristics of
SML and CML, which can be used by investor for improving their current investment scope.
Furthermore, the difference directly indicates the level of risk and return attribute, which can
be used by organisations for improving their current return generation capability. Therefore,
it can be detected that with the use of CML investor are able to detect the performance of a
portfolio, which helps them to make adequate investment decisions. On the other hand, the
SML line directly depicts the significance of a partial stock, while detecting its risk and return
attribute. The difference between the CML and SML is further elaborated.
Risk Measurement:
The major difference between SML and CML line is overall risk measure, which is
depicted by the calculation. The calculations conducted by the SML method directly uses
beta of the stock for determining the level of risk engulfing the investment. In addition, the
CML adequately uses standard deviation for calculating the risk measures of the investment.
Both the risk and return attributes of the stock can be used for investment by the investor for
2 Christensen, Hans B., Luzi Hail, and Christian Leuz. "Capital-market effects of securities
regulation: Prior conditions, implementation, and enforcement." The Review of Financial
Studies 29.11 (2016): 2885-2924.
Corporate Financial Management: SML, CML, MVP, and CAPM_4

End of preview

Want to access all the pages? Upload your documents or become a member.

Related Documents
Exploring Security Market Line, Capital Market Line, Minimum Variance Portfolio and CAPM Calculation in Corporate Finance
|12
|2984
|83

Corporate Finance: CML, SML, Minimum Variance Portfolio, and CAPM
|12
|2832
|378

Corporate Finance: Understanding Capital Market Line, Security Market Line, Minimum Variance Portfolio and CAPM Calculation
|13
|2867
|187

Finance | SML, CML and Minimum Variance Portfolio
|13
|2843
|20

Investment Management: SML vs CML, Minimum Portfolio Variance, CAPM Equation
|13
|2801
|330

Corporate Financial Statement: SML, CML, MVP and CAPM
|12
|2867
|289