Performance Evaluation of DeGrandis Sporting Goods Projects

Performance Evaluation
Presentation
DeGrandis Sporting Goods
[Student Name] – [Student Number]

Introduction
DeGrandis is one of the largest retail company that
mainly sell exercise and sport equipment. The company
sells the shoes of the international brands
puma,nike,adidas. The company has a private brand
which it wants to promote to a higher level. For this the
company have proposed a new strategic plan to create
more revenues. The following projects were implemented
with the plan
o Three key projects:
1. Project A – DeGrandis Running Shoes
2. Project B –Australian Olympic Committee
3. Project C – Lady Bird Apparel

DeGrandis Strategic Goals
The key strategic goals that company wanted to achieve
through this project.
• Key Strategic Goals:
1. double revenues generation from the private
label products range in next three years.
2. building better and stronger network with the
reliable sporting goods’ suppliers.
3. maintaining highest quality of the private
product range and be the highest quality
providing sports company in Australia(Fleming
& Koppelman, 2016).

DeGrandis Ethical Standards
These ethical standard was needed to justify that the
projects should follow these rules before
implementation.
• Key Ethical Standards:
1. The company follows a code of conduct that says the
company would not collaborate with the suppliers if
they have child labours working under
them(Lock,2017).
2. Bribery is strictly prohibited in the company
3. the company focuses on customer’s satisfaction and
try to inferior quality is cancelled if it cause the
inconvenience to the society.

Project A: Strategy & Ethics
Alignment with strategy:
• The new shoes where launched with new cushioning
technology.
• The project was done within the timeframe.
• The shoes got 5/5 ratings from the customers.
• Increased company revenue more than 5 million(Serra &
Kunc,2015).
Alignment with the ethics:
• The project A did not align with the ethical code of conduct to
reach its success.
• the project team did not consult board of directors before the
selection and collaborating with the organisation.
• There are chances that suppliers had child labour in their factories
which break the code of conduct.

Project A: PPS Snapshot
Dimension Score Explanation
Stakeholders
4/5 • the project team did not consult the board of directors
• The project was liked by the customers
• 5/5 review ratings
Project Process
4/5 • The new product of running shoes with cushion sole
was launched in the market
• the project was completed within the given timeframe.
• Loved by the customers.
• Collaborated with Chinese organization which had child
labour working under them
Innovation and
Learning
5/5 • new technology of cushion sole technology
Quality 5/5 • the customer loved the product .
• 5/5 rating from online site
Benefit 5/5 • gave better platform to the company
• Increased the revenue over 5 million
Use 4/5 • the company’s first step towards their strategic goals