Critical Leadership Comparison Paper

Running head: CRITICAL LEADERSHIP COMPARISON PAPER
CRITICAL LEADERSHIP COMPARISON PAPER
Name of the student:
Name of the university:
Author note:

1Critical leadership comparison paper
Critical leadership comparison paper
The main aim of the paper is to assess, compare and contrast three leadership styles,
specifically transformational, servant leadership and authentic leadership. The paper will carry
out the analysis considering definitions, strengths, weakness and applications in various
scenarios. Through the study, an understanding of the ways parallels and differences are
approached by these three leadership will be gained.
Transformational leadership:
The process through which an individual engage with other individual and creates a
connection that may result to the rise of morality and motivation in the leader as well as the
follower is called the transformational leadership. Transformational leadership is depended on
the power of the leader that is made to motivate the followers by their personal charisma,
individualized consideration and their intellectual stimulation. A leader of this kind will help
encouraging the followers thinking beyond ordinary (Northouse, 2018).
They encourage the followers in brainstorming ideas that are distinctive and new through
which one can challenge the established order and change the environment that leads to
exceptional success. These kinds of leaders are known well and demanded by every aspects of
life as they enhance morale, motivation and performance of the people around them. They play a
vital role since they have the capability of helping people make sense of identity and self to the
project for followers. Also, in the meantime they also make sense of a collective identity with the
organization (Breevaart et al., 2014).

2Critical leadership comparison paper
A good example of transformational model according to me would be John D.
Rockefeller who stated, “Good leadership consists of showing average people how to do work of
superior people”. The success achieved by Rockefeller was from the ability of aligning from his
organization with simple vision, and then he held every person responsible for their part in order
to make the vision happen. His attitude around people inspired others to become better and
perform better (Fosdick, 2017).
Authentic leadership
Drawing from high advanced organizational context any process along with optimistic
psychological capacities is known as authentic leadership. This leads to self-awareness as well as
self-regulated positive behavior in the leaders and the people who are associated with the leader.
A positive self-development to a great extent is achieved through this form of leadership.
A process that is traced from highly developed organizational contexts along with
positive psychological capacities is called authentic leadership. It results in not only self-
awareness but also self-regulated positive behavior on the leader’s part and people associated
with the leader. This leadership fosters positive self-development to a higher extent.
Authentic leaders are categorized as positive people with truthful self-concepts that
encourages openness, they think and act with hopefulness and confidence. They are resilient and
optimist people. These kinds of people are possessed with high degree of integrity. They
continue to work by creating an organization with suitable and profitable purpose, heart, value,
self-discipline, and relationships. The prime aim for them is to serve the organization rather than
acquiring material possession or gaining power. They have their unique way of serving the
organizations, through features such as empathy, hearing, awareness, persuasion, commitment