Court Case of a Truck Driver

Running head: KANSAS V. GLOVER
KANSAS V. GLOVER
Name of the Student
Name of the University
Author Note

1
KANSAS V. GLOVER
KANSAS v. CHARLES GLOVER
Argued: November 04, 2019
Decided: Pending
 Syllabus
 Opinion, [student’s name]
 Separate, [Student’s Separate Opinion]
Syllabus
The question in issue in this case is whether a police officer has rational disbelief to stop the
vehicle if the Police officer had knowledge about the suspended license of the vehicle's
registered owner, but he is uncertain whether the registered owner is driving the vehicle or
not. Refering to the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution, police officers may
stop a driver of a car about whom they are doubtful about committing a crime. Wolf v.
Colorado, 338 U.S. 25,[1]
Opinion
(Student), Opinion of the Court
MR. JUSTICE (Student), delivered the opinion of the Court.
As formally elaborated in the syllabus to the opinion, the Supreme Court of Kansas
established that Glover’s sentence was not lawful holding that the conjecture without any
authority “stacked” presumptions and would release the onus of displaying a rational doubt
for a stop.