Critical Appraisal on Research Articles in Healthcare
Added on 2023-04-24
14 Pages4097 Words428 Views
|
|
|
Healthcare
Critical appraisal on research articles
Name
Professor
Institution
Course
Date
Critical appraisal on research articles
Name
Professor
Institution
Course
Date
Healthcare
Introduction
Generally, the aspect of research appraisal plays a key role in research work. Basically, a critical
appraisal helps in identifying the weaknesses, strengths and understanding the entire content of
the research (Bannon,McGaughey,Clarke,McAuley & Blackwood 2016, p.90).The content
revealed in the paper shows a critical appraisal for two articles. All the two articles help in
analyzing the research carried out in the field of public health. The first article is Guilcher et al.
(2016) which describes research on gambling and homelessness which have become a huge
problem in public health. The second article is the Weetra et al. (2016) which shows research on
Aboriginal families that investigated experiences of mothers having Aboriginal babies in South
Australia.
Tool selection
In order to analyze the two articles, the discussion has utilized the CASP and STARD critical
appraisal tool (Cope 2014, p.86). The CASP tool analyses the qualitative research while the
STARD tool handles the quantitative research. CASP tool has been selected because it aims to
help individuals to develop adequate skills that will assist in building the research evidence. On
another hand the STARD tool has been selected because it will assist in improving the
transparency of the research. The tool contains different items that can be used as checklist by
readers to ensure all the research related problems have adequate information. When analyzing
the quantitative research there are various appraisal tools which must be used. The critical
appraisal tool used in quantitative research are; meta-analysis, systematic review, the randomized
control trial commonly known as (RCT), the cohort study, case-control study, the longitudinal
study and lastly the quasi-experimental study procedure (Crowe,Sheppard & Campbell
2012,p.54).Health On another hand, the critical appraisal tool for the qualitative research will
analyze parts such as ; the semi-structured interview, observational study analysis, documental
analysis, the narrative analysis, understanding the focus groups and unstructured interview
(Grove,Burns & Gray 2012, p.51).
Critical appraisal of the qualitative article
(a). Critical appraisal for the case study using the CASP tool.
Introduction
Generally, the aspect of research appraisal plays a key role in research work. Basically, a critical
appraisal helps in identifying the weaknesses, strengths and understanding the entire content of
the research (Bannon,McGaughey,Clarke,McAuley & Blackwood 2016, p.90).The content
revealed in the paper shows a critical appraisal for two articles. All the two articles help in
analyzing the research carried out in the field of public health. The first article is Guilcher et al.
(2016) which describes research on gambling and homelessness which have become a huge
problem in public health. The second article is the Weetra et al. (2016) which shows research on
Aboriginal families that investigated experiences of mothers having Aboriginal babies in South
Australia.
Tool selection
In order to analyze the two articles, the discussion has utilized the CASP and STARD critical
appraisal tool (Cope 2014, p.86). The CASP tool analyses the qualitative research while the
STARD tool handles the quantitative research. CASP tool has been selected because it aims to
help individuals to develop adequate skills that will assist in building the research evidence. On
another hand the STARD tool has been selected because it will assist in improving the
transparency of the research. The tool contains different items that can be used as checklist by
readers to ensure all the research related problems have adequate information. When analyzing
the quantitative research there are various appraisal tools which must be used. The critical
appraisal tool used in quantitative research are; meta-analysis, systematic review, the randomized
control trial commonly known as (RCT), the cohort study, case-control study, the longitudinal
study and lastly the quasi-experimental study procedure (Crowe,Sheppard & Campbell
2012,p.54).Health On another hand, the critical appraisal tool for the qualitative research will
analyze parts such as ; the semi-structured interview, observational study analysis, documental
analysis, the narrative analysis, understanding the focus groups and unstructured interview
(Grove,Burns & Gray 2012, p.51).
Critical appraisal of the qualitative article
(a). Critical appraisal for the case study using the CASP tool.
Healthcare
The critical appraisal uses the Critical Appraisal Skills Programmes tool which is commonly
known as the (CASP).Guilcher et al. (2016) indicates qualitative research on the problem of
gambling and homelessness which have been identified as an important public health concern.
The research used is the case study design which includes events that have been studied in
different methods. The article reveals how the impacts of gambling and homelessness have
impacted families and the entire society (Heyvaert, Hannes,Maes & Onghena 2013,p.84).The
research aimed in analyzing the experiences in health and social spheres. The problem of
gambling and homelessness is a public domain especially to men in Toronto, Ontario. In order to
analyze the research topic, then critical appraisal tools on qualitative research were used. The
tools used assisted in revealing the major objectives, analyzing the methodological steps used,
discussing the results obtained and summarizing the strengths and weaknesses of the research.
(b).Appraising the article using the CASP tool.
The following questions and procedures show the summarized CASP tool that is used to analyze
the article. The CASP tool helps in analyzing the relevance of the research and analyze the
strengths and weaknesses associated with the research. All the questions have been answered to
give clear guidance thus helping in understanding the entire article (Hoare & Hoe 2013,
p.21).The CASP tool helps in appraising the article by following the questions mentioned at
every paragraph.
1. Is the aim of the study stated?
Guilcher et al. (2016) starts by indicating the research objective and the aim. The research starts
by accepting the fact that gambling and homelessness are major issues that have affected
families, communities and society at large (Hoe & Hoare 2012,p.43).The aim of the research is
to analyze how the problem of gambling and housing problems have affected the men in
Toronto, Ontario. Generally, the issue of gambling has been identified as a common leisure
activity for many people. There are individuals who are more vulnerable to gambling behavior.
When someone incurs no gain in gambling activities there are significant problems such as
family problems, educational or employment crisis as well as financial hardships and sometimes
housing inabilities or homelessness. Men in Toronto are believed to have associated themselves
The critical appraisal uses the Critical Appraisal Skills Programmes tool which is commonly
known as the (CASP).Guilcher et al. (2016) indicates qualitative research on the problem of
gambling and homelessness which have been identified as an important public health concern.
The research used is the case study design which includes events that have been studied in
different methods. The article reveals how the impacts of gambling and homelessness have
impacted families and the entire society (Heyvaert, Hannes,Maes & Onghena 2013,p.84).The
research aimed in analyzing the experiences in health and social spheres. The problem of
gambling and homelessness is a public domain especially to men in Toronto, Ontario. In order to
analyze the research topic, then critical appraisal tools on qualitative research were used. The
tools used assisted in revealing the major objectives, analyzing the methodological steps used,
discussing the results obtained and summarizing the strengths and weaknesses of the research.
(b).Appraising the article using the CASP tool.
The following questions and procedures show the summarized CASP tool that is used to analyze
the article. The CASP tool helps in analyzing the relevance of the research and analyze the
strengths and weaknesses associated with the research. All the questions have been answered to
give clear guidance thus helping in understanding the entire article (Hoare & Hoe 2013,
p.21).The CASP tool helps in appraising the article by following the questions mentioned at
every paragraph.
1. Is the aim of the study stated?
Guilcher et al. (2016) starts by indicating the research objective and the aim. The research starts
by accepting the fact that gambling and homelessness are major issues that have affected
families, communities and society at large (Hoe & Hoare 2012,p.43).The aim of the research is
to analyze how the problem of gambling and housing problems have affected the men in
Toronto, Ontario. Generally, the issue of gambling has been identified as a common leisure
activity for many people. There are individuals who are more vulnerable to gambling behavior.
When someone incurs no gain in gambling activities there are significant problems such as
family problems, educational or employment crisis as well as financial hardships and sometimes
housing inabilities or homelessness. Men in Toronto are believed to have associated themselves
Healthcare
in gambling activities thus more vulnerable to experiencing the negative characteristics
mentioned in the article (LoBiondo-Wood & Haber 2014, p.90).
2. Is the rationale of study properly used in the qualitative research?
In order to analyze the rationale of the study, it's good to discuss the key strengths used in the
study. By using the CASP tool the research appreciates the problem of gambling and investigates
the major issue inappropriate manner. There is recognition of the gambling problem in society
and that's why the participants tried to use the research in order to come up with an apt solution.
3. Was the method of data collection appropriate?
The method of data collection was not appropriate. This is because the research only interviewed
30 participants who were all men (LoBiondo-Wood,Haber,Berry & Yost 2013,p.75).The aim of
the research was to get the reason on why the issue of gambling and housing inability has
become an issue in health care but the researchers failed on the method of data collection. The
data revealed gave results which describe the effects experienced by a small number but not the
entire population. Interviewing 30 participants is a small number and the results can't be
compared with a big population of men in Toronto.
4. Does the study indicate the information on the results obtained?
All the information regarding to the results has been clearly indicated in the research. The
procedure indicates the strengths of the research (Lockwood,Munn & Porritt 2015, p.21).The
research tried to explore the health and social services that were believed to have a long history
in gambling and housing inabilities in Toronto. All the results and findings have been analyzed
and a systematic recommendation process has been analyzed in the article. The results tend to
highlight the importance of the person-centered engagement which included compassion,
empathy, and empowerment for men. All the characteristics obtained in the person-centered
engagement builds the healthcare concern for those individuals with complex in health and social
needs.
5. Is the recording of the data retrievable?
in gambling activities thus more vulnerable to experiencing the negative characteristics
mentioned in the article (LoBiondo-Wood & Haber 2014, p.90).
2. Is the rationale of study properly used in the qualitative research?
In order to analyze the rationale of the study, it's good to discuss the key strengths used in the
study. By using the CASP tool the research appreciates the problem of gambling and investigates
the major issue inappropriate manner. There is recognition of the gambling problem in society
and that's why the participants tried to use the research in order to come up with an apt solution.
3. Was the method of data collection appropriate?
The method of data collection was not appropriate. This is because the research only interviewed
30 participants who were all men (LoBiondo-Wood,Haber,Berry & Yost 2013,p.75).The aim of
the research was to get the reason on why the issue of gambling and housing inability has
become an issue in health care but the researchers failed on the method of data collection. The
data revealed gave results which describe the effects experienced by a small number but not the
entire population. Interviewing 30 participants is a small number and the results can't be
compared with a big population of men in Toronto.
4. Does the study indicate the information on the results obtained?
All the information regarding to the results has been clearly indicated in the research. The
procedure indicates the strengths of the research (Lockwood,Munn & Porritt 2015, p.21).The
research tried to explore the health and social services that were believed to have a long history
in gambling and housing inabilities in Toronto. All the results and findings have been analyzed
and a systematic recommendation process has been analyzed in the article. The results tend to
highlight the importance of the person-centered engagement which included compassion,
empathy, and empowerment for men. All the characteristics obtained in the person-centered
engagement builds the healthcare concern for those individuals with complex in health and social
needs.
5. Is the recording of the data retrievable?
End of preview
Want to access all the pages? Upload your documents or become a member.
Related Documents