This article analyzes the Honey and Mumford learning theory and Dolnicar's classification of students to identify the author's learning style and weaknesses. Strategies to address these weaknesses are also discussed.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Development for Success in Business
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Table of Contents Introduction.................................................................................................................................................3 Learning Theory Analysis.......................................................................................................................3 Self analysis:...........................................................................................................................................4 Conclusion...................................................................................................................................................6 References...................................................................................................................................................7
Introduction I did my primary and high school in Republic of Moldova. I have diplomas of 9thclass along with a baccalaureate diploma which I got after completion of my 12thstandard. After then, I studies in the university for almost six months and left the university as I chose to study in English group. It is because the French group was small where the entire group just study in own language. In addition, I posses a NVQ in dry lining in England. I wish to have financial as well as professional stability in my life hence I wished to progress to achieve more in life. During my construction job, I realized that it is quite difficult to stick with a particular industry for longer time and it’s never too late to start something new. Here, I motivated to put extra efforts in order to achieve milestones in future career. In light of attendance, I always maintained 100% attendance as I know the significance of study in life. During the entire semester, I merely missed one class that too, due to some technical issues. I do not have any bad habits and I always extract for study as I know this is the only way to make a bright career. Learning Theory Analysis According to this theory, Honey and Mumford recommend that it is important for each and every learner to understand their own learning style. In addition to this, they need to look out for the opportunities to learn in their learning style(Bates, 2019). However, there is also requirement to develop understanding in order to learn in other learning styles. It is based on four different learning styles which are mentioned below: Activist:This kind of learners seek to learn new concepts through trial & error. They involve themselves in new learning experiences. In addition, they are open minded to adapt new environment. Theorist:Theyrespondtolearningthroughclarityofargument.Theyintegrate observations in complex and logical theories. In addition, they think about problem in a logical way by classifying the problem into different steps(Vanhorn and et. al., 2019). Pragmatist:These kinds of learners believe on implementing new ideas, techniques and theories to see their practical implementation. Additionally, they search for new ideas and take opportunity to make experiments.
Reflector:Reflectors collect potential amount of data and analyze it before reaching at final conclusion. Comparison between Honey & Mumford theory and Kolb learning theory Honey & Mumford theoryKolb learning theory This learning theory is developed on the basis of analysis of Kolb learning theory.However,thereiscertain difference in this theory as they add somenewtermssuchasactivist, pragmatic,reflector,theorist(Clark, 2018). Kolb learning theory includes different stagesandusesdifferentwordsto describe various learning stages. According to Dolnicar, Six types of attenders are mentioned below: Idealist Pragmatics Averagely motivated students Fundamentals oriented students Minimalists Everything but pleasure Self analysis: From different categories of Honey and Mumford learning style, I fall underactivist category. I am an active learner who always keen to learn new things. In this context, I always adopt different ways to learn new and evolving concept. I believe in trial and error method and actively search for the new and innovative ways to enhance my knowledge in significant manner. Dolnicarclassifiedstudentsindifferentcategories.Studentsattendtheclassroom sessions with different motives. In this context, I fall under the first category as I am an enthusiastic learner who always attend the lectures in order to learn new concept. In my opinion, lectures are meaningful and need to attend in order to learn new knowledge and concept.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Conclusion From above-mentionedinformation,itisanalyzedthatI amawareregardingthe significant of study hence attend the regular classes so that I can achieve something exponential in future. While analyzing the theory of the honey and Mumford learning style, I realized that I have certain weaknesses which affect my performance profoundly. However, I am an active learner but I found it difficult to concentrate while studying in the classroom. It affects my learning ability and my capabilities to understand the concept. My another weakness is to give least importance to analysis of data and directly draw the conclusion. In order to address the issues, I am enhancing my concentration capability by joining the necessary sessions. To deal with the other weakness, I have been determined to analyze the data and information before reaching at final conclusion. Theses strategies will help me in addressing my weaknesses in an efficient manner.
References Bates, B., 2019.Learning Theories Simplified:... and how to apply them to teaching. Sage. Vanhorn, S., Ward, S.M., Weismann, K.M., Crandall, H., Reule, J. and Leonard, R., 2019. Exploring active learning theories, practices, and contexts.Communication research trends,38(3), pp.5-25. Clark, K.R., 2018. Learning theories: cognitivism.Radiologic technology,90(2), pp.176-179. (Bates, 2019)(Vanhorn and et. al., 2019)(Clark, 2018)