Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Culture and society1 CULTURAL COMPETENCE, HUMILITY AND CULTURAL RESPONSIVENESS IN RELATION TO PUBLIC HEALTH by Course Tutor University City and State Date
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Culture and society2 Introduction The terms cultural competence, cultural humility and cultural responsiveness refer to various important aspects of culture in public health that makes it possible for people of different cultures to be able to coexist, understand and appreciate one another, learn from each other, provide high quality and competent care as well as promote understanding among health workers and community even in the light of disparities and inequalities(Rogers, Bower, Malla, Manhire, and Rhodes, 2017). Although the terms may be used interchangeably in different contexts, the terms differ in terms of definition, perspective and meaning. This paper explores the aspects of cultural competence, cultural humility and cultural responsiveness and attempts to analyze their similarities, differences and interconnection in the field of public health. Cultural competence Cultural competence refers to the ability of health care institutions to provide quality healthcare to all people regardless of their values, beliefs, ethnicity or race(Clifford, McCalman, Bainbridge, and Tsey, 2015). Therefore, in a broader term, cultural competence refers to the ability of healthcare providers to offer high quality services that meet the cultural, social and linguistic needs of the patients and the society at large. Cultural competence therefore demands of all organizations to have a set of values, beliefs and a code of conduct that guides workers in the provision of culturally competent services. Cultural competence is necessary since there is cultural diversity in every part of the world. Cultural competence helps to improve quality of care by improving patient outcomes. This is so because people who feel that their culture is respected are able to communicate more honestly and freely without bias therefore providing accurate information that helps to improve the outcomes of care. Cultural competence can
Culture and society3 therefore be said to reduce health disparities and inequalities which increases the quality of care as well as patient safety and satisfaction. Cultural competence in the healthcare system can be improved through provision of interpreter services to accommodate people from different ethnic backgrounds, recruitment and retention of minority staff, coordination of formal health institutions with traditional care providers, introduction of culture specific values and attitudes to accommodate people from different cultures. Inclusion of family and community members in patient’s decision making, provide easily accessible care in geographically convenient places and provision of training to both the community and health workers to increase awareness and skills. Various organizations have also come up with various guidelines that help to promote cultural competence within the organization. Government, policy makers and relevant stakeholders have also come up with various policies and laws that help to regulate service delivery in order to ensure high standards of cultural competence especially for minority and marginalized groups such as certain indigenous communities. (Hunt, Ramjan, McDonald, Koch, Baird, and Salamonson, 2015).Cultural competency has also been entrenched in the teaching curriculum so as to prepare medical students for their future practice in stable and culturally competent environments. Some of the guidelines that have been adopted in learning institutions to address cultural sensitivity and competence include harnessing for a clear understanding of the impacts of social cultural factors in healthcare, recognition of bias in different cultures, respecting and tolerating cultural differences, the responsibility to learn and understand cultural perspectives of health and disease and the responsibility to fight all kinds of cultural based discrimination such as racism that may occur in the health institutions(Jongen, McCalman, and Bainbridge, 2017). Lastly, the
Culture and society4 government has created several accreditation bodies that focus on regulation of cultural competence in hospitals as well as medical learning institutions. In the recent past, cultural competence has been on the increase due to various other factors such as the realization of human rights of all people, completion among different organizations and hospitals as cultural competence is a good business practice as well as pressure mounted by the government and special interest groups(Kohlbry, 2016). Among the major efforts that have been made by the institutions include provision of bilingual and bicultural services effectively and training to increase literacy levels. This works to equip workers with the necessary skills to set ground for a more culturally competitive workplace. Lastly, it is also worth noting some of the challenges that have cropped up in various institutions and in the community at large due to lack of cultural competence. According to Bainbridge, McCalman, Clifford, and Tsey, 2015 various marginalized and minority groups may suffer from various illnesses and fail to seek medical services if the healthcare providers do not offer culturally competent care. This may accelerate health risks of the larger community especially if the diseases are communicable. There is a high likelihood of increase in diagnostic errors due to communication and language barriers. Patient dissatisfaction and lowering of quality standards in the hospital also increases due to lack of cultural competence. Cultural humility Bennett, and Gates, 2019 states that cultural humility as opposed to cultural competence is a process of understanding culture through studying one’s own culture in terms of reflection, inquiry and self-critique. It helps one to be able to understand and tolerate the weakness in other cultures by reflecting on one’s own culture and understanding weaknesses and bias in one’s own
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Culture and society5 culture. Culture has a dynamic nature since it is shaped by cultural influences that change depending on time and location. Cultural humility is therefore an ongoing process that allows people to be able to coexist through mutual respect and understanding. The cultural orientation of people influences their views towards health and illness and it also informs the decisions that they make regarding health and illness. Cultural humility leans on the background and social environments and their influence on beliefs and values. According toMurray-García and Tervalon, 2017, cultural factors that may influence such decisions include religion, beliefs, norms, customs, educational and economic factors. Cultural humility therefore helps to build trustworthy relationships among people of different cultures which helps them to coexist in the same environment by increasing the quality of the interactions between workers as well as community members. There are several barriers to cultural humility in many working institutions. Some of these barriers include; lack of diversification in the workforce which makes people to get so used to one culture to an extent where they become intolerant of other cultures. Poor leadership that does not sensitize workers on the essence of cultural humility, poor and ineffective communication between patients and health workers of different cultural backgrounds, stereotypes and bias levelled on various cultures, insufficient knowledge on cultural history of other people and lack of healthy relationships that encourage mutual trust and understanding (Fisher-Borne, Cain, and Martin, 2015). In modern healthcare institutions, cultural humility is developed through various ways such as; cultural immersion programs, reflection on people and profession, cultivating mindfulness, building healthy relationships, understanding cultural history and breaking down stereotypes(Foronda, and Baptiste, 2016). Cultural immersion programs are programs that are
Culture and society6 designed to allow medical workers and students to acquire cultural humility through acquisition of various skills such as self-efficacy and the global view of health and care. In order to break down stereotypes, there is need to analyze, verify and validate beliefs regarding other cultures. It is also important to avoid use of stereotypes of classifying individuals along cultural or ethnic lines. Certain stereotypes observed along cultural lines include paternalism in male dominated cultures. Health workers who come from male dominated societies may pay little regard to the views and opinions of women when handling a couple. There are also stereotypes that are vested on social classes. Many people tend to associate poor people with negative traits such as illiterate and unhygienic which is rather judgmental and a barrier to cultural humility. Understanding cultural history is also one of the ways that may help to increase cultural humility. Population groups that have had a history of discrimination may tend to develop negative attitudes towards other people. There may also be various stereotypes about the group. It is therefore important to understand the history as it helps to differentiate truth from fiction. In addition, it also helps to appreciate progress as well as pick out individuals who misrepresent their cultural backgrounds. Cultural humility requires of individuals to be flexible and humble enough to accommodate others despite their flaws or weaknesses(Foronda, Baptiste, Pfaff, Velez, Reinholdt, Sanchez, and Hudson, 2018). To love and treat people right irrespective of who they are or what they do. In other words, cultural humility requires universal positive regard to all people in order to be able to associate with them freely and to focus on their strengths and help them improve on their weaknesses. It is therefore possible to attain cultural humility by
Culture and society7 cultivating health relationships that helps to extinguish stereotypes and eliminate bias imposed on others. Cultural responsiveness Cultural responsiveness refers to the ability to respectfully relate and learn from people with similar or different cultural backgrounds(Na, Ryder, and Kirmayer, 2016). This is a process of using culture as a tool of imparting knowledge by empowering people socially, politically, emotionally and intellectually. Cultural responsiveness can therefore be described as a self- driven learning process that occurs with the understanding and appreciation of cultural disparities and continues throughout life as people learn from each other on the basis of cultural interaction. In health care, cultural responsiveness helps people to assess and improve their behavior due to the understanding that behavior is reflected and imparted on others too through the process of cultural responsiveness. In addition, it helps to get rid of judgmental attitudes as well as bias when addressing cultural issues due to the understanding of cultural relativity which may make differences even among people of a similar culture. There is dire need for health workers to cultivate cultural responsiveness as it has several advantages. For instance, cultural responsiveness is a quick way of learning other cultures that helps to handle patients well in the field. Learning from a colleague also offers room for clarity and correction. Cultural responsiveness also encourages team work that in the long run helps to improve the quality of care. Cultural responsiveness helps to learn from colleagues other factors that are not necessarily cultural oriented but may help in other areas of practice. Cultural responsiveness also builds a strong foundation for healthy relationships and good communication flow among workers.
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Culture and society8 According toSeeleman, Essink-Bot, Stronks, and Ingleby, 2015, there are also several barriers that may hinder cultural responsiveness. Lack of respect among workers makes it hard to see anything good that is worth learning in a person. Poor and disorganized working environments that may make people unwilling to share and contribute to the positive development of each other’s personality. It is also likely to find people who have strong egos and are unwilling to accommodate others or see things in their perspective. False beliefs, stereotypes and bias associated with other people mays also hinder learning other cultures. There are several ways through which cultural responsiveness can be cultivated among health workers. These include; being open minded and inquisitive, high self-awareness, getting to know others well, resolving personal conflicts, embracing learning and self-reflection (Laverty, McDermott, and Calma, 2017). Being open minded refers to not creating assumptions or self-fulfilling prophesies about others but rather taking time to learn and also inquiring in order to understand deeper. Self-awareness refers to being conscious of personal values and beliefs which then helps a person to avoid judging others or making conclusions based on what one believes is good for them. Avoiding conflicts and resolving them once they occur is also a way in which one can cultivate cultural responsiveness. Conflicts can be avoided by being able to control feelings so as to avoid overreacting or being too defensive, seeking justice from relevant authorities and good use of verbal and nonverbal communication skills to avoid hurting others. Self-reflection allows one to think of their actions and analyze them so as to know what errors to avoid and to also learn from mistakes. Reflection also helps to find ways of moving forward. Lastly, it is essential to embrace learning. Embracing learning involves having an open mind and a teachable personality that also embraces correction.
Culture and society9 Analysis of the 3 aspects It is quite evident from the discussion that the three aspects are intertwined and essential for the maintenance of high quality standards of care. There are a few similarities and differences in the nature and how the three aspects can be cultivated, the barriers and the advantages of the three aspects.Forrest, Lean, and Dunn, 2016 explains that culture plays a very important role in controlling behavior, beliefs and perceptions about health and illness. The three aspects are important in addressing cultural diversity and its effect on health care in the society by ensuring that people respect and appreciate other people’s cultures and beliefs. One of the major difference between cultural competence, cultural humility and cultural responsiveness is that cultural competence largely focuses on the provision of quality care as opposed to the other two which refer to a learning process that is aimed at helping health workers and the community to coexist, understand, appreciate one another and also learn from each other. This is evident in the fact that cultural competence is acquired through the modification of the health care system and not the health workers so as to provide culturally competent health care. According toGermov, 2014, there is a striking similarity between cultural humility and cultural responsiveness in the fact that they are both lifelong learning processes unlike cultural competence whose measures can be completed in a day to make a health institution culturally competent. Cultural humility and responsiveness focus on the development of personality of health workers such as nurses in such a way that they are able to work together without developing cultural shock based on the action of others. Cultural humility and responsiveness also ensures that health workers are able to share knowledge with each other by the fact that the two are lifelong learning processes.
Culture and society10 It is quite interesting to note that the three aspects are intertwined and all focus on improving patient safety and quality of care. While competence focuses on the improvement of the system, humility and responsiveness focuses on equipping the health workers with the necessary skills and competencies that are essential in effecting cultural competence(Lupton, 2014). The two allow health workers to learn how to cope with cultural differences and to provide patient centered care that is essential in improving cultural competence. Conclusion Culturally competent care is dependent on cultural competence, humility and responsiveness. Cultural competence is the ability of health care systems to provide care that meets the cultural, social and linguistic needs of patients in the society. Cultural humility is the continuous process of learning culture based on self-reflection, inquiry and self-critique. Cultural responsiveness refers to the use of culture as a tool of learning and understanding people with similar or different cultures. The three terms therefore refer to different aspects of culture that when cultivated together are essential is improving the quality of healthcare, patient safety and satisfaction.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Culture and society11 References Bainbridge, R., McCalman, J., Clifford, A. and Tsey, K., 2015. Cultural competency in the delivery of health services for Indigenous people. Bennett, B. and Gates, T.G., 2019. Teaching cultural humility for social workers serving LGBTQI Aboriginal communities in Australia.Social Work Education, pp.1-14. Clifford, A., McCalman, J., Bainbridge, R. and Tsey, K., 2015. Interventions to improve cultural competency in health care for Indigenous peoples of Australia, New Zealand, Canada and the USA: a systematic review.International Journal for Quality in Health Care,27(2), pp.89-98. Fisher-Borne, M., Cain, J.M. and Martin, S.L., 2015. From mastery to accountability: Cultural humility as an alternative to cultural competence.Social Work Education,34(2), pp.165-181. Foronda, C.L. and Baptiste, D.L., 2016. Cultural Humility in Simulation Education: A State of the Science. Foronda, C.L., Baptiste, D.L., Pfaff, T., Velez, R., Reinholdt, M., Sanchez, M. and Hudson, K.W., 2018. Cultural competency and cultural humility in simulation-based education: An integrative review.Clinical Simulation in Nursing,15, pp.42-60. Forrest, J., Lean, G. and Dunn, K., 2016. Challenging racism through schools: teacher attitudes to cultural diversity and multicultural education in Sydney, Australia.Race Ethnicity and Education,19(3), pp.618-638. Germov, J., 2014.Second opinion: an introduction to health sociology. Oxford University Press, USA.
Culture and society12 Hunt, L., Ramjan, L., McDonald, G., Koch, J., Baird, D. and Salamonson, Y., 2015. Nursing students' perspectives of the health and healthcare issues of Australian Indigenous people.Nurse education today,35(3), pp.461-467. Jongen, C.S., McCalman, J. and Bainbridge, R.G., 2017. The implementation and evaluation of health promotion services and programs to improve cultural competency: a systematic scoping review.Frontiers in public health,5, p.24. Kohlbry, P.W., 2016. The impact of international service‐learning on nursing students’ cultural competency.Journal of Nursing Scholarship,48(3), pp.303-311. Laverty, M., McDermott, D.R. and Calma, T., 2017. Embedding cultural safety in Australia’s main health care standards.The Medical Journal of Australia,207(1), pp.15-16. Lupton, D., 2014. Health promotion in the digital era: a critical commentary.Health promotion international,30(1), pp.174-183. Murray-García, J. and Tervalon, M., 2017. Rethinking intercultural competence: Cultural humility in internationalising higher education. InIntercultural Competence in Higher Education(pp. 19-31). Routledge. Na, S., Ryder, A.G. and Kirmayer, L.J., 2016. Toward a culturally responsive model of mental health literacy: Facilitating help‐seeking among East Asian immigrants to North America.American Journal of Community Psychology,58(1-2), pp.211-225. Rogers, A., Bower, M., Malla, C., Manhire, S. and Rhodes, D., 2017. Developing a cultural protocol for evaluation.Evaluation Journal of Australasia,17(2), pp.11-19.
Culture and society13 Seeleman, C., Essink-Bot, M.L., Stronks, K. and Ingleby, D., 2015. How should health service organizations respond to diversity? A content analysis of six approaches.BMC health services research,15(1), p.510.