logo

Digital Portfolio Assignment (Doc)

   

Added on  2020-10-05

13 Pages3712 Words405 Views
Digital Portfolio and Writtenproject

TABLE OF CONTENTSOne minute reflective paper ............................................................................................................1Critical analysis of theoretical papers .............................................................................................1Theoretical paper 1: ....................................................................................................................1Theoretical paper 2: ....................................................................................................................2Critique on white papers .................................................................................................................4White paper 1..............................................................................................................................4White paper 2..............................................................................................................................5Video post .......................................................................................................................................6Posts related to chosen topic (Web 2.0 and its implications from business perspective )...............7Post 1...........................................................................................................................................7Post 2 ..........................................................................................................................................8Post 3 ..........................................................................................................................................9

One minute reflective paper Web 2.0 is widely used for the websites which are more focused on user generated ordynamic content. Thus with this technology people are able to easily exchange, modify andcollaborate information by using websites, social media tools and blog posts. As compare to thepast technology of web 1.0 this approach is two way communication in which people can interactwith each others. The technique has been widely used by the business communities for makingtheir business processes more productive. A huge number of customers are using these services for enhancing their learnings andcommunication. Thus for business organisations there can be no better tool than web 2.0 topromote and sale their products and services. The mobile computing, user generated data andsocial networking has made it possible to develop a transparent relation between serviceproviders and its users. However it is essential that social media and web 2.0 services must bemanaged and monitored so that its adverse threats can be eliminated. REFERENCE: Shuen, A., 2018.Web 2.0: A Strategy Guide: Business thinking and strategies behind successfulWeb 2.0 implementations. O'Reilly Media.Critical analysis of theoretical papers Theoretical paper 1: Author: Fernando, A. Title: “Web 2.0 Technologies and Social Networking Security Fears in Enterprises”Journal name and volume: (IJACSA) International Journal of Advanced Computer Science andApplications, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2012Problem statement: In the paper the author has tried to highlight the security threats associatedwith the web 2.0 tools. Purpose, method conclusion and hypothesis: The purpose of the paper is to create awarenessamong enterprises that instead of directly using social media and other web 2.0 methodsenterprises must assure that they are capable to manage and implement the necessary security1

prevention methods. From the paper the hypothesis can be drawn that without necessary securitypolicies web 2.0 can create significant damages to the business. The paper analyses the impact ofeach threat on business and explains that how each threat can be avoided by the organisations. Analysis: The title of paper is suitable as it describes the details and purpose of the paper. Theabstract provided in the study is very specific. However it does not provide a glimpse of methodsused in the study or a brief description of web 2.0. As per the purpose the security threats andtheir remedies are emphasised. It has been observed that the impact of security threats onperformance of companies is not give more emphasis and thus the understanding of severity ofthese threats is quite limited. Though the statements of author are clear and on many instances they are supported bythe necessary facts. For instance the number of social networking users and percentage of web2.0 use within organisations is also mentioned and supported by appropriate references. Thestudy does not include any elements which highlights the challenges for implementing securityprevention methods and the causes which underpin the significance of each security threats frombusiness perspective. Thus the paper is efficient in brining awareness about social networkingthreats but it could have been more effective if certain examples were provided whichdemonstrate the seriousness of these threats and factors which prohibits companies to takeessential security measures. REFERENCE Fernando, A., 2012. Web 2.0 Technologies and Social Networking Security Fears in Enterprises.[Online]. Accessed through <https://arxiv.org/pdf/1204.1824.pdf> Theoretical paper 2: Author: Daniel J, Power. and Gloria Phillips, W.Title: “Impact of Social Media and Web 2.0 on Decision-Making” Journal name and volume: Journal of Decision Systems. Volume 13- No. 1/20042

End of preview

Want to access all the pages? Upload your documents or become a member.

Related Documents
Privacy and Security Challenges on Social Media Report
|9
|1936
|70

Influence of Web 2.0 and Social Media on Small Businesses
|13
|2459
|96

HI6008 : Assignment Requirements
|11
|3072
|204

Effective Communication Strategies: Insights into Nike Company, Competitors, and Innovative Methods
|7
|401
|137

IT - The internet, World Wide Web and social media
|6
|889
|398

E Commerce Marketing and Advertising
|2
|595
|410