Effective Leadership in Healthcare: Styles, Techniques, and Challenges

This paper discusses the importance of effective leadership in healthcare, exploring leadership styles and techniques, and shedding light on key leadership issues for healthcare services. It also analyses the impact of leadership on healthcare services, including challenges related to rising healthcare expenses, ethical dilemmas, and technological advancements.

Running head: EFFECTIVE LEADERSHIP IN HEALTH
EFFECTIVE LEADERSHIP IN HEALTH
Name of the Student:
Name of the University:
Author note:

1
EFFECTIVE LEADERSHIP IN HEALTH
Introduction
Leadership has been signified as the behaviour of an individual while directing the
activities of a group towards the effective completion of shared goals and objectives. The
fundamental determinants of leadership role primarily involve influencing group activities and
contesting with developments and change. Leadership is identified as a critical component for
any organization aiming to drive developments and improvements in healthcare excellence and
patient safety (Hargett et al., 2017). Healthcare delivery systems tend to shift from volume based
towards value-based systems whereby leaders experience new and varied challenges which
necessitate better ideas, behaviours and performance. Healthcare systems are primarily
constituted of numerous professional groups, sections and expertise with intricate, complex
nonlinear interactions between them. However the level of complexities related to such systems
typically as considered as unparalleled because of certain constraints related to various disease
areas, multidirectional goals as well as multidisciplinary employee base. Within wide range of
organizations such as healthcare organizations, numerous groups comprising subcultures might
align or engage into conflicting situations with each other (Ginter, Duncan & Swayne, 2018).
Leadership thus requires efficiently benefiting from the diversity within healthcare domain as
whole and proficiently utilizing resources while arranging management processes and further
acknowledging personnel to advance towards share aims and objectives. The following paper
primarily evaluates the leadership styles and techniques in healthcare domain and shed light on
key leadership issues for healthcare services. In addition to this, it will further analyse the impact
of leadership on healthcare services.
Discussion

2
EFFECTIVE LEADERSHIP IN HEALTH
An important attribute of good leader is the competence to essentially explore
individualistic and team motives in attaining transformation or perceived vision of success.
Healthcare professionals should possess an insight into leadership the techniques and
responsibilities to successfully obtain in-depth understanding of the characteristics and skills
required for underlining ‘leaders’ within the organization (Patel et al., 2016). Leadership further
has been perceived as a fundamental role within new nursing and allied healthcare professional
domain. Thus it has become no longer justifiable for healthcare professionals to avoid
distinguishing the value and implication of effective leadership in contemporary healthcare
environment (Ginter, Duncan & Swayne, 2018). There can be witnessed that wide ranging
developments essential within healthcare domain cannot be implemented using doctorial
management techniques which tend to strengthen change using ‘top down approach’ (Patel et al.,
2016). Healthcare professionals must essentially possess adequate leadership competencies in
diverse healthcare organizational settings in order to implement developments based on good
clinical decision making and pertaining to patient-centred approach to care (Shanafelt et al.,
2015).
Effective leaders in healthcares services fundamentally emphasize on continual
protected, improved quality and compassionate care to the major priority. Leadership techniques
further ensure that the voice of patients must be consistently taken into consideration at every
level such as while dealing with patients’ concerns, demands, suggestions and experiences.
Individual leadership primarily aim to offer supportive, accessible, empathic, justifiable and
empowering leadership and further encourages involvement, participation as their core
leadership strategy (Wang, Kung & Byrd, 2018). Furthermore individual leadership techniques
seek to emphasize on transparency in relation to errors, critical incidents, grievances and

3
EFFECTIVE LEADERSHIP IN HEALTH
complains and tend to perceive these areas effectual for attaining comprehensive understanding
about healthcare leadership techniques (Frich, Brewster, Cherlin, & Bradley, 2015). On the other
hand, clinical leadership in teams create a strong sense of team value and identity by efficiently
ascertaining distinctive as well as inspiring vision of team’s performance and also focuses on
sound commitment towards collaborative diverse teams and diverse-boundary performance
(Shanafelt et al., 2015).
It has been observed that for centuries there has been witnessed much areas of discussion
and arguments related to the most efficient leadership approach to successfully implement
economical healthcare exposure for millions of Australians. Clinical leaders in contemporary
times experience unconstructive situations in seeking resolutions for multiple complex issues
which further exhibit propensity to impact the ability to efficiently implement cost-effective
programs, initiatives and sustain productive operations and services to support other healthcare
initiatives. The future of organisational sustainment in healthcare fundamentally requires highly
proficient leaders to strategize for any potential areas of challenges. Recently healthcare leaders
have been encountering a plethora of challenges and complexities (Wang, Kung & Byrd, 2018).
These areas of challenges include regulatory and policy changes, ethical dilemmas along with
medicinal and technological advancements. Frich, Brewster, Cherlin, & Bradley, (2015) state
that clinical leaders must efficiently comprehend a combination of challenges which could
rapidly and proficiently consume time and economic constraints for medical services. (Lin,
MacLennan, Hunt & Cox, (2015) have observed that technological progress tends to pose
additional challenges with programming, controlling as well as support issues.
At this juncture issues related to elevating rising expenses of healthcare have been taken
into consideration. As more and more people strive to live longer and lead healthier and

4
EFFECTIVE LEADERSHIP IN HEALTH
energetic lifestyles, the extent of healthcare challenges and concerns. Further research has
revealed that healthcare expenses have been increasing at a rapid pace resulting to a strong
elevation in exceeding inflation and has further the potential to increase in the future. Healthcare
services in Australia has indicated that aggregate healthcare expenditure has risen at an average
rate of around 6% from 2015 and has been considered as higher than the anticipated annual
increase in the gross domestic product (GDP) (Boamah, Laschinger, Wong & Clarke, 2018).
These situations have thus led clinical leaders to seek emphasis on offering provisions for their
employees. It is essentially crucial for healthcare leaders to seek alternative tools and approaches
in order to successfully combat the increasing expenses of care. Furthermore, modern practice of
medicine and technology has been creating critical challenges and complexities in the way
healthcare providers have been offering services (Hornstein, 2015). Healthcare organizations in
contemporary times have been encountering clinician deficits and lack of low-cost alternatives in
patient care. Al-Haddad & Kotnour, (2015)argued that the pressure and increasing influx of
patient data as well as legal demands and requirements for stringent privacy and security along
with the rapidly progressing clinical technology has been raising costs and expenses of
healthcare services. These critical forms of issues and challenges have been creating critical
dilemma for clinical leaders to seek efficient ways to manage proficient ways of offering
healthcare services (Trastek, Hamilton & Niles, 2014). Thus studies exploring leadership
techniques in healthcare sphere posited that leaders must effectively comprehend and assume the
behaviour of systems and further provide vital knowledge and expertise to inform potential
developments (Mosson et al., 2018).
Ethical dilemma and intricacies in healthcare has been perceived as a critical
determinant. Reports reveal that many modern healthcare leaders have been using unethical

5
EFFECTIVE LEADERSHIP IN HEALTH
means and approaches of providing misleading medical services which often led to higher
casualty level. Furthermore on the other hand, healthcare providers are ethically proscribed to
enter into the personal sphere of patients in the course of efficiently offering healthcare services
(Hornstein, 2015). They are typically perceived to be positioned at situations of risks and threats
for being accounted for malpractices and clinical negligence. Patients who have been affected by
malfunctioning or defective medical equipment or services during the course of clinical therapy
due to certain types of medication errors which can litigate to recover the losses often sue clinical
providers thus leading to unconstructive outcomes (Aarons, Ehrhart, Farahnak & Hurlburt,
2015). Leadership in healthcare domain typically necessitates wide range of clinician
engagement along with forms of citizenship behaviours within the arena of healthcare services.
This area of engagement as per Johnson & May, (2015) tends to intervene into the consideration
of clinical leadership. It is further to note that professional progress and development has been
distinguished as one of the major determinants in clinical leadership. Healthcare leaders often
experience critical forms of dilemma and challenge to efficiently evaluate, develop and attain
essential personal as well as professional capacities in order to sustain high level of proficiency
and expertise. Tistad et al., (2016) note that major proportion of training initiatives has been
constrained with customary clinical interview with its primary emphasis on acute illness and
disorder; however clinical leaders will be contested to alter to change that dynamic. Thus leaders
engaged in healthcare domain would essentially necessitate employing practical approach and
integrating patients in health care treatments.
With the current focus on inter-professional problem solving techniques for efficient
healthcare services, intense collaboration emerges as a major factor in offering exceptional
treatment and care and leading clinical projects. Intrinsic in inter-professional association has

6
EFFECTIVE LEADERSHIP IN HEALTH
been recognized as a requisite which each theoretical discipline tends to share an understanding
of similarities as well as a universal language of change process (Mosson et al., 2018). Extensive
rate of language intricacies and variation in healthcare perspectives an intervention model has
been implemented to seek mutual ground for understanding so that each discipline sustains an
influence. Since decades, broad range of healthcare professionals has been proposed to use
Lewin’s Three Step Change Management Model to efficiently sustain developments and
transitions in healthcare organizations (Al-Haddad & Kotnour, 2015). Healthcare organizations
are extensively complex adaptive systems exhibits transitions which are regarded as complex
process with varying extents of challenges and agreement among disciplines. Cummings,
Bridgman & Brown, (2016) denote that Lewin’s ‘Unfreezing’ stage is regarded as the first stage
which essentially includes organizing the healthcare enterprises to embrace developments which
are highly essential. Healthcare sectors in order to successfully prepare professionals efficiently
must initiate from the core and contest perceptions, values, standards and behaviours which
would signify their attributes (Ram-Liebig et al., 2015). However, it is critical to note that the
initial part of change process typically tends to exhibit immense criticality and challenges and
must evoke strong responses in healthcare professionals to understand the primary determinants
of change process.
Furthermore, the second stage of change model is created following to the level of
uncertainties generated during the previous stage. The shift from unfreeze to change in
healthcare organizations does not tend to occur at a rapid pace which results to clinicians to
gradually adapt new course and further engage in the process of change management. However
in order to productively embrace transitions and facilitate clinicians understand its beneficial
factors this stage is highly essential (Bakari, Hunjra & Niazi, 2017). Time and communication

7
EFFECTIVE LEADERSHIP IN HEALTH
are identified as two significant factors to changes occurring in a successful manner. Clinicians
while sustaining forms of change requires an extensive rate of time and effort along with
practical management competencies. Lastly, with the roughly organized changes, the healthcare
organizations develop the ability to refreeze (Cummings, Bridgman & Brown, 2016). However,
the outward indicators of the refreeze stage are identified as consistent organization chart and
further necessitate healthcare organizations to facilitate professionals to successfully internalize
as well as incorporate transitions and developments. The rationale for developing a new sense of
consistency in the ever-changing world is often being questioned (Ram-Liebig et al., 2015). It is
important to recognize that any change process devoid of refreeze stage would get into
transitional ensnare which emerges high level of uncertainty about things which need to be
executed in utmost capacity. With the wide ranging efficiency, Lewin’s change management
model had undergone certain form of criticisms related to deficit in terms of accountability for
the interaction of healthcare individuals, teams and organizations.
However in addition to change theory, contemporary healthcare sector has shifted to
certain other theoretical conceptualization of leadership. Specifically transformational leadership
theory seeks to emphasize on change process whereby leaders who implement such techniques
are recognized as transition agents (Hornstein, 2015).. These change agents further use their
excellence and attributes in order to acknowledge their followers to efficiently share ideas and
visions and further empower them. Drawing ideas from transformational leadership theory it has
been observed that clinicians at the primary stage organize appropriate and adequate time to
patients to ensure providing utmost dignity and trust to others (Trastek, Hamilton & Niles, 2014).
Transformational leadership is further about contesting the status quo further creating a
comprehensive and sharing those relevant perspectives and ideas while being highly consistent

8
EFFECTIVE LEADERSHIP IN HEALTH
and determined to stimulate momentum towards change (Hornstein, 2015). Furthermore,
healthcare leaders exhibiting transformational leadership techniques tends to align facets of ‘self-
knowing’ with ‘emotional wisdom’ and further emphasizes on ideas related to emotional
intelligence where prospering transformational healthcare leaders have attained the ability to
enthuse others. Hughes et al., (2016) state that thus there can be witnessed an inter-reliance of
followers and leaders within this theory which implies that transformational leadership has seek
favour in sphere of care-centric as well as learning fields. Author has stated a classic example of
Florence Nightingale who exhibited true transformational leadership skills in the field of
healthcare and therapeutic treatment. Tistad et al., (2016) observed a crucial correlation between
ideas of transformational leadership and innovation within the healthcare labour force. In the
study of Australia, it has been recognized that clinical leaders who exhibited transformational
leadership styles have been perceived to put additional effort and further attaining greater degree
of satisfaction and efficacy. While this has been significant that transformational leadership has
attained substantial degree of prominence because of its relation to formation of vision and
embracing transitions without empirical evaluation transformational leadership constrains the
approaches through which transformational leadership techniques can be conceptualized in
healthcare settings (Mosson et al., 2018).
Transactional leadership theory primarily signifies as the antithesis of transformational
leadership and further denotes that transactional leadership competencies prevail in areas
constituting exchange relationships between leader and followers. Trastek, Hamilton & Niles,
(2014) noted that role of transformational clinical leaders fundamentally sheds light on the aim
of the organization. Leaders underlining transactional leadership skills facilitate people to
efficiently recognize determining factors to accomplish desired outcome through process of

9
EFFECTIVE LEADERSHIP IN HEALTH
reward and penalty motivator (Hornstein, 2015). It has further been signified that transactional
leadership as a form of skill and capability tends to contest with mundane, practical, operational
and regular dealings of healthcare organizational life. Healthcare professionals exhibiting
transactional leadership abilities need to manage such ordinary organizational dealings with
utmost efficiency and further to retain their creditability and productivity (Trastek, Hamilton &
Niles, 2014).
However criticisms associated to this form of leadership theory primarily relied on
significant procedures, technical expertise and accurate information to inform decision making
process. Transactional leadership has further been signified as form of ‘scientific managerialism’
which depends on the relative conjectures (Cameron & Green, 2015). These assumptions
however reveal that transactional leaders tend to be sited in the position to control rewards and
assertively recognizing leaders. Aarons, Ehrhart, Farahnak & Hurlburt, (2015) state that though
with its wide ranging expertise, transactional leadership theory similar to transformational theory
have experienced certain level of criticisms which state that human behavioural pattern is
stimulated by factors of motivation for recognition and incentive procedure and due to its greater
degree of inclination towards highly conservative aspects rather than inventive (Hughes et al.,
2016). However, the underlying principle of transactional leadership relies that clinical leader in
order to efficiently perform must enable themselves to regulate any forms of situational contexts
within which they are expected to take primary roles and positions and further manage healthcare
environment and restraining transitions (Johnson & May, 2015).
Conclusion

10
EFFECTIVE LEADERSHIP IN HEALTH
The types of challenges and intricacies that healthcare leaders experience while leading
highly complex situational contexts of contemporary healthcare services primarily incorporate
diverse and altering demands and requirements along with elevating rate of patients’ experiences
and expectations and high cost of new interventions as well as therapeutic care. These situations
however need clinical leaders to primarily consider needs of broader range of patient population
and efficiently execute clinically-led service developments which are typically to progress. To
conclude it can be stated that several theories and models have influenced contemporary
leadership strategies and theories which can be relevant to the clinical setting. Significant
assistance needed for effective leadership skill should emphasize on the dynamic associations
between leadership values, standards, ideologies, culture and competencies. Clinical leadership
development has successfully attained a decisive crossroad and the major role of healthcare
leader can be signified as ascertaining effective involvement of replacement leaders to sustain
organizational advancement in the ever-changing healthcare domain.

11
EFFECTIVE LEADERSHIP IN HEALTH
References
Aarons, G. A., Ehrhart, M. G., Farahnak, L. R., & Hurlburt, M. S. (2015). Leadership and
organizational change for implementation (LOCI): a randomized mixed method pilot
study of a leadership and organization development intervention for evidence-based
practice implementation. Implementation Science, 10(1), 11.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-014-0192-y
Al-Haddad, S., & Kotnour, T. (2015). Integrating the organizational change literature: a model
for successful change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 28(2), 234-262
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-11-2013-0215
Bakari, H., Hunjra, A. I., & Niazi, G. S. K. (2017). How Does Authentic Leadership Influence
Planned Organizational Change? The Role of Employees’ Perceptions: Integration of
Theory of Planned Behavior and Lewin's Three Step Model. Journal of Change
Management, 17(2), 155-187. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2017.1299370
Banks, G. C., McCauley, K. D., Gardner, W. L., & Guler, C. E. (2016). A meta-analytic review
of authentic and transformational leadership: A test for redundancy. The Leadership
Quarterly, 27(4), 634-652. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.02.006
Boamah, S. A., Laschinger, H. K. S., Wong, C., & Clarke, S. (2018). Effect of transformational
leadership on job satisfaction and patient safety outcomes. Nursing outlook, 66(2), 180-
189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2017.10.004
Cameron, E., & Green, M. (2015). Making sense of change management: A complete guide to
the models, tools and techniques of organizational change. Kogan Page Publishers.

12
EFFECTIVE LEADERSHIP IN HEALTH
Retrieved from http://www.mim.ac.mw/books/Making%20sense%20of%20change
%20management%202nd%20ed.pdf
Choi, S. L., Goh, C. F., Adam, M. B. H., & Tan, O. K. (2016). Transformational leadership,
empowerment, and job satisfaction: the mediating role of employee
empowerment. Human resources for health, 14(1), 73. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-
016-0171-2
Cummings, S., Bridgman, T., & Brown, K. G. (2016). Unfreezing change as three steps:
Rethinking Kurt Lewin’s legacy for change management. human relations, 69(1), 33-60.
DOI: 10.1177/0018726715577707
Frich, J. C., Brewster, A. L., Cherlin, E. J., & Bradley, E. H. (2015). Leadership development
programs for physicians: a systematic review. Journal of general internal
medicine, 30(5), 656-674. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-014-3141-1
Ginter, P. M., Duncan, W. J., & Swayne, L. E. (2018). The strategic management of health care
organizations. John Wiley & Sons. Retrieved from
https://erl.ucc.edu.gh/dspace/bitstream/123456789/3016/1/%5BLinda_E._Swayne
%2C_Jack_Duncan%2C_Peter_M._Ginter%5D_St%28BookZZ.org%29.pdf
Hargett, C. W., Doty, J. P., Hauck, J. N., Webb, A. M., Cook, S. H., Tsipis, N. E., ... & Taylor,
D. C. (2017). Developing a model for effective leadership in healthcare: a concept
mapping approach. Journal of healthcare leadership, 9, 69. doi: 10.2147/JHL.S141664

13
EFFECTIVE LEADERSHIP IN HEALTH
Hornstein, H. A. (2015). The integration of project management and organizational change
management is now a necessity. International Journal of Project Management, 33(2),
291-298. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.08.005
Hughes, A. M., Gregory, M. E., Joseph, D. L., Sonesh, S. C., Marlow, S. L., Lacerenza, C. N., ...
& Salas, E. (2016). Saving lives: A meta-analysis of team training in healthcare. Journal
of Applied Psychology, 101(9), 1266. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/apl0000120
Johnson, M. J., & May, C. R. (2015). Promoting professional behaviour change in healthcare:
what interventions work, and why? A theory-led overview of systematic reviews. BMJ
open, 5(9), e008592. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008592
Lin, P. Y., MacLennan, S., Hunt, N., & Cox, T. (2015). The influences of nursing
transformational leadership style on the quality of nurses’ working lives in Taiwan: a
cross-sectional quantitative study. BMC nursing, 14(1), 33.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-015-0082-x
Mosson, R., von Thiele Schwarz, U., Hasson, H., Lundmark, R., & Richter, A. (2018). How do
iLead? Validation of a scale measuring active and passive implementation leadership in
Swedish healthcare. BMJ open, 8(6), e021992. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-
021992
Patel, V. M., Ashrafian, H., Uzoho, C., Nikiteas, N., Panzarasa, P., Sevdalis, N., ... &
Athanasiou, T. (2016). Leadership behaviours and healthcare research performance:
prospective correlational study. Postgraduate Medical Journal, 92(1093), 663-669.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/postgradmedj-2016-134088

14
EFFECTIVE LEADERSHIP IN HEALTH
Ram-Liebig, G., Bednarz, J., Stuerzebecher, B., Fahlenkamp, D., Barbagli, G., Romano, G., ... &
Knispel, H. (2015). Regulatory challenges for autologous tissue engineered products on
their way from bench to bedside in Europe. Advanced drug delivery reviews, 82, 181-
191. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2014.11.009
Richter, A., von Thiele Schwarz, U., Lornudd, C., Lundmark, R., Mosson, R., & Hasson, H.
(2015). iLead—a transformational leadership intervention to train healthcare managers’
implementation leadership. Implementation Science, 11(1), 108.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-016-0475-6
Shanafelt, T. D., & Noseworthy, J. H. (2017, January). Executive leadership and physician well-
being: nine organizational strategies to promote engagement and reduce burnout. In Mayo
Clinic Proceedings (Vol. 92, No. 1, pp. 129-146). Elsevier.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.10.004
Shanafelt, T. D., Gorringe, G., Menaker, R., Storz, K. A., Reeves, D., Buskirk, S. J., ... &
Swensen, S. J. (2015, April). Impact of organizational leadership on physician burnout
and satisfaction. In Mayo Clinic Proceedings (Vol. 90, No. 4, pp. 432-440).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.01.012
Tistad, M., Palmcrantz, S., Wallin, L., Ehrenberg, A., Olsson, C. B., Tomson, G., ... & Eldh, A.
C. (2016). Developing leadership in managers to facilitate the implementation of national
guideline recommendations: a process evaluation of feasibility and
usefulness. International journal of health policy and management, 5(8), 477.
doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.35

15
EFFECTIVE LEADERSHIP IN HEALTH
Trastek, V. F., Hamilton, N. W., & Niles, E. E. (2014, March). Leadership models in health care
—a case for servant leadership. In Mayo Clinic Proceedings (Vol. 89, No. 3, pp. 374-
381). Elsevier. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.10.012
Wang, Y., Kung, L., & Byrd, T. A. (2018). Big data analytics: Understanding its capabilities and
potential benefits for healthcare organizations. Technological Forecasting and Social
Change, 126, 3-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.12.019