Criminal Psychology - Law enforcement

Running head: CRIMINAL PSYCHOLOGY
Criminal Psychology
Name of the student:
Name of the university:
Author Note

CRIMINAL PSYCHOLOGY
1
Summarizing social science on: “Consenting to searches by law enforcement
particularly during a traffic stop”
One of the common exception of protection of Fourth Amendment’s security against the
warrantless type of search is the consent. As one consent to any search, the law enforcement of able
to seek as much as one consented to. This is whether that has been the stuff, car, home or person.
This prosecution is able to typically utilize whatever the offers see as proof against the criminal in
one trail. As one grant the consent, the mind must be changed regarding the search as it starts and
one might stop that search at particular situations (Vito). The following study deals with fact why
anyone consent to the search. Then, the reason why people must feel that have got the choice of
denying the consent and factors leading to the consent are demonstrated. Lastly, the point of view
social science research regarding this is analyzed in the study.
Reason why one is consent to search:
The consent search is the intrusion of government agent to anyone reasonable intention of
privacy. The Fourth Amendment has provides the measure that police should gain a warrant on the
basis of possible reason for interrupting the right in lawful manner (Ybarra). Nevertheless, as the
police asks to search the vehicle and one responds in positive manner, he is never needed to retrieve
the possible warrant or cause. As one provides the consent, it is most frequently cited intention for
the requirement of the warrant. As the vehicle is considered, maximum of folks things they have
nothing left to have hidden and give permission to he police officer in searching that. Nevertheless,
perils are also there. Here, one can waive any sort of logic that an evidence is collected in illegal
manner. As one keep the prescription thyroid medication or example, within pill driver and never the
main bottle of prescription, one can get immediately arrested (Rousseau). Every time this is an
effective practice to refuse the consent for searching the car or home since one never understand

CRIMINAL PSYCHOLOGY
2
what the police can find and utilize against that. As one refuse the consent, that must be done
politely. Again, the police officers must commonly get annoyed by the person who never allow them
with the search. However, the good news is that this has been never against law. As they never need
to search the cat and never have any expectation, they are needed to get that warrant (Gold).
Feeling of people to deny the consent:
It is seen one of the very frequently utilize measure n the tool box of law enforcement is the
effective power in intimidating the citizens in voluntarily give up the rights and commonly despite
realizing what they are doing (Sengoelge et al.). The police are been trained to believe in authority
and are trained to perform interactions with the private citizens with total strength and confidences.
Maximum ones, as confronted by police are seen to feel a nervous discomfort. They turn to be
anxious. They act in extreme compliant way as the fear rightfully the probable outcomes of
displeasing the police (Baumgartner). Nevertheless, the imbalance of power between the officer and
citizen leads maximum one to consent despite understanding that that are seen to be giving up the
constitutions securities against the unsuitable meddling through the State at citizens private affairs.
Factors that lead to consent:
This happens as the officer of law enforcement makes an effective and strong worded
request. Most of the people witness the cases while the routine traffic stop take place. Here, one is
pulled on for the perceived or real violation of vehicle and checking the registration and license of
driver, the officer can ask whether one have any illegal drug or weapon in the vehicle. As one reacts
negatively, here the police officer is seen to ask with strongest voice that he could despite been
demanding to investigate that for himself (Saposnik).
The point of view of social science:
The thing that is demanded by the police from the citizen relies on context of interaction with
officer. Commonly, police are permitted by the courts to act as the reasonable type of private citizen