Entrepreneur Opportunity Project

This project discusses the opportunity of developing intellectual properties and commercializing them in the global market. It explains the feasibility of commercializing new opportunities and the screening process involved. The project also talks about the importance of artistic work in resourcing and budgeting sales and product designs testing procedures.

OPPORTUNITY PROJECT 1
ENTREPRENEUR OPPORTUNITY PROJECT
Student’s Name
Professor
Date

OPPORTUNITY PROJECT 2
Introduction
A real business opportunity requires new ideas of introducing the new product in the
market system. Commercialization process enables the business system to develop new
opportunity based on featuring the new brand of product in the business organization (Sutton
2013). In many cases, it is the orientation procedures on drawing up business, prototyping,
development, consultation and market research that helps many employers to realize
opportunities. In this case, a business opportunity involves intellectual properties which are
represented in the commercial markets as the mass sales. It is these opportunities that help in
determining the potential of the business based on ideas developed in the marketplace (Bester
2012). The opportunity of developing intellectual properties is the best idea that can help in
forming stable industry. A good intervention is established preparing relevant information
properties designs to help present better platforms of offering services within the industry of
interest. Business opportunities integrated through legal ways of engaging mass products to meet
demands of products in the market structures. As such, financial evaluation procedures can help
designs some better market validation to allow the process of commercialization.
Opportunity for a Product and Services; Intellectual Property
The product line development requires tangible goods to help establish better trademark
system. The need to develop the intellectual property is to designs better trade secrets to protect
rights of many competitors in the market system. A good business opportunity is modelled on the
idea of developing literature creativity work in music. With such artistic works, there will be
better discoveries in the designs an symbols that engage protection regarding intellectual
properties. The intellectual property policy provides a wide range of commonplace where people
can develop their artistic works (Baumann 2012). The development of the idea toward

OPPORTUNITY PROJECT 3
commercialization allows one to have a better overview of the business opportunity. In the same
way, the identified idea of developing artistic work is using intellectual properties enables
internal and external testing to provide professional advice. The opportunity is supported by
different concepts to demonstrate its effectiveness in the global business fully.
These concepts involve following features of the speculated opportunity. The first proof
of aspects of a product developed by artistic work is that it provides the better characteristic of a
working prototype to feature consumers' needs. Secondly, the intellectual property allows
internal and external testing to increase its certification in the global markets. These aspects help
in registering process and later to provide approval after testing (Cukjati 2012). Thirdly, the
opportunity of integrating artistic work forms some technical support on based on instructions
and specifications of the new brand. In this case, the representation of real business opportunity
designs some benefits and featured services of the product. The fourth aspect of the real
opportunity is developed through disclosing individual information especially in the
development of artistic work. A confidential agreement is engaged to certify ideas on the new
opportunity (Watts, and Wray, 2012). Additionally, the research procedures require intellectual
property protection design better funding programs. With these developments of new strategies,
the proposed opportunity will easily venture into the global market.
Equally important, the intellectual law requires good opportunity in the product
development to help realize competitive advantage. Artistic work enhances some better programs
featuring new product in the market structure (Rasmussen 2012). As such, there will be better
development of new opportunity based on intellectual provisions. Intellectual protection helps
the market system to design different products based on economic incentives and stimulating
consumers' expectations. The principal objective of the intellectual policy is to initiates services

OPPORTUNITY PROJECT 4
based on technological innovations on properties like goods and lands. The market system
provides a good validation on completion of the industrial trail (Elliott 2014). After this process,
the new opportunities for artistic work can be ventured in the global business. Distribution
channels and price setting plan are modeled on the vision of artistic work. With these aspects,
commercialization new opportunity is taken in the larger markets with accounting reports and
financial projections (Sutton,2013).
Opportunity Screening Process
The process of integrating factors on artistic work is done based on the established
market system. A greater opportunity of these programs is perceived through sufficiently
developing and engaging sustainable market offers. The complex task in the intellectual analysis
requires a good system of evaluating competition system, market potential, market size,
processing conditions, cost on fabricating needs of consumers (Grimshaw 2014). Shifting trends
in the market segments are assessed based on the complexity of the opportunities. In such cases,
it appears essay to integrate intellectual goods with new patterns of the market system.
Importantly, artistic work forms better foundations of resourcing and budgeting sales and
product designs testing procedures (Baumann, Lorrmann, Rauh, Deibel, and Dyakonov, 2012.).
The screening process of the new opportunity involves interactions with modern
technology to help realize potential needs of consumers. The best applications of intellectual
properties design better acknowledgment on significant returns of the business system. An active
approach of the business system enables the proactive engagement with the new approaches of
investing on new market approaches (McEvoy 2014). Commercialization provides that that good
return on intellectual properties requires market attractiveness challenges to help develops vital

OPPORTUNITY PROJECT 5
ideas in the business system. The symbol on artistic work helps the new opportunities to provide
effective services in the global markets.
Feasibility of Commercializing
Business planning activities help the investor to have a functional evaluation of business
ideas especially in starting up of a business system. Commercializing new opportunity in the
extensive business system needs detailed analysis on of the service and product line.
Commercialization is a process of introducing a new product or service to a target market. For
commercialisation, to be a success, it takes into account the production, distribution, marketing,
sales, and customer service. It also requires the business to come up with a marketing plan and
also develop barriers to success. The ideation phase, stakeholder stage and business process are
the main stages of the commercialization process. The ideation stage includes generation of ideas
about a new product or service which will go through a thorough funnelling. This is where all the
unanswered consumer needs are found as features such as the 4P’s are the primary interest. After
the selection of the best ideas is done, the establishment of development stages, goals, and
milestones is addressed. Broadly, the entrepreneur needs to have a good understanding of
different channels of distributing well and services (Nick, Grundmann and Frauenhofer 2012).
The opportunity of designing artistic work based on intellectual policies should be developed in
competitive environments. With this plan, the commercialization process will have a better
overview of nature of the market. In this case, the entrepreneur should make decisions on new
opportunities based on product safety. The critical step of determining feasibility in the market
system is to enhance better regulations policies to attract investors.
Commercialization experiences are challenged with different difficulties especially when
presenting new opportunities in the market (Elliott, Turner, Clavisi, Thomas, Higgins,

OPPORTUNITY PROJECT 6
Mavergames, and Gruen,2014). The challenges require one to fill potential gaps in the global
business. With this action, one will be able to reduce the potential risk of taking the newly
established brand in the large market system. Feasibility on commercialization requires that the
newly established opportunity to have a short research time to help set the better framework on
exceptional returns (Pham 2014). A good visualisation on product costs requires some simple
technical approaches to designing desirable product in the large market. Commercialization
requires less pressure to help design better market space of licensing technological outright. In
this case, the new opportunity should develop an alternative brand to help link different
feasibility market efforts. As such, the intellectual properties are protected through willingly
purchasing power of commercial items (Bester, 2012).
Conclusion
In summary, the proposed opportunity of artistic work is integrated with the larger market
to help provide fast returns on produced goods. The processes of pricing the product symbolize
commercialization aspects of identifying viable products in the markets system. The business
plan model different export potential of newly established brands to helps the intellectual policy
provide supports artistic work (Watts and Wray 2012). The various distribution channel is
formed after creating joint ventures of encouraging investors. Therefore, the feasibility analysis
generates foundation facts of expecting inventions on a new opportunity. Intellectual property
policy helps in supporting programs that enhance commercialisation of new opportunities.

OPPORTUNITY PROJECT 7
Reference List
Bester, C., 2012, January. A model for commercialisation of honeybush tea, an indigenous crop.
In II All Africa Horticulture Congress 1007 (pp. 889-894).
Baumann, A., Lorrmann, J., Rauh, D., Deibel, C. and Dyakonov, V., 2012. A new approach for
probing the mobility and lifetime of photogenerated charge carriers in organic solar cells
under real operating conditions. Advanced Materials, 24(32), pp.4381-4386.
Ukjati, N., Zupančič, G.D., Roš, M. and Grilc, V., 2012. Composting of anaerobic sludge:
An economically feasible element of a sustainable sewage sludge management. Journal
of environmental management, 106, pp.48-55.
Elliott, J.H., Turner, T., Clavisi, O., Thomas, J., Higgins, J.P., Mavergames, C. and Gruen, R.L.,
2014. Living systematic reviews: an emerging opportunity to narrow the evidence-
practice gap. PLoS medicine, 11(2), p.e1001603.
Grimshaw, J.M., Presseau, J., Tetroe, J., Eccles, M.P., Francis, J.J., Godin, G., Graham, I.D.,
Hux, J.E., Johnston, M., Légaré, F. and Lemyre, L., 2014. Looking inside the black box:
results of a theory-based process evaluation exploring the results of a randomized
controlled trial of printed educational messages to increase primary care physicians’
diabetic retinopathy referrals [Trial registration number SRCTN72772651].
Implementation Science, 9(1), p.86.

OPPORTUNITY PROJECT 8
McEvoy, R., Ballini, L., Maltoni, S., O’Donnell, C.A., Mair, F.S. and MacFarlane, A., 2014. A
qualitative systematic review of studies using the normalization process theory to
research implementation processes. Implementation Science, 9(1), p.2.
Nick, W., Grundmann, J. and Frauenhofer, J., 2012. Test results from Siemens low-speed, high-
torque HTS machine and description of further steps towards commercialisation of HTS
machines. Physica C: Superconductivity and its applications, 482, pp.105-110.
Pham, M.T., Rajić, A., Greig, J.D., Sargeant, J.M., Papadopoulos, A. and McEwen, S.A., 2014.
A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the
consistency. Research synthesis methods, 5(4), pp.371-385.
Rasmussen, E. and Sørheim, R., 2012. How governments seek to bridge the financing gap for
university spin-offs: Proof-of-concept, pre-seed, and seed funding. Technology Analysis
& Strategic Management, 24(7), pp.663-678.
Sutton, D.L., 2013. Great Lawyer: Scholar, Orator and Servant. Ga. BJ, 19, p.8.
SHAHVERDI, M. and HOSSAIN, K.I.M., Recognition Nano-Entrepreneurial Opportunities in
Achieving Sustainable Development. development, 1(13), p.14.
Watts, C.A. and Wray, K., 2012. Using toolkits to achieve STEM enterprise learning
outcomes. Education+ Training, 54(4), pp.259-277.