Engineering Challenges of Katrina - A Case Study for Study of Engineering Ethics
Verified
Added on 2023/01/17
|17
|3923
|1
AI Summary
This case study explores the engineering challenges of Hurricane Katrina and its implications for the study of engineering ethics. It discusses the causes of hurricanes, damage to agricultural land, the formation of the ASCE panel, and their recommendations. The paper also highlights the lessons learned from the disaster.
Running Head: ENGINEERING CHALLENGES OF KATRINA – A CASE STUDY FOR STUDY OF ENGINEERING ETHICS Engineering challenges of Katrina – a case study for the study of engineering ethics Engineering Ethics Students Name Institution
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
ENGINEERING CHALLENGES OF KATRINA – A CASE STUDY FOR STUDY OF ENGINEERING ETHICS2 Executive Summary When August 29, 2005, reached, Hurricane Katrina made a landfall becoming one of the biggest natural disasters to hit the USA. The storm brought high rainfall, intense wind, storm surge and waves to Louisiana, Alabama and Mississippi. However, this report looks into the destruction of New Orleans. The low-lying marshland of New Orleans running along Mississippi made it vulnerable. Hurricane Katrina walked over the erected floodwalls and leeves easily leading to the New Orleans city flooding. Hence the paper looks into the causes of hurricanes and the damages hurricanes cause to agricultural land before indulging in the reason for the formation of ASCE panel as well as the panel’s recommendation. Hurricane Katrina’s imposed challenges are discussed in this paper before noting down the lessons learnt and concluding the report.
ENGINEERING CHALLENGES OF KATRINA – A CASE STUDY FOR STUDY OF ENGINEERING ETHICS3 Table of Contents Executive Summary.......................................................................................................................2 1.Introduction............................................................................................................................4 2.Brief Overview........................................................................................................................6 3.Causes of Hurricanes.............................................................................................................7 4.Damage to agricultural land and crops................................................................................9 5.Formation of ASCE panel...................................................................................................10 6.Recommendations by ASCE Panel.....................................................................................10 7.Challenges faced...................................................................................................................12 8.Lessons learned.....................................................................................................................14 9.Conclusion.............................................................................................................................15 References.....................................................................................................................................17
ENGINEERING CHALLENGES OF KATRINA – A CASE STUDY FOR STUDY OF ENGINEERING ETHICS4 1.Introduction Background August 29, 2005, marked Hurricane Katrina’s landfall on southeast Louisiana triggering disasters that made a mark in the USA. Hurricane Katrina overtopped the floodwalls and leeves across southeast Louisiana apart from breaching and causing failure of the floodwalls and leeves of New Orleans and many more locations(Mirón, Beabout, & Boselovic, 2015).The New Orleans city was 80% flooded by the rushing water in that some neighbourhoods were more than 10 feet submerged in water(Brown, 2015). 1,118 people died in New Orleans while 135 other people were presumed dead or missing. Property worth a lump sum of money was damaged. 400,000 and more people were displaced and fled the city and some did not come back(Bildner, 2015).The health care and educational systems crippled in New Orleans due to the devastatingly extensive residual risk that loomed quite openly that after a year the New Orleans city stays clouded(Pratt, 2016). The focus of the Paper The paper focuses on the professional and ethical considerations done by the ASCE external review panel members. Their heartfelt sympathy, ethics and profession were directed mostly to the New Orleans occupants who were displaced from their homes, jobs and communities, facing an uncertain future. Additionally, the external review panel took time to research and produce a review at the comprehensive USACE work. Efforts from the panel’s 150 scientists engineers who followed Hurricane Katrina’s movement evaluated the effects and causes of the failures of the hurricane protection system in New Orleans. The external review panel had the obligation of sharing its insights and findings that went beyond the previously conducted hurricane protection
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
ENGINEERING CHALLENGES OF KATRINA – A CASE STUDY FOR STUDY OF ENGINEERING ETHICS5 system designs. Such openness showed a move to enable others to prevent identical tragedies and heed from similar tragedies. The document did not only help New Orleans but helped other communities that would experience similar vulnerability to flooding and hurricanes as well (Powelson, 2017). Paper’s Structure This paper has its content dwelling on the brief overview of the event occurrence from the first landfall of Hurricane Katrina on August 27, 2005, in Louisiana but focusses on New Orleans city. Once through with briefing the flow of hurricane Katrina events in New Orleans, the paper looks at the causes of hurricanes and how they develop into such natural disastrous, whereby, the phases of hurricane development are noted down(Yoe, 2019).Once the hurricanes develop and make landfall, there are damages caused afterwards on the land and crops, these will be the next area of discussion(Molinari, Menoni, & Ballio, 2017)before looking at the recommendations and outcomes posed by the ASCE external review panel(Conner, 2014).Research done by the review panel also expose the environmental, economic and human life challenges felt before dwelling on the lessons learnt from hurricane Katrina disaster(Ruth & Goessling-Reisemann, 2019). 2.Brief Overview On August 27, 2005, Hurricane Katrina had its strength increased to category three in that its top winds covered almost the entire Gulf of Mexico area while reaching August 29, the hurricane further progressed into a category four before approaching Plaquemines Parish. The direct
ENGINEERING CHALLENGES OF KATRINA – A CASE STUDY FOR STUDY OF ENGINEERING ETHICS6 intense winds did not reach New Orleans, however, Lake Pontchartrain, as well as Lake Borgne, had their waters overwhelm the protective leeves. Flooding began from east of Industrial Canal. A number of inhabitants did not get a chance to evacuate and the state worsened when 80% of the city got flooded. The local agencies were helpless to react to the awful situation. The picture above shows the flooded areas with the red areas being the most flooded(Bleemer & van der Klaauw, 2019). The picture above shows the eye of Hurricane Katrina(Brusentsev & Vroman, 2017). On August 31, 2005, the Red Cross managed to land the first evacuees batch at their shelters. On the other hand, the scarcity of food and water increased with an increasing number of evacuees. Moreover, there was a worsening public health emergency as basic sanitation was dwindling. On September 2, the military got involved in the distribution of food and water. More batches of
ENGINEERING CHALLENGES OF KATRINA – A CASE STUDY FOR STUDY OF ENGINEERING ETHICS7 evacuees were shipped in while there was a reconstruction of the breached leeves. It was the beginning of positive changes to come into New Orleans. Other changes included other nations contributing to saving, evacuating people from the flooded zones and supplying food. The army troops came in on October 11 to pump the remnant patches of water from New Orleans. In conclusion, Hurricane Katrina destroyed lots of property and led to numerous loss of lives. The picture above shows the army troops on site. 3.Causes of Hurricanes Hurricanes sprout from the air that is warm and moist rising from an ocean’s surface rapidly. Along its way, this air meets with cool air causing condensation of the warm water forming storm clouds as well as raindrops. When condensation begins, latent heat is released thus warming the cooler air, rising and making way for extra air coming from the ocean(Lew, 2018). The cycle continues with the extra addition of warm air getting drawn into the storm forming while more heat comes from the earth’s surface to the ocean’s atmosphere. The exchange of heat leads to the creation of wind pattern spiralling around a calmer centre, similar to swirling water down a drain(Waterford, 2017).
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
ENGINEERING CHALLENGES OF KATRINA – A CASE STUDY FOR STUDY OF ENGINEERING ETHICS8 Winds converge near the water surface and collide thereby producing more water droplets that vaporize and move upward to the increasing warm air circulation and increasing wind speeds (Johnson, 2016).Simultaneously, strong winds steadily blow at high altitudes thus pulling warm air that was rising, from the center of the storm. This leads to swirling motion similar to the cyclone pattern of the classical hurricanes(Neely, 2016). High altitudes more than 9,000 metres have high pressure that draws away heat from the center of the storm, calling the air rising. High-pressure air is pulled into zones with low pressure at the storm’s center. Gradually, the speed of wind increases(Quaschning, 2019). 4.Damage to agricultural land and crops On land There were elevated lead and arsenic concentrations gotten from the New Orleans soil samples. The concentrations were even higher in the New Orleans’ city areas that had poorer soil. Such mineral deposits came from sediment deposits or building materials that caved in due to flooding (Furuta, Frangopol, & Akiyama, 2014).Arsenic and lead pose a great risk to the inhabitants of New Orleans in that they became more susceptible to cancerous growths and poisoning. Wastewater systems and air quality systems were affected in that wastewater systems had to be reconfigured or renovated whereas indoor air quality needed monitoring to ensure healthy condition for the homes and businesses set up. On Crops Reports from the USDA showed losses in agriculture amounting to 151 million dollars. Sugarcane loss amounted to 50 million dollars while cotton had 40 million dollars loss due to
ENGINEERING CHALLENGES OF KATRINA – A CASE STUDY FOR STUDY OF ENGINEERING ETHICS9 wind damage, submergence and shifts in soil nutrients. Rice and soybeans are other crops that were affected by wind. Major market challenges came from transportation difficulty of crops due to skyrocketing fuel prices. Regarding rice and cotton growing, damages done to cotton plants may have been on their reduction in quality rather than losses in production. Similarly, rice farmers experienced minor losses since they were already harvested at that time of the hurricane’s landfall. 5.Formation of ASCE panel The head of engineers asked the ASCE to create an external review panel to give an opinion and review the works of IPET. ASCE gathered 14 experts from major scientific and engineering fields concerned with the hurricane protection systems flaws to develop an external review Panel for hurricane Katrina(Bianchi, Allison, & Cai, 2014). The nature of work of the ASCE external review panel for hurricane Katrina was to offer objective, real-time and ongoing complex review of the findings in the IPET report concerning the hurricane protection system’s performance in the New Orleans and adjacent areas(Amadei, 2014). The members of ASCE external review panel for the hurricane Katrina went to New Orleans, found substantial data concerning the hurricane, the causing factors and also evaluated damages caused(Mechler, Bouwer, Schinko, Surminski, & Linnerooth-Bayer, 2018). 6.Recommendations by ASCE Panel Engineering standpoint The failures revealed during Hurricane Katrina should act as the best reminder to all engineers that their duties involve both death and life matters. Whichever the challenges faced be it political related, schedule, inertia or costs, it is important for engineers to observe the required
ENGINEERING CHALLENGES OF KATRINA – A CASE STUDY FOR STUDY OF ENGINEERING ETHICS10 professionalism standards. They should keep in mind that the lives of individuals are at risk. There is a need for improving engineering design processes(Harris, Pritchard, Rabins, James, & Englehardt, 2018).This recommendation comes from the engineers’ obligation to practice competently whereby engineers have to use instruments linked with regulations and act on sufficient knowledge. Upgrade understanding of failure The lessons picked from the engineering and policies related to engineering flaws as a result of Hurricane Katrina have substantial impacts on various communities in America concerning the flaws. That is to imply that, there is a need to prioritize the health, safety and welfare of the public first as any other thing may cause failures(Rodríguez, Donner, & Trainor, 2017).This recommendation comes from the engineering code to identify, asses and manage risk for failure reduction. Underestimation of soil strength The engineering design disregarded the changes in the soft soil's strength close to and beneath the levees. Engineers ought to put into consideration any spaces filled with water that forms at the back of I-walls which leads to a decrease in the strength of soils. It means that the I-walls should be curving outwards from the exerted forces as a result of the floodwaters. This recommendation comes from the obligation to practice competently stating that engineers’ should objectively represent areas of competency by developing dependable skills and knowledge. The protection systems should be repaired
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
ENGINEERING CHALLENGES OF KATRINA – A CASE STUDY FOR STUDY OF ENGINEERING ETHICS11 In a wider perspective, the lessons picked from Hurricane Katrina are not only applicable to New Orleans or the need to upgrade the design of floodwalls and levees. They should be applied in every engineering project that concerns the safety, public health and welfare threats. These protection systems must involve matters concerning efforts of recovery, before or after evacuation and rescue missions. These issues affect the ultimate results of the flaws of the hurricane protection systems. For instance systems of communication and transportation roads must be upgraded to be operative in difficult situations(Kabisch, Korn, Stadler, & Bonn, 2017). This recommendation comes from the engineers’ code in demonstrating integrity in using well- informed conscience when planning or managing engineering systems. 7.Challenges faced a.Human life challenges Poverty The victims of hurricane Katrina earned very little wages while a huge population experienced difficulties after losing homes(Bleemer & van der Klaauw, 2019). Insecurity Due to the lack of social amenities increased the rate of looting. Homelessness Individuals from impacted places lost their homes and standing back on their feet was never easy. Death
ENGINEERING CHALLENGES OF KATRINA – A CASE STUDY FOR STUDY OF ENGINEERING ETHICS12 The population of New Orleans decreased by more than half of the original population as a result of hurricane Katrina. b.Environmental problems Disposal of wastes Solid wastes and debris were spread and had to be collected for proper disposal. Quality of air The indoor air was supervised according to the reliable information on public health concerning homes and businesses had been released. Control of vectors There was a need to control mosquitoes and flies by the use of pesticides Wastewater systems The systems for wastewater collection were reconfigured and renovated. c.Economic challenges The economy of the city was affected as the uninsured property lost as a result of the floodwaters was devastated. Individuals without insurance cover also faced difficulties because the coverage policy of New Orleans was not enough to cover the loss of homes or household property(Lincove, Barrett, & Strunk, 2018). About half of the housing units in New Orleans were rentals as per the census conducted in the year 2000. Renters were therefore forced to search for alternative housing. Furthermore, many
ENGINEERING CHALLENGES OF KATRINA – A CASE STUDY FOR STUDY OF ENGINEERING ETHICS13 residents paid fewer rents because of poverty. Very few people were able to return back to New Orleans because of high rents following the reconstructed or undamaged dwellings in the city. 8.Lessons learned There is a need for periodical quantification and update of data used in assessing risk. Thus sticking to engineers’ code of practicing competently through developing and maintaining skills and knowledge. Such an approach is applicable in the areas in the USA with vulnerability to huge losses from flooding and hurricanes. The government should prioritize the public’s safety through developing responsible agencies that can re-evaluate practices and policies ensuring the public’s safety protection, welfare and health. These should be the agencies’ top priority in case of potential or infrequent devastating impacts from flooding and hurricanes, additionally, demonstrating integrity through respecting personnel dignity as demanded by the engineering code. There have to be expert individuals ready to critically review the lifesaving structures for possible higher-level structures(Bullard, 2018).This promotes sustainability by engaging relevant stakeholders able to ensure safety as per the EAPC codes. The engineering designs have to be improved as well as the practices boosting safety. Improvement is done through supporting and encouraging diversity in engineering practitioners. 9.Conclusion The ethical and professional conductance of the external review panel was amazing since the idea brought to light a number of reasons for the heavy damage of Hurricane Katrina, visibly.
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
ENGINEERING CHALLENGES OF KATRINA – A CASE STUDY FOR STUDY OF ENGINEERING ETHICS14 USACE had appropriately taken control and earned commendation due to its constructive and professional review bearing marvellous fruits noted down as manuscripts, figures and photographs that composed technical reports(Kabisch, Korn, Stadler, & Bonn, 2017).The considerable skills from the panel in implementing engineering ethics when explaining and recommending possible events leading to increased risks when Hurricane Katrina ran down New Orleans and why it is important to improve the hurricane protection systems(Bleemer & van der Klaauw, 2019). The 150 engineers that made up the external review panel produced important information for protecting and rebuilding New Orleans and other affected areas from identical flooding and hurricanes. Thus it was an honour to see and have the engineering ethics be sued in developing competitive, comprehensive evaluation and analysis that had important findings and lessons learnt(Yoe, 2019).
ENGINEERING CHALLENGES OF KATRINA – A CASE STUDY FOR STUDY OF ENGINEERING ETHICS15 References Amadei, B. (2014).Engineering for Sustainable Human Development: A Guide to Successful Small-scale Community Projects.Jhang: ASCE Press/American Society of Civil Engineers. Bianchi, T., Allison, M., & Cai, W. (2014).Biogeochemical Dynamics at Major River-Coastal Interfaces: Linkages with Global Change.Jhang: Cambridge University Press. Bildner, P. (2015).Marvelous Cornelius: Hurricane Katrina and the Spirit of New Orleans. Lahore: Chronicle Books. Bleemer, Z., & van der Klaauw, W. (2019). Long-run net distributionary effects of federal disaster insurance: The case of Hurricane Katrina.Journal of Urban Economics, 70-88. Brown, D. (2015).Drowned City: Hurricane Katrina & New Orleans.Karachi: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. Brusentsev, V., & Vroman, W. (2017).Disasters in the United States: Frequency, Costs, and Compensation.Multan: W.E. Upjohn Institute. Bullard, R. D. (2018). The Overlooked Significance of Place in Law and Policy: Lessons from Hurricane Katrina.In Race, Place, and Environmental Justice After Hurricane Katrina, 71-84. Conner, A. (2014).Fema's Disaster Relief Fund: Elements and Considerations.Peshawar: Nova Science Publishers, Incorporated. Furuta, H., Frangopol, D., & Akiyama, M. (2014).Life-Cycle of Structural Systems: Design, Assessment, Maintenance and Management.Mardan: CRC Press.
ENGINEERING CHALLENGES OF KATRINA – A CASE STUDY FOR STUDY OF ENGINEERING ETHICS16 Harris, C., Pritchard, M., Rabins, M., James, R., & Englehardt, E. (2018).Engineering Ethics: Concepts and Cases.Kasur: Cengage Learning. Johnson, R. (2016).What Is a Hurricane?Peshawar: Crabtree Publishing Company. Kabisch, N., Korn, H., Stadler, J., & Bonn, A. (2017).Nature-Based Solutions to Climate Change Adaptation in Urban Areas: Linkages between Science, Policy and Practice. Wah Cantonment: Springer. Lew, K. (2018).Hurricanes.Peshawar: Britannica Educational Publishing. Lincove, J. A., Barrett, N., & Strunk, K. O. (2018). Lessons from Hurricane Katrina: The employment effects of the mass dismissal of New Orleans teachers.Educational Researcher, 191-203. Mechler, R., Bouwer, L., Schinko, T., Surminski, S., & Linnerooth-Bayer, J. (2018).Loss and Damage from Climate Change: Concepts, Methods and Policy Options.Jhang: Springer. Mirón, L., Beabout, R., & Boselovic, J. (2015).Only in New Orleans: School Choice and Equity Post-Hurricane Katrina.Rawalpindi: Springer. Molinari, D., Menoni, S., & Ballio, F. (2017).Flood Damage Survey and Assessment: New Insights from Research and Practice.Gujranwala: John Wiley & Sons. Neely, W. (2016).The Greatest and Deadliest Hurricanes of the Caribbean and the Americas: The Stories Behind the Great Storms of the North Atlantic.Multan: iUniverse. Powelson, M. (2017).Hurricane Katrina and the Lessons of Disaster Relief.Rawalpindi: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
ENGINEERING CHALLENGES OF KATRINA – A CASE STUDY FOR STUDY OF ENGINEERING ETHICS17 Pratt, M. (2016).Hurricane Katrina and the Flooding of New Orleans: A Cause-and-Effect Investigation.Lahore: Lerner Publications. Quaschning, V. (2019).Renewable Energy and Climate Change, 2nd Edition.Islamabad: John Wiley & Sons. Rodríguez, H., Donner, W., & Trainor, J. (2017).Handbook of Disaster Research.Sahiwal: Springer. Ruth, M., & Goessling-Reisemann, S. (2019).Handbook on Resilience of Socio-Technical Systems.Rawalpindi: Edward Elgar Publishing. Waterford, C. (2017).Hurricane Harvey.Multan: Abdo Publishing. Yoe, C. (2019).Principles of Risk Analysis: Decision Making Under Uncertainty, Second Edition.Gujranwala: Taylor & Francis Limited.