This document discusses the process of criteria and standards assessment in a group setting. It covers topics such as designing a proposal, collecting information, and overcoming challenges. The document also includes references for further reading.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Criteria andStandardsAssessment The group selected informationafter an agreement by all the participants. We discussed the relevance of each information before highlighting them in the design proposal. Interviews were also done on what to cover and solutions satisfying every group member was taken. We came out with different arguments and at the end we had a better solution to that particular argument. We evaluated some samples of books related to various courses of our study together as a group. Then the group leader compiled the results by taking the major areas covered in several paper samples. A tally was done and the tabulated pass rates for engineering your future third edition third edition taken each leader, then interview was done and surveys were collected. The content of the proposal, in general, we decided to use our main reference from “engineering your future third generation” and we also agreed to get some more content from more relevant books which are related to the topic and also get some more relevant sources from the internet. All this sources were compiled and an appropriate proposal contend was provided. The information was also to be from most recent sources and most important in case it is a book, then it should be the latest edition of the book. Every member of the group was to at least make sure has contributed in setting the design of the proposal. I personally did a lot in order to make sure that we come up with a good design of the proposal. I had requirements for the proposal like the reference book and others like online sources. One of the things I did was participating during the writing of the proposal and always being active in terms of coming up with new ideas and concepts. Also reading the book engineering your future editions and giving out opinions. I also did some corrections in some parts of the proposal. Interacting with the group gave me an opportunity to explore more. In the group different people have different skills and abilities. This gives room for exchanging ideas and different views and thus one gets to know what he or she does not know. It also made me to develop confidence as the group was made up of different people of which some of them we had never interacted with each other before. This interaction also enhances our own self understanding and gives us the potential to deal with the relationship amongst ourselves. We also get to understand our own personal values and contribution to each other. Everybody in the group had to come with at least one reference material of which I did carry mine which at the end was of great benefit towards writing of the proposal. I also encouraged some members who probably had no interest in contributing to the research and discussion by talking to them and they were able to change. Time was also another factor that I always gave a priority in the proposal. I did attend the meetings all times whenever we were supposed to meet for some clarifications. We respected each other and cooperated towards achieving our one goal that brought us together. The group had several members and had the general secretary who was the leader of the group. It was further divided into small sub groups. Each sub group had its own leader and had its own part to cover in the proposal. The leaders maintained the groups and was to make all communications concerning the proposal. All the leaders of the subgroups collected the information from the members and take them to the overall secretary to compile them and come up with the best solution. Despite having leaders, every member had a role to play, that is, participating full to all the group activities. There were several challenges that were encountered during designing and writing of the proposal. Some of them we were able to manage them. One of the main challenge was that some members
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
assigned some roles and they never shored up or brought the results and therefore we had to find the solutions for ourselves. I personally had a challenge with time but I had to postpone all the other activities and attend the meetings when called. We designed a good report after compiling all the information we collected from our research. The report is organized systematically with all the requirements and the language is of course good. The report is written as required. References Andrade, H. and Du, Y., 2010. Student responses to criteria‐referenced self‐assessment.Assessment & evaluation in higher education,32(2), pp.159-181. Taras, M., 2010. Student self-assessment: Processes and consequences.Teaching in Higher Education,15(2), pp.199-209. Spiller, D., 2012. Assessment matters: Self-assessment and peer assessment.New Zealand: Teaching Development, University of Waikato. Leaf, J.B., Dotson, W.H., Oppeneheim, M.L., Sheldon, J.B. and Sherman, J.A., 2010. The effectiveness of a group teaching interaction procedure for teaching social skills to young children with a pervasive developmental disorder.Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders,4(2), pp.186-198. Kuo, Y.H., 2011. Language challenges faced by international graduate students in the United States.Journal of International Students,1(2). Popek, S., Grant, M., Gemmill, R., Wendel, C.S., Mohler, M.J., Rawl, S.M., Baldwin, C.M., Ko, C.Y., Schmidt, C.M. and Krouse, R.S., 2010. Overcoming challenges: life with an ostomy.The American Journal of Surgery,200(5), pp.640-645.