This document provides an overview of criminal law and discusses the procedures involved in prosecuting and convicting individuals accused of crimes. It also explores alternative dispute resolution methods for resolving conflicts. References to relevant legal texts are included.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running head: CRIMINAL LAW Criminal Law Name of the Student Name of the University Author Note
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
1CRIMINAL LAW Answer 1: a)Firstly, the offence of attempting to murder his girlfriend will be reported to the police against Dan, which will result in the police starting an investigation regarding the same. When the police arrives at an opinion that it is likely that Dan has attempted the alleged murder, the Crown Prosecution Service will extend advice to the police on the possibility of prosecution. Afterwards the police will submit the case to the Crown, which will review the same. However, this case is an attempt to murder, which is of a complex and serious nature. Hence, the charges will imposed upon the alleged person by the Crown Court. The decision of the court regarding whether to prosecute or to refrain from prosecuting will depend upon two factors, the first one being the presence of adequate evidence and the second being the public interest that might demands such a prosecution. The court will hear the case, where a jury or a magistrate will decide whether to convict the accused or acquit the same. However, most of the crimes are handled by the court of Magistrates and the more serious kinds of offences are passed on to the Crown court1. b)In this situation, the report of the alleged attempt to murder will be in the first instances be made to the police. As this situation involves a more serious crime of attempting a murder, the same needs to be reported to the Crown Court Services by the police. However, the police needs to investigate the case and collect evidences regarding the same. The case will be initially heard by the court of Magistrate. As in this case the crime attempted is of a serious nature, the same will be passed on to a higher court, which will hear the case and deliver a verdict of either the acquittal or conviction of the alleged offender. In this situation, as the case has been related to a serious offence of attempt to murder, the same will be heard and decided by the 1Ormerod, David C., et al. Smith and Hogan's criminal law. Oxford University Press, USA, 2015.
2CRIMINAL LAW Crown Court. The court will investigate the matter first, collect evidence and then decide whether to prosecute or not. The decision of the Crown Court relating to the hearing or non-hearing of the case will be depending upon two factors. Firstly, the court will strive to investigate the presence of adequate evidence and the public interest that is connected to such prosecution2. c)Once the case has been passed on to the Crown Court for trial, the court will analyse two instances relating to the case. Firstly, the court will verify whether the accusation is backed by enough evidence or not. In considering the same, the court will consider all the evidences that are available about the case and the evidences that have been submitted by the police. The court will also strive to collect fresh evidences if available. After ensuring the presence of enough evidence relating to the case, the court will strive to verify whether the to prosecute or not to prosecute the accused. In determining the same, the court will examine whether the prosecution will serve the public interest or not. Once the court has decided to prosecute, the court will strive to decide whether the accused namely Dan is telling the truth or the witness is telling the truth. While verifying the same, the court will notice of the witnesses available. The statement of the girlfriend of Dan on whom the gun has been pointed will be taken as an evidence. If all the evidences available confirms the conviction of the accused the court will deliver a sentence effecting the conviction3. d)Once the case has been submitted by police for the same being a serious one, the court will consider all the evidences and witnesses relating to the case. The present case will be passed on to the Crown Court owing to its serious nature. The Crown Court will initially analyse whether the evidences available are adequate to proceed with the prosecution or not. After the court has arrived at the opinion that an ample amount of 2Martin, Jacqueline, and Tony Storey. Unlocking criminal law. Routledge, 2015. 3Leong, Angela Veng Mei. The disruption of international organised crime: an analysis of legal and non-legal strategies. Routledge, 2016.
3CRIMINAL LAW evidence is present, the court will strive to verify whether proceeding with the prosecution will ensure public interest or not. After ensuring the same, the court will strive to verify, whether the matter will come under the purview of the Criminal Attempts Act 19814. In deciding the same, court will examine the intention of the accused person. The court needs to consider whether the accused has the intention ton commit the offence. The court also needs to ensure that whether the attempt was exceeding the scope of a mere preparatory for an offence. In case the same has been established the crown court has the power to proceed with the prosecution of the accused person namely Dan. Answer 2: a)In this present case, Alisha has been separated from her husband, which resulted to a dispute between them regarding the contact time with the children and the division of furniture amongst them. Alisha has also been facing a problem regarding her job. The has been dismissed from her job for her absence from the same owing to the illness of her three years old son. She has a belief that the effected dismissal is an unfair one. In these situations, the best methods that are available to her will be the methods of Alternative Dispute Resolution. In this exact situation, mediation will be the best suited method for dispute resolution. Mediation implies a process in which a dispute is resolved with the intervention of a third party into a matter and the third party intervening is not the court. This process involves sessions of interaction, which includes analysis, discussion and negotiations. The process involves two disputing parties and a mediator who has been appointed to solve the dispute5. The mediator is a neutral third party who strives to come to a solution relating to the dispute by the process of mediation. It is best suited for the situation as the present situation needs to 4The Criminal Attempts Act 1981 5Roberts, Marian. Mediation in family disputes: principles of practice. Routledge, 2016.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
4CRIMINAL LAW determine the rights and interests of a person. Mediation is generally applied when the rights and needs of a person is in question arising in a dispute. This facilitates the determinationof therightsandinterestthathasbeeninvolvedina question. Moreover, the same is cost efficient and as Alisha has been dismissed from her employment, she needs to resort to a cost efficient alternative of dispute resolution. Moreover, litigation would be very time consuming, which can be avoided by resorting to mediation. b)Mediation has a considerable amount of advantages over litigation. It is cost efficient, which ensures dispute resolution to people having economic distress. It maintains the confidentiality of the parties to the dispute. The parties may retain the confidentiality of their dispute while availing a resolution of the same. The parties to the dispute can exercise a control over the whole process. As the parties to the dispute are involved in the resolution, the same will be likely to be complied by them. The agreement to solve the dispute is arrived at under a mutually decided terms. However, there are certain disadvantages relating to the process of mediation. The resolution thus, arrived upon lacks the authority of the court of law, which makes the chances of compliance of the resolution to be low. The resolution is arrived upon by mutual negotiations, which might lead to a deadlock. The compliance of the resolution arrived at by the process of mediation is lacks the authority as the same is not backed by penalty6. 6Agler, Robert, and Paul De Boeck. "On the Interpretation and Use of Mediation: Multiple Perspectives on Mediation Analysis." Frontiers in psychology 8 (2017): 1984.
5CRIMINAL LAW References Agler, Robert, and Paul De Boeck. "On the Interpretation and Use of Mediation: Multiple Perspectives on Mediation Analysis." Frontiers in psychology 8 (2017): 1984. Leong, Angela Veng Mei. The disruption of international organised crime: an analysis of legal and non-legal strategies. Routledge, 2016. Martin, Jacqueline, and Tony Storey. Unlocking criminal law. Routledge, 2015. Ormerod, David C., et al. Smith and Hogan's criminal law. Oxford University Press, USA, 2015. Roberts, Marian. Mediation in family disputes: principles of practice. Routledge, 2016. The Criminal Attempts Act 1981